Cyprus is not the only such country in the euro zone. Luxembourg and
Malta, which have established themselves as tax havens serving big
global corporations and the superrich, have banking systems that are
even larger. Luxembourg’s bank assets are a staggering 22 times its
gross domestic product, and Maltese bank assets clock in at eight times
the size of its economy.
Leaders of both countries have insisted that they should not be compared
with Cyprus and that they expected European leaders to stand behind
their governments and banks come what may. Speaking of his banking
system, the finance minister of Luxembourg, Luc Frieden, said: “We want to expand it further, not to downsize it.”
Banks in Luxembourg and Malta,
many owned by big European and American financial firms, are healthier
than those in Cyprus, according to the International Monetary Fund. But
the I.M.F. raised concerns about the ability of the countries to
properly monitor their banks or support them in a crisis. In other
words, the euro zone and the I.M.F. would have to step in to bail them
out if they ran into trouble.
In any case, the euro zone needs urgently to finish work on a banking union
that would allow the European Central Bank to supervise large banks
instead of leaving that task to national policy makers who may be too
protective of their banks. Europe should also have a common process to
restructure troubled banks, which should reduce the risk of Cyprus-like
debacles. A banking union would also give savers more confidence that
their insured deposits are truly guaranteed, an assurance that was
deeply shaken by what happened in Cyprus.
Thankfully, the crowds were not as big and chaotic
as people had feared when banks in Cyprus reopened last week after for
two weeks — but only after the country imposed tough capital controls to
prevent depositors from fleeing. Europeans may not be as lucky next
time.
No comments:
Post a Comment