Peter Byrne of
The Gold Report (4/24/13)
After the extreme volatility of gold in the last few weeks, OCM Gold
Fund Manager Greg Orrell is more convinced than ever of the necessity of
owning gold assets. In this interview with
The Gold Report, Orrell lays out the rationale for buying these cheap gold stocks around the world, including California of all places.
The Gold Report: How has your bullish view on the gold
sector evolved as a series of crises has jolted both the international
stock market and the price of gold?
Greg Orrell: First off, my belief in gold as a monetary asset
has not wavered. Japan basically admitted that it is bankrupt with its
intention to aggressively debase its currency. Normally such actions
would invoke, and may still, a race to the bottom as each country
engages in economic warfare to deal with its debt issues. At this
juncture the fear of global deflation among the G7 crowd remains its
worst nightmare, especially as additional stimulus by the Federal
Reserve is showing diminishing returns. With high debt levels in both
the private and public sectors around the world, stimulating economic
growth is proving elusive. These alarming events are setting the stage
for the next leg up in the dollar gold price, in my opinion. The fiscal
and monetary crisis is ongoing and underscores the necessity of owning
gold assets.
Though agonizing, the past 18 months have been nothing more than a
consolidation for gold from the September 2011 highs of $1,900/ounce
($1,900/oz). The recent decline in gold prices below $1,500/oz is not
the end of the bull market in gold, despite the barrage of negative
commentary by those wanting to dance on gold’s grave. The destruction of
currencies is in full bloom, but it is not a straight line. The problem
for many gold investors is that they can see the endgame. Gold prices
rise in a straight line at the end of a monetary system, but we are not
there yet. It takes some patience to hold the course while the
establishment fights tooth and nail to keep the dollar system from
failing.
TGR: The years 2009 and 2010 were better for gold stocks. Can
you talk about how things changed after that and how investors can best
respond to the precipitous drop in market value?
GO: A number of factors go into the poor performance of the
gold shares over the past couple of years besides the gold price. We
have seen investor rotation out of defensive posturing and then the gold
miners ended up being their own worst enemy. Gold share investors
became concerned, and rightfully so, with rising operating and capital
costs, poor capital allocation and growing resource nationalization.
This in turn made bullion exchange-traded fund (ETF) products more
attractive and prompted a trend of shorting the miners versus long gold
positions.
Let’s look at the world’s largest producer, Barrick Gold Corp.
(ABX:TSX; ABX:NYSE). It incurred cost overruns at the Pascua-Lama
project in Latin America. And it overpaid for a copper asset in Africa
after spinning off its African gold assets a couple of years earlier.
Each of these instances led to contraction of cash flow and net asset
value multiples for the whole sector, and set a theme for the industry.
At this point, the pendulum has swung too far, with the shares basically
discounting everything that could go wrong and more. Therefore, if an
investor is not in the gold sector, now is an opportune time to take
advantage of the significant decline in share values as there are signs
of positive change taking place within the sector.
TGR: Can you provide any insight as to why longer-term
investors, and also new gold investors, should buy into the current gold
market?
GO: The rationale for owning gold assets remains simple:
global deterioration of sovereign credit and a growing need to debase
currencies in order to meet future obligations, whether it’s here in the
U.S., Europe or Japan. The policy of socializing risk with monetary and
fiscal policy has destroyed the balance sheets of the Western world. We
are in a phase of experimental central banking, which I believe is
going to end badly due to the dislocations of capital it has caused
through prolonged periods of negative rates.
In the event economic growth were to take hold, an unleashing of
built up reserves in the system would set off inflation with a
corresponding rise in rates. Just imagine the effect of a change in the
direction of interest rates and the collateral damage that will create
in the bond markets and the interest rate derivative markets after all
of these years of managing a zero interest rate policy. The cost of
funding the U.S. deficit will rise exponentially. More quantitative
easing begets more quantitative easing. Investors need to have some type
of asset to balance their portfolios. Policymakers who got us into this
mess are unlikely to navigate us out of it. History tells us that only
gold is a good place to be.
TGR: Is now a good time to be looking at the gold miners, including the juniors?
GO: Absolutely. With current sentiment negative on the miners,
it is an incredible opportunity to buy gold shares and recapture lost
value. A major problem for the mining industry is that its business
model is flawed. Gold investors are not strictly interested in taking
money from one hole in the ground and putting it in another. Investors
want participation in cash flow through dividends and earnings leverage
to higher gold prices along with the potential for increased shareholder
value through discovery . Not paying dividends was great for
management, geologists, engineers and everyone but the investor who was
locked out of the cash flow.
Now falling share prices have put the onus on management to compete
with the ETFs for investor dollars. A number of CEOs are being shown the
door. Marginal projects are being shelved. Dividends are increasing.
Management is beginning to understand that the needs of shareholders
must be prioritized. Granted, the decline has been painful, but in my 30
years in the business, this is exactly what needed to happen.
TGR: Has the balance in your portfolio between bullion, large
caps, mid caps, small caps, ETFs, royalties and cash changed over the
last five years?
GO: Because production is cheap, we are weighting toward the
large- and mid-cap producers. They are poised to recapture value as
sentiment turns around in that space. The smaller, macro-cap exploration
and development companies are bombed out, and a number of companies are
trading where market cap per resource ounce is down to $10 or lower.
Those companies are interesting as long as they have a balance sheet and
they’re not diluting their shares to keep the lights on. Royalty
companies have outperformed along with bullion over the last five years
because of all the negative factors that I mentioned previously. But I’m
not adding to the royalty companies right now because the operating
companies offer better value.
TGR: You’re not adding to bullion?
GO: Not at this time. We’re keeping bullion around 5–6%. The
miners, in my opinion, offer tremendous value at this point with gold
reserves in the ground.
TGR: Who are some of the companies you think are attractive in the middle and small spaces?
GO: Endeavour Mining Corp. (EDV:TSX; EVR:ASX)
is interesting right here. The share price has been washed out because
it is a higher-cost producer, around $900/oz. Its market cap is down to
under $400 million ($400M) with 300,000 oz (300 Koz) of annual
production in West Africa, but is slated to grow to 450 Koz over the
next couple of years. That’s a 50% increase. Endeavour is driving
expansion mostly from internally generated cash flow.
Esperanza Resources Corp. (EPZ:TSX.V)
is cashed up with over $70M and with experienced management is
developing a couple of attractive heap-leach projects in Mexico. One
project can put up 35 Koz/year and another one can do 110 Koz/year. Pan
American Silver Corp. (PAA:TSX; PAAS:NASDAQ) is a major shareholder.
Esperanza could be an early day Alamos Gold Inc. (AGI:TSX).
Avala Resources Ltd. (AVZ:TSX.V),
50% owned by Dundee Precious Metals Inc. (DPM:TSX), is trading down at
dirt prices. The company has an entire Carlin-style belt tied up in
Serbia where it has outlined close to 3 million ounces (3 Moz) so far.
The company’s market cap is $12–15M, with $9M in the bank; it’s not a
bad option—the market will appreciate the optionality value on the
company’s assets at some point.
TGR: Are you a fan of the royalty model?
GO: I am a fan of royalty companies. The revenue comes right
off the top so royalty holders have no exposure to increases in costs
and typically have exposure to increases in reserves. Royalty companies
often acquire the royalties from the original property owners. Another
form of royalty is the creation of a gold or silver stream: the royalty
firm helps to finance the project and receives gold or silver in return.
We have seen a pick up of companies selling either net smelter
royalties or streaming deals on projects as a way to finance in a
marketplace where equity capital has become expensive.
TGR: Are there any royalty companies that people should be looking at?
GO: We own a couple of the big ones in our portfolio—
Royal Gold Inc. (RGLD:NASDAQ; RGL:TSX) and
Franco-Nevada Corp. (FNV:TSX; FNV:NYSE). We also own
Silver Wheaton Corp. (SLW:TSX; SLW:NYSE).
Sandstorm Gold Ltd. (SSL:TSX)
is the up and coming player in the royalty space. It’s a highly
competitive business. Recently a number of junior companies have cobbled
together questionable projects that most likely won’t come into
production in order to claim that they are royalty companies. Franco,
Royal and Silver Wheaton have committed significant dollars to
individual projects of late, which increases their risk profiles.
However, with the diversification of their asset bases at this point, it
should not be a problem with all three positioned to grow revenues
substantially over the next three years. So overall I do like the
royalty model.
TGR: What is your take on pure-play gold producers?
GO: I prefer pure-play gold producers, but those deposits are hard to find.
Randgold Resources Ltd. (GOLD:NASDAQ; RRS:LSE)
is a good example of a pure gold play, as are a number of other
intermediates and juniors. But often base metals accompany gold. All of
the major gold producers produce copper:
Goldcorp Inc. (G:TSX; GG:NYSE), Newmont Mining Corp. (NEM:NYSE), Yamana Gold Inc. (YRI:TSX; AUY:NYSE; YAU:LSE),
New Gold Inc. (NGD:TSX; NGD:NYSE.MKT)
and Barrick. Production has been shelved in many big copper-gold
porphyry deposits because it is so capital intensive. Consequently, we
are more likely to see the smaller, pure gold projects go forward.
In the past, the majors looked for big projects because they did not
want to operate the smaller mines. Now they are focusing on grade and
smaller projects that won’t blow up the company. It may be smarter to
take on 10 projects producing 150 Koz than to try and capitalize one
project capable of producing 1.5 Moz.
TGR: Do any particular firms come to mind in that area?
GO: Gold Fields Ltd. (GFI:NYSE)
out of South Africa says it is going to focus on smaller projects,
around 150–200 Koz. I’ve heard the same thing from Newmont. Management
is not going to be punished for making a small acquisition versus a buy
of $5 billion. The big buy days are not likely to return any time soon.
Managements’ excuse that it was difficult to manage multiple smaller
assets rather than a couple of large ones has been cast aside as the
large projects have shown to expose companies to too much risk.
TGR: We both live in California where there’s a history of gold mining, but current public awareness is limited. What the story?
GO: There is gold in the Mother Lode Belt in Northern
California, in Imperial County in Southern California and in Siskiyou
County in far Northern California. The unemployment rate in those areas
is pretty high, so the residents are open to mining’s economic benefits.
It is the outsiders who are up in arms about mining. Regulations have
been put in place by a very staunch environmental crowd in California,
but it’s no different than what we see around the world where local
residents are in favor of a mine because of its economic benefits, only
to have the professional environmentalists come in and oppose the
project.
TGR: What junior gold miners in California are worthwhile?
GO: One project that has the potential to turn mining around in California is the
Sutter Gold Mining Inc. (SGM:TSX.V; OTCQX:SGMNF)
start up of the Lincoln mine on the Mother Lode Belt in Amador County.
It’s a high-grade, underground mine that’s financed by its 50%
shareholder, the Rand Merchant Bank. The first 150–200 feet (150–200 ft)
of that deposit is going to pay back the capital cost of building and
developing the mine. The mines on either side of it historically
produced down to 4,000 ft. Production will start off relatively low at
about 22 Koz/year. But there are significant growth opportunities at the
Lincoln mine and along the Mother Lode Belt for Sutter to exploit once
it has established itself. I am very excited about its prospects.
TGR: How do the California companies stack up against Nevada-based mining companies?
GO: Atna Resources Ltd. (ATN:TSX)
has a heap-leach mine down in Southern California that has been going
for quite some time. New Gold has the old Mesquite mine, which is a
heap-leach mine near the border of Mexico. But California has hardly any
mining activity, or even exploration activity. So I would say it
doesn’t stack up at this point.
TGR: Is that primarily because of environmental regulations or the political climate or the availability of gold?
GO: The perceived difficult environmental and permitting
climate in California has been a deterrent. If a company wants to do
open-pit mining in California, it must be prepared to backfill the pit.
That is not required in most places.
TGR: How expensive is it to backfill?
GO: Handling waste material can be quite expensive. So the
real California-based opportunity is underground mining in the Mother
Lode Belt and that also is where the higher-grade ore is.
TGR: Maybe we’ll see a replay of 1849.
GO: We’re not going to see a replay of 1849. What we’ll see is
a replay of the underground mines of between 1900 and 1940. Some of
those were just great mines and were the blue chip companies of their
day. The gold is still there.
TGR: Thank you, Greg.
Greg Orrell
is the portfolio manager of the OCM Gold Fund. He is also president of
Orrell Capital Management, the investment adviser to the fund. Orrell
has over 28 years of experience in the gold sector as a retail and
institutional broker, investment banker and portfolio manager.
Want to read more
Gold Report interviews like this?
Sign up
for our free e-newsletter, and you’ll learn when new articles have been
published. To see a list of recent interviews with industry analysts
and commentators, visit our
Streetwise Interviews page.
DISCLOSURE:
1) Peter Byrne conducted this interview for
The Gold Report and provides services to
The Gold Report as an independent contractor. He or his family own shares of the following companies mentioned in this interview: None.
2) The following companies mentioned in the interview are sponsors of
The Gold Report:
Royal Gold Inc., Franco-Nevada Corp. and Goldcorp Inc. Streetwise
Reports does not accept stock in exchange for its services or as
sponsorship payment.
3) Greg Orrell: I or my family own shares of the following companies
mentioned in this interview: Endeavour Mining Corp., Avala Resources
Ltd., Esperanza Resources Corp., Newmont Mining Corp., New Gold Inc.,
Sutter Gold Inc., Randgold Resources Ltd., Royal Gold Inc., Silver
Wheaton, Barrick Gold Corp. and Gold Fields Ltd., all owned through
holdings in the OCM Gold Fund. I personally am or my family is paid by
the following companies mentioned in this interview: None. My company
has a financial relationship with the following companies mentioned in
this interview: None. I was not paid by Streetwise Reports for
participating in this interview. Comments and opinions expressed are my
own comments and opinions. I had the opportunity to review the interview
for accuracy as of the date of the interview and am responsible for the
content of the interview.
4) Interviews are edited for clarity. Streetwise Reports does not
make editorial comments or change experts’ statements without their
consent.
5) The interview does not constitute investment advice. Each reader
is encouraged to consult with his or her individual financial
professional and any action a reader takes as a result of information
presented here is his or her own responsibility. By opening this page,
each reader accepts and agrees to Streetwise Reports’ terms of use and
full legal disclaimer.
6) From time to time, Streetwise Reports LLC and its directors,
officers, employees or members of their families, as well as persons
interviewed for articles and interviews on the site, may have a long or
short position in securities mentioned and may make purchases and/or
sales of those securities in the open market or otherwise.
Streetwise –
The Gold Report
is Copyright © 2013 by Streetwise Reports LLC. All rights are reserved.
Streetwise Reports LLC hereby grants an unrestricted license to use or
disseminate this copyrighted material (i) only in whole (and always
including this disclaimer), but (ii) never in part.
Streetwise Reports LLC does not guarantee the accuracy or thoroughness of the information reported.
Streetwise Reports LLC receives a fee from companies that are listed
on the home page in the In This Issue section. Their sponsor pages may
be considered advertising for the purposes of 18 U.S.C. 1734.
Participating companies provide the logos used in
The Gold Report. These logos are trademarks and are the property of the individual companies.
101 Second St., Suite 110
Petaluma, CA 94952
Tel.: (707) 981-8999
Fax: (707) 981-8998
Email:
jluther@streetwisereports.com
Back of the new $100 bill.As Matt Phillips has explained at length before, nearly 80% of all US currency is denominated in $100 bills. There were more than 820 million Ben Franklins out in the world at the end of last year, making it the most popular bank note, by value, among the world’s major currencies. (Here are the circulation figures for the euro; the €50 note is the currency’s most popular by quantity and value.)
Tuesday
tweet allegedly from the Associated Press went global claiming two
explosions in the White House and that President Barack Obama had been
injured – causing the US stock market to crash in minutes
Bull Market Thinking – by Tekoa Da Silva 
