A lot of reading, scroll to the headlines. I
enjoyed all of this, but I know liveleak members get bored easily. To
the ones who value knowledge read on...
Tell someone you are going to a convention of accountants and you might
get a few yawns, yet money and how it works is probably one of the most
interesting things on earth.
It is fascinating and almost magical how money appeared on our planet.
Unlike most developments we enjoy, which can be traced back to a source,
civilisation or inventor, money appeared in places then unconnected all
over the world in a remarkably simular way.
Consider the American Indians using Wampum, West Africans trading in
decorative metallic objects called Manillas and the Fijians economy
based on whales teeth, some of which are still legal tender; add to that
shells, amber, ivory, decorative feathers, cattle including oxen &
pigs, a large number of stones including jade and quartz which have all
been used for trade across the world, and we get a taste of the variety
of accepted currency.
There is something charming and childlike imagining primitive societies,
our ancestors, using all these colourful forms of money. As long as
everyone concerned can agree on a value, this is a sensible thing for a
community to do.
After all, the person who has what you need might not need what you have
to trade. Money solves that problem neatly. Real value with each
exchange, and everyone gaining from the convenience. The idea is really
inspired which might explain why so many diverse minds came up with it.
BUT ALL IS NOT WELL
"History records that the money changers have used every form of abuse,
intrigue, deceit, and violent means possible to maintain their control
over governments by controlling money and its issuance."
President James Madison
Money, money, money, it's always just been there, right? Wrong.
Obviously it's issued by the government to make it easy for us to exchange things. Wrong again!
Truth is most people don't realise that the issuing of money is
essentially a private business, and that the privilege of issuing money
has been a major bone of contention throughout history.
Wars have been fought and depressions have been caused in the battle
over who issues the money; however the majority of us are not aware of
this, and this is largely due to the fact that the winning side became
and increasingly continues to be a vital and respected member of our
global society, having an influence over large aspects of our lives
including our education, our media and our governments.
While we might feel powerless in trying to stop the manipulation of
money for private profit at our expense, it is easy to forget that we
collectively give money its value. We have been taught to believe
printed pieces of paper have special value, and because we know others
believe this too, we are willing to work all our lives to get what we
are convinced others will want.
An honest look at history will show us how our innocent trust has been misused.
Let's start our exploration of money with:
JESUS FLIPS (many coins) 33 A.D.
Jesus was so upset by the sight of the money changers in the temple, he
waded in and started to tip over the tables and drive them out with a
whip, this being the one and only time we ever hear of him using force
during his entire ministry.
So what caused the ultimate pacifist to become so aggressive?
For a long time the Jews had been called upon to pay their temple tax
with a special coin called the half shekelshekel. It was a measured half
ounce of pure silver with no image of a pagan emperor on it.
It was to them the only coin acceptable to God.
But because there was only a limited number of these coins in
circulation, the money changers were in a buyers market and like with
anything else in short supply, they were able to raise the price to what
the market would bear.
They made huge profits with their monopoly on these coins and turned
this time of devotion into a mockery for profit. Jesus saw this as
stealing from the people and proclaimed the whole setup to be. "A den of
thieves". 1
Once money is accepted as a form of exchange, those who produce, loan
out and manipulate the quantity of money are obviously in a very strong
position. They are the "Money Changers".
1. King James NT, Mt 21:13, Mr 11:17, Lu 19:46
MEDIEVAL ENGLAND (1000 - 1100 A.D.)
Here we find goldsmith's offering to keep other people's gold and silver
safe in their vaults, and in return people walking away with a receipt
for what they have left there.
These paper receipts soon became popular for trade as they were less heavy to carry around than gold and silver coins.
After a while, the goldsmith's must have noticed that only a small
percentage of their depositor's ever came in to demand their gold at any
one time. So cleverly the goldsmith's made out some receipts for gold
which didn't even exist, and then they loaned it out to earn interest.
A nod and a wink amongst themselves, they incorporated this practice
into the banking system. They even gave it a name to make it seem more
acceptable, christening the practice 'Fractional Reserve Banking' which
translates to mean, lending out many times more money than you have
assets on deposit.
Today banks are allowed to loan out at least ten times the amount they
actually are holding, so while you wonder how they get rich charging you
11% interest, it's not 11% a year they make on that amount but actually
110%.
THE TALLY STICKS (1100 - 1854)
King Henry the First produced sticks of polished wood, with notches cut
along one edge to signify the denominations. The stick was then split
full length so each piece still had a record of the notches.
The King kept one half for proof against counterfeiting, and then spent
the other half into the market place where it would continue to
circulate as money.
Because only Tally Sticks were accepted by Henry for payment of taxes,
there was a built in demand for them, which gave people confidence to
accept these as money.
He could have used anything really, so long as the people agreed it had
value, and his willingness to accept these sticks as legal tender made
it easy for the people to agree. Money is only as valuable as peoples
faith in it, and without that faith even today's money is just paper.
The tally stick system worked really well for 726 years. It was the most
successful form of currency in recent history and the British Empire
was actually built under the Tally Stick system, but how is it that most
of us are not aware of its existence?
Perhaps the fact that in 1694 the Bank of England at its formation
attacked the Tally Stick System gives us a clue as to why most of us
have never heard of them. They realised it was money outside the power
of the money changers, (the very thing King Henry had intended).
What better way to eliminate the vital faith people had in this rival
currency than to pretend it simply never existed and not discuss it.
That seems to be what happened when the first shareholder's in the Bank
of England bought their original shares with notched pieces of wood and
retired the system. You heard correctly, they bought shares. The Bank of
England was set up as a privately owned bank through investors buying
shares. Even the Banks resent nationalisation is not what it at first
may appear, as its independent resources unceasingly multiply and
dividends continue to be produced for its shareholder's.
These investors, who's names were kept secret, were meant to invest one
and a quarter million pounds, but only three quarters of a million was
received when it was chartered in 1694.
It then began to lend out many times more than it had in reserve, collecting interest on the lot.
This is not something you could just impose on people without
preparation. The money changers needed to created the climate to make
the formation of this private concern seem acceptable.
Here's how they did it.
With King Henry VIII relaxing the Usury Laws in the 1500's, the money
changers flooded the market with their gold and silver coins becoming
richer by the minute.
The English Revolution of 1642 was financed by the money changers
backing Oliver Cromwell's successful attempt to purge the parliament and
kill King Charles. What followed was 50 years of costly wars. Costly to
those fighting them and profitable to those financing them.
So profitable that it allowed the money changers to take over a square
mile of property still known as the City of London, which remains one of
the three main financial centres in the world today.
The 50 years of war left England in financial ruin. The government
officials went begging for loans from guess who, and the deal proposed
resulted in a government sanctioned, privately owned bank which could
produce money from nothing, essentially legally counterfeiting a
national currency for private gain.
Now the politicians had a source from which to borrow all the money they
wanted to borrow, and the debt created was secured against public
taxes.
You would think someone would have seen through this, and realised they
could produce their own money and owe no interest, but instead the Bank
of England has been used as a model and now nearly every nation has a
Central Bank with fractional reserve banking at its core.
These central banks have the power to take over a nations economy and
become that nations real governing force. What we have here is a scam of
mammoth proportions covering what is actually a hidden tax, being
collected by private concerns.
The country sells bonds to the bank in return for money it cannot raise
in taxes. The bonds are paid for by money produced from thin air. The
government pays interest on the money it borrowed by borrowing more
money in the same way. There is no way this debt can ever be paid, it
has and will continue to increase.
If the government did find a way to pay off the debt, the result would
be that there would be no bonds to back the currency, so to pay the debt
would be to kill the currency.
With its formation the Bank of England soon flooded Britain with money.
With no quality control and no insistence on value for money, prices
doubled with money being thrown in every direction.
One company was even offering to drain the Red Sea to find Egyptian gold lost when the sea closed in on their pursuit of Moses.
By1698 the national debt expanded from £1,250,000 to £16,000,000 and up went the taxes the debt was secured on.
As hard as it might be to believe, in times of economic upheaval, wealth
is rarely destroyed and instead is often only transferred. And who
benefits the most when money is scarce? You may have guessed. It's those
controlling what everyone else wants, the money changer's.
When the majority of people are suffering through economic depression,
you can be sure that a minority of people are continuing to get rich.
Even today the Bank of England expresses its determination to prevent
the ups and downs of booms and depressions, yet there have been nothing
but ups and downs since its formation with the British pound rarely
being stable.
One thing however has been stable and that is the growing fortune of:
THE ROTHSCHILDS (1743)
A goldsmith named Amshall Moses Bower opened a counting house in
Frankfurt Germany in 1743. He placed a Roman eagle on a red shield over
the door prompting people to call his shop the Red Shield Firm
pronounced in German as "Rothschild".
His son later changed his name to Rothschild when he inherited the
business. Loaning money to individuals was all well and good but he soon
found it much more profitable loaning money to governments and Kings.
It always involved much bigger amounts, always secured from public
taxes.
Once he got the hang of things he set his sights on the world by
training his five sons in the art of money creation, before sending them
out to the major financial centres of the world to create and dominate
the central banking systems.
J.P. Morgan was thought by many to be the richest man in the world
during the second world war, but upon his death it was discovered he was
merely a lieutenant within the Rothschild empire owning only 19% of the
J.P. Morgan Companies.
"There is but one power in Europe and that is Rothschild."
19th century French commentator 1
We will explore a little more about the richest family a little later, after we've had a look at:
1. Niall Ferguson, THE HOUSE OF ROTHSCHILD, Money's Prophets, 1798-1848
THE AMERICAN REVOLUTION (1764 - 1781)
By the mid 1700's Britain was at its height of power, but was also heavily in debt.
Since the creation of the Bank of England, they had suffered four costly
wars and the total debt now stood at £140,000,000, (which in those days
was a lot of money).
In order to make their interest payments to the bank, the British
government set about a programme to try to raise revenues from their
American colonies, largely through an extensive programme of taxation.
There was a shortage of material for minting coins in the colonies, so
they began to print their own paper money, which they called Colonial
Script. This provided a very successful means of exchange and also gave
the colonies a sense of identity. Colonial Script was money provided to
help the exchange of goods. It was debt free paper money not backed by
gold or silver.
During a visit to Britain in 1763, The Bank of England asked Benjamin
Franklin how he would account for the new found prosperity in the
colonies. Franklin replied.
"That is simple. In the colonies we issue our own money. It is called
Colonial Script. We issue it in proper proportion to the demands of
trade and industry to make the products pass easily from the producers
to the consumers.
In this manner, creating for ourselves our own paper money, we control
its purchasing power, and we have no interest to pay to no one."
Benjamin Franklin 1
America had learned that the people's confidence in the currency was all
they needed, and they could be free of borrowing debts. That would mean
being free of the Bank of England.
In Response the world's most powerful independent bank used its
influence on the British parliament to press for the passing of the
Currency Act of 1764.
This act made it illegal for the colonies to print their own money, and
forced them to pay all future taxes to Britain in silver or gold.
Here is what Franklin said after that.
"In one year, the conditions were so reversed that the era of prosperity
ended, and a depression set in, to such an extent that the streets of
the Colonies were filled with unemployed."
Benjamin Franklin
"The colonies would gladly have borne the little tax on tea and other
matters had it not been that England took away from the colonies their
money, which created unemployment and dissatisfaction. The inability of
the colonists to get power to issue their own money permanently out of
the hands of George III and the international bankers was the PRIME
reason for the Revolutionary War."
Benjamin Franklin's autobiography
By the time the war began on 19th April 1775 much of the gold and silver
had been taken by British taxation. They were left with no other choice
but to print money to finance the war.
What is interesting here is that Colonial Script was actually working so
well, it became a threat to the established economic system of the
time.
The idea of issuing money as Franklin put it "in proper proportion to
the demands of trade and industry" and not charging any interest, was
not causing any problems or inflation. This unfortunately was alien to
the Bank of England which only issued money for the sake of making a
profit for its shareholder's.
1. Congressman Charles G. Binderup of Nebraska, Unrobing the Ghosts of Wall Street
THE BANK OF NORTH AMERICA (1781-1785)
If you can't beat them, join them, might well have been his argument
when arms dealer, Robert Morris suggested he be allowed to set up a Bank
of England style central bank in the USA in 1781.
Desperate for money, the $400,000 he proposed to deposit, to allow him
to loan out many times that through fractional reserve banking, must
have looked really attractive to the impoverished American Government.
Already spending the money they would be loaned, no one made a fuss when
Robert Morris couldn't raise the deposit, and instead suggested he
might use some gold, which had been loaned to America from France.
Once in, he simply used fractional reserve banking, and with the banks
growing fortune he loaned to himself, and his friends the money to buy
up all the remaining shares. The bank then began to loan out money
multiplied by this new amount to eager politicians, who were probably
too drunk with the new 'power cash' to notice or care how it was done.
The scam lasted five years until in 1785, with the value of American
money dropping like a lead balloon. The banks charter didn't get
renewed.
The shareholder's walking off with the interest did not go unnoticed by the governor.
"The rich will strive to establish their dominion and enslave the rest.
They always did. They always will... They will have the same effect here
as elsewhere, if we do not, by (the power of) government, keep them in
their proper spheres."
Governor Morris 1
1. THE CONSTITUTIONAL CONVENTION OF 1787, 7/2
FIRST BANK OF THE UNITED STATES (1791-1811)
It worked once, it will work again. It's been six years. There are a lot
of new hungry politicians. Let's give it a try. And so there it was, in
1791, the First Bank of the United States (BUS). Not only deceptively
named to sound official, but also to take attention away from the real
first bank which had been shut down.
Its initials however gave a clear indication that Americans were once
again being taken for a ride. And true to its British model, the name of
the investors was never revealed.
Having gotten away with it a second time, some of them probably wished
Amshall Rothschild had picked a different time to make his pronouncement
from his private central bank in Frankfurt.
"Let me issue and control a nation's money and I care not who writes the laws."
Mayer Amschel Rothschild, 1790
Not to worry, no one was listening, the American government borrowed 8.2
million dollars from the bank in the first 5 years and prices rose by
72%. This time round the money changer's had learned their lesson, they
had guaranteed a twenty year charter.
The president, who could see an ever increasing debt, with no chance of ever paying back, had this to say.
"I wish it were possible to obtain a single amendment to our
Constitution - taking from the federal government their power of
borrowing."
Thomas Jefferson, 1798
While the independent press, who had not been bought off yet, called the
scam "a great swindle, a vulture, a viper, and a cobra."
As with the real first bank, the government had been the only depositor
to put up any real money, with the remainder being raised from loans the
investors made to each other, using the magic of fractional reserve
banking. When time came for renewal of the charter, the bankers were
warning of bad times ahead if they didn't get what they wanted. The
charter was not renewed.
Five month later Britain had attacked America and started the war of 1812.
Meanwhile a short time earlier, an independent Rothschild business, the
Bank of France, was being looked upon with suspicion by none other than:
NAPOLEON (1803 - 1825)
He didn't trust the bank saying:
"When a government is dependent upon bankers for money, they and not the
leaders of the government control the situation, since the hand that
gives is above the hand that takes... Money has no motherland;
financiers are without patriotism and without decency; their sole object
is gain."
Napoleon Bonaparte, 1815
For both sides of a war to be loaned money from the same privately owned
Central Bank is not unusual. Nothing generates debt like war. A Nation
will borrow any amount to win. So naturally if the loser is kept going
to the last straw in a vain hope of winning, then the more resources
will be used up by the winning side before their victory is obtained
more resources used, more loans taken out, more money made by the
bankers; and even more amazing, the loans are usually given on condition
that the victor pays the debts left by the loser.
In 1803, instead of borrowing from the bank, Napoleon sold territory
west of the Mississippi to the 3rd President of the United States,
Thomas Jefferson for 3 million dollars in gold; a deal known as the
Louisiana Purchase.
Three million dollars richer, Napoleon quickly gathered together an army and set about conquering much of Europe.
Each place he went to, Napoleon found his opposition being financed by
the Bank of England, making huge profits as Prussia, Austria and finally
Russia all went heavily into debt trying to stop him.
Four years later, with the main French army in Russia, Nathan Rothschild
took charge of a bold plan to smuggle a shipment of gold through France
to finance an attack from Spain by the Duke of Wellington.
Wellington's attack from the south and other defeats eventually forced
Napoleon into exile. However in 1815 he escaped from his banishment in
Elba, an Island off the coast of Italy, and returned to Paris.
By March of that year Napoleon had equipped an army with the help of borrowed money from the Eubard Banking House of Paris.
With 74,000 French troops led by Napoleon, sizing up to meet 67,000
British and other European Troops 200 miles NE of Paris on June 18th
1815, it was a difficult one to call. Back in London, the real potential
winner, Nathan Rothschild, was poised to strike in a bold plan to take
control of the British stock market, the bond market, and possibly even
the Bank of England.
Nathan, knowing that information is power, stationed his trusted agent named Rothworth near the battle field.
As soon as the battle was over Rothworth quickly returned to London,
delivering the news to Rothschild 24 hours ahead of Wellington's
courier.
A victory by Napoleon would have devastated Britain's financial system.
Nathan stationed himself in his usual place next to an ancient pillar in
the stock market.
This powerful man was not without observers as he hung his head, and
began openly to sell huge numbers of British Government Bonds.
Reading this to mean that Napoleon must have won, everyone started to sell their British Bonds as well.
The bottom fell out of the market until you couldn't hardly give them
away. Meanwhile Rothschild began to secretly buy up all the hugely
devalued bonds at a fraction of what they were worth a few hours before.
In this way Nathan Rothschild captured more in one afternoon than the
combined forces of Napoleon and Wellington had captured in their entire
lifetime.
XAT3
THE HISTORY OF MONEY PART 2
The 19th century became known as the age of the Rothschild's when it was
estimated they controlled half of the world's wealth. While their
wealth continues to increase today, they have managed to blend into the
background, giving an impression that their power has waned. They only
apply the Rothschild name to a small fraction of the companies they
actually control. Some authors claim that the Rothschild's had not only
taken over the Bank of England but they had also in 1816 backed a new
privately owned Central Bank in America called The Second Bank of The
United States, causing huge problems to the American president.
ANDREW JACKSON (1828 - 1836)
When the American congress voted to renew the charter of The Second Bank
of The United States, Jackson responded by using his veto to prevent
the renewal bill from passing. His response gives us an interesting
insight. "It is not our own citizens only who are to receive the bounty
of our government. More than eight millions of the stock of this bank
are held by foreigners... is there no danger to our liberty and
independence in a bank that in its nature has so little to bind it to
our country?...
Controlling our currency, receiving our public moneys, and holding
thousands of our citizens in dependence... would be more formidable and
dangerous than a military power of the enemy. If government would
confine itself to equal protection, and, as Heaven does its rains,
shower its favour alike on the high and the low, the rich and the poor,
it would be an unqualified blessing. In the act before me there seems to
be a wide and unnecessary departure from these just principles."
Andrew Jackson 1 In 1832 Jackson ordered the withdrawal of government
deposits from the Second bank and instead had them put into safe banks.
The Second Banks head, Nicholas Biddle was quite candid about the power
and intention of the bank when he openly threatened to cause a
depression if the bank was not re-chartered, we quote. "Nothing but
widespread suffering will produce any effect on Congress... Our only
safety is in pursuing a steady course of firm restriction - and I have
no doubt that such a course will ultimately lead to restoration of the
currency and the re-charter of the bank."
Nicholas Biddle 1836 By calling in existing loans and refusing to issue
new loans he did cause a massive depression, but in 1836 when the
charter ran out, the Second Bank ceased to function. It was then he made
these two famous statements: "The Bank is trying to kill me - but I
will kill it!" and later "If the American people only understood the
rank injustice of our money and banking system - there would be a
revolution before morning..."
Andrew Jackson When asked what he felt was the greatest achievement of
his career Andrew Jackson replied without hesitation "I killed the
bank!" However we will see this was not the end of private financial
influence passing itself off as official when we look at...
1. Andrew Jackson, Veto of the Bank Bill, to the Senate, (1832)
ABRAHAM LINCOLN AND THE CIVIL WAR (1861 - 1865)
With the Central Bank killed off, fractional reserve banking moved like a
virus through numerous state chartered banks instead causing the
instability this form of economics thrives on. When people lose their
homes someone else wins them for a fraction of their worth. Depression
is good news to the lender; but war causes even more debt and dependency
than anything else, so if the money changers couldn't have their
Central Bank with a license to print money, a war it would have to be.
We can see from this quote of the then chancellor of Germany that
slavery was not the only cause for the American Civil War. "The division
of the United States into federations of equal force was decided long
before the Civil War by the high financial powers of Europe. These
bankers were afraid that the US, if they remained as one block, and as
one nation, would attain economic and financial independence, which
would upset their financial domination over the world."
Otto von Bismark chancellor of Germany 1876 On the 12th of April 1861
this economic war began. Predictably Lincoln, needing money to finance
his war effort, went with his secretary of the treasury to New York to
apply for the necessary loans. The money changers wishing the Union to
fail offered loans at 24% to 36%. Lincoln declined the offer. An old
friend of Lincoln's, Colonel Dick Taylor of Chicago was put in charge of
solving the problem of how to finance the war. His solution is recorded
as this. "Just get Congress to pass a bill authorising the printing of
full legal tender treasury notes... and pay your soldiers with them and
go ahead and win your war with them also."
Colonel Dick Taylor When Lincoln asked if the people of America would
accept the notes Taylor said. "The people or anyone else will not have
any choice in the matter, if you make them full legal tender. They will
have the full sanction of the government and be just as good as any
money; as Congress is given that express right by the Constitution."
Colonel Dick Taylor 1 Lincoln agreed to try this solution and printed
450 million dollars worth of the new bills using green ink on the back
to distinguish them from other notes. "The government should create,
issue and circulate all the currency and credit needed to satisfy the
spending power of the government and the buying power of consumers.....
The privilege of creating and issuing money is not only the supreme
prerogative of Government, but it is the Government's greatest creative
opportunity. By the adoption of these principles, the long-felt want for
a uniform medium will be satisfied. The taxpayers will be saved immense
sums of interest, discounts and exchanges. The financing of all public
enterprises, the maintenance of stable government and ordered progress,
and the conduct of the Treasury will become matters of practical
administration. The people can and will be furnished with a currency as
safe as their own government. Money will cease to be the master and
become the servant of humanity. Democracy will rise superior to the
money power."
Abraham Lincoln 2 From this we see that the solution worked so well
Lincoln was seriously considering adopting this emergency measure as a
permanent policy. This would have been great for everyone except the
money changers who quickly realised how dangerous this policy would be
for them. They wasted no time in expressing their view in the London
Times. Oddly enough, while the article seems to have been designed to
discourage this creative financial policy, in its put down we're clearly
able to see the policies goodness. "If this mischievous financial
policy, which has its origin in North America, shall become endurated
down to a fixture, then that Government will furnish its own money
without cost. It will pay off debts and be without debt. It will have
all the money necessary to carry on its commerce. It will become
prosperous without precedent in the history of the world. The brains,
and wealth of all countries will go to North America. That country must
be destroyed or it will destroy every monarchy on the globe."
Hazard Circular - London Times 1865 From this extract its plan to see
that it is the advantage provided by the adopting of this policy which
poses a threat to those not using it. 1863, nearly there, Lincoln needed
just a bit more money to win the war, and seeing him in this vulnerable
state, and knowing that the president could not get the congressional
authority to issue more greenbacks, the money changers proposed the
passing of the National Bank Act. The act went through. From this point
on the entire US money supply would be created out of debt by bankers
buying US government bonds and issuing them from reserves for bank
notes. The greenbacks continued to be in circulation until 1994, their
numbers were not increased but in fact decreased. "In numerous years
following the war, the Federal Government ran a heavy surplus. It could
not (however) pay off its debt, retire its securities, because to do so
meant there would be no bonds to back the national bank notes. To pay
off the debt was to destroy the money supply."
John Kenneth Galbrath The American economy has been based on government
debt since 1864 and it is locked into this system. Talk of paying off
the debt without first reforming the banking system is just talk and a
complete impossibility. That same year Lincoln had a pleasant surprise.
Turns out the Tsar of Russia, Alexander II, was well aware of the money
changers scam. The Tsar was refusing to allow them to set up a central
bank in Russia. If Lincoln could limit the power of the money changers
and win the war, the bankers would not be able to split America and hand
it back to Britain and France as planned. The Tsar knew that this
handing back would come at a cost which would eventually need to be paid
back by attacking Russia, it being clearly in the money changers
sights. The Tsar declared that if France or Britain gave help to the
South, Russia would consider this an act of war. Britain and France
would instead wait in vain to have the wealth of the colonies returned
to them, and while they waited Lincoln won the civil war. With an
election coming up the next year, Lincoln himself would wait for renewed
public support before reversing the National Bank Act he had been
pressured into approving during the war. Lincoln's opposition to the
central banks financial control and a proposed return to the gold
standard is well documented. He would certainly have killed off the
national banks monopoly had he not been killed himself only 41 days
after being re-elected. The money changers were pressing for a gold
standard because gold was scarce and easier to have a monopoly over.
Much of this was already waiting in their hands and each gold merchant
was well aware that what they really had could be easily made to seem
like much much more. Silver would only widen the field and lower the
share so they pressed for...
1. Lincoln By Emil Ludwig 1930, containing a letter from Lincoln, also
reprinted in Glory to God and the Sucker Democracy A Manuscript
Collection of the Letters of Charles H. Lanphier compiled by Charles C.
Patton.
2. Abraham Lincoln. Senate document 23, Page 91. 1865.
THE RETURN OF THE GOLD STANDARD (1866 - 1881)
"Right after the Civil War there was considerable talk about reviving
Lincoln's brief experiment with the Constitutional monetary system. Had
not the European money-trust intervened, it would have no doubt become
an established institution."
W.Cleon Skousen. Even after his death, the idea that America might print
its own debt free money set off warning bells throughout the entire
European banking community. On April 12th in 1866, the American congress
passed the Contraction Act, allowing the treasury to call in and retire
some of Lincoln's greenbacks, With only the banks standing to gain from
this, it's not hard to work out the source of this action. To give the
American public the false impression that they would be better off under
the gold standard, the money changers used the control they had to
cause economic instability and panic the people. This was fairly easy to
do by calling in existing loans and refusing to issue new ones, a tried
and proven method of causing depression. They would then spread the
word through the media they largely controlled that the lack of a single
gold standard was the cause of the hardship which ensued, while all
this time using the Contraction Act to lower the amount of money in
circulation.
It went from $1.8 billion in circulation in 1866 allowing $50.46 per
person, to $1.3 billion in 1867 allowing $44.00 per person, to $0.6
billion in 1876 making only $14.60 per person and down to $0.4 billion
only ten years later leaving only $6.67 per person and a continually
growing population.
Most people believe the economists when they tell us that recessions and
depressions are part of the natural flow, but in truth the money supply
is controlled by a small minority who have always done so and will
continue to do so if we let them. By 1872 the American public was
beginning to feel the squeeze, so the Bank of England, scheming in the
back rooms, sent Ernest Seyd, with lots of money to bribe congress into
demonetising silver. Ernest drafted the legislation himself, which came
into law with the passing of the Coinage Act, effectively stopping the
minting of silver that year. Here's what he said about his trip,
obviously pleased with himself. "I went to America in the winter of
1872-73, authorised to secure, if I could, the passage of a bill
demonetising silver. It was in the interest of those I represented - the
governors of the Bank of England - to have it done. By 1873, gold coins
were the only form of coin money."
Ernest Seyd Or as explained by Senator Daniel of Virginia "In 1872
silver being demonetized in Germany, England, and Holland, a capital of
100,000 pounds ($500,000.00) was raised, Ernest Seyd was sent to this
country with this fund as agent for foreign bond holders to effect the
same object (demonetization of silver)". 1
Within three years, with 30% of the work force unemployed, the American
people began to harken back to the days of silver backed money and the
greenbacks. The US Silver Commission was set up to study the problem and
responded with telling history: "The disaster of the Dark Ages was
caused by decreasing money and falling prices... Without money,
civilisation could not have had a beginning, and with a diminishing
supply, it must languish and unless relieved, finally perish. At the
Christian era the metallic money of the Roman Empire amounted to
$1,800,million. By the end of the fifteenth century it had shrunk to
less than $200,million. History records no other such disastrous
transition as that from the Roman Empire to the Dark Ages..."
United States Silver Commission While they obviously could see the
problems being caused by the restricted money supply, this declaration
did little to help the problem, and in 1877 riots broke out all over the
country. The bank's response was to do nothing except to campaign
against the idea that greenbacks should be reissued. The American
Bankers Association secretary James Buel expressed the bankers attitude
well in a letter to fellow members of the association.
He wrote: "It is advisable to do all in your power to sustain such
prominent daily and weekly newspapers, especially the Agricultural and
Religious Press, as will oppose the greenback issue of paper money and
that you will also withhold patronage from all applicants who are not
willing to oppose the government issue of money. To repeal the Act
creating bank notes, or to restore to circulation the government issue
of money will be to provide the people with money and will therefore
seriously affect our individual profits as bankers and lenders. See your
congressman at once and engage him to support our interest that we may
control legislation."
James Buel American Bankers Association 2 What this statement exposes is
the difference in mentality between your average person and a banker.
With a banker 'less really is more' and every need an opportunity to
exploit. James Garfield became President in 1881 with a firm grasp of
where the problem lay. "Whosoever controls the volume of money in any
country is absolute master of all industry and commerce... And when you
realise that the entire system is very easily controlled, one way or
another, by a few powerful men at the top, you will not have to be told
how periods of inflation and depression originate."
James Garfield 1881 Within weeks of releasing this statement President
Garfield was assassinated. The cry from the streets was to...
1. Senator Daniel of Virginia, May 22, 1890, from a speech in Congress,
to be found in the Congressional Record, page 5128, quoting from the
Bankers Magazine of August, 1873
2. from a circular issued by authority of the Associated Bankers of New
York, Philadelphia, and Boston signed by one James Buel, secretary, sent
out from 247 Broadway, New York in 1877, to the bankers in all of the
States
FREE SILVER (1891 - 1912)
Fleecing of the flock is the term the money changers use for the process
of booms and depressions which make it possible for them to repossess
property at a fraction of its worth. In 1891 a major fleece was being
planned. "On Sept 1st, 1894, we will not renew our loans under any
consideration. On Sept 1st we will demand our money. We will foreclose
and become mortgagees in possession. We can take two-thirds of the farms
west of the Mississippi, and thousands of them east of the Mississippi
as well, at our own price... Then the farmers will become tenants as in
England..."
1891 American Bankers Association as printed in the Congressional Record
of April 29, 1913 The continued gold standard made this possible.
William Jennings Bryan was the Democratic candidate for president in
1896, campaigning to bring silver back as a money standard. (free
Silver) "We will answer their demand for a gold standard by saying to
them: You shall not press down upon the brow of labour this crown of
thorns, you shall not crucify mankind upon a cross of gold."
William Jennings Bryan Of course the money changers supported his
opposition on the Republican side so long as he wanted the gold standard
maintained. The factory bosses were somehow convinced to tell their
work force that business would close down if Bryan was elected, and
everyone would lose their jobs. The Republicans won by a small margin.
Bryan tried again in 1900 and in 1908 but lost both times. He became
secretary of state under Wilson in 1912 but became disenchanted and
resigned in 1915 under suspicious circumstances connected with the
sinking of the Lusitania which drove America into the First World War.
J.P.MORGAN AND THE CRASH OF 1907
If you want to work out the cause of the crash of 1907, checking who
benefited is where you might like to look first. With the stock market
slump causing most of the over extended banks to falter, in steps J.P.
Morgan offering to save the day. People will do strange things when in a
panic, and this might explain why Morgan was authorised to print $200
million from nothing, which he then used to prop things up. Some of the
troubled banks with less than 1% in reserve had no choice. It was accept
this solution or go under. Even if they had worked out that their
problems had been caused by the same people now offering the solution,
there is not a lot they could have done about it. J.P.Morgan was hailed a
hero. "All this trouble could be averted if we appointed a committee of
six or seven men like J.P.Morgan to handle the affairs of our country."
Woodrow Wilson But not everyone was fooled. "Those not favourable to the
money trust could be squeezed out of business and the people frightened
into demanding changes in the banking and currency laws which the Money
Trust would frame."
Rep. Charles A. Lindbergh (R-MN) Apart from making a small number rich
at the expense of the many, in this case the instability also served the
second purpose of encouraging the public to believe that they would be
better off living under a Central Bank and a Gold Standard. Desperate
people have little time for logic.
LINCOLN WATCHES
In Washington the statue of Lincoln sitting in his chair is facing a
building called the Federal Reserve Headquarters. This institution would
not be there if Lincoln's monetary policy had been adopted by the USA.
It is not Federal and it has doubtful reserves. The name is an open
deception designed to give this private bank the appearance that it is
operating in the public's interest, when in fact it is run solely to
gain private profit for its select stock holders. It came into being as
the result of one of the slickest moves in financial history. On 23rd
December 1913 the house of representatives had past the Federal Reserve
Act, but it was still having difficulty getting it out of the senate.
Most members of congress had gone home for the holidays, but
unfortunately the senate had not adjourned sene die (without day) so
they were technically still in session. There were only three members
still present. On a unanimous consent voice vote the 1913 Federal
Reserve Act was passed. No objection was made, possibly because there
was no one there to object. Charles Lindbergh would have objected. "The
financial system has been turned over to... the federal reserve board.
That board administers the finance system by authority of... a purely
profiteering group. The system is private, conducted for the sole
purpose of obtaining the greatest possible profits from the use of other
peoples money."
Rep Charles A, Lindbergh (R-MN) Louis T. McFadden would have objected.
"We have in this country one of the most corrupt institutions the world
has ever known. I refer to the Federal Reserve Board... This evil
institution has impoverished... the people of the United States... and
has practically bankrupted our Government. It has done this through...
the corrupt practice of the moneyed vultures who control it."
Rep. Louis T, McFadden (R-PA) Barry Goldwater would also have objected.
"Most Americans have no real understanding of the operation of the
international money lenders... The accounts of the Federal Reserve
System have never been audited. It operates outside the control of
Congress and... manipulates the credit of the United States."
Sen. Barry Goldwater (R-AZ) Most Americans would object if they knew.
The Federal Reserve is the largest single creditor of the United States
Government, and they are also the people who decide how much the average
persons car payments are going to be, what their house payments are
going to be, and whether they have a job or not. The three people who
passed the Federal Reserve Act in 1913, knew exactly what they were
doing when they set up this private bank, modelled on the Bank of
England and the fact that THE BANK OF ENGLAND had been operating
independently unopposed since 1694 must have given them a great deal of
confidence.
WHERE THERE'S WAR THERE'S MONEY
War uses up more materials more quickly than most anything else on
earth. In war expensive equipment doesn't wear out slowly, it gets blown
up. (It's interesting to note that during the 119 year period from the
founding of the Bank of England to Napoleon's defeat at Waterloo,
England had been at war for 56 years, while the rest of the time
preparing for it. In the process the money changers had been getting
rich.) So there it was, the newly formed Federal Reserve poised to
produce any money the U.S. Government might need from thin air with each
dollar standing to make a healthy interest. Nine days after its
formation the Federal Reserve founders were wishing each other a Happy
New Year. What good fortune might 1914 bring?
XAT3
THE HISTORY OF MONEY PART 3
WORLD WAR I (1914-1918)
The Germans borrowed money from the German Rothschilds bank, the British
from the British Rothschilds bank, and the French from the French
Rothschilds.
American super banker J.P. Morgan was amongst other things also a sales
agent for war materials. Six months into the war his spending of $10
million a day made him the largest consumer on the planet.
The Rockefeller's and the head of president Willson's War Industries
Board, Bernard Baruch each made some 200 million dollars while families
contributed their sons to the bloody front lines, but profit was not the
only motive for involvement.
Russia had spoiled the money changers plan to split America in two, and
remained the last major country not to have its own central bank.
However, three years after the start of the war the entire Russian Royal Family was killed and Communism began.
You might find it strange to learn that the Russian Revolution was also
fuelled with British money. Capitalist businessmen financing Communism?
Author Gary Allen gives his explanation:
"If one understands that socialism is not a share-the-wealth programme,
but is in reality a method to consolidate and control the wealth, then
the seeming paradox of super-rich men promoting socialism becomes no
paradox at all. Instead, it becomes logical, even the perfect tool of
power-seeking megalomaniacs.
Communism or more accurately, socialism, is not a movement of the downtrodden masses, but of the economic elite."
Gary Allen, Author
W.Cleon Skousen wrote in his book 'The Naked Capitalist'.
"Power from any source tends to create an appetite for additional
power... It was almost inevitable that the super-rich would one day
aspire to control not only their own wealth, but the wealth of the whole
world.
To achieve this, they were perfectly willing to feed the ambitions of
the power-hungry political conspirators who were committed to the
overthrow of all existing governments and the establishments of a
central world-wide dictatorship."
W.Cleon Skousen
Extreme revolutionary groups were controlled by being financed when they
complied and cut off, with money sometimes being given to their
opposition, when they didn't.
If you find this hard to believe, listen to what the so called dictator of the new Soviet Union had to say.
"The state does not function as we desired. The car does not obey. A man
is at the wheel and seems to lead it, but the car does not drive in the
desired direction. It moves as another force wishes."
Vladimir Lenin 1
Rep. Louis T. McFadden, chairman of the House Banking and Currency Committee throughout the 1920-30s explained it this way.
"The course of Russian history has, indeed, been greatly affected by the
operations of international bankers... The Soviet Government has been
given United States Treasury funds by the Federal Reserve Board...
acting through the Chase Bank. ...
England has drawn money from us through the Federal Reserve Banks and
has re-lent it at high rates of interest to the Soviet Government... The
Dnieperstory Dam was built with funds unlawfully taken from the United
States Treasury by the corrupt and dishonest Federal Reserve Board and
the Federal Reserve Banks." Rep. Louis T.McFadden (D-PA) 2
Even when Communism collapsed in the Soviet Union, Boris Yeltsin
revealed that most of the foreign aid was ending up, we quote. "straight
back into the coffers of western banks in debt service."
1. Wurmbrand, "Marx and Satan," p. 49
2.United States Congressional Record, June 15, 1934
WORLD DOMINATION
With Russia down the money changers now had control of every major
national economy. Like a steam roller moving and a wolf gathering its
pack, there was only one thing left to do and that was to go global. The
first attempt was the proposal at the Paris Peace Conference after WWI
to set up the League of Nations. Old habits die hard, and even what they
called 'the war to end all wars' was not enough to convince nations to
dissolve their boundaries. The League died.
If politicians really were being controlled, you would think at least
one would break ranks and cry out against it. Many did. One was no less
than former New York City Mayor John Haylan
"These international bankers and Rockefeller-Standard Oil interests
control the majority of the newspapers and magazines in this country.
They use the columns of these papers to club into submission or drive
out of office public officials who refuse to do the bidding of the
powerful corrupt cliques which compose the invisible government....
The warning of Theodore Roosevelt has much timeliness today, for the
real menace of our republic is this invisible government which like a
giant octopus sprawls its slimy length over City, State, and nation...
It seizes in its long and powerful tentacles our executive officers, our
legislative bodies, our schools, our courts, our newspapers, and every
agency created for the public protection...
To depart from mere generalisations, let me say that at the head of this
octopus are the Rockefeller-Standard Oil interest and a small group of
powerful banking houses generally referred to as the international
bankers. The little coterie of powerful international bankers virtually
run the United States government for their own selfish purposes.
They practically control both parties, write political platforms, make
catspaws of party leaders, use the leading men of private organisations,
and resort to every device to place in nomination for high public
office only such candidates as will be amenable to the dictates of
corrupt big business...
These international bankers and Rockefeller-Standard Oil interests
control the majority of newspapers and magazines in this country."
John Hylan, Mayor of New York 1927, 1
These warnings fell on deaf ears, drowned out by the music and
excitement of the roaring 20's. People don't tend to complain much in
times of prosperity, so the money changers used this boom time they had
created to defuse any complaints about their growing control.
1. (Former New York City Mayor John Haylan speaking in Chicago and quoted in the March 27, 1927, New York Times)
DEPRESSION IN 1929
Stack in front of you the biographies of all the Wall Street giants,
J.P. Morgan, Joe F. Kennedy, J.D Rockefeller, Bernard Baruch, and you'll
find they all marvel at how they got out of the stock market and put
their assets in gold just before the crash.
Non mention a secret directive, since revealed, sent by the father of
the Federal Reserve, Paul Warburg, warning of the coming collapse and
depression.
With control of the press and the education system, few Americans are
aware that the Fed caused the depression. It is however a well known
fact among leading top economists.
"The Federal Reserve definitely caused the Great depression by
contracting the amount of currency in circulation by one-third from 1929
to 1933."
Milton Friedman, Nobel Prize winning economist
"It was not accidental. It was a carefully contrived occurrence... The
international bankers sought to bring about a condition of despair here
so that they might emerge as rulers of us all."
Rep. Louis T.McFadden (D-PA)
"I think it can hardly be disputed that the statesmen and financiers of
Europe are ready to take almost any means to re-acquire rapidly the gold
stock which Europe lost to America as the result of World War I."
Rep. Louis T.McFadden (D-PA)
40 billion dollars somehow vanished in the crash.
It didn't really vanish, it simply shifted into the hands of the money
changers. This is how Joe Kennedy went from having 4 million dollars in
1929 to having over 100 million in 1935.
During this time the Fed caused a 33% reduction of the money supply, causing deeper depression.
HOW THE FED CREATES MONEY
We've been talking about how the privately owned Federal Reserve can produce money from thin air. Here's how it's done.
1. The purchase of bonds is approved by the Federal Open Market Committee.
2. The Fed buys the bonds which it pays for with electronic credits made
to the sellers bank. These credits are based on nothing.
3. The receiving banks then use these credits as reserves from which they can loan out ten times the amount.
To reduce the amount of money in the economy they simply reverse the process.
The Fed sells bonds to the public and money is drawn from the purchasers bank to pay for them.
Each million withdrawn lowers the banks ability to loan by 10 million.
The Federal bank in this way has overall control of the US money supply,
as each country's central bank does in the same way. The bankers,
through the magic of fractional reserve banking have been delegated the
right to create 90% of the money supply. This control makes a mockery of
any elected government. It places so called leaders behind a toy
steering wheel, like the plastic ones, set up to amuse small children.
Or as Rep.Charles Lindbergh father of famous aviator Lucky Lindy puts it when commenting on the Federal Reserve Act:
"This act establishes the most gigantic trust on earth. When the
President signs this bill, the invisible government by the Monetary
Power will be legalised.
The people may not know it immediately, but the day of reckoning is only
a few years removed... The worst legislative crime of the ages is
perpetrated by this banking bill."
Rep. Charles Lindbergh (R-MN)
Or as Woodrow Wilson put it:
"We have come to be one of the worst ruled, one of the most completely
controlled governments in the civilised world - no longer a government
of free opinion, no longer a government by... a vote of the majority,
but a government by the opinion and duress of a small group of dominant
men.
Some of the biggest men in the United States, in the field of commerce
and manufacture, are afraid of something. They know that there is a
power somewhere so organised, so subtle, so watchful, so interlocked, so
complete, so pervasive, that they had better not speak above their
breath when they speak in condemnation of it."
Woodrow Wilson
In order to clearly establish that this is not a conspiracy theory, but
is actually how things are controlled, we further quote Charles
Lindbergh. From the house of representatives, Lindbergh was well placed
to see exactly what was happening back then and continues to happen
today.
"To cause high prices all the federal reserve board will do will be to
lower the re-discount rate..., producing an expansion of credit and a
rising stock market; then when... business men are adjusted to these
conditions, it can check... prosperity in mid-career by arbitrarily
raising the rate of interest.
It can cause the pendulum of a rising and falling market to swing gently
back and forth by slight changes in the discount rate, or cause violent
fluctuations by greater rate variation, and in either case it will
possess inside information as to financial conditions and advance
knowledge of the coming change, either up or down.
This is the strangest, most dangerous advantage ever placed in the hands
of a special privilege class by any Government that ever existed.
The system is private, conducted for the sole purpose of obtaining the
greatest possible profits from the use of other people's money.
They know in advance when to create panics to their advantage. They also
know when to stop panic. Inflation and deflation work equally well for
them when they control finance..."
Rep. Charles Lindbergh (R-MN)
ADOLF'S BANKERS
Most all will be aware of Hitler's rise to power. What they probably
don't know is that he was almost completely financed by money drawn from
the privately owned American Federal Reserve.
"After WWI, Germany fell into the hands of the international bankers.
Those bankers bought her and they now own her, lock, stock, and barrel.
They have purchased her industries, they have mortgages on her soil,
they control her production, they control all her public utilities.
The international German bankers have subsidised the present Government
of Germany and they have also supplied every dollar of the money Adolph
Hitler has used in his lavish campaign to build up threat to the
government of Bruening.
When Bruening fails to obey the orders of the German International
Bankers, Hitler is brought forth to scare the Germans into submission...
Through the Federal Reserve Board over $30 billion of American money has
been pumped into Germany. You have all heard of the spending that has
taken place in Germany...
Modernistic dwellings, her great planetariums, her gymnasiums, her
swimming pools, her fine public highways, her perfect factories. All
this was done on our money. All this was given to Germany through the
Federal Reserve Board. The Federal Reserve Board has pumped so many
billions of dollars into Germany that they dare not name the total."
Congressman Louis T.McFadden (D-PA) who served twelve years as Chairman of the Committee on Banking and Currency.
FORT KNOX
In 1933 new President Franklin D. Roosevelt signed a bill forcing all
the American people, to hand over all their gold at base rate. With the
exception of rare coins. He disowned himself from the bill claiming to
not have read it and his secretary of the treasury claimed this was
"what the experts wanted".
Bought at bargain basement price with money produced from nothing by the
Federal Reserve, the gold was melted down and stacked in the newly
built bullion depository called Fort Knox. Once collected in 1935 the
price of gold was raised from $20.66 up to $35 per ounce, but only non
American gold qualified to be sold. This meant those who had avoided the
crash by investing in gold they had shipped to London could now nearly
double their money while the rest of America starved.
But that's not all folks. By the end of WWII Fort Knox did hold 70% of
the world's gold, but over the years it was sold off to the European
money changers while a public audit of Fort Knox reserves was repeatedly
denied.
Rumours spread about missing gold.
"Allegations of missing gold from our Fort Knox vaults are being widely
discussed in European circles. But what is puzzling is that the
Administration is not hastening to demonstrate conclusively that there
is no cause for concern over our gold treasure - if indeed it is in a
position to do so."
Edith Roosevelt
Finally in 1981 President Ronald Reagan was convinced to have a look
into Fort Knox with a view to re-introducing the Gold Standard. He
appointed a group called The Gold Commission. They found that the US
Treasury owned no gold at all.
All the Fort Knox gold remaining is now being held as collateral by the
Federal Reserve against the national debt. Using credits made from
nothing. The Fed had robbed the largest treasure of gold on earth.
WORLD WAR II (1939-1945)
World War II saw the US debt increased by 598%, while Japan's debt went
up by 1,348%, with France up by 583% and Canada up by 417%.
When you hear this, what is your first impression? Do you automatically
think this is bad or this is good? Most of us feel a well programmed
sense of desperation when we hear figures like this, but remember, to
the money changers, this is music to their ears.
With the hot war over, the cold war began, the arms race causing more
and more borrowing. Now the money changers could really concentrate on
global domination.
Step one, the European Monetary Union and NAFTA.
Step two, centralise the global economy via the World Bank, the IMF and GATT (now the WTO).
THE WORLD CENTRAL BANK (1948 - Present)
In Washington, the headquarters of both the World Bank and the IMF
(International Monetary Fund) face each other on the same street. What
are these organisations, and who controls them?
To find out we need to look back to just after WWI. At this point the
money changers were attempting to consolidate the central banks under
the guise of peacemaking. To stop future wars they put forward the
formation of a world central bank named the Bank of International
Settlements, a world court called the World Court in the Hague, and a
world executive for legislation called the League of Nations.
In his 1966 book entitled Tragedy and Hope, president Clinton's mentor Carroll Quigley writes about this.
"The powers of financial capitalism had [a] far-reaching [plan], nothing
less than to create a world system of financial control in private
hands able to dominate the political system of each country and the
economy of the world as a whole.
This system was to be controlled in a feudalist fashion by the central
banks of the world acting in concert, by secret agreements arrived at in
frequent meetings and conferences.
The apex of the system was to be the Bank for International Settlements
in Basel, Switzerland, a private bank owned and controlled by the
world's central banks which were themselves private corporations.
Each central bank... Sought to dominate its government by its ability to
control treasury loans, to manipulate foreign exchanges, to influence
the level of economic activity in the country, and to influence
cooperative politicians by subsequent economic rewards in the business
world."
Carroll Quigley, Professor, Georgetown University
They got 2 out of 3. The league of nations failed largely owing to the
suspicions of the people and while opposition concentrated on this, the
other two proposals snuck their way through.
It would take another war to wear the public resistance down. Wall
street invested heavily to rebuild Germany, as the Chase bank had
propped up the Russian revolution.
Now the Chase merged with the Warburg's Manhattan Bank to form the Chase
Manhattan which would later merge with the Chemical Bank to become the
largest bank on Wall Street.
In 1944 the US approved its full participation in the IMF and the World
Bank. By 1945 the second League of Nations was approved under the new
name 'The United Nations'. The war had dissolved all opposition. The
methods used in the National Banking Act of 1864 and the Federal Reserve
Act of 1913 were now simply used on a Global scale.
The Federal Reserve Act allowing the creation of Federal Reserve notes
is mirrored by the IMF's authority to produce money called Special
Drawing Rights (SDR's). It is estimated the IMF has produced $30 billion
dollars worth of SDR's so far. In the United States SDR's are already
accepted as legal money, and all other member nations are being
pressured to follow suit. With SDR's being partially backed by gold, a
world gold standard is sneaking its way in through the back door, which
comes with no objection from the money changers who now hold two-thirds
of the worlds gold and can use this to structure the worlds economy to
their further advantage.
We have gone from the goldsmith's fraud being reproduced on a national
scale through the Bank of England and the Federal Reserve, to a Global
level with the IMF and the World Bank. Unless we together stop giving
these exchange units their power by our collective faith in them, the
future will probably see the Intergalactic Bank and the Federation of
Planets Reserve set up in much the same way.
This radical transfer of power has taken place with absolutely no mandate from the people.
Nations borrow Special Drawing Right from the International Monetary
Fund in order to pay interest on their mounting debts. With these SDR's
produced at no cost, the IMF charges more interest. This contrary to
bold claims does not alleviate poverty or further any development. It
just creates a steady flow of wealth from borrowing nations to the money
changers who now control the IMF and the World Bank.
The permanent debt of Third World Countries is constantly being
increased to provide temporary relief from the poverty being caused by
previous borrowing.
These repayments already exceed the amount of new loans. By 1992
Africa's debt had reached $290 billion dollars, which is two and a half
times greater than it was in 1980. A noble attempt to repay it has
caused increased infant mortality and unemployment, plus deteriorating
schools, and general health and welfare problems.
As world resources continue to be sucked into this insatiable black hole
of greed, if allowed to continue the entire world will face a simular
fate.
As one prominent Brazilian politician, Luis Ignacio Silva,ðput it.
"Without being radical or overly bold, I will tell you that the Third
World War has already started - a silent war, not for that reason any
the less sinister. This war is tearing down Brazil, Latin America and
practically all the Third World. Instead of soldiers dying there are
children, instead of millions of wounded there are millions of
unemployed; instead of destruction of bridges there is the tearing down
of factories, schools, hospitals, and entire economies . . . It is a war
by the United States against the Latin American continent and the Third
World. It is a war over the foreign debt, one which has as its main
weapon interest, a weapon more deadly than the atom bomb, more
shattering than a laser beam . ."1
If a group or organisation had used its hard earned money to help these
developing nations, then we might sympathise that there should be a real
effort to repay these loans. But the money used was created from
fractional reserve banking. The money loaned to the Third World came
from the 90% the banks allow themselves to loan on the 10% they actually
held. It didn't exist, it was created from nothing, and now people are
suffering and dying in an effort to pay it back.
This has gone beyond clever financing, it's whole sale murder and it's time we stopped it. We can!
1. Luis Ignacio Silva, at the Havana Debt Conference in August 1985, quoted by Susan George, A Fate Worse Than Death p 238
http://www.xat.org/xat/moneyhistory.html
http://www.xat.org/xat/usury.html
http://www.xat.org/xat/worldbank.html
The Washington Post – by Ed O’Keefe
