Wolf Richter wolfstreet.com, www.amazon.com/author/wolfrichter
Mergers and Acquisitions
activity in the US jumped 60% this year over the same period last year,
according to a Goldman Sachs report. But LBOs?
After years of a relentless
run-up in stock prices, corporations are busy gobbling up overvalued
companies with their own overvalued shares of which they can print an
unlimited amount, and they’re raising debt that is nearly free after
inflation, and/or they’re using the cash on their balance sheets rather
than investing it in plant, equipment, and personnel.
The higher the price, the
better. Bidding up each other’s stocks collectively has been one of the
powerful drivers behind the soaring stock market, which has encouraged
even more acquisitions, and everyone on Wall Street knows this, so they
push M&A activity relentlessly. And then there are the big fat fees
extracted from every deal.
Companies have other reasons.
Acquisitions add to their revenues when organic revenue growth has
stalled or turned negative. They’re a way of getting rid of a pesky
competitor and clear the way for an oligopoly that has more pricing and
lobbying power. And best of all, acquisition accounting allows acquirers
to lump all sorts of expenses paid for with real dollars and real
shares, both of which come out of the stockholders’ pocket, into a
“non-cash” acquisition-related charge that analysts and investors have
been well-trained over the years to ignore. Expense problem solved.
And so corporate M&A activity has soared this year. But according to a Goldman Sachs report cited by the Wall Street Journal, the number of LBOs year has collapsed.
A typical LBO involves one or
more private equity firms, in association perhaps with some lenders, who
take a publically traded company private. In the process, they leverage
up the acquired company with a mountain of debt. For instant
gratification, PE firms then often draw cash out of the acquired company
via a special dividend.
But not this year.
PE firms are awash in cash:
$465 billion “recently,” up nearly 20% from the same period last year,
according to the report. PE firms are the ultimate smart money; instead
of buying companies and doing new LBOs, they’ve been dumping their prior
LBOs, either by selling them to the public as IPOs or by selling them
to large corporations that can print an unlimited amount of their
overvalued shares to buy an overvalued company from a smart PE firm….
You get the idea who is going to pay for this.
This year, public-to-private
LBO volume plunged to $3 billion, the lowest level since crisis year
2009, when deal volume dropped to zero.
Last year, there were still $80
billion in public-to-private LBOs, including four deals of over $5
billion each: H.J. Heinz, Dell, BMC Software, and Neiman Marcus.
Between 2004 and 2013, the average was $75 billion in these deals per
year. The record? LBO bubble year 2007, just before the house of cards
came crashing down: $275 billion in deals.
This included the most gigantic
LBO of them all, the buyout of TXU, the largest electric utility in
Texas, which was acquired in a $47 billion masterpiece of Wall-Street
engineering by KKR, TPG Capital, and Goldman Sachs. The smart money
piled $40 billion in debt on the utility. Now, Energy Future Holdings,
as it has been renamed, is trying to sort out its future in bankruptcy.
While PE firms are ferretting
out opportunities overseas, there’s no appetite for public-to-private
LBOs in the US this year – despite the near record piles of cash PE
firms are wallowing in. But there’s a reason.
Unlike corporations that can
just print more of their overvalued shares to buy already overvalued
companies at a big premium, PE firms are turned off by the current
valuations. Their business model gets very tough if they overpay by
ridiculous proportions for their acquisitions. And so the smart money is
more interested in selling its current holdings into this wondrous
stock market, rather than buying at these levels.
And when will PE firms, the
ultimate smart money, become buyers again? Goldman gives it a good
guess: they will likely wait until after the stock market has come down
from its lofty heights. And this could be by a lot, because that’s what
it would take to make the equation work. Until then, the ultimate smart
money will just keep its powder dry.
Markets are ebullient and in no
mood to listen to the Fed’s rate-hike cacophony. So it found that
investors are pricing in “a later liftoff date” for rate increases and a
slower pace of tightening than FOMC participants themselves. That
disconnect could cause financial instability. Read….. To Avert Sudden Market Collapse, the Fed Tries to Spook Utterly Unspookable Markets
No comments:
Post a Comment