Sunday, March 28, 2010

APS: 700 jobs may be cut

Albuquerque Public Schools Superintendent Winston Brooks says the district could eliminate 700 jobs as part of his plan to close a larger than expected budget gap.

APS officials say that cuts in funding from the legislature will contribute to a $43 million shortfall – more than double what the district had expected.

State budget cuts will account for $24 million of the shortfall. The district has $15 million in its cash reserves. An additional $4 million will go to salary and benefits adjustments.

Brooks says there will most likely be layoffs of about 700 employees, an estimated 500 retirements and resignations will not be filled and a hiring freeze may have to be implemented.

Overtime and non-payroll spending could also be reduced and non-school departments will have to cut about 5% of their budgets and 40% of their discretionary spending.

And, Brooks cautioned, federal stimulus money isn't expected for the 2011-2012 school year, which could cause the budget gap to balloon to $100 million.

APS currently employees 14,000 people including teachers, administrators and custodians and has 139 campuses, according to the district’s Website.

Based on last year’s budget, roughly 85% of the district’s operating budget goes toward paying salaries and benefits.

The APS Board of Education will meet on April 1.

UAE: head of largest sovereign wealth fund missing

RABAT, Morocco — Rescue workers were scouring an artificial Moroccan lake Saturday in search of the head of Abu Dhabi's sovereign wealth fund — the world's largest — who went missing after his glider crashed.

Morocco's official MAP news agency said that Ahmed bin Zayed Al Nahyan's glider went down in the lake Friday. The pilot of the aircraft was rescued in good condition, but authorities continued the search for Al Nahyan.

Al Nahyan is the managing director of the Abu Dhabi Investment Authority. He is also the younger brother of Sheik Khalifa bin Zayed Al Nahyan, the leader of the United Arab Emirates.

The Abu Dhabi Investment Authority could not be immediately reached for comment.

The glider went down near the Sidi Mohammed Ben Abdallah Dam, which forms the lake. It is located near the Atlantic coastal town of Skhirat, some 35 kilometers south of the capital city Rabat and site of one of Morocco's royal palaces.

The search could be particularly arduous because of recent heavy rains that have pushed up water levels.

The family of Ahmed bin Zayed Al Nahyan is known to have numerous properties around this North African kingdom, which offers up ocean, mountains and desert.

The bulk of the Abu Dhabi Investment Authority holdings are in the United States and Europe. Al Nahyan said earlier this year the Abu Dhabi fund sees "significant, long-term investment potential" in both regions despite the global downturn.

The fund broke with its customary privacy by issuing its first yearly statement last week — one of the biggest steps yet by the world's largest sovereign wealth fund to increase transparency. However, the report did not contain information on its balance sheet or the overall size of the fund's holdings.

Analysts believe ADIA is the world's largest sovereign wealth fund, with estimates of its size having ranged from less than $400 billion to $875 billion and beyond.

Its investments include a $7.5 billion cash injection into Citigroup Inc. in 2007. Stocks and other equities in the developed world make up the largest class of the fund's assets, ranging from 35 to 45 percent of its holdings.

Between 35 and 50 percent of ADIA's investments are typically in North America, and another 25 to 35 percent are in Europe.

The fund, like other investors, is believed to have lost considerable value during the market downturn before bouncing back somewhat over the past year.

FBI Conducts Raids

(WXYZ) - The FBI was conducting raids Saturday night at multiple locations in southeast Michigan.

Action News has learned Homeland Security and the Joint Anti-terrorism Task Force is also involved in a major operation.

Federal officials would not say who they were targeting or where, but the FBI has set up a command center at the Washtenaw County Sheriff's Department in Ann Arbor, where they have brought in two satellite trucks and a radio tower.

Agents have also obtained search warrants and multiple arrests have been made.

Arlie plan to log for dollars no sure bet

The Eugene developer owns thousands of acres of coveted koa trees in Hawaii, but getting permission to harvest them is a difficult task


Eugene resident Jim Hanks has developed a sudden and keen interest in the unlikely subject of Hawaii’s native koa tree.

It’s not the sultry grain of the wood that attracts Hanks, or its historical relationship with Hawaii’s succession of King Kamehamehas.

Rather, it’s his pocketbook.

His JRH Engineering is owed money by Arlie & Co., a major local real estate company that has filed for the protection of bankruptcy court while it reorganizes its finances. And harvesting koa on land that Arlie owns in Hawaii has been batted about in bankruptcy hearings as one way for the company to repay the $873,734 it owes unsecured creditors — including $8,930 that belongs to Hanks’ company.

Money owed to unsecured creditors isn’t backed up by any collateral that the creditors could seize.

In a three-hour meeting with the unsecured creditors committee earlier this week, Arlie’s forester touted the value of koa timber that covers much of 5,600 acres of land Arlie owns in Hawaii, Hanks said.

Arlie executive vice president John Musumeci said during a recent bankruptcy hearing that harvesting the rare timber, which only grows on Hawaii, could produce a couple of million dollars a month.

“My preference, right now, given everything I know — and we want to be open with everybody about this asset to the extent it makes business sense — now is the time to harvest it,” he said, later adding, “Let’s just go ahead and harvest it.”

Musumeci declined to speak to a reporter on the record for this story, but company officials said in court that their goal is to do sustainable harvesting.

Arlie owns about 5,600 acres in long narrow parcels that cross the hills above Hilo on Hawaii’s Big Island. Musumeci said there is valuable timber on about 3,800 of those acres.

But Hawaii state officials say getting approvals to harvest koa on the islands is a long and arduous, if not impossible, process, especially when the land is designated for conservation — as is 95 percent of Arlie’s Hawaii holdings.

“The point is: It’s not guaranteed,” said Sam Lemmo, the state official who oversees Hawaii’s conservation lands.

The restrictions on private lands — when they’re designated for conservation under state land use law — are mind-boggling for developers from around the world who’ve purchased land in Hawaii, Lemmo said.

“They’re floored when they hear ‘I can’t do this and I can’t do that.’ It’s different here,” he said.

State would like to buy the land

Musumeci bought the Hawaii land, with what he called its “extremely rare and highly valuable timber,” in 2002 from C. Brewer & Co., a crumbling sugar empire, which had owned the land for as long as 140 years — since the time of King Kamehameha IV.

Koa has become the subject of speculation among Big Island land buyers in recent years, said John Henshaw, a retired, Oregon State University-trained federal forester who recently started a second career with The Nature Conservancy in Hawaii.

The rare and highly figured red flame koa wood sells for upwards of $150 per board foot, and some dealers claim sales as high as $500 per board foot.

The finest woodworkers sell the wavy grained “curly” koa tables, beds and other furniture pieces for a jaw dropping $10,000 to $20,000 each.

High-end veneer mills, auto manufacturers, jet plane companies, instrument makers and conference table builders all vie for a steady supply of koa, Musumeci said.

“The nature of this (Big Island) property,” Musumeci said in a recent bankruptcy hearing, “is that it is extremely unique in the world in that it’s the largest privately held forest — or maybe I should say one of the largest privately held forests — of a commodity in which there’s great worldwide demand.”

A lot of people see the potential, Henshaw said.

“They see a gold mine. They see the trees there,” he said, “but they don’t understand they’re in conservation areas and — even though they’re buying land — they can’t just cut the trees down.”

Hawaii resident Kyle Dong was the last to attempt large-scale koa logging on conservation land. A decade ago, he borrowed $10.3 million to buy 13,000 acres on the Big Island, within 10 miles of Arlie’s land, Henshaw said.

He figured his company could produce koa at the rate of 50,000 to 100,000 board feet per month.

But the lion’s share of the land that Dong bought was zoned “conservation.”

Hawaii’s 1961 land use laws divide the land on each of the islands — across private and public ownership — into four classifications: Conservation, which includes about 51 percent of the land; agriculture, about 46 percent; rural, less than 1 percent; and urban, about 2.5 percent.

The broad conservation zone was born out of worries that clearing land for growing sugar cane and pineapple — and grazing cattle — threatened to hamper the land’s ability to recharge underground water supplies.

Much of Arlie’s forests, like Dong’s forests, are “very much the intact upland forests that act like a sponge and collect water and produce water in the low land areas where most of the people and the agricultural endeavors are at,” said Sheri Mann, a state forester who surveyed the Arlie land by air last week. “They’re also where our threatened and endangered species rest. They’re like a haven for them.”

Hawaii, in fact, would like to buy Arlie’s land, if it could afford to, Mann said. “The state owns land right above it and on either side — and literally all around it,” she said.

No permits issued since early 70s

Dong began seeking a permit to log on his own land — as Arlie would have to — from the Board of Land and Natural Resources in 2000. The requirements include an environmental impact statement, public hearings and close state scrutiny.

Theoretically, it takes a minimum of six months or a year to get through the process — although the exact length of time is unknown because no applicant has gotten a permit to log on conservation land since the early 1970s, state officials said.

All who tried were either rejected or they withdrew their applications.

Dong quit trying after seven years.

“Environmentalists and native Hawaiian groups blew the whistle and said, ‘No you can’t allow this.’ They in effect stopped him from logging,” said Diane Ware, conservation chair with the Big Island’s chapter of the Sierra Club.

Dong, meanwhile, was fined $141,000 for illegally logging 135 koa trees. The developer and his lenders have been mired in a foreclosure procedure for years. This February, a bankruptcy court judge ordered the sale of the land.

“It was really agonizing for them,” Henshaw said.

So how would Arlie fare in an effort to raise cash through harvesting koa?

The company owns 289 acres zoned for agriculture and logging there would be comparatively easy. Arlie officials said in court they are doing a timber cruise to estimate the timber there.

With regard to the vast holdings of conservation land, the company has conducted preliminary talks with Mann, the state forester, who oversees the Hawaii Forest Stewardship program, which helps landowners set up forest management plans, which can include timber production.

So far, the program has been used mostly for restoration projects and seldom participates in logging proposals, Mann said. And the company still would have to obtain a permit to log on conservation land.

Arlie could face additional obstacles.

A Hong Kong-based group, Pioneer Asset Investment, holds a $1.5 million security interest on a large share of Arlie’s Hawaii land. Under Oregon law, Pioneer Asset Investment can try to stop the company from doing anything that it feels would diminish the value of the land — which could include cutting trees.

The Hawaii Sierra Club has already issued an e-mail alert to members about Arlie’s potential logging plans, Ware said.

Native Hawaiians value koa wood, Lemmo said. Koa is the traditional material of canoes, bowls, containers and tools. The Hawaiian royal families lived surrounded by furnishings made of koa.

“Native Hawaiians have certain rights to gather resources and worship and do certain things on private land,” Lemmo said. “I wouldn’t be surprised if the native Hawaiian groups came in and said, ‘No you can’t give (Arlie) a permit because those trees don’t belong to them.’ People can make those claims.”

Arlie officials told the unsecured creditors Thursday that they would first log small pieces to build confidence with regulators and Hawaii residents that the company would act sustainably and with respect, Hanks said.

“They understand it’s a difficult process, but it’s not an impossible process. And the economics for Arlie would make sense,” he said.

On the other hand, Hanks said, it’s premature to say what Arlie will do until it files its actual reorganization plan in May.

Complex tax codes confuse lawmakers too

Feeling overwhelmed by the tax code? Don't feel bad, most lawmakers and IRS officials don't understand it well enough to do their own taxes either.

From the Daily Caller:

IRS Commissioner Doug Shulman practically ran away when The Daily Caller asked him whether he prepares his own taxes. Millions of Americans struggling through complicated IRS forms in the weeks leading up to tax day - April 15 - might like to know.

"I don't have time for this ... If you want an interview, you can call my office," he said, speed-walking down an ornate hallway in the Longworth House Office Building. Shulman's spokesman later said he employs an accountant to prepare his tax filings, as does about 60 percent of the country who shell out hundreds or even thousands of dollars each for such services.

What about Rep. Xavier Becerra, a top Democrat on the House Ways & Means Committee?

"No. I have a tax preparer back home who's been doing it for me for many years," he told The Daily Caller. Becerra explains that his finances are more complex - and his tax filings fall under far greater scrutiny - than ordinary Americans who could figure out the forms if they tried.

Perhaps the chairman of that committee, Rep. John Lewis, surely he does his own taxes right?

"Oh no, no, no, no, no. I have an accountant that I've been using for years," Rep. John Lewis said. He said he needs to head home this weekend to fill out paperwork for his accountant.

So did the Daily Caller find anyone on the Hill who prepares their own taxes?

We asked people whether they knew of any lawmakers who do prepare their own taxes. One suggestion was Wyoming Sen. Mike Ezni, a certified accountant. Enzi's spokeswoman confirmed that yes, Enzi is one of the (very) few. [emphasis added]

"Senator Enzi does prepare his own taxes. He believes the federal tax code, which is more than 17,000 pages long and counting, is too complex. He has sponsored several bills to simplify the tax code so taxpayers aren't forced to spend additional money on taxpayer professionals to prepare their taxes," she said.

Obama Democrats VS Tea Party Republicans: A Fake Fight Over Fake Health Care Reform

which stakeholders?by BAR managing editor Bruce A. Dixon

There are real fights and there are fake fights, engineered to distract attention away from the real deal. The shouting match between Obama's Dems and the Tea party Repubs is one of those fake fights. The health care legislation passed by the Obama Democrats is incomparably worse than anything they could have passed right after the presidential election, and significantly worse than anything Democrats could have passed at midyear 2009. The president and his minions have delayed as long as possible to guarantee the worst, not the best bill for patients, and the best deal possible for Big Insurance, Big Pharma and Big Medicine.

Obama Democrats VS Tea Party Republicans: A Fake Fight Over Fake Health Care Reform

by BAR managing editor Bruce A. Dixon

The fifteen month running battle between Obama Democrats and tea party Republicans was never much more real than televised professional wrestling. Like the opposing wrestlers, both sides work for the same bosses, for Big Pharma, Big Insurance, and the biggest medical providers. The real health care fight waged by the Obama administration has not been against Republicans, who never had the votes to stop, let alone dictate or pass anything.

The administration's effort all along has been to pass the worst bill possible, with the greatest amounts of corporate welfare and loopholes, and the fewest protections for patients, while silencing, neutering and coercing the voices of most Democrats, who have favored some form of single payer, or Medicare For All from the beginning.

The Fake Reform

On the whole, the Obama health care legislation is just plain bad. It's fake reform. Most of the people getting medical coverage for the first time under its provisions will get through an expansion of Medicaid. The Medicaid expansion and inclusion of children in their parents' policies till the age of 24 are perhaps the only unambiguously positive aspects of the bill, and both these could have been passed through the House and Senate at any time since the end of 2006.

Supposedly, insurers can't refuse to insure anybody, or jack prices on the basis of pre-existing conditions, and can't revoke policies when people get sick enough to actually use them. But so many loopholes and end runs have been written into the legislation that these and other widely ballyhooed provisions to safeguard the interests of patients are in fact meaningless. The ban on pre-existing conditions for example is negated by allowing insurers to offer “wellness” discounts. The older, the fatter, the less physically fit and the already sick need not apply for these discounts, and the fit will lose them when they gain a few pounds.

Insurance policies will continue to cherry pick their customers in the marketing, and like the credit card industry, insurers will now be able to evade already weak state regulators by selling policies across state lines. This will undoubtedly lead to concentrations of insurance companies in the least regulated states, and a race to the bottom. Health coverage that many working Americans now get will be steeply taxed, and to evade this tax employers will simply offer policies worth less, provoking yet another downward stampede.

Big pharmaceutical companies are assured exclusive rights for even longer periods than before to new classes of drugs, and insurance companies are prohibited from paying for the re-importation of drugs originally manufactured here from Canada, or combining to negotiate drug prices downward.

The ban on selling low-cost health insurance to the nation's twelve or fifteen million undocumented means the border will now extend to every doctor's office and emergency room in the land. And insurance policies offered through “the exchange” are prohibited from covering abortions or a list of reproductive health services.

Private insurance companies will use their all-too-real death panels to continue to decide which procedures they will cover, and which ones they won't, and how much they will pay for them. Health insurance premiums will be capped at just under ten percent of a family's income, but this will not include already high co-payments, or deductibles. In Massachusetts, where a version of the president's plan has been law since 2006, sick people are forgoing treatment because they cannot afford the high co-payments and deductibles, and the flood of bankruptcies from unpayable medical bills is continuing.

The legislation is not a step toward single payer, as it removes none of the legal obstacles facing states which choose that path on their own. It's almost a good thing that most of the bill's provisions don't take effect till 2014.

And of course the too big to fail private health insurers get a stream of compulsory customers, some of them paid for in part with government money.

The Fake Fight

The legislation just passed is a million miles away from anything Democrats campaigned on in the 2006-2008 run for the White House, and incomparably worse than anything House Democrats would have passed in the first months of the Obama administration. The 2007-2008 class of House Democrats included 99 co-sponsors of HR 676, the Single Payer Medicare For All. All but one or two of these were sworn in for the current Congress.

What happened? Persistent and single-minded interventions of the White House and its minions in the Senate and House Democratic leadership have relentlessly censored and excluded single payer viewpoints from the public conversation and pushed the actual legislation further and further in the directions the insurance companies, the drug companies, and the biggest medical providers desired.

The White House met continuously in early 2009 with representatives of pharmaceutical companies, and insisted that their super-profits be protected. A former VP of WellPoint, one of the nation's top insurers was allowed to write large portions of the Senate version of the Obama bill. Senate Democratic leader Harry Reid handed the writing of its legislation over to a committee of senators who had more money from private insurers and Big Pharma than any of their fellows, and which gave its Republican members veto power over its final product.

To cover their own impotence, Democrats who had once supported single payer became outspoken advocates of a phantom policy called “the public option,” which polled well because it sounded something like universal health care or single payer, but never in fact existed. The president definitively stomped on their fake public option back in September 2009, when he said his version of it would only apply to fiver percent of the market at most, and was not essential to his proposal anyhow. House leaders balked a little, and corralled their members behind whatever the president wanted, and whatever the pea party fanatics declared they didn't want.

A much better health care bill could have been passed at mid-year 2009, and a less good, but still somewhat better one was possible at year's end. But the Obama administration was convinced that still more could be given to Big Insurance and Big Pharma, and so delayed the bill into 2010. Even as late as December a majority of Democratic senators were willing to pay lip service to the public option. For the Obama administration, that meant it was still too soon to pass its version of heath care.

The Real Fight

The margin and distribution of votes last weekend reveals White House effort to blame Republican obstruction and Democratic progressives for the delay in passing health care to have been utter scams. Not one Republican voted for the bill, and no Republican votes were ever needed. While the White House allowed 26 of 58 Democratic Blue Dogs to vote against the bill, including Art Davis of Alabama and John Marshall and John Barrow of Georgia, it applied incredible pressure against Dennis Kucinch and other advocates of single payer to line up behind the pro-corporate, anti health care bill. They, and the movement for real universal health care, for single payer, were the White House's real foes.

It's Not Over. For the next several years 18 or 20 thousand people will sicken and die each year who don't have to, thanks now to Barack Obama and his hand picked Democratic leaders in the House and Senate. The most awful failures of this legislation will not be obvious for several years, as most of it does not even take effect till 2014. More than six hundred thousand bankruptcies truggered by unpayable medical expenses will continue to happen yearly at least till then, with their numbers not greatly reduced on the other side.

The Single Payer Movement, among whose leading organizations are the National Nurses Union, HealthCare NOW, and Physicians For a National Health Care Plan are preparing for a long struggle. Not this year or the next, but in a decade or less, many predict, single payer will be enacted. California has passed single payer three times now, but has never had a governor with the guts to sign it. Pennsylvania and a few other states are thought to be close to passing single payer on their own. That's how it happened in Canada. One province did it, everybody saw how it worked, and it became national policy.

In health care, as in war and peace, as in the environment and education, as in the rights of women and immigrants, the First Black President's historic role is clear. His job is to smile and speechify and neutralize the left on every front, while taking the country further to the right than his white Republican predecessor would ever have been able.

China: Closing for Business?

Western companies are finding themselves shut out as Beijing promotes homegrown rivals

Not so long ago in China, Western business executives traveling to the provinces could expect a hearty welcome and a banquet with endless toasts of maotai liquor. In February, however, representatives of General Electric (GE) and a dozen other U.S. companies got a taste of the way commercial relations have been changing. They were in Wuhan, a city of 9 million on the Yangtze River, for a seminar on water-treatment technology organized by the U.S. embassy. At a dinner after the meeting they were supposed to have a chance to mingle with top local officials. But at the last minute, Wuhan's mayor canceled his keynote speech and backed out of the gathering. That same day the provincial party secretary and governor begged off a separate event for American Ambassador Jon M. Huntsman Jr. One attendee, who won't be quoted by name, speculates that the Wuhan officials were responding to direct orders from the central government in Beijing not to meet the Americans. The provincial government acknowledges that the original lineup was changed but notes other officials attended the events.

Nearly a decade after China's entry into the World Trade Organization, many foreign companies say the warm reception they once received has turned frosty. While China can still be highly profitable, some question how long that will last as Beijing changes the rules to give a lift to its domestic companies, especially state-owned enterprises. A new government procurement program known as "indigenous innovation" features rules favoring local firms: It could block sales worth billions of dollars a year, says Joerg Wuttke, director of the European Union Chamber of Commerce in China. Beijing has written strict standards for everything from cell phones to cars, often couching them in a way that gives an advantage to domestic producers. A recently revised patent law could force foreign companies to hand over key technologies to Chinese bureaucrats. And anti-monopoly regulations have been used to limit foreign access to sectors such as construction machinery and energy. "They have moved away from a level playing field to benefit their own companies," says Wuttke. Multinationals "are seeing the golden China opportunity become a mirage," says the China government relations chief of a major tech supplier, who would not be named for fear of reprisals.

Trade associations can speak more openly. A Jan. 26 letter to the White House from the U.S. Chamber of Commerce, the Business Software Alliance, and more than a dozen other groups representing hundreds of multinationals such as Microsoft (MSFT), Boeing (BA), Motorola (MOT), Caterpillar (CAT), and United Technologies (UTX), warned of "systematic efforts by China to develop policies that build their domestic enterprises at the expense of U.S. firms." The signatories asked the Administration for its "urgent attention to policy developments in China that pose an immediate danger to U.S. companies."


Why a chill now? Chinese look across the landscape of their economy today and see much that could be improved. After 30 years serving as the workshop of the world, mainly producing low-value goods for foreign brands and distant markets, they want to move up the value chain. To date they have only been able to capture a fraction of the value of a Nike (NKE) shoe or Apple (AAPL) iPhone. And they know they have a poor record in creating global brands. Apart from telecom equipment maker Huawei, notebook giant Lenovo, appliance marketer Haier, and perhaps consumer electronics maker TCL and car companies Geely and Chery, they have few champions. Even at home, General Motors (GM) and Volkswagen vie for the top spot, while Nokia sells the most handsets of any company in China, with a 32.9% share. "People feel that foreign brands have taken too much market share," says Wang Yong, director of the Center for International Political Economy at Peking University.