Wednesday, September 1, 2010

USA - What a pitiful indictment on USDA

In an interview US Sen. Barbara Mikulski says she plans to write the Russian ambassador in an effort to get the country to reopen its markets to American poultry imports.

Image provided by  Prime Equipment Group


Mikulski, a Maryland Democrat, is to join a bipartisan group of senators from poultry states in that letter. She said Russia's trade stoppage amounts to "raw protectionism."

Russia banned US poultry imports last winter, saying it didn't want to accept birds processed with chlorine, a chemical companies use in food safety. In the past three years, US poultry exports to Russia have been valued at $800 million.

"Today it will be (problems with) antibiotics. Tomorrow it will be we don't use enough antibiotics," Mikulski said.

The 74-year-old Baltimore senator, is seeking her fifth term in November

worldpoultry

Source: newsroom - meattradenewsdaily.co.uk

Time to Go Global

Chris Wood, Editor
Casey Research

Here at Casey Research, we really don’t enjoy being a buzz-kill. It’s just that we think it’s more important for investors to be well informed about the reality in which we find ourselves today than it is to be happy-go-lucky all the time.

The good news is that when the stuff hits the fan, as it has for going on two years now, it opens up a number of unexpected opportunities for profit. Even in the hairiest situations, there are ways to protect yourself.

Having said that, let’s start with the bad news…

If you live in the U.S., your taxes are about to get much, much, higher. And I’m not talking about the Bush tax cuts set to expire at the end of this year. I’m talking about a structural deficiency in the tax base that will force the spendthrift federal government to demand much more from the productive members of society, no matter who’s in charge of Congress and the White House.

Here are the facts.
Summary of Federal Government Receipts and Outlays
Fiscal Years 2009 and 2010 by Month ($ Millions)

Receipts
Outlays
Surplus/(Deficit)
Fiscal Year 2009


October$164,827$320,360($155,533)
November$144,769$269,970($125,201)
December$237,785$289,540($51,755)
January$226,090$289,547($63,457)
February$87,312$281,171($193,859)
March$128,924$320,513($191,589)
April$266,205$287,112($20,907)
May$117,217$306,868($189,651)
June$215,339$309,671($94,332)
July$151,480$332,160($180,680)
August$145,529$249,083($103,554)
September$218,880$264,087($45,207)
Total Fiscal Year 2009$2,104,357$3,520,082($1,415,725)
Fiscal Year 2010


October$135,294$311,657($176,363)
November$133,564$253,851($120,287)
December$218,918$310,328($91,410)
January$205,239$247,873($42,634)
February$107,520$328,429($220,909)
March$153,358$218,745($65,387)
April$245,260$327,950($82,690)
May$146,794$282,721($135,927)
June$251,048$319,470($68,422)
Fiscal Year-to-Date 2010$1,596,995$2,601,024($1,004,029)
Source: Department of the Treasury Financial Management Service


For a bit of a refresher and to update where we are, in the table above I broke down federal government receipts and outlays (revenue and expense) by month for fiscal year 2009 and year-to-date 2010.

As you can see in the table, we’re through three-fourths of fiscal year 2010 and the deficit is already over $1 trillion. At this point last year, the deficit was also just above $1 trillion. So you can bet we’re on track for a total deficit of between $1.4 and $1.5 trillion this year.

Just like last year, the huge deficit figure will be widely reported, even in the mainstream media. But a related piece of vital information will be glossed over (if reported at all).

This piece of information is the most crucial to why your taxes are set to skyrocket – and nobody is even bothering to mention it.

You see, the “outlays” column above comprises two types of spending: discretionary and mandatory. Mandatory spending, expenditures that must go into the U.S. budget, includes things like Social Security, Medicare, Medicaid, income security programs, and some others. And according to the Congressional Budget Office, mandatory spending reached $2.1 trillion in fiscal year 2009. What’s more, it increased more than 30% from the year before.

Now look back up at the table above. Notice anything?

Total receipts for 2009 were also $2.1 trillion. In 2009, for the first time ever, mandatory spending just about equaled total tax receipts.

That means that basically every single penny the federal government received in taxes last year (including individual income taxes, corporate income taxes, social insurance and retirement receipts, excise taxes, estate and gift taxes, customs duties, and miscellaneous receipts) was already spent on something mandatory before it came in.

It’s also worth mentioning that while mandatory spending grew by 30% last year, tax receipts fell by 16%. So under the current tax structure, a gap will begin to grow where mandatory spending pulls away from total tax receipts.

What this all means is that your tax burden is sure to rise, significantly, over the coming years. That’s the government’s only choice at this point. You think it will cut discretionary expenses by any meaningful amount? Not hardly, it’s too politically damaging. And forget about legislation to cut mandatory spending until the system goes completely bust. In the meantime, both parties will try to kick the can further down the road by extracting as much as possible from you in taxes.

Now, here’s the good news…

Unlike the government, you do have a choice. You can “go global” and protect yourself by internationalizing your wealth through all the legal means available, making yourself a target that’s not easy to hit.

---

For the past several months, we’ve had some of our best people working on a special report with the purpose of providing you everything you need to know to internationalize your assets and yourself. And it’s finally finished. You can read all the details here, incl. the 5 best ways of going global… at this point, this is not “Whenever you get around to it” advice anymore – the time to act is now, before new laws and regulations kick in that prevent you from getting your money out of the country.

Record number in government anti-poverty programs

WASHINGTON — Government anti-poverty programs that have grown to meet the needs of recession victims now serve a record one in six Americans and are continuing to expand.

More than 50 million Americans are on Medicaid, the federal-state program aimed principally at the poor, a survey of state data by USA TODAY shows. That's up at least 17% since the recession began in December 2007.

"Virtually every Medicaid director in the country would say that their current enrollment is the highest on record," says Vernon Smith of Health Management Associates, which surveys states for Kaiser Family Foundation.

The program has grown even before the new health care law adds about 16 million people, beginning in 2014. That has strained doctors. "Private physicians are already indicating that they're at their limit," says Dan Hawkins of the National Association of Community Health Centers.

More than 40 million people get food stamps, an increase of nearly 50% during the economic downturn, according to government data through May. The program has grown steadily for three years.

Caseloads have risen as more people become eligible. The economic stimulus law signed by President Obama last year also boosted benefits.

"This program has proven to be incredibly responsive and effective," says Ellin Vollinger of the Food Research and Action Center.

Close to 10 million receive unemployment insurance, nearly four times the number from 2007. Benefits have been extended by Congress eight times beyond the basic 26-week program, enabling the long-term unemployed to get up to 99 weeks of benefits. Caseloads peaked at nearly 12 million in January — "the highest numbers on record," says Christine Riordan of the National Employment Law Project, which advocates for low-wage workers.

More than 4.4 million people are on welfare, an 18% increase during the recession. The program has grown slower than others, causing Brookings Institution expert Ron Haskins to question its effectiveness in the recession.

As caseloads for all the programs have soared, so have costs. The federal price tag for Medicaid has jumped 36% in two years, to $273 billion. Jobless benefits have soared from $43 billion to $160 billion. The food stamps program has risen 80%, to $70 billion. Welfare is up 24%, to $22 billion. Taken together, they cost more than Medicare.

The steady climb in safety-net program caseloads and costs has come as a result of two factors: The recession has boosted the number who qualify under existing rules. And the White House, Congress and states have expanded eligibility and benefits.

Conservatives fear expanded safety-net programs won't contract after the economy recovers. "They're much harder to unwind in the long term," says Michael Tanner of the Cato Institute, a libertarian think tank.

Other anti-poverty experts say the record caseloads are a necessary response to economic hardship. "We should be there to support people when the economy can't," says LaDonna Pavetti of the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities, a liberal-leaning think tank.

Swedish policeman dancing - polis dansar på stortorget i malmö

Leaked Video: Glenn Beck uses Vicks to Cry

'Never mind the heat, climate change is hoax by gravy-train scientists'

Davidowitz Says `Worst to Come' for U.S. Retail Sales: Video