In April of last year I wrote an article that questioned the motives of a UN official who went public calling for a new investigation into the "neocons' role in 9/11." The person I am referring to is Richard Falk, who, as I stated in the aforementioned article, is a member of the Council on Foreign Relations as well as the World Federalist Society. Richard Falk was also a leading contributor to the globalist World Order Models Project, financed by the Rockefeller Foundation and Carnegie Endowment in the 1970's, which was a report that suggested "strategies of transition" into a new global era. On top of this, Falk has published numerous books with titles such as Toward a Just World Order (1982) and The United Nations and a Just World Order (1991), calling for global governance.
Falk is perhaps best known to some for having written the foreword to David Ray Griffin's 2004 book, The New Pearl Harbor: Disturbing Questions About the Bush Administration and 9/11. This book played a crucial role in the rise of the 9/11 Truth Movement, and is perhaps the most widely sold book on the subject. The book quickly made its way on to the shelves of every major bookstore and even most libraries across the US and much of the world. Following the publication of Griffin's book, he was given a 90-minute time slot on C-SPAN in April of '05 to air his findings and promote his book.
While I have found much of Griffin's information on 9/11 to be quite good, I found it suspicious that he was so adamant on placing the blame for an inside job almost entirely on the Bush administration. Certainly anyone who has even slight knowledge regarding government black-ops knows they go much higher than the puppetocracy of the White House.
My suspicions about Griffin were further confirmed when I stumbled upon this YouTube clip of him saying we need global governance to solve our problems.
Globalists for "9/11 Truth"
In the past year and a half, other UN officials have come forward calling for a "new investigation" into 9/11. In March, 2008, Japanese Member of Parliament, Yukihisa Fujita, stated on a nationally syndicated radio show that a new investigation into 9/11 could be lead by global parliamentarians or the United Nations itself, according to people he has been in contact with. This came less than a month after the EU parliament in Brussels held a "9/11 Truth" conference. As you can see from this video, New World Order minion David Ray Griffin sat on the panel at this conference.
Clearly the globalists have a stake in the 9/11 Truth Movement and are using it to further an agenda that is apparently unbeknownst to the majority of the movement.
You would think that what I mentioned above would warrant enough suspicion from people to attract more attention to this issue than it's receiving, which is almost no attention at all. Why is this? Part of it is because many who claim to have "woken up" still have their heads buried in the sand. They don't think because they depend on their authorized "leaders" to tell them everything, and certainly the big names in this so-called "movement" (which I do NOT belong to) are not talking about it. This makes them no better than the sheeple they condemn, who make a steady diet of CNN and FOX News, relying on these corporate news outlets to provide them all their information, never taking the time and effort to think for themselves and ask if maybe they're being duped.
It is quite obvious that the powers that be, who engineered the attacks of September 11th, are not afraid of "the truth" getting out, as long as it's the authorized version of the truth peddled by people like David Ray Griffin and the charlatans in the "alternative" media that give them airtime. No, they control the 9/11 "Truth" Movement, "Patriot" Movement, and the sorry excuses for "leaders" they have leading people back into the sheep pen from which they emerged. If these so-called leaders are not being controlled directly, they are certainly being promoted for a reason that has nothing to do with "defeating the New World Order."
Corporate media whores for "9/11 Truth"
Does anyone ever stop to ask themselves why the media is so willing to give coverage to the conspiratorial version of events surrounding 9/11? Yeah, there definitely is substance to the notion that they bring the truth out in to the open so they can marginalize and discredit it. After all, the truth is always much safer for the PTB when it's in plain sight than lurking in the shadows. But like all things under this system, the media, too, works according to the Hegelian dialectic. While on one hand they will attack and ridicule any alternative views on 9/11, they also will give airtime to very prominent and "credible" people who will give legitimacy to this version of events in certain people's eyes. This way they can bring it out into the public view in a way that will draw people in, while at the same time associating it with kookery, so they can play one side (the believers, aka "conspiracy theorists") off the other side (the non-believers), so there is never any true awakening on a mass scale.
There is no doubt that 9/11 Truth would not be nearly as big as it is without the mainstream-corporate media's help. The Truth Movement seems to really have gained momentum since sitcom actor Charlie Sheen appeared on The Alex Jones Show to share his views regarding what happened on 9/11 back in 2006. This triggered a firestorm of mainstream media attention to Sheen's comments and landed Jones an appearance on CNN's Showbiz Tonight, marking the first widespread coverage of 9/11 Truth in the televised media. A few months after this, in June, 2006, the American Scholars Symposium was held in Los Angeles. Its panel consisted of 9/11 researchers, hosted by Alex Jones and featuring names like Webster Tarpley, Stephen Jones, Jim Fetzer and Col. Bob Bowman. Charlie Sheen also spoke at this event. This event, too, was given hours of airtime by C-SPAN. C-SPAN's companion news website, Capital News, later stated that the conference was their most popular program ever aired. C-SPAN touts itself as being independent from the corporate media monopoly and therefore a source of unbiased news and information. Its founder, Brian Lamb, in an interview, states that C-SPAN "in effect is not owned by anybody, but is controlled by a board of directors made up of some 21 people." However, once you look at the list of these 21 people, you see it consists of names from Time-Warner, Comcast Communications, Adelphia Communications, Columbia Partners and others. Ultimately it's these people who decide what gets aired and what doesn't. The notion that C-SPAN is an independent media outlet is a crock.
9/11 Truth to futher the NWO agenda
I believe that the cover will be blown off 9/11 eventually, and probably sooner than later. However, it will not be blown in a way that exposes the true criminals or exposes the New World Order for what it truly is. Instead it will be used to usher in the New World Order by creating the pretext to offer an "international solution" to a demoralized and disillusioned public, under the guise that the American government is broken and cannot be fixed. This is why people from the UN and EU have taken such an interest in 9/11. It's all about creating a pretext for increased internationalism to solve the problems the internationalists themselves created. Bush and Cheney -- who are no doubt criminals and mass-murderers of the worst kind, but still low-level frontmen -- will be used as the scapegoats, while the real criminals not only remain unpunished but will reap the rewards of the atrocity they were responsible for.
Just last week it was announced that Barack Obama's Attorney General, Eric Holder, is considering appointing a criminal prosecutor to investigate abuses involving torture during the Bush administration's tenure. There has been much talk in recent months of Bush and Cheney being put on trial before an international tribunal. Could this possibly evolve into an exposé of Bush and Cheney for their role in the 9/11 attacks? I think this is not only possible, but probable.
As Barack Obama continues to become less and less popular, as he works to gut what's left of the US economy and move us ever closer toward unabashed socialism, it is only a matter of time before he experiences a backlash from the public once they realize they've been sold up the river. I believe it is possible that the Obama administration, with help from the international community, could pull a trick out of the bag and expose Bush, Cheney and others in the Bush administration for their involvement in 9/11 (and therefore the collapse of the economy and everything else that has happened since then). This would not only redirect the public's anger away from Obama, but it would give him impetus to further push his sovereignty-eroding agenda and bring the United States fully into the hands of global governance.
"We need a new investigation into 9/11" = sheeplike group-think
Those reading this who believe a "new investigation" into 9/11 is needed must realize that there can be no such thing. The people who carried out these attacks at the highest levels control this system lock, stock and barrel. Any investigation into 9/11, no matter how independent it appears to be, will still be controlled and steered by "them," for an agenda that is to their benefit only.
The amount of group-think and lack of critical thought prevalent among people who claim to be "awake" frightens me. These people will get behind their sellout leaders and shout slogans all day about how there needs to be a new investigation into 9/11, never asking themselves what that really means or would entail.
It is obvious to anyone who has researched 9/11 that it was a massive hoax perpetrated on the people of the world. I know what happened that day isn't what the "official story" would have us believe and I can accept that. I don't need a new investigation to tell me what I already know, and the notion that it will bring those responsible for this atrocity to justice is a pipe dream.
What people should be questioning are those big names in the "Truth" Movement, who claim to be against the New World Order, yet promote and give credence to people who clearly want to use 9/11 to forward a globalist agenda.
Falk is perhaps best known to some for having written the foreword to David Ray Griffin's 2004 book, The New Pearl Harbor: Disturbing Questions About the Bush Administration and 9/11. This book played a crucial role in the rise of the 9/11 Truth Movement, and is perhaps the most widely sold book on the subject. The book quickly made its way on to the shelves of every major bookstore and even most libraries across the US and much of the world. Following the publication of Griffin's book, he was given a 90-minute time slot on C-SPAN in April of '05 to air his findings and promote his book.
While I have found much of Griffin's information on 9/11 to be quite good, I found it suspicious that he was so adamant on placing the blame for an inside job almost entirely on the Bush administration. Certainly anyone who has even slight knowledge regarding government black-ops knows they go much higher than the puppetocracy of the White House.
My suspicions about Griffin were further confirmed when I stumbled upon this YouTube clip of him saying we need global governance to solve our problems.
Globalists for "9/11 Truth"
In the past year and a half, other UN officials have come forward calling for a "new investigation" into 9/11. In March, 2008, Japanese Member of Parliament, Yukihisa Fujita, stated on a nationally syndicated radio show that a new investigation into 9/11 could be lead by global parliamentarians or the United Nations itself, according to people he has been in contact with. This came less than a month after the EU parliament in Brussels held a "9/11 Truth" conference. As you can see from this video, New World Order minion David Ray Griffin sat on the panel at this conference.
Clearly the globalists have a stake in the 9/11 Truth Movement and are using it to further an agenda that is apparently unbeknownst to the majority of the movement.
You would think that what I mentioned above would warrant enough suspicion from people to attract more attention to this issue than it's receiving, which is almost no attention at all. Why is this? Part of it is because many who claim to have "woken up" still have their heads buried in the sand. They don't think because they depend on their authorized "leaders" to tell them everything, and certainly the big names in this so-called "movement" (which I do NOT belong to) are not talking about it. This makes them no better than the sheeple they condemn, who make a steady diet of CNN and FOX News, relying on these corporate news outlets to provide them all their information, never taking the time and effort to think for themselves and ask if maybe they're being duped.
It is quite obvious that the powers that be, who engineered the attacks of September 11th, are not afraid of "the truth" getting out, as long as it's the authorized version of the truth peddled by people like David Ray Griffin and the charlatans in the "alternative" media that give them airtime. No, they control the 9/11 "Truth" Movement, "Patriot" Movement, and the sorry excuses for "leaders" they have leading people back into the sheep pen from which they emerged. If these so-called leaders are not being controlled directly, they are certainly being promoted for a reason that has nothing to do with "defeating the New World Order."
Corporate media whores for "9/11 Truth"
Does anyone ever stop to ask themselves why the media is so willing to give coverage to the conspiratorial version of events surrounding 9/11? Yeah, there definitely is substance to the notion that they bring the truth out in to the open so they can marginalize and discredit it. After all, the truth is always much safer for the PTB when it's in plain sight than lurking in the shadows. But like all things under this system, the media, too, works according to the Hegelian dialectic. While on one hand they will attack and ridicule any alternative views on 9/11, they also will give airtime to very prominent and "credible" people who will give legitimacy to this version of events in certain people's eyes. This way they can bring it out into the public view in a way that will draw people in, while at the same time associating it with kookery, so they can play one side (the believers, aka "conspiracy theorists") off the other side (the non-believers), so there is never any true awakening on a mass scale.
There is no doubt that 9/11 Truth would not be nearly as big as it is without the mainstream-corporate media's help. The Truth Movement seems to really have gained momentum since sitcom actor Charlie Sheen appeared on The Alex Jones Show to share his views regarding what happened on 9/11 back in 2006. This triggered a firestorm of mainstream media attention to Sheen's comments and landed Jones an appearance on CNN's Showbiz Tonight, marking the first widespread coverage of 9/11 Truth in the televised media. A few months after this, in June, 2006, the American Scholars Symposium was held in Los Angeles. Its panel consisted of 9/11 researchers, hosted by Alex Jones and featuring names like Webster Tarpley, Stephen Jones, Jim Fetzer and Col. Bob Bowman. Charlie Sheen also spoke at this event. This event, too, was given hours of airtime by C-SPAN. C-SPAN's companion news website, Capital News, later stated that the conference was their most popular program ever aired. C-SPAN touts itself as being independent from the corporate media monopoly and therefore a source of unbiased news and information. Its founder, Brian Lamb, in an interview, states that C-SPAN "in effect is not owned by anybody, but is controlled by a board of directors made up of some 21 people." However, once you look at the list of these 21 people, you see it consists of names from Time-Warner, Comcast Communications, Adelphia Communications, Columbia Partners and others. Ultimately it's these people who decide what gets aired and what doesn't. The notion that C-SPAN is an independent media outlet is a crock.
9/11 Truth to futher the NWO agenda
I believe that the cover will be blown off 9/11 eventually, and probably sooner than later. However, it will not be blown in a way that exposes the true criminals or exposes the New World Order for what it truly is. Instead it will be used to usher in the New World Order by creating the pretext to offer an "international solution" to a demoralized and disillusioned public, under the guise that the American government is broken and cannot be fixed. This is why people from the UN and EU have taken such an interest in 9/11. It's all about creating a pretext for increased internationalism to solve the problems the internationalists themselves created. Bush and Cheney -- who are no doubt criminals and mass-murderers of the worst kind, but still low-level frontmen -- will be used as the scapegoats, while the real criminals not only remain unpunished but will reap the rewards of the atrocity they were responsible for.
Just last week it was announced that Barack Obama's Attorney General, Eric Holder, is considering appointing a criminal prosecutor to investigate abuses involving torture during the Bush administration's tenure. There has been much talk in recent months of Bush and Cheney being put on trial before an international tribunal. Could this possibly evolve into an exposé of Bush and Cheney for their role in the 9/11 attacks? I think this is not only possible, but probable.
As Barack Obama continues to become less and less popular, as he works to gut what's left of the US economy and move us ever closer toward unabashed socialism, it is only a matter of time before he experiences a backlash from the public once they realize they've been sold up the river. I believe it is possible that the Obama administration, with help from the international community, could pull a trick out of the bag and expose Bush, Cheney and others in the Bush administration for their involvement in 9/11 (and therefore the collapse of the economy and everything else that has happened since then). This would not only redirect the public's anger away from Obama, but it would give him impetus to further push his sovereignty-eroding agenda and bring the United States fully into the hands of global governance.
"We need a new investigation into 9/11" = sheeplike group-think
Those reading this who believe a "new investigation" into 9/11 is needed must realize that there can be no such thing. The people who carried out these attacks at the highest levels control this system lock, stock and barrel. Any investigation into 9/11, no matter how independent it appears to be, will still be controlled and steered by "them," for an agenda that is to their benefit only.
The amount of group-think and lack of critical thought prevalent among people who claim to be "awake" frightens me. These people will get behind their sellout leaders and shout slogans all day about how there needs to be a new investigation into 9/11, never asking themselves what that really means or would entail.
It is obvious to anyone who has researched 9/11 that it was a massive hoax perpetrated on the people of the world. I know what happened that day isn't what the "official story" would have us believe and I can accept that. I don't need a new investigation to tell me what I already know, and the notion that it will bring those responsible for this atrocity to justice is a pipe dream.
What people should be questioning are those big names in the "Truth" Movement, who claim to be against the New World Order, yet promote and give credence to people who clearly want to use 9/11 to forward a globalist agenda.
No comments:
Post a Comment