Monday, October 5, 2009

Will California become America's first failed state?

Los Angeles, 2009: California may be the eighth largest economy in the world, but its state staff are being paid in IOUs, unemployment is at its highest in 70 years, and teachers are on hunger strike. So what has gone so catastrophically wrong?

Patients without medical insurance wait for treatment
Patients without medical insurance wait for treatment in the Forum, a music arena in Inglewood, Los Angeles. The 1,500 free places were filled by 4am. Photograph: John Moore/Getty Images


California has a special place in the American psyche. It is the Golden State: a playground of the rich and famous with perfect weather. It symbolises a lifestyle of sunshine, swimming pools and the Hollywood dream factory.

But the state that was once held up as the epitome of the boundless opportunities of America has collapsed. From its politics to its economy to its environment and way of life, California is like a patient on life support. At the start of summer the state government was so deeply in debt that it began to issue IOUs instead of wages. Its unemployment rate has soared to more than 12%, the highest figure in 70 years. Desperate to pay off a crippling budget deficit, California is slashing spending in education and healthcare, laying off vast numbers of workers and forcing others to take unpaid leave. In a state made up of sprawling suburbs the collapse of the housing bubble has impoverished millions and kicked tens of thousands of families out of their homes. Its political system is locked in paralysis and the two-term rule of former movie star Arnold Schwarzenegger is seen as a disaster – his approval ratings having sunk to levels that would make George W Bush blush. The crisis is so deep that Professor Kenneth Starr, who has written an acclaimed history of the state, recently declared: "California is on the verge of becoming the first failed state in America."

Outside the Forum in Inglewood, near downtown Los Angeles, California has already failed. The scene is reminiscent of the fallout from Hurricane Katrina, as crowds of impoverished citizens stand or lie aimlessly on the hot tarmac of the centre's car park. It is 10am, and most have already been here for hours. They have come for free healthcare: a travelling medical and dental clinic has set up shop in the Forum (which usually hosts rock concerts) and thousands of the poor, the uninsured and the down-on-their-luck have driven for miles to be here.

The queue began forming at 1am. By 4am, the 1,500 spaces were already full and people were being turned away. On the floor of the Forum, root-canal surgeries are taking place. People are ferried in on cushions, hauled out of decrepit cars. Sitting propped up against a lamp post, waiting for her number to be called, is Debbie Tuua, 33. It is her birthday, but she has taken a day off work to bring her elderly parents to the Forum, and they have driven through the night to get here. They wait in a car as the heat of the day begins to rise. "It is awful for them, but what choice do we have?" Tuua says. "I have no other way to get care to them."

Yet California is currently cutting healthcare, slashing the "Healthy Families" programme that helped an estimated one million of its poorest children. Los Angeles now has a poverty rate of 20%. Other cities across the state, such as Fresno and Modesto, have jobless rates that rival Detroit's. In order to pass its state budget, California's government has had to agree to a deal that cuts billions of dollars from education and sacks 60,000 state employees. Some teachers have launched a hunger strike in protest. California's education system has become so poor so quickly that it is now effectively failing its future workforce. The percentage of 19-year-olds at college in the state dropped from 43% to 30% between 1996 and 2004, one of the highest falls ever recorded for any developed world economy. California's schools are ranked 47th out of 50 in the nation. Its government-issued bonds have been ranked just above "junk".

Some of the state's leading intellectuals believe this collapse is a disaster that will harm Californians for years to come. "It will take a while for this self-destructive behaviour to do its worst damage," says Robert Hass, a professor at Berkeley and a former US poet laureate, whose work has often been suffused with the imagery of the Californian way of life.

Now, incredibly, California, which has been a natural target for immigration throughout its history, is losing people. Between 2004 and 2008, half a million residents upped sticks and headed elsewhere. By 2010, California could lose a congressman because its population will have fallen so much – an astonishing prospect for a state that is currently the biggest single political entity in America. Neighbouring Nevada has launched a mocking campaign to entice businesses away, portraying Californian politicians as monkeys, and with a tag-line jingle that runs: "Kiss your assets goodbye!" You know you have a problem when Nevada – famed for nothing more than Las Vegas, casinos and desert – is laughing at you.

This matters, too. Much has been made globally of the problems of Ireland and Iceland. Yet California dwarfs both. It is the eighth largest economy in the world, with a population of 37 million. If it was an independent country it would be in the G8. And if it were a company, it would likely be declared bankrupt. That prospect might surprise many, but it does not come as news to Tuua, as she glances nervously into the warming sky, hoping her parents will not have to wait in the car through the heat of the day just to see a doctor. "It is so depressing. They both worked hard all their lives in this state and this is where they have ended up. It should not have to be this way," she says.

It is impossible not to be impressed by the physical presence of Arnold Schwarzenegger when he walks into a room. He may appear slightly smaller than you imagine, but he's just as powerful. This is, after all, the man who, before he was California's governor, was the Terminator and Conan the Barbarian.

But even Schwarzenegger is humbled by the scale of the crisis. At a press conference in Sacramento to announce the final passing of a state budget, which would include billions of dollars of cuts, the governor speaks in uncharacteristically pensive terms. "It is clear that we do not know yet what the future holds. We are still in troubled waters," he says quietly. He looks subdued, despite his sharp grey suit and bright pink tie.

Later, during a grilling by reporters, Schwarzenegger is asked an unusual question. As a gaggle of journalists begins to shout, one man's voice quickly silences the others. "Do you ever feel like you're watching the end of the California dream?" asks the reporter. It is clearly a personal matter for Schwarzenegger. After all, his life story has embodied it. He arrived virtually penniless from Austria, barely speaking English. He ended up a movie star, rich beyond his dreams, and finally governor, hanging Conan's prop sword in his office. Schwarzenegger answers thoughtfully and at length. He hails his own experience and ends with a passionate rallying call in his still thickly accented voice.

"There is people that sometimes suggest that the American dream, or the Californian dream, is evaporating. I think it's absolutely wrong. I think the Californian dream is as strong as ever," he says, mangling the grammar but not the sentiment.

Looking back, it is easy to see where Schwarzenegger's optimism sprung from. California has always been a special place, with its own idea of what could be achieved in life. There is no such thing as a British dream. Even within America, there is no Kansas dream or New Jersey dream. But for California the concept is natural. It has always been a place apart. It is of the American West, the destination point in a nation whose history has been marked by restless pioneers. It is the home of Hollywood, the nation's very own fantasy land. Getting on a bus or a train or a plane and heading out for California has been a regular trope in hundreds of books, movies, plays, and in the popular imagination. It has been writ large in the national psyche as free from the racial divisions of the American South and the traditions and reserve of New England. It was America's own America.

Michael Pollan, author of The Omnivore's Dilemma and now an adopted Californian, remembers arriving here from his native New England. "In New England you would have to know people for 10 years before they let you in their home," he says. "Here, when I took my son to his first play date, the mother invited me to a hot tub."

Michael Levine is a Hollywood mover and shaker, shaping PR for a stable of A-list clients that once included Michael Jackson. Levine arrived in California 32 years ago. "The concept of the Californian dream was a certain quality of life," he says. "It was experimentalism and creativity. California was a utopia."

Levine arrived at the end of the state's golden age, at a time when the dream seemed to have been transformed into reality. The 1950s and 60s had been boom-time in the American economy; jobs had been plentiful and development rapid. Unburdened by environmental concerns, Californian developers built vast suburbs beneath perpetually blue skies. Entire cities sprang from the desert, and orchards were paved over into playgrounds and shopping malls.

"They came here, they educated their kids, they had a pool and a house. That was the opportunity for a pretty broad section of society," says Joel Kotkin, an urbanist at Chapman University, in Orange County. This was what attracted immigrants in their millions, flocking to industries – especially defence and aviation – that seemed to promise jobs for life. But the newcomers were mistaken. Levine, among millions of others, does not think California is a utopia now. "California is going to take decades to fix," he says.

So where did it all wrong?

Few places embody the collapse of California as graphically as the city of Riverside. Dubbed "The Inland Empire", it is an area in the southern part of the state where the desert has been conquered by mile upon mile of housing developments, strip malls and four-lane freeways. The tidal wave of foreclosures and repossessions that burst the state's vastly inflated property bubble first washed ashore here. "We've been hit hard by foreclosures. You can see it everywhere," says political scientist Shaun Bowler, who has lived in California for 20 years after moving here from his native England. The impact of the crisis ranges from boarded-up homes to abandoned swimming pools that have become a breeding ground for mosquitoes. Bowler's sister, visiting from England, was recently taken to hospital suffering from an infected insect bite from such a pool. "You could say she was a victim of the foreclosure crisis, too," he jokes.

But it is no laughing matter. One in four American mortgages that are "under water", meaning they are worth more than the home itself, are in California. In the Central Valley town of Merced, house prices have crashed by 70%. Two Democrat politicians have asked for their districts to be declared disaster zones, because of the poor economic conditions caused by foreclosures. In one city near Riverside, a squatter's camp of newly homeless labourers sleeping in their vehicles has grown up in a supermarket car park – the local government has provided toilets and a mobile shower. In the Los Angeles suburb of Pacoima, one in nine homeowners are now in default on their mortgage, and the local priest, the Rev John Lasseigne, has garnered national headlines – swapping saving souls to saving houses, by negotiating directly with banks on behalf of his parishioners.

For some campaigners and advocates against suburban sprawl and car culture, it has been a bitter triumph. "Let the gloating begin!" says James Kunstler, author of The Long Emergency, a warning about the high cost of the suburban lifestyle. Others see the end of the housing boom as a man-made disaster akin to a mass hysteria, but with no redemption in sight. "If California was an experiment then it was an experiment of mass irresponsibility – and that has failed," says Michael Levine.

Nowhere is the economic cost of California's crisis writ larger than in the Central Valley town of Mendota, smack in the heart of a dusty landscape of flat, endless fields of fruit and vegetables. The town, which boldly terms itself "the cantaloup capital of the world", now has an unemployment rate of 38%. That is expected to rise above 50% as the harvest ends and labourers are laid off. City officials hold food giveaways every two weeks. More than 40% of the town's people live below the poverty level. Shops have shut, restaurants have closed, drugs and alcohol abuse have become a problem.

Standing behind the counter of his DVD and grocery store, former Mendota mayor Joseph Riofrio tells me it breaks his heart to watch the town sink into the mire. His father had built the store in the 1950s and constructed a solid middle-class life around it, to raise his family. Now Riofrio has stopped selling booze in a one-man bid to curb the social problems breaking out all around him.

"It is so bad, but it has now got to the point where we are getting used to it being like this," he says. Riofrio knows his father's achievements could not be replicated today. The state that once promised opportunities for working men and their families now promises only desperation. "He could not do what he did again. That chance does not exist now," Riofrio says.

Outside, in a shop that Riofrio's grandfather built, groups of unemployed men play pool for 25 cents a game. Near every one of the town's liquor stores others lie slumped on the pavements, drinking their sorrows away. Mendota is fighting for survival against heavy odds. The town of 7,000 souls has seen 2,000 people leave in the past two years. But amid the crisis there are a few sparks of hope for the future. California has long been an incubator of fresh ideas, many of which spread across the country. If America emerges from its crisis a greener, more economically and politically responsible nation, it is likely that renewal will have begun here. The clues to California's salvation – and perhaps even the country as a whole – are starting to emerge.

Take Anthony "Van" Jones, a man now in the vanguard of the movement to build a future green economy, creating millions of jobs, solving environmental problems and reducing climate change at a stroke. It is a beguiling vision and one that Jones conceived in the northern Californian city of Oakland. He began political life as an anti-poverty campaigner, but gradually combined that with environmentalism, believing that greening the economy could also revitalise it and lift up the poor. He founded Green for All as an advocacy group and published a best-selling book, The Green Collar Economy. Then Obama came to power and Jones got the call from the White House. In just a few years, his ideas had spread from the streets of Oakland to White House policy papers. Jones was later ousted from his role, but his ideas remain. Green jobs are at the forefront of Obama's ideas on both the economy and the environment.

Jones believes California will once more change itself, and then change the nation. "California remains a beacon of hope… This is a new time for a new direction to grow a new society and a new economy," Jones has said.

It is already happening. California may have sprawling development and awful smog, but it leads the way in environmental issues. Arnold Schwarzenegger was seen as a leading light, taking the state far ahead of the federal government on eco-issues. The number of solar panels in the state has risen from 500 a decade ago to more than 50,000 now. California generates twice as much energy from solar power as all the other US states combined. Its own government is starting to turn on the reckless sprawl that has marked the state's development.

California's attorney-general, Jerry Brown, recently sued one county government for not paying enough attention to global warming when it came to urban planning. Even those, like Kotkin, who are sceptical about the end of suburbia, think California will develop a new model for modern living: comfortable, yes, but more modest and eco-friendly. Kotkin, who is writing an eagerly anticipated book about what America will look like in 2050, thinks much of it will still resemble the bedrock of the Californian dream: sturdy, wholesome suburbs for all – just done more responsibly. "We will still live in suburbs. You work with the society you have got. The question is how we make them more sustainable," he says.

Even the way America eats is being changed in California. Every freeway may be lined with fast-food outlets, but California is also the state of Alice Waters, the guru of the slow-food movement, who inspired Michelle Obama to plant a vegetable garden in the White House. She thinks the state is changing its values. "The crisis is bringing us back to our senses. We had adopted a fast and easy way of living, but we are moving away from that now," she says.

There is hope in politics, too. There is a growing movement to call for a constitutional convention that could redraw the way the state is governed. It could change how the state passes budgets and make the political system more open, recreating the lost middle ground. Recently, the powerful mayor of Los Angeles, Antonio Villaraigosa, signed on to the idea. Gerrymandering, too, is set to take a hit. Next year Schwarzenegger will take steps to redraw some districts to make them more competitive, breaking the stranglehold of party politics. He wants district boundaries to be drawn up by impartial judges, not politicians. In previous times that would have been the equivalent of a turkey voting for Christmas. But now the bold move is seen for what it is: a necessary step to change things. And there is no denying that innovation is something that California does well.

Even in the most deprived corners of the state there is a sense that things can still turn around. California has always been able to reinvent itself, and some of its most hardcore critics still like the idea of it having a "dream".

"I believe in California. It pains me at the moment to see it where it is, but I still believe in it," said Michael Levine.

Perhaps more surprisingly, a fellow believer is to be found in Mendota in the shape of Joseph Riofrio. His shop operates as a sort of informal meeting place for the town. People drop in to chat, to get advice, or to buy a cold soft drink to relieve the unrelenting heat outside. The people are poor, many of them out of work, often hiring a bunch of DVDs as a cheap way of passing the time. But Riofrio sees them as a community, one that he grew up in. He is proud of his town and determined to stick it out. "This is a good place to live," he says. "I want to be here when it turns around." He is talking of the stricken town outside. But he could be describing the whole state.

by Paul Harris

World Bank and IMF join global attack on the dollar!

In my emails to you over the past couple of weeks, I’ve shown you why Washington has no choice but to devalue the dollar — and how global leaders and even the United Nations have joined the attack on the greenback by demanding it be replaced as the world’s reserve currency.

Now, just this week, the International Monetary Fund and the World Bank have begun adding their voices to the international choir calling for a new global reserve currency:

  • Last week, World Bank President Robert Zoellick warned that the dollar’s status will be challenged and shouldn’t be taken for granted.

  • According to Turkish Deputy Prime Minister Ali Babacan, it’s likely that the role of special drawing rights (SDRs) based on a basket of currencies will be discussed as an alternative to the dollar during meetings of the World Bank and IMF in Istanbul next week.

  • Meanwhile, global governments, central banks, companies and investors continue to slash their dollar holdings. According to the IMF, in April through June of this year, the greenback’s share of global currency reserves fell to the lowest level in a decade. Holdings of euros, in contrast, rose to a new all-time record high.

All this adds weight and momentum to the devaluation of the dollar. It is DEFINITELY ON THE TABLE. Indeed, for the first time I can remember, the G-7 finance officials, meeting this weekend, are rumored to be breaking with tradition and choosing not to release a statement on the global economy and currencies.

I feel this is an extremely significant development: At last week’s G-20 meeting, the group officially anointed itself as being in charge of global economic affairs.

Plus, we now have the G-7 refusing to discuss the dollar, which is highly unusual. Many will say that, if the G-7 does indeed refuse to comment on the dollar at this weekend’s meeting, it’s merely a sign they’re beginning to turn the reigns over to the G-20 for currency matters.

Baloney! The G-7 WILL discuss the huge “global economic imbalances” in the world. And to me, that’s code talk for a currency devaluation on the agenda. Members of the G-7 ARE discussing it. They’re just NOT doing it in public.

It reminds me of the 1985 Plaza Accord, where James Baker committed the U.S. to a depreciating dollar, bulldozing over our creditors, and ultimately precipitating the ‘87 crash.

The difference: Back then the U.S. was in a position to lead the devaluation. Today, it’s not. Today, our creditors are going to bulldoze over us.

FINAL 24 HOURS to learn how to protect yourself
and profit from this dollar disaster
at this Tuesday’s online seminar!

This coming Tuesday, October 6, 2009, Dr. Weiss and I will host Washington’s Secret War on the Dollar — an online briefing we’ve designed to help you shield your family from the impact of the dollar’s demise and also to name the investments most likely to soar as this great megatrend continues to unfold.

But the ONLY way we can make sure you receive your instructions for attending in time is for you to accept your free registration to this briefing now — certainly no later than tomorrow.

At this watershed online briefing, I’ll give you everything you need to fully understand this disturbing trend … plus what you must do immediately to insulate your family from its disastrous impact … PLUS the investments I’m counting on to spin off enormous profits as the dollar continues to dive.

Registering for Washington’s Secret War on the Dollar is FREE and takes only seconds: Just click this link to reserve your place before it’s too late.

Best wishes,

Larry Edelson

Former Japanese finance minister Shoichi Nakagawa found dead

A former Japanese Finance Minister was found dead in bed yesterday beside packets of sleeping pills months after he caused an uproar for appearing drunk at an international press conference.

An initial examination found that Shoichi Nakagawa, 56, was suffering from circulatory disease and had traces of alcohol in his body. After the humiliation that he suffered after the drunken debacle at a G7 meeting in Rome in February, however, there will be speculation that he committed suicide.

Video of his performance at the press conference, during which he slurred, misunderstood questions and appeared to nod off, was broadcast across the world. Despite claiming to be suffering from the intoxicating effects of cough medicine, Mr Nakagawa resigned a few days later.

During the Japanese general election campaign in August he apologised repeatedly for the incident and promised to give up alcohol. He lost his seat in the northern island of Hokkaido in a nationwide landslide victory for the opposition Democratic Party of Japan (DPJ).

Former Japanese Finance Minister Shoichi Nakagawa

Mr Nakagawa, who had a 25-year-old son and 17-year-old daughter, was found by his wife. There were traces of vomit on the bed and packets of what appeared to be sleeping pills on the bedside table, according to the Kyodo news agency. Neighbours said that he had looked unhappy in recent weeks and had neglected his garden.

Taro Aso, the former Prime Minister who was close to Mr Nakagawa, said: “I’m in such a state of shock right now that I do not have words. I offer my deepest condolences.”

Mr Nakagawa was, in many ways, a typical senior member of the Liberal Democratic Party (LDP) which ruled Japan almost undefeated until this year. He graduated from the law faculty of the University of Tokyo and became a banker.

His constituency, a sparsely populated region of farmers and fishermen, was known as the Nakagawa Kingdom; for 20 years before he was elected in 1983, Mr Nakagawa’s father, Ichiro, was its MP. His son succeeded to it when his father hanged himself in a hotel at the age of 57, after failing to be elected the LDP leader.

Mr Nakagawa became Agriculture Minister in 1998 and had three other Cabinet posts before becoming Finance Minister.

His social conservatism was suggested in an interview that he gave in 2007. He said: “Women have their proper place: they should be womanly. They have their own abilities and these should be fully exercised, for example in flower arranging, sewing or cooking.” His drinking was an open secret among journalists and civil servants, but ordinary Japanese were shocked to see his performance in Rome and the excuses that he made afterwards. It emerged that after he left his news conference, he went to the Vatican Museum, where he climbed over a barrier around a statue, setting off a security alarm.

“I feel terribly sorry for the Japanese public as well as the Diet that such footage and words of mine were conveyed to the world,” he said to a parliamentary panel. Mr Aso asked him to resign.

Nervous US retailers brace for critical holiday season

Approaching a holiday shopping season critical to economic recovery, US retailers are bracing for a difficult period with credit still tight and consumer caution lingering.

Many early projections suggests retail spending in the final two months of 2009 -- a season that accounts for a large proportion of sales and profits -- will be flat or lower.

Consulting group Deloitte expects total holiday sales to be around 810 billion dollars excluding cars and gasoline, unchanged from a year ago.

That would be better than last season's 2.4 percent decrease, which was the first decline since 1967, according to Deloitte.

"Although there are signs that suggest the economy is nearing the end of its darkest days, many consumers remain burdened by restricted credit availability, high unemployment and foreclosures," said Carl Steidtmann, chief economist with Deloitte Research.

"Americans continue to save at historically high rates while also paying down debt, and these factors combined suggest another chilly holiday season for retailers."

Others point out that retailers are being squeezed by tight credit that prevents them from stocking up as much as they might like, and the concern that consumers will pull back further.

"Retailers are still caught between a rock and a hard place," said Ted Vaughan, partner in the consultancy BDO Seidman LLP.

"Reducing inventory is necessary, but retailers run the risk of hindering selection, which can lead to disappointed customers and fewer sales. On the other hand, merchandise overflow can lead to a frenzy of deep discounts, which can cheapen the brand and slash profits."

The research firm Retail Forward also expects flat spending over the holiday season, saying it would be the worst in 42 years behind last year's tumble.

The group sees apparel and home furnishing sales falling 2.0 percent compared with last year, and grimmer results for consumer electronics stores.

Sung Won Sohn, economist at California State University, said there is a danger of an economic relapse if retailers and consumers remain gripped by fear.

"Expecting weak economic recovery in demand ahead including the upcoming holiday shopping season, the employers are in no mood to start hiring," Sohn said.

"They want to make sure that a sustained economic recovery is here before hiring. This type of fear could undermine the budding economic recovery."

A slightly more upbeat outlook came from the International Council of Shopping Centers, which projects a 1.0 percent increase in same-store sales in November and December. With January included, sales may rise 1.5 percent, their best performance in three years, ICSC said.

"Retailers will experience their first non-recession holiday season in three years, and economic growth is fundamentally on the mend, even though there will be lingering pockets of weakness," said ICSC chief economist Michael Niemira.

"The wear and tear of the recession and financial crisis on the consumer psyche are slowly giving way to renewed hope, optimism and most likely gift buying."

Joel Naroff at Naroff Economic Advisors said prospects remain bleak unless confidence improves.

"Until we break the logjam in confidence, the prospects are for a mediocre holiday season at best," he said.

"There is the possibility it could turn out better than we fear now. There are so many people with jobs and income who are still spending as if they could lose their jobs. If we get to the holiday season they may decide to splurge a little. If that happens then we might be surprised with the level of sales."

US focused on recovery, wants strong dollar: Geithner

US Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner said on Saturday the United States was focused on restoring growth to the world's largest economy and reaffirmed Washington's commitment to a strong dollar.

"It's very important to the United States that we continue to have a strong dollar," Geithner said at a news conference in Istanbul after a meeting of the finance chiefs of the Group of Seven richest countries.

The US Treasury chief spoke in response to a reporter's question about the dollar's weakness in recent months and repeated insistence by President Barack Obama's administration on a strong-dollar policy.

"We recognize the dollar's important role in the system conveys special burdens and responsibilities on the US," Geithner said.

"And we're going to do everything necessary to make sure we sustain confidence," he said, referring to the Federal Reserve's massive support of the financial system and accommodative monetary policy that has kept its key interest rate near zero to try to stimulate economic growth.

Washington is committed "to make sure we bring our growth level back to sustainable conditions as soon as we have a recovery under way," Geithner said.

"The important thing is the world is growing," he added.

RON PAUL : THE FED CREATES MONEY OUT OF THIN AIR

Check this link ........ http://bit.ly/1k0LNE

Peter Schiff in Philadelphia

No Gravatar


glenn greenwald tells it like it is

Check this link ....... http://bit.ly/17ys8p

Architects of Control : Program One - Mass Control and Future of Mankind

Check this link ....... http://bit.ly/7yRJI

Unemployment Figure Soars to 17%

Fridays employment report was widely reported as the figure came in much weaker than expected. The street was expecting a decline of 150,000 non-farm payrolls for the month of September while the actual figure was 263,000. The official unemployment rate was pushed up by 0.01% to 9.8%. Though the unemployment rate only ticked up by 0.01%, the household survey showed a steep decline of 785,000.

The official unemployment rate would have ticked higher had it not been for a slight data adjustment. The BLS reduced the size of the Labor Force by 571,000. Most of those 571,000 are actually unemployed workers but because they “Gave up” on looking for a job, they were not counted in the calculation. Remember that the official unemployment rate is calculated as follows:

unemployment

Luckily, the Bureau also releases figures which add back “Discouraged Workers. That figure rose to 10.2%. Better still is their “U-6″ measure of unemployment which adds back discouraged and underemployed (those who can only find part time jobs) workers. That measure of unemployment rose to an eye popping 17%!

Further, The Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) indicated that their preliminary assessment of the annual benchmark revision pointed to a sizable downward adjustment of 824,000 (0.6%) jobs lost for the year. In other words, the official understated numbers were even greatly understated this year. The final figures for 2009 won’t be released until February.

Jim Sinclair on King World News – Pandora’s Box is Open for Hyperinflation

No Gravatar


Rep. Garrett Questions Chairman Bernanke

Check this link ...... http://bit.ly/1459t2

印度‧機師與空服員毆鬥‧飛機無人駕嚇壞乘客

(印度‧新德里)印度航空公司一架班機早前發生機師與空服員空中毆鬥,飛機一度無人駕駛,嚇壞乘客。

印度航空週日(10月4日)表示,他們正在調查這間公司一架空巴A-320班機機師和空服員在空中打架事件,他們在客艙上百名乘客面前揮拳互毆,兩名機師都“參戰”,飛機一度無人駕駛。

這架班機在大馬時間上週六上午7時許自阿拉伯聯合大公國沙加赫飛往印度德里。印度時報報導,飛行途中,一名24歲女空服員認為駕駛員性騷擾,雙方隨即拳腳相向並彼此叫囂,一路由駕駛艙打到廚房,完全不理會106名目瞪口呆的乘客。

報導稱,客機駕駛艙一度無人坐鎮,一名機師並揚言準備將客機轉往巴基斯坦。

這架客機配置7名機組員,當時已經進入巴基斯坦領空,飛行高度大約9100公尺。

這名空服員與一名機師受到擦傷,空服員在客機降落後立即提出申訴,警方隨即立案控告機師“侵犯一名女子”,機師則辯稱,女空服員此舉意在轉移焦點,這件事起因是機師們指控另一名男性空服員行為不檢。

印航表示,涉案的2名機師及2名空服員已遭停職調查。

加拿大‧15歲要嫁65歲老頭‧多妻村村長娶22妻

(加拿大.卑詩)加拿大卑詩省邦廷富有個多妻村,摩門教主布萊克摩爾帶著一幫男女信眾,過著一夫多妻的隱世生活,並由此引發巨大爭議。

據加拿大《環球華報》報導,邦廷富位於山坡上,大約由50戶人家組成。這裡的居民都是崇尚一夫多妻制的摩門教“末日聖徒”派教徒。

據對布萊克摩爾的妻子們的調查,並不存在性剝削和性侵犯。教主辯稱,對他的指控侵犯了宗教自由原則,是宗教迫害,因為摩門教派一貫實行一夫多妻。

身為“村長”的布萊克摩爾本身擁有22個妻子和103個子女。103個孩子管父親的22個妻子都叫“媽媽”。表面上,妻子們相處得其樂融融,但事實上,為了吸引丈夫的注意,她們經常爭風吃醋,有時還會大打出手。

夫少妻在摩門教裡很普遍,15歲的少女往往要嫁給65歲的老頭。

在這個一夫多妻制的村落,不僅女人命運卑微,男孩同樣命運多舛。許多男孩生下來之後就丟棄在路旁,即使有少數男孩能夠僥倖隨同家人成長,長大後也會被強行驅趕出家族。這樣做只有一個目的:減少競爭者,讓剩下的男人能夠娶上多個老婆。

意大利‧暴雨23人死

(意大利‧羅馬)意大利政府週日(10月4日)宣佈,襲擊意大利墨西拿地區的暴雨已導致23人死亡。

據官方統計,目前已確定23人在這場災難中罹難、95人受傷、40人失蹤,當地500多名居民被緊急疏散。

目前,逾2000名救援人員繼續在現場進行搜救工作。

總理貝盧斯科尼當天乘坐直升飛機視察了災區現場,並承諾會儘快在安全地區修建新房供災民,同時,暫時免除災民的賦稅義務。

墨西拿是意大利西西里島東北部的沿海城市,行政規劃屬西西里大區。

當地上週四夜間突降暴雨,不到1小時的傾盆大雨引發巨大的洪水和山泥傾瀉,導致市內和周邊小鎮房屋嚴重損毀,政府已宣佈受災地區進入緊急狀態。

中國‧福建拉橙色大風警報‧2泳客遭大浪捲走失蹤

(中國‧福州)受冷空氣和“芭瑪”共同影響,中國福建省中北部沿海刮起7到9級東北大風,陣風達10至11級,福建週一(10月5日)已拉響了橙色大風警報。

適值國慶黃金週期間,福建氣象部門發出警報稱,沿海和台灣海峽風力較大,出海船隻和沿海的旅遊點,應注意防範大風的影響。

福建已有遊客在海上游泳“天文大潮”,結果遭巨浪捲走。

中秋節當日,5名通過網上結識的青年,結伴到福建南安大佰島露營,正值天文大潮,但5人仍下海游泳,最終被大浪捲走,其中3人獲救,另2人下落不明,兇多吉少。

印尼‧終止搜尋生還者‧3萬人失所依賴國際援助

(印尼‧巴東)印尼官員週一(10月5日)稱,巴東大地震災區的搜索生還者的行動,已告終止。

西蘇門答臘省副省長拉赫曼估計,受災最嚴重的西蘇門答臘省首府巴東和附近地區,至少有3萬人流離失所,還有30萬人ㄕP程度受災。

印尼政府表示,這麼一場突如其來的大災難已經超出了本國的救助能力,只能依靠國際援助,才能挽救更多生命,度過難關。

災區學校復課

救援人員表示,地震已過了5天,受困者存活的機率非常渺茫,與其將救災經費花在挖掘屍體的工作上,還不如用來幫助僥倖存活的人。

在災情較輕微的地區,居民的生活也逐步恢復正常;街上的市集重新營業,學童們也開始回到學校上課了。

巴東災區各學校週一象徵式地復課,僅數百名倖存兒童有機會和教師見面,在經歷多日的創傷後,接受心理輔導。

道路中斷耽誤救災

印尼災害管理局表示,有超過18萬棟建築物被震毀或遭嚴重破壞,當中包括數百間學校。

巴東市如今聚集了來自世界各地的救援及醫療隊伍,但由於通往內陸地區的道路已被土石流阻斷,令救援工作耽誤不少。

救援隊伍抵達當地後,發現至少5個村落被直沖而下的山泥掩埋,估計至少有600人被活埋,而生還者則面對斷糧、斷水和無家可歸的困境。

新加坡‧“我不怕丟臉,只要出名”‧棄冠世姐享受“瞬間成名”

(新加坡)“不怕丟臉,我就是要出名!”

在過去一個多週里,19歲的劉依敏從新加坡世界小姐的寶座重重摔入谷底,成為臭名遠揚的“盜卡棄冠世姐”。

一夜之間壞了名聲,一般人都想趕快被公眾淡忘,但劉依敏卻出奇般享受這種“瞬間成名”的感覺,甚至感謝那些恨她、討厭她和炮轟她的人。

“因為他們讓我提高了知名度。雖然我現在聲名狼藉,但很多事情都要從不同角度去,我覺得無所謂。”

在盜卡事件曝光後,首次面對面接受華文媒體專訪的她坦言,從小就喜歡引人矚目,參加選也是自幼的夢想。當初就是為了成名,她冒著盜卡事件可能被拆穿的風險,大膽參加世姐賽。

緩刑期滿就參加選美

緩刑監視在後年期滿,劉依敏到時要做的第一件事,就是報名參加選美,希望再次成為美姐!

“我想要站上國際舞台,向全世界展示,新加坡也有美女。”

“我也告訴大家,就算曾經犯過錯,只要肯努力,還是有機會站起來,取得成功。”

為了兩年後重闖選美界,劉依敏目前積極備戰,除了每週4天學跳鋼管舞,平時下課後就到國家圖書館閱讀小說和醫藥書籍,豐富自己的常識。

她滿面笑容地說︰“兩年後我還是一隻鳳!我一定會東山再起!”

贊助商不滿主辦單位

世姐賽其中一個贊助商對主辦單位有3大不滿,有意採取法律行動!

Young and Healthy保健食品公司負責人許雙祥說,世姐賽演變成今日的混亂局面,他對主辦單位ERM行銷公司有3大不滿,即在合約下,他有權讓世姐為產品進行宣傳、打廣告和出席活動。不過,世姐賽風波不斷,使他沒辦法這麼做。

ERM發言人對此表示不願置評,只表示一切已交由律師處理。

新加坡‧吃馬來麵隆冬‧一家六口中毒

(新加坡)一家六口吃了咖啡店的馬來面和隆冬後上吐下瀉,集體食物中毒,一對兩歲的龍鳳胎也受到感染留院接受治療。為了照顧龍鳳胎,婦女自己也病倒,還被公司炒魷魚。

龍鳳胎的媽媽許女士(30歲)說,兩週前的週六(10月3日)早上9時許,家翁家婆在四地鐵站一帶的咖啡店,吃了隆冬和馬來面後,打包回家給家人吃。

她指出,下午3時左右,家婆開始上吐下瀉,之後輪到大姑和小姑,最後是家翁。他們到診所求醫,醫生說是食物中毒,給了他們3天病假。

她披露,這時她的一對龍鳳胎也開始上吐下瀉,她立即帶孩子到竹腳婦幼醫院求醫,惟他們都需要留醫。

糞便帶菌傳染腸胃炎

許女士說,醫藥報告指出,孩子得了腸胃炎,住院醫藥費高達2196元(約馬幣5270令吉)。

“我問醫生,為甚麼我的孩子沒吃公婆打包的馬來食物也會得腸胃炎,他表示腸胃炎患者的排泄物和嘔吐物帶有病菌,可經由空氣傳播,我的孩子也許是因此受到感染。”

她披露,一對子女同時病倒,讓她疲於奔波的同時,也丟了財務分析師的工作。

“當時,我的身體已不適,一直咳嗽,當大家一個個病倒後,我也開始有點不舒服,了醫生拿了3天病假。”

她聲稱,兩個孩子年紀小,出院後也還是瀉肚子,約一週後才完全康復,但她在3天病假結束後,就回到公司上班。

“沒想到,闆卻認為我常因為孩子請假,要我收拾東西離開,令我十分難過。”

許女士已就食物中毒事件,向國家環境局投訴。

台灣‧“芭瑪”海峽徘徊‧疏散6000多人

(台灣‧台北)“芭瑪”減弱為輕度颱風後,繼續在巴士海峽徘徊,帶來豪雨,台灣政府已發出泥石流警戒,並已疏散了逾6000人。

儘管如此,受“芭瑪”外圍環流影響,加上東北季候風增強,東北部包括宜蘭、花蓮及台北山區,持續暴雨,雨量明顯增加,當局正採取措施,防止發生s洪暴發及土石流。

花蓮山泥傾瀉
澎湖船難13人失蹤

其中,宜蘭多處地區降暴雨而淹水,學校宣佈停課;花蓮市區部份道路水浸,並發生山泥傾瀉,令交通中斷;澎湖外海發生船難13人失蹤。

台灣災害應變中心表示,截至週一(10月5日)上午,6個縣共撤離6688人,以防萬一。

應變中心表示,台軍方和空中勤務總隊直升機已出勤3案64架次,運載6000公升油料、後送傷員和災民共62人。

“芭瑪”颱風目前行蹤飄忽,目前在鵝鑾鼻西南方約250公里海面上,呈滯留打轉。

氣象局指出,離台灣較遠的強颱“茉莉”週二(10月6日)與“芭瑪”的距離會拉近,可能產生藤原效應。預測“芭瑪”將會偏南移動,屆時台灣海域可能逐漸脫離暴風圈,颱風環流的降雨影響也會慢慢減弱。

但氣象局指,“芭瑪”的實際動向還是要“茉莉”靠近時的位置及牽引力道。

印尼‧土石流2分鐘淹沒3村‧250村民或長埋黃土

(印尼‧巴東、巴利阿曼)距離巴東市約莫3小時車程的巴利阿曼小鎮,有3個村落逾250名村民慘遭地震引發的山體滑坡而活埋。

這些村民或將自此長埋黃土,成為無主孤魂。


逃生的災黎重返村落,在已不見的家園搜找親人。(圖:星洲日報)

在這起讓人悲慟的慘劇中,強震在半小時內引發毀滅性的山體滑坡事故,以致山腳下的250名村民,在短短2分鐘內遭土崩活埋。而更讓人悲痛的是,這些已埋在黃土下的遺體,在親友根本不知情的情況下,或將面對無人認領的局面。

32歲的伊利克週日(10月4日)傍晚在土崩現場懇求在場的新聞工作者,全面性地報導這起事故,以讓更多人注意到在巴利阿曼小鎮的甘榜坦迪卡內,共有3個村落的大部份村民遭到活埋。

許多人不知家人罹難

他說,土崩發生已數日,但災場卻只有少數的罹難者親屬在場守候消息,他相信這是因為許多人仍不知曉他們的家人已經罹難的緣故。

“這些埋在黃土下的罹難者,他們都有摯愛的家人,他們的家人或許就在遠方,就在大都市內,但他們卻不知道家鄉發生了災難,而這些遺體一旦出土,都必須得到家人的妥善安葬。”

巴利阿曼小鎮是另一地震重災區,而遭土崩埋沒的3個村落,已有超過百年歷史。

一名災民昂莫爾(61歲)指出,這些村落百余年來雖地震頻仍,但卻從未發生過土崩或山體滑坡意外,以致許多人在發生地震時都不以為意。

成功逃出來的村民形容,“排山倒海般的土石流在短短2分鐘內,就將3個村落完全淹沒,許多人在還未來得及在強震中反應過來,就慘遭活埋。”

大馬拯救隊赴小鎮搜救

大馬災難特別拯救隊伍進入巴利阿曼小鎮展開搜救行動!

於上週六抵達巴東的大馬災難特別拯救隊伍,週一(10月5日)上午進入巴利阿曼小鎮,在多個災情嚴重的村落內展開搜救行動。

為數共25人的特別拯救隊伍,在抵達印尼的2天內已先後到巴東市的2間酒店,包括傳出仍有逾80名受困者的安查邦酒店,和各國拯救部隊合作執行任務。

失4至親男子悲痛欲絕

“幾乎所有至親都已經不在,的心都快要碎了!”

多年前曾在大馬工作的印尼男子蘇法米(39歲)在土崩現場告訴記者,他的4名親人,包括妻子以及2歲的女兒都在這起土崩事故中喪生,讓他悲痛欲絕。

他表示,他是於2年前與妻女搬至岳母家中居住,事發時他和妻舅出外工作,因此逃過一劫,但他的4名至親都不在人世,數天待在災場的他,仍盼望親人遺體出土的一日。

一名印尼緊急反應隊伍隊員告訴記者,土崩發生至今災場內共有60具遺體出土,僅僅在週日就有多達8具遺體出土。

詢及村落內一間擁有約110名師生的學校是否如謠傳般悉數罹難時,他表示目前確實失蹤人數仍然不明。

巴東恢復電供商家開業

地震後的第5天,巴東市全面恢復電流供應!

巴東市民經歷4日的斷水斷電後,在地方政府的搶修下,市內大部份地區已全面恢復電流,許多商家紛紛在週日開始營業。

市內僅存數間未受地震影響的酒店,在斷電時使用發電機提供電源,但電源只在入夜後啟動,而多間著名快餐店也已投入營業,市民生活開始恢復正常。

對於災黎而言,恢復電流更是莫大的喜訊,許多原訂在地震當日及後3天內共結連理的情侶,在得悉電流逐步恢復後,都紛紛在週日舉辦婚禮。

政府救助緩慢災黎攔路

等人救不如自救!

巴利阿曼鎮內多個受地震而家園毀壞的災黎,在等不及政府援助金的到來時,寧可“主動出擊”,在主要公路上設置路障“攔路”,懇求路過者捐款協助重整家園。

記者週早前往巴利阿曼鎮時,親眼目睹多名年齡介於9至30餘歲的年輕災黎,手舉大字報及盒子,逐個攔下路過車子,要求車主捐助。

這些災黎為能有更長時間向車主要求捐款,甚至自制“路障”,將十呎長的粗木條放在車道上,以讓車主放慢速度,停下聆聽災黎陳情。

現場所見,幾乎每100公呎就有數戶災黎沿路要求捐款,許多車主心生憐憫,都掏出現款捐助。

今晚,水淹帳篷!

週日下午前往巴利阿曼鎮,採訪遭土崩淹沒的村落中途下起傾盆大雨,一眾記者紛紛關心雨水是否會再次引發另一波更嚴重土崩,導致仍守候在災場外的民眾面臨危險,當時大家都沒想到其實我們早已“自身難保”。

就在我們冒雨回返塞拉西醫院的臨時指揮中心,踩著泥漿抵達各自的帳篷,在打開帳篷後才發現水淹帳篷,場面“一片狼藉”。

水是自帳篷角落處滲入,在短短數小時內,小小的帳篷幾乎成了“蓄水池”,而放置在帳篷內的睡袋、背包及衣物更已被浸泡得濕透。

然而,恐怖的並非帳篷內發生的“水災”事故,更嚴重的事情是:週一晚上將必須露宿!惶恐的大家立時彷徨失措,驚呆地冒雨站在草地上“無語問蒼天”,那個時候,已是入夜的9時許。

在充滿絕望的時刻,大伙兒最後決定厚臉皮向鄰近的餐館陳情,希望能讓對方騰出空間讓我們渡過一晚,所幸當地處處是熱血市民,在聽說記者們的苦況後,立即在停止營業後騰出空間,讓記者最終得以有“棲身之處”。

原以為在沒有衣物更換、不斷被蚊蟲叮咬的情況下將會是一個難熬的夜晚,但大伙兒卻在聊天、打稿及處理照片中渡過。

我想,就隨而安吧。

美國‧國家森林山火6000人撤離

國)美國加州聖貝納迪諾國家森林發生山火,被燒面積目前已達1417公頃。加州州長阿諾舒華辛力加宣佈進入緊急狀態,近6000居民被迫撤離。

山火上週六從賴特伍德附近的森林開始燃燒,隨後借助大風向西部蔓延,有多間房屋被燒毀,並威脅附近2000幢房屋。當局動員千多名消防員救火,出動飛機及直升機,投擲水彈灌救,防止火勢蔓延到附近的洛杉磯,但目前僅10%火勢受控。

中國‧56民族團結柱永立天安門



(中國)中國媒體報導,為中國60週年國慶大典而豎立起來的56根“民族團結柱”,很有可能將永久矗立在北京天安門廣場上,成為繼1977年毛澤東主席紀念堂落成後,首次出現在天安門廣場的“新”建築。

報導指,每根民族團結柱高13.6米、重達26噸,間距為5.91米,每根均可抗141級大風,填補了人民大會堂與國家博物館中間的間隔。

圖為“十‧一”國慶當晚的煙花表演,把“民族團結柱”上的夜空點綴得絢麗斑斕。

Bank Closing Information - October 2, 2009

These links contain useful information for the customers and vendors of these closed banks.

Southern Colorado National Bank, Pueblo, CO
Jennings State Bank, Spring Grove, MN
Warren Bank, Warren, MI

Banks Changed Hands, Records Lost, People Unable to Cash CDs

A couple of cautionary tales for those of you who have CDs with banks that are changing names due to merger/collapse.

Bank May Have Lost Grandma’s Money

Phoenix resident Rosemarie Braunstein said Wells Fargo has refused to cash her certificate of deposit because it has lost her records.

Which Bank Owes Couple $400K?

Paul and Christine Dickey have a certificate of deposit worth $400,000, but they have not been able to collect the cash.

The Casa Grande couple has spent a year trying figure out which bank owes them the money.

Paul’s father bought the $10,000 CD in 1980 from First National Bank of Arizona branch in Benson, Ariz. Since then, the bank has changed hands three times.

John F. McManus: Dollars and Sense

No Gravatar


The Economic Recovery is an Illusion

The Bank for International Settlements (BIS) Warns of Future Crises

War is Peace, Freedom is Slavery, Ignorance is Strength, and Debt is Recovery

In light of the ever-present and unyieldingly persistent exclamations of ‘an end’ to the recession, a ‘solution’ to the crisis, and a ‘recovery’ of the economy; we must remember that we are being told this by the very same people and institutions which told us, in years past, that there was ‘nothing to worry about,’ that ‘the fundamentals are fine,’ and that there was ‘no danger’ of an economic crisis.

Why do we continue to believe the same people that have, in both statements and choices, been nothing but wrong? Who should we believe and turn to for more accurate information and analysis? Perhaps a useful source would be those at the epicenter of the crisis, in the heart of the shadowy world of central banking, at the global banking regulator, and the “most prestigious financial institution in the world,” which accurately predicted the crisis thus far: The Bank for International Settlements (BIS). This would be a good place to start.

The economic crisis is anything but over, the “solutions” have been akin to putting a band-aid on an amputated arm. The Bank for International Settlements (BIS), the central bank to the world’s central banks, has warned and continues to warn against such misplaced hopes.

What is the Bank for International Settlements (BIS)?

The BIS emerged from the Young Committee set up in 1929, which was created to handle the settlements of German reparations payments outlined in the Versailles Treaty of 1919. The Committee was headed by Owen D. Young, President and CEO of General Electric, co-author of the 1924 Dawes Plan, member of the Board of Trustees of the Rockefeller Foundation and was Deputy Chairman of the Federal Reserve Bank of New York. As the main American delegate to the conference on German reparations, he was also accompanied by J.P. Morgan, Jr.[1] What emerged was the Young Plan for German reparations payments.

The Plan went into effect in 1930, following the stock market crash. Part of the Plan entailed the creation of an international settlement organization, which was formed in 1930, and known as the Bank for International Settlements (BIS). It was purportedly designed to facilitate and coordinate the reparations payments of Weimar Germany to the Allied powers. However, its secondary function, which is much more secretive, and much more important, was to act as “a coordinator of the operations of central banks around the world.” Described as “a bank for central banks,” the BIS “is a private institution with shareholders but it does operations for public agencies. Such operations are kept strictly confidential so that the public is usually unaware of most of the BIS operations.”[2]

The BIS was founded by “the central banks of Belgium, France, Germany, Italy, the Netherlands, Japan, and the United Kingdom along with three leading commercial banks from the United States, including J.P. Morgan & Company, First National Bank of New York, and First National Bank of Chicago. Each central bank subscribed to 16,000 shares and the three U.S. banks also subscribed to this same number of shares.” However, “Only central banks have voting power.”[3]

Central bank members have bi-monthly meetings at the BIS where they discuss a variety of issues. It should be noted that most “of the transactions carried out by the BIS on behalf of central banks require the utmost secrecy,”[4] which is likely why most people have not even heard of it. The BIS can offer central banks “confidentiality and secrecy which is higher than a triple-A rated bank.”[5]

The BIS was established “to remedy the decline of London as the world’s financial center by providing a mechanism by which a world with three chief financial centers in London, New York, and Paris could still operate as one.”[6] As Carroll Quigley explained:

[T]he powers of financial capitalism had another far-reaching aim, nothing less than to create a world system of financial control in private hands able to dominate the political system of each country and the economy of the world as a whole. This system was to be controlled in a feudalist fashion by the central banks of the world acting in concert, by secret agreements arrived at in frequent private meetings and conferences. The apex of the system was to be the Bank for International Settlements in Basle, Switzerland, a private bank owned and controlled by the world’s central banks which were themselves private corporations.[7]

The BIS, is, without a doubt, the most important, powerful, and secretive financial institution in the world. It’s warnings should not be taken lightly, as it would be the one institution in the world that would be privy to such information more than any other.

Derivatives Crisis Ahead

In September of 2009, the BIS reported that, “The global market for derivatives rebounded to $426 trillion in the second quarter as risk appetite returned, but the system remains unstable and prone to crises.” The BIS quarterly report said that derivatives rose 16% “mostly due to a surge in futures and options contracts on three-month interest rates.” The Chief Economist of the BIS warned that the derivatives market poses “major systemic risks” in the international financial sector, and that, “The danger is that regulators will again fail to see that big institutions have taken far more exposure than they can handle in shock conditions.” The economist added that, “The use of derivatives by hedge funds and the like can create large, hidden exposures.”[8]

The day after the report by the BIS was published, the former Chief Economist of the BIS, William White, warned that, “The world has not tackled the problems at the heart of the economic downturn and is likely to slip back into recession,” and he further “warned that government actions to help the economy in the short run may be sowing the seeds for future crises.” He was quoted as warning of entering a double-dip recession, “Are we going into a W[-shaped recession]? Almost certainly. Are we going into an L? I would not be in the slightest bit surprised.” He added, “The only thing that would really surprise me is a rapid and sustainable recovery from the position we’re in.”

An article in the Financial Times explained that White’s comments are not to be taken lightly, as apart from heading the economic department at the BIS from 1995 to 2008, he had, “repeatedly warned of dangerous imbalances in the global financial system as far back as 2003 and – breaking a great taboo in central banking circles at the time – he dared to challenge Alan Greenspan, then chairman of the Federal Reserve, over his policy of persistent cheap money.”

The Financial Times continued:

Worldwide, central banks have pumped thousands of billions of dollars of new money into the financial system over the past two years in an effort to prevent a depression. Meanwhile, governments have gone to similar extremes, taking on vast sums of debt to prop up industries from banking to car making.

White warned that, “These measures may already be inflating a bubble in asset prices, from equities to commodities,” and that, “there was a small risk that inflation would get out of control over the medium term.” In a speech given in Hong Kong, White explained that, “the underlying problems in the global economy, such as unsustainable trade imbalances between the US, Europe and Asia, had not been resolved.”[9]

On September 20, 2009, the Financial Times reported that the BIS, “the head of the body that oversees global banking regulation,” while at the G20 meeting, “issued a stern warning that the world cannot afford to slip into a ‘complacent’ assumption that the financial sector has rebounded for good,” and that, “Jaime Caruana, general manager of the Bank for International Settlements and a former governor of Spain’s central bank, said the market rebound should not be misinterpreted.”[10]

This follows warnings from the BIS over the summer of 2009, regarding misplaced hope over the stimulus packages organized by various governments around the world. In late June, the BIS warned that, “fiscal stimulus packages may provide no more than a temporary boost to growth, and be followed by an extended period of economic stagnation.”

An article in the Australian reported that, “The only international body to correctly predict the financial crisis ... has warned the biggest risk is that governments might be forced by world bond investors to abandon their stimulus packages, and instead slash spending while lifting taxes and interest rates,” as the annual report of the BIS “has for the past three years been warning of the dangers of a repeat of the depression.” Further, “Its latest annual report warned that countries such as Australia faced the possibility of a run on the currency, which would force interest rates to rise.” The BIS warned that, “a temporary respite may make it more difficult for authorities to take the actions that are necessary, if unpopular, to restore the health of the financial system, and may thus ultimately prolong the period of slow growth.”

Further, “At the same time, government guarantees and asset insurance have exposed taxpayers to potentially large losses,” and explaining how fiscal packages posed significant risks, it said that, “There is a danger that fiscal policy-makers will exhaust their debt capacity before finishing the costly job of repairing the financial system,” and that, “There is the definite possibility that stimulus programs will drive up real interest rates and inflation expectations.” Inflation “would intensify as the downturn abated,” and the BIS “expressed doubt about the bank rescue package adopted in the US.”[11]

The BIS further warned of inflation, saying that, “The big and justifiable worry is that, before it can be reversed, the dramatic easing in monetary policy will translate into growth in the broader monetary and credit aggregates.” That will “lead to inflation that feeds inflation expectations or it may fuel yet another asset-price bubble, sowing the seeds of the next financial boom-bust cycle.”[12] With the latest report on the derivatives bubble being created, it has become painfully clear that this is exactly what has happened: the creation of another asset-price bubble. The problem with bubbles is that they burst.

The Financial Times reported that William White, former Chief Economist at the BIS, also “argued that after two years of government support for the financial system, we now have a set of banks that are even bigger - and more dangerous - than ever before,” which also, “has been argued by Simon Johnson, former chief economist at the International Monetary Fund,” who “says that the finance industry has in effect captured the US government,” and pointedly stated: “recovery will fail unless we break the financial oligarchy that is blocking essential reform.”[13] [Emphasis added].

At the beginning of September 2009, central bankers met at the BIS, and it was reported that, “they had agreed on a package of measures to strengthen the regulation and supervision of the banking industry in the wake of the financial crisis,” and the chief of the European Central Bank was quoted as saying, “The agreements reached today among 27 major countries of the world are essential as they set the new standards for banking regulation and supervision at the global level.”[14]

Among the agreed measures, “lenders should raise the quality of their capital by including more stock,” and “Banks will also have to raise the amount and quality of the assets they keep in reserve and curb leverage.” One of the key decisions made at the Basel conference, which is named after the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision, set up under the BIS, was that, “banks will need to raise the quality of their so-called Tier 1 capital base, which measures a bank’s ability to absorb sudden losses,” meaning that, “The majority of such reserves should be common shares and retained earnings and the holdings will be fully disclosed.”[15]

In mid-September, the BIS said that, “Central banks must coordinate global supervision of derivatives clearinghouses and consider offering them access to emergency funds to limit systemic risk.” In other words, “Regulators are pushing for much of the $592 trillion market in over-the-counter derivatives trades to be moved to clearinghouses which act as the buyer to every seller and seller to every buyer, reducing the risk to the financial system from defaults.” The report released by the BIS asked if clearing houses “should have access to central bank credit facilities and, if so, when?”[16]

A Coming Crisis

The derivatives market represents a massive threat to the stability of the global economy. However, it is one among many threats, all of which are related and intertwined; one will set off another. The big elephant in the room is the major financial bubble created from the bailouts and “stimulus” packages worldwide. This money has been used by major banks to consolidate the economy; buying up smaller banks and absorbing the real economy; productive industry. The money has also gone into speculation, feeding the derivatives bubble and leading to a rise in stock markets, a completely illusory and manufactured occurrence. The bailouts have, in effect, fed the derivatives bubble to dangerous new levels as well as inflating the stock market to an unsustainable position.

However, a massive threat looms in the cost of the bailouts and so-called “stimulus” packages. The economic crisis was created as a result of low interest rates and easy money: high-risk loans were being made, money was invested in anything and everything, the housing market inflated, the commercial real estate market inflated, derivatives trade soared to the hundreds of trillions per year, speculation ran rampant and dominated the global financial system. Hedge funds were the willing facilitators of the derivatives trade, and the large banks were the major participants and holders.

At the same time, governments spent money loosely, specifically the United States, paying for multi-trillion dollar wars and defense budgets, printing money out of thin air, courtesy of the global central banking system. All the money that was produced, in turn, produced debt. By 2007, the total debt – domestic, commercial and consumer debt – of the United States stood at a shocking $51 trillion.[17]

As if this debt burden was not enough, considering it would be impossible to ever pay back, the past two years has seen the most expansive and rapid debt expansion ever seen in world history – in the form of stimulus and bailout packages around the world. In July of 2009, it was reported that, “U.S. taxpayers may be on the hook for as much as $23.7 trillion to bolster the economy and bail out financial companies, said Neil Barofsky, special inspector general for the Treasury’s Troubled Asset Relief Program.”[18]

Bilderberg Plan in Action?

In May of 2009, I wrote an article covering the Bilderberg meeting of 2009, a highly secretive meeting of major elites from Europe and North America, who meet once a year behind closed doors. Bilderberg acts as an informal international think tank, and they do not release any information, so reports from the meetings are leaked and the sources cannot be verified. However, the information provided by Bilderberg trackers and journalists Daniel Estulin and Jim Tucker have proven surprisingly accurate in the past.

In May, the information that leaked from the meetings regarded the main topic of conversation being, unsurprisingly, the economic crisis. The big question was to undertake “Either a prolonged, agonizing depression that dooms the world to decades of stagnation, decline and poverty ... or an intense-but-shorter depression that paves the way for a new sustainable economic world order, with less sovereignty but more efficiency.”

Important to note, was that one major point on the agenda was to “continue to deceive millions of savers and investors who believe the hype about the supposed up-turn in the economy. They are about to be set up for massive losses and searing financial pain in the months ahead.”

Estulin reported on a leaked report he claimed to have received following the meeting, which reported that there were large disagreements among the participants, as “The hardliners are for dramatic decline and a severe, short-term depression, but there are those who think that things have gone too far and that the fallout from the global economic cataclysm cannot be accurately calculated.” However, the consensus view was that the recession would get worse, and that recovery would be “relatively slow and protracted,” and to look for these terms in the press over the next weeks and months. Sure enough, these terms have appeared ad infinitum in the global media.

Estulin further reported, “that some leading European bankers faced with the specter of their own financial mortality are extremely concerned, calling this high wire act ‘unsustainable,’ and saying that US budget and trade deficits could result in the demise of the dollar.” One Bilderberger said that, “the banks themselves don't know the answer to when (the bottom will be hit).” Everyone appeared to agree, “that the level of capital needed for the American banks may be considerably higher than the US government suggested through their recent stress tests.” Further, “someone from the IMF pointed out that its own study on historical recessions suggests that the US is only a third of the way through this current one; therefore economies expecting to recover with resurgence in demand from the US will have a long wait.” One attendee stated that, “Equity losses in 2008 were worse than those of 1929,” and that, “The next phase of the economic decline will also be worse than the '30s, mostly because the US economy carries about $20 trillion of excess debt. Until that debt is eliminated, the idea of a healthy boom is a mirage.”[19]

Could the general perception of an economy in recovery be the manifestation of the Bilderberg plan in action? Well, to provide insight into attempting to answer that question, we must review who some of the key participants at the conference were.

Central Bankers

Many central bankers were present, as per usual. Among them, were the Governor of the National Bank of Greece, Governor of the Bank of Italy, President of the European Investment Bank; James Wolfensohn, former President of the World Bank; Nout Wellink, President of the Central Bank of the Netherlands and is on the board of the Bank for International Settlements (BIS); Jean-Claude Trichet, the President of the European Central Bank was also present; the Vice Governor of the National Bank of Belgium; and a member of the Board of the Executive Directors of the Central Bank of Austria.

Finance Ministers and Media

Finance Ministers and officials also attended from many different countries. Among the countries with representatives present from the financial department were Finland, France, Great Britain, Italy, Greece, Portugal, and Spain. There were also many representatives present from major media enterprises around the world. These include the publisher and editor of Der Standard in Austria; the Chairman and CEO of the Washington Post Company; the Editor-in-Chief of the Economist; the Deputy Editor of Die Zeit in Germany; the CEO and Editor-in-Chief of Le Nouvel Observateur in France; the Associate Editor and Chief Economics Commentator of the Financial Times; as well as the Business Correspondent and the Business Editor of the Economist. So, these are some of the major financial publications in the world present at this meeting. Naturally, they have a large influence on public perceptions of the economy.

Bankers

Also of importance to note is the attendance of private bankers at the meeting, for it is the major international banks that own the shares of the world’s central banks, which in turn, control the shares of the Bank for International Settlements (BIS). Among the banks and financial companies represented at the meeting were Deutsche Bank AG, ING, Lazard Freres & Co., Morgan Stanley International, Goldman Sachs, Royal Bank of Scotland, and of importance to note is David Rockefeller,[20] former Chairman and CEO of Chase Manhattan (now J.P. Morgan Chase), who can arguably be referred to as the current reigning ‘King of Capitalism.’

The Obama Administration

Heavy representation at the Bilderberg meeting also came from members of the Obama administration who are tasked with resolving the economic crisis. Among them were Timothy Geithner, the US Treasury Secretary and former President of the Federal Reserve Bank of New York; Lawrence Summers, Director of the White House's National Economic Council, former Treasury Secretary in the Clinton administration, former President of Harvard University, and former Chief Economist of the World Bank; Paul Volcker, former Governor of the Federal Reserve System and Chair of Obama’s Economic Recovery Advisory Board; Robert Zoellick, former Chairman of Goldman Sachs and current President of the World Bank.[21]

Unconfirmed were reports of the Fed Chairman, Ben Bernanke being present. However, if the history and precedent of Bilderberg meetings is anything to go by, both the Chairman of the Federal Reserve and the President of the Federal Reserve Bank of New York are always present, so it would indeed be surprising if they were not present at the 2009 meeting. I contacted the New York Fed to ask if the President attended any organization or group meetings in Greece over the scheduled dates that Bilderberg met, and the response told me to ask the particular organization for a list of attendees. While not confirming his presence, they also did not deny it. However, it is still unverified.

Naturally, all of these key players to wield enough influence to alter public opinion and perception of the economic crisis. They also have the most to gain from it. However, whatever image they construct, it remains just that; an image. The illusion will tear apart soon enough, and the world will come to realize that the crisis we have gone through thus far is merely the introductory chapter to the economic crisis as it will be written in history books.

Conclusion

The warnings from the Bank for International Settlements (BIS) and its former Chief Economist, William White, must not be taken lightly. Both the warnings of the BIS and William White in the past have gone unheralded and have been proven accurate with time. Do not allow the media-driven hope of ‘economic recovery’ sideline the ‘economic reality.’ Though it can be depressing to acknowledge; it is a far greater thing to be aware of the ground on which you tread, even if it is strewn with dangers; than to be ignorant and run recklessly through a minefield. Ignorance is not bliss; ignorance is delayed catastrophe.

A doctor must first properly identify and diagnose the problem before he can offer any sort of prescription as a solution. If the diagnosis is inaccurate, the prescription won’t work, and could in fact, make things worse. The global economy has a large cancer in it: it has been properly diagnosed by some, yet the prescription it was given was to cure a cough. The economic tumor has been identified; the question is: do we accept this and try to address it, or do we pretend that the cough prescription will cure it? What do you think gives a stronger chance of survival? Now try accepting the idea that ‘ignorance is bliss.’

As Gandhi said, “There is no god higher than truth.”


For an overview of the coming financial crises, see: "Entering the Greatest Depression in History: More Bubbles Waiting to Burst," Global Research, August 7, 2009.


Endnotes

[1] Time, HEROES: Man-of-the-Year. Time Magazine: Jan 6, 1930: http://www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,738364-1,00.html

[2] James Calvin Baker, The Bank for International Settlements: evolution and evaluation. Greenwood Publishing Group, 2002: page 2

[3] James Calvin Baker, The Bank for International Settlements: evolution and evaluation. Greenwood Publishing Group, 2002: page 6

[4] James Calvin Baker, The Bank for International Settlements: evolution and evaluation. Greenwood Publishing Group, 2002: page 148

[5] James Calvin Baker, The Bank for International Settlements: evolution and evaluation. Greenwood Publishing Group, 2002: page 149

[6] Carroll Quigley, Tragedy and Hope: A History of the World in Our Time (New York: Macmillan Company, 1966), 324-325

[7] Carroll Quigley, Tragedy and Hope: A History of the World in Our Time (New York: Macmillan Company, 1966), 324

[8] Ambrose Evans-Pritchard, Derivatives still pose huge risk, says BIS. The Telegraph: September 13, 2009: http://www.telegraph.co.uk/finance/newsbysector/banksandfinance/6184496/Derivatives-still-pose-huge-risk-says-BIS.html

[9] Robert Cookson and Sundeep Tucker, Economist warns of double-dip recession. The Financial Times: September 14, 2009: http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/e6dd31f0-a133-11de-a88d-00144feabdc0.html

[10] Patrick Jenkins, BIS head worried by complacency. The Financial Times: September 20, 2009: http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/a7a04972-a60c-11de-8c92-00144feabdc0.html

[11] David Uren. Bank for International Settlements warning over stimulus benefits. The Australian: June 30, 2009:

http://www.theaustralian.news.com.au/story/0,,25710566-601,00.html

[12] Simone Meier, BIS Sees Risk Central Banks Will Raise Interest Rates Too Late. Bloomberg: June 29, 2009:

http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601068&sid=aOnSy9jXFKaY

[13] Robert Cookson and Victor Mallet, Societal soul-searching casts shadow over big banks. The Financial Times: September 18, 2009: http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/7721033c-a3ea-11de-9fed-00144feabdc0.html

[14] AFP, Top central banks agree to tougher bank regulation: BIS. AFP: September 6, 2009: http://www.google.com/hostednews/afp/article/ALeqM5h8G0ShkY-AdH3TNzKJEetGuScPiQ

[15] Simon Kennedy, Basel Group Agrees on Bank Standards to Avoid Repeat of Crisis. Bloomberg: September 7, 2009: http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601087&sid=aETt8NZiLP38

[16] Abigail Moses, Central Banks Must Agree Global Clearing Supervision, BIS Says. Bloomberg: September 14, 2009: http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601087&sid=a5C6ARW_tSW0

[17] FIABIC, US home prices the most vital indicator for turnaround. FIABIC Asia Pacific: January 19, 2009: http://www.fiabci-asiapacific.com/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=133&Itemid=41

Alexander Green, The National Debt: The Biggest Threat to Your Financial Future. Investment U: August 25, 2008: http://www.investmentu.com/IUEL/2008/August/the-national-debt.html

John Bellamy Foster and Fred Magdoff, Financial Implosion and Stagnation. Global Research: May 20, 2009: http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=va&aid=13692

[18] Dawn Kopecki and Catherine Dodge, U.S. Rescue May Reach $23.7 Trillion, Barofsky Says (Update3). Bloomberg: July 20, 2009: http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601087&sid=aY0tX8UysIaM

[19] Andrew Gavin Marshall, The Bilderberg Plan for 2009: Remaking the Global Political Economy. Global Research: May 26, 2009: http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?aid=13738&context=va

[20] Maja Banck-Polderman, Official List of Participants for the 2009 Bilderberg Meeting. Public Intelligence: July 26, 2009: http://www.publicintelligence.net/official-list-of-participants-for-the-2009-bilderberg-meeting/

[21] Andrew Gavin Marshall, The Bilderberg Plan for 2009: Remaking the Global Political Economy. Global Research: May 26, 2009: http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?aid=13738&context=va


by Andrew Gavin Marshall
Andrew Gavin Marshall is a Research Associate with the Centre for Research on Globalization (CRG). He is currently studying Political Economy and History at Simon Fraser University.