Thursday, October 15, 2009

The Muslims are Coming!

Not only are Muslims coming -- but they want to take over America! At least that's what four Republican Members of Congress alleged today.

Representatives John Shadegg (Ariz.), Paul Broun (Ga.), Trent Franks (Ariz.) and Sue Myrick (N.C.) are alarmed because they found Muslims trying to lobby Congress. Can you believe that? Muslims-Americans actually want to have input into the American political system! Thank God (a/k/a Allah) that we have these four Congressional watch dogs on the job being paid with our tax dollars to warn of the Muslims dastardly plan to influence legislation.

These elected "officials" timed their allegation to coincide with the release of the book: Muslim Mafia: Inside the Secret Underworld that's Conspiring to Islamize America, written by Dave Gaubatz -- a man who claimed last year that a vote for "Hussein Obama is a vote for Sharia Law."

Now I want to digress for a moment to say that a "Muslim Mafia" does sound cool on some level. Americans love mafia shows so this "Muslim Mafia" could inspire the first show on US TV to star Muslims. Or maybe I like the term "Muslim Mafia" so much because my father is Muslim and my Mom is Sicilian. With this pedigree, I'm a shoe-in for a top position in the "Muslim Mafia."

Back to the real issue: Are Muslims really trying to take over America? Most estimates indicate that there are 3-4 million Muslims in the United States. In order for Muslims to take over, simple math says they have to be at least 50 percent of the 300 million Americans. As of now, Muslims are still about 147 million people short.

In an effort to speed up the Muslim take over of America -- which on some level would probably help my comedy career because I'll get even more bookings by Muslim groups -- my fellow Arab-American comedians Aron Kader and Maysoon Zayid went out to the streets of NYC with me to see if we could recruit Americans to Islam. (We did this a little while back when we first heard this allegation.) We offered prizes to people to convert to Islam, such as a toaster, a blender and even Sudoku. Here is a clip of our efforts to convert Americans!


Thousands of desperate job seekers queue at City work fair as unemployment hits 2.47million

  • Around 10,000 job seekers flood work fair
  • Jobless total rises 88,000 in three months to August
  • Rate 1,000 lower than July figures at 2,469million
  • Youth unemployment falls fractionally to 946,000

It looks like the queue to get tickets for Wimbledon or a major pop star's comeback tour. In fact it is a sobering reminder of the City of London's fall from grace.

This is a crowd of more than 10,000 former Square Mile workers descending on a jobs fair in Canary Wharf.

Some queued for three hours, while others had to be turned away.

Most of the firms recruiting were hoping to attract highfliers who lost their jobs as the financial sector collapsed.

work fair at Canary Wharf in London

Join the queue: Desperate job seekers line up for the work fair at Canary Wharf in London

New figures today reveal the jobless total has fallen for the first time in 18 months, down 1,000 from 2.47million in the three months to July to 2.469million in the three months to August.

It dropped from 2.47million for the three months to July down to 2.469million in the three months to August, according to the Office for National Statistics.

However, across the period unemployment was 88,000 higher than in the three months to May, according to the Office for National Statistics.


Experts were quick to warn that the crisis is far from over and will deepen as public sector cuts start and young people flood the jobs market next year.

Capital Economics' Vicky Redwood said: 'We think the fiscal squeeze could require around 750,000 job losses in the public sector - meaning that unemployment should easily surpass three million

IHS Global Insight's Howard Archer warned: 'Unless the economy turns out to be stronger than expected ... many of the school leavers who cannot get a job will still be unemployed next year when the next batch of school leavers emerge.'

TUC general secretary Brendan Barber said the figures gave 'some cause for hope' but added: 'The jobs crisis has not gone away and the economy remains very fragile.'

Enlarge Canary Wharf jobs fair

Scramble: An estimated 10,000 people flocked to the event in the heart of London

Canary Wharf jobs fair

Disappointment: So many job seekers turned up that they had to be turned away by organisers

There were other signs of some recovery in the labour market.

The number of people on jobseeker's allowance rose 20,800 to 1.63million in September, its highest since April 1997 but the smallest increase since May last year.

And fears of youth unemployment hitting 1 million were scotched as it actually dropped fractionally, down from 947,000 to 946,000 in the quarter to August.

Meanwhile the number of vacancies held firm at 434,000, ending a constant plunge since April last year.

The jobless rate was also stable at 7.9 per cent - the first time it has stayed the same since the start of 2008 - and redundancies in the three months to August were also down 68,000 to 233,000.

However, average earnings including bonuses rose 1.6 per cent over the quarter - down 0.2 per cent on the previous month.

Excluding bonuses, they grew 1.9 per cent - the lowest rise for eight years.

Scroll down to view video

INDUSTRY Unemployment2.jpg

Paul Kenny from the GMB union said: 'Bad as these figures are, there are some tentative signs of a very fragile recovery in the economy.'

Work and Pensions Secretary Yvette Cooper said: 'Although unemployment isn't as high today as many feared it would be at the time of the Budget, it remains a serious problem, which is why we must keep increasing support and advice to get people back into jobs. We will not leave them on their own.'

The Government revealed it is creating 5,000 more jobs for young people through its Future Jobs Fund, taking the total to almost 60,000.

Paul Slams Neo-Con Graham For “Angry White Guys” Jibe

Big government Senator resorts to race pimping in an attempt to discredit the Texan Congressman

Paul Slams Neo Con Graham For Angry White Guys Jibe 151009top

Neo-con Lindsey Graham resorted to race-pimping the other night when he attacked Congressman Ron Paul for representing “angry white men,” to which Paul responded on CNN by pointing out that Graham represents the exact opposite of true conservatism.

During a town hall meeting on Tuesday night, Graham was heckled by the audience and called a “traitor” for his decision to back Supreme Court Justice Sonia Sotomayor, and for his support for climate change legislation.

“The troubles all started Sunday, when Graham co-wrote an Op-Ed article with Massachusetts Democratic Sen. John Kerry in the New York Times called “Yes We Can (Pass Climate Change Legislation),” which talked about their campaign to corral bipartisan support for climate change legislation,” reports the L.A. Times.

During the meeting, protesters responded to Graham’s claim that he would grow the Republican party by shouting, “Ron Paul would grow it,” to which Graham retorted, “We’re not going to be the Ron Paul party.”

“We’re not going to be the party of angry white guys,” said Graham.

During a subsequent CNN segment, Ron Paul responded to Graham by asking him why he has abandoned traditional conservative principles by supporting big government, renewing the Patriot Act, TARP funds, as well as Obama’s expansion of the war in Afghanistan.

“What does he have against the Constitution?” asked Paul.

“For him to say that everybody who is upset with the government and upset with his type of voting record are ‘angry white men’ – that is preposterous, that is a real insult,” said Paul, adding that the people who attended his rallies were from diverse backgrounds.

Paul slammed Graham for supporting Obama’s expansion of the war by “urging him on to do more and more,” when in fact “we have no right to be there and we need to bring our troops home,” according to the Congressman.

Watch the video below.

Saudis want US to pay for reducing oil usage

If you thought the executives at Goldman Sachs were the kings of backroom finance, think again.

Goldman Sachs, meet Saudi King Abdullah.

A new gambit by the oil-dealing kingdom would have Western oil guzzlers paying for using less oil. Sounds like the opposite of reality, you say? The Saudis say it's the only way they'll be able to afford helping the fight against global warming.

The New York Times frames the Saudi idea as, "if wealthy countries reduce their oil consumption to combat global warming, they should pay compensation to oil producers."

Saudi climate negotiator, Mohammad al-Sabban, described the position as a “make or break” measure for the oil-heavy kingdom in the lead-up to global climate negotiations in Copenhagen. In an email exchange with the times, al-Sabban said wealthy Western countries like the United States should help the Saudis with "economic diversification" by paying for oil they don't even use.

“Assisting us as oil-exporting countries in achieving economic diversification is very crucial for us through foreign direct investments, technology transfer, insurance and funding,” Sabban said in an e-mail.

“It is a very serious trend that we need to follow and influence if we want to minimize its adverse impacts on our economies and our people,” Sabban said in another e-mail to OPEC officials. “That does not mean we would like to obstruct any progress or that we do not want to join any international agreement. We will do that if the deal is fair and equitable and does not transfer the burden to us.”

The Saudi position isn't new, but the shock over its position in the wake of record high oil prices and a global recession is.

Environmentalists say the idea is ludicrous.

“It is like the tobacco industry asking for compensation for lost revenues as a part of a settlement to address the health risks of smoking,” Jake Schmidt, the international climate policy director at the Natural Resources Defense Council, told the Times. “The worst of this racket is that they have held up progress on supporting adaptation funding for the most vulnerable for years because of this demand.”

By Raw Story

The Banks are STILL insolvent

We have a real judge!

“The foreclosure sales (in question are) invalid because they failed to meet the requirements of (Massachusetts law),” Land Court Judge Keith Long wrote yesterday in reaffirming a decision he originally reached in March.

At issue is "lost" paperwork when mortgages are sold from party to party, as typically happens many times during a securitization process.

I have often argued that a lot of "lost" paperwork is in fact intentionally destroyed, as this is one of the few ways to cover up blatant fraud in the origination of mortgages - brokers putting the same application through with a half-dozen ever-higher "claimed" incomes, for example, until they get an approval. The original paperwork that is executed by the borrower, if it bears hand-written numbers that don't match the signature, could be a strong indicator of fraud committed by those brokers (and willingly ignored by securitizers.)

Judge Long wrote:

“The issues in this case are not merely . . . a matter of dotting i’s and crossing t’s. Instead, they lie at the heart of the protections given to homeowners and borrowers,”

Yep.

Banks have long run roughshod over the law. Indeed, their so-called "profits" virtually demand it in this world of lies, deceit and outright fraud. In several states, including Florida, judges have been nothing more than handmaidens of these "enterprises", despite black-letter law in this state (and most others) that demand an unbroken chain of original, wet signatures in the assignment of interest.

If you can't produce the documents, by statute, you have no standing to foreclose.

Period.

The willful destruction or non-retention of these original documents makes the securitizations fraudulent, as they were sold off to investors as being "asset backed" when in fact they were not, as being "asset backed" requires compliance with state law in the perfection of security interest. More importantly all of the actors involved, including the securitizing banks, MERS and similar institutions, were aware at the outset that they did not comport with the laws of these states. These "missing documents" are not an exception or an "occasional" circumstance they are in fact the rule rather than the exception.

This elevates these omissions from "ministerial errors" to something far more serious, in that if you sell something to someone knowing you are not complying with the black letter of the law of the state in which you operate in every line of business - save one - you'd find yourself on the wrong end of a criminal complaint from the State Attorney General.

We need 50 Andrew Cuomos to bring criminal and civil charges, and we need them now. This is a legitimate State Law issue in that The States have an affirmative duty to enforce the laws that protect their citizens, and in this regard the law is black-letter.

Can we find a (state) cop somewhere?

Oh, and for extra credit, does anyone care to take a wager on how much of the so-called "Secured" MBS that The Fed has been monetizing also has no valid assignment and thus has NO collateral, and in the event of a default, is WORTHLESS?

How the Servant Became a Predator: Finance's Five Fatal Flaws digg Share this on Facebook Huffpost - stumble reddit del.ico.us ShareThis RSS Read mo

What exactly is the function of the financial sector in our society? Simply this: Its sole function is supplying capital efficiently to aid the real economy. The financial sector is a tool to help those that make real tools, not an end in itself. But five fatal flaws in the financial sector's current structure have created a monster that drains the real economy, promotes fraud and corruption, threatens democracy, and causes recurrent, intensifying crises.

1. The financial sector harms the real economy.

Even when not in crisis, the financial sector harms the real economy. First, it is vastly too large. The finance sector is an intermediary -- essentially a "middleman". Like all middlemen, it should be as small as possible, while still being capable of accomplishing its mission. Otherwise it is inherently parasitical. Unfortunately, it is now vastly larger than necessary, dwarfing the real economy it is supposed to serve. Forty years ago, our real economy grew better with a financial sector that received one-twentieth as large a percentage of total profits (2%) than does the current financial sector (40%). The minimum measure of how much damage the bloated, grossly over-compensated finance sector causes to the real economy is this massive increase in the share of total national income wasted through the finance sector's parasitism.

Second, the finance sector is worse than parasitic. In the title of his recent book, The Predator Statehttp://books.simonandschuster.com/Predator-State/James-Galbraith/9781416566830, James Galbraith aptly names the problem. The financial sector functions as the sharp canines that the predator state uses to rend the nation. In addition to siphoning off capital for its own benefit, the finance sector misallocates the remaining capital in ways that harm the real economy in order to reward already-rich financial elites harming the nation. The facts are alarming:

• Corporate stock repurchases and grants of stock to officers have exceeded new capital raised by the U.S. capital markets this decade. That means that the capital markets decapitalize the real economy. Too often, they do so in order to enrich corrupt corporate insiders through accounting fraud or backdated stock options.

• The U.S. real economy suffers from critical shortages of employees with strong mathematical, engineering, and scientific backgrounds. Graduates in these three fields all too frequently choose careers in finance rather than the real economy because the financial sector provides far greater executive compensation. Individuals with these quantitative backgrounds work overwhelmingly in devising the kinds of financial models that were important contributors to the financial crisis. We take people that could be conducting the research & development work essential to the success of our real economy (including its success in becoming sustainable) and put them instead in financial sector activities where, because of that sector's perverse incentives, they further damage both the financial sector and the real economy. Michael Moore makes this point in his latest film, Capitalism: A Love Story.

• The financial sector's fixation on accounting earnings leads it to pressure U.S manufacturing and service firms to export jobs abroad, to deny capital to firms that are unionized, and to encourage firms to use foreign tax havens to evade paying U.S. taxes.

• It misallocates capital by creating recurrent financial bubbles. Instead of flowing to the places where it will be most useful to the real economy, capital gets directed to the investments that create the greatest fraudulent accounting gains. The financial sector is particularly prone to providing exceptional amounts of funds to what I call accounting "control frauds". Control frauds are seemingly-legitimate entities used by the people that control them as a fraud "weapons." In the financial sector, accounting frauds are the weapons of choice. Accounting control frauds are so attractive to lenders and investors because they produce record, guaranteed short-term accounting "profits." They optimize by growing rapidly like other Ponzi schemes, making loans to borrowers unlikely to be able to repay them (once the bubble bursts), and engaging in extreme leverage. Unless there is effective regulation and prosecution, this misallocation creates an epidemic of accounting control fraud that hyper-inflates financial bubbles. The FBI began warning of an "epidemic" of mortgage fraud in its congressional testimony in September 2004. It also reports that 80% of mortgage fraud losses come when lender personnel are involved in the fraud. (The other 20% of the fraud would have been impossible had these fraudulent lenders not suborned their underwriting systems and their internal and external controls in order to maximize their growth of bad loans.)

• Because the financial sector cares almost exclusively about high accounting yields and "profits", it misallocates capital away from firms and entrepreneurs that could best improve the real economy (e.g., by reducing short-term profits through funding the expensive research & development that can produce innovative goods and superior sustainability) and could best reduce poverty and inequality (e.g., through microcredit finance that would put the "Payday lenders" and predatory mortgage lenders out of business).

• It misallocates capital by securing enormous governmental subsidies for financial firms, particularly those that have the greatest political power and would otherwise fail due to incompetence and fraud.

2. The financial sector produces recurrent, intensifying economic crises here and abroad.

The current crisis is only the latest in a long list of economic crises caused by the financial sector. When it is not regulated and policed effectively, the financial sector produces and hyper-inflates bubbles that cause severe economic crises. The current crisis, absent massive, global governmental bailouts, would have caused the catastrophic failure of the global economy. The financial sector has become far more unstable since this crisis began and its members used their lobbying power to convince Congress to gimmick the accounting rules to hide their massive losses. Secretary Geithner has exacerbated the problem by declaring that the largest financial institutions are exempt from receivership regardless of their insolvency. These factors greatly increase the likelihood that these systemically dangerous institutions (SDIs) will cause a global financial crisis.

3. The financial sector's predation is so extraordinary that it now drives the upper one percent of our nation's income distribution and has driven much of the increase in our grotesque income inequality.

4. The financial sector's predation and its leading role in committing and aiding and abetting accounting control fraud combine to:

• Corrupt financial elites and professionals, and

• Spur a rise in Social Darwinism in an attempt to justify the elites' power and wealth. Accounting control frauds suborn accountants, attorneys, and appraisers and create what is known as a "Gresham's dynamic" -- a system in which bad money drives out good. When this dynamic occurs, honest professionals are pushed out and cheaters are allowed to prosper. Executive compensation has become so massive, so divorced from performance, and so perverse that it, too, creates a Gresham's dynamic that encourages widespread accounting fraud by both financial firms and firms in the real economy.

As financial sector elites became obscenely wealthy through predation and fraud, their psychological incentives to embrace unhealthy, anti-democratic Social Darwinism surged. While they were, by any objective measure, the worst elements of the public, their sycophants in the media and the recipients of their political and charitable contributions worshiped them as heroic. Finance CEOs adopted and spread the myth that they were smarter, harder working, and more innovative than the rest of us. They repeated the story of how they rose to the top entirely through their own brilliance and willingness to embrace risk. All of their employees weren't simply above average, they told us, but exceptional. They hated collectivism and adored Ayn Rand.

5. The CEOs of the largest financial firms are so powerful that they pose a critical risk to the financial sector, the real economy, and our democracy.

The CEOs can directly, through the firm, and by "bundling" contributions of its officers and employees, easily make enormous political contributions and use their PR firms and lobbyists to manipulate the media and public officials. The ability of the financial sector to block meaningful reform after bringing the world to the brink of a second great depression proves how exceptional its powers are to corrupt nearly every critical sector of American public and economic life. The five largest U.S. banks control roughly half of all bank assets. They use their political and financial power to provide themselves with competitive advantages that allow them to dominate smaller banks.

This excessive power was a major contributor to the ongoing crisis. Effective financial and securities regulation was anathema to the CEOs' ideology (and the greatest danger to their frauds, wealth, and power) and they successfully set out to destroy it. That produced what criminologists refer to as a "criminogenic environment" (an atmosphere that breeds criminal activity) that prompted the epidemic of accounting control fraud that hyper-inflated the housing bubble.

The financial industry's power and progressive corruption combined to produce the perfect white-collar crimes. They successfully lobbied politicians, for example, to legalize the obscenity of "dead peasants' insurance" (in which an employer secretly takes out insurance on an employee and receives a windfall in the event of that person's untimely death) that Michael Moore exposes in chilling detail. State legislatures changed the law to allow a pure tax scam to subsidize large corporations at the expense of their taxpayers.

Caution: Never Forget the Need to Fix the Real Economy

Economic reform efforts are focused almost entirely on fixing finance because the finance sector is so badly broken that it produces recurrent, intensifying crises. The latest crisis brought us to the point of global catastrophe, so the focus on finance is obviously rational. But the focus on finance carries a grave risk. Remember, the sole purpose of finance is to aid the real economy. Our ultimate focus needs to be on the real economy, which creates goods and services, our jobs, and our incomes. The real economy came off the rails at least three decades ago for the great majority of Americans.

We need to commit to fixing the real economy by guaranteeing that everyone willing to work can work and making the real economy sustainable rather than recurrently causing global environmental crises. We must not spend virtually all of our reform efforts on the finance sector and assume that if we solve its defects we will have solved the other fundamental reasons why the real economy has remained so dysfunctional for decades. We need to be work simultaneously to fix finance and the real economy.

Roosevelt Institute Braintruster William K. Black is an Associate Professor of Economics and Law at the University of Missouri-Kansas City. He is a white-collar criminologist and was a senior financial regulator. He is the author of The Best Way to Rob a Bank is to Own One.

*Originally published on the Roosevelt Institute's blog, New Deal 2.0.

台灣‧馬英九接任黨主席‧兩岸事務借重吳伯雄

(台灣‧台北)據報導,台灣總統馬英九接任國民黨主席後,將繼續借重卸任黨魁吳伯雄處理兩岸事務。

國民黨第18屆全代會週六(10月17日)登場,馬英九屆時將正式接任黨主席,台灣媒體引述黨政高層透露,馬英九未來將在兩岸事務繼續借重吳伯雄,包括兩岸重要會談、國共論壇等。

將宣佈吳任榮譽主席

而《中國時報》也披露,馬英九將在全代會當天宣佈增聘吳伯雄擔任榮譽主席,未來兩岸事務將借重吳伯雄,由吳伯雄代表馬參加國共論壇。

國民黨中央週三(10月14日)為即將卸任黨主席職務的吳伯雄舉行歡送茶會,國民黨秘書長詹春柏在茶會上代表馬英九致贈“海量”茶壺。

詹春柏強調,“吳伯雄一直都是馬總統堅強不移的支持者”,並且透露“馬總統已決定繼續借重吳伯雄”。

詹春柏說,未來馬英九還有很多地方要特別借重、請吳伯雄幫忙,雙方也都有共識,尤其對於黨務、政務的推動,兩人會充份合作,應會有很的推動成果與績效。

據透露,未來凡是馬英九不便以黨主席身份與對岸領導人會談或會面時,將借重吳伯雄擔任“分身”,推展兩岸事務,包括國共論壇、兩岸重要會談,不排除由吳伯雄擔任“特使”身份出席。

落實黨政分際
國民黨副主席大洗牌

據報導,馬英九回鍋接任國民黨主席後,國民黨權力中樞將出現大洗牌。

《聯合報》指出,行政院長吳敦義、副院長朱立倫已確定不續任副主席,國民黨政務系統將陸續退出黨部、僅保留5席指定中常委,以落實黨政分際。

國民黨黨內高層已證實,考量縣市長選戰逼近,人事佈局採“單純化”,吳敦義、朱立倫確定退出副主席團,但其餘6位副主席皆傾向留任。

據透露,海基會董事長江丙坤續任後,仍是排名第一的副主席,其餘包括林豐正、立委蔣孝嚴、立院副院長曾永權、黨秘書長詹春柏、嘉義市長黃敏惠等人傳將續任,副主席團人數將會縮編。

吳敦義拒任黨職

吳敦義週三(10月14日)已證實,擔任閣揆後,政務繁忙,考量時間有限,已向馬英九表達婉拒兼任黨職,未來若有時間,可列席中山會報或中常會聽取報告。

據透露,馬英九週二(10月13日)晚間已密會吳伯雄,就黨務革新交換意見,馬吳共識是“排除院長級”與“政務系統退出”,以落實黨政分際。

目前,立法院長王金平確定不會回鍋兼任副主席,曾永權仍續任副主席,加上蔣孝嚴,立院系統維持兩席副主席。

馬接任主席首要任務
展開縣市長輔選行程

馬英九週六接任國民黨主席,正式宣告統整黨政權力的馬英九時代到來。

馬英九已將週六登場的國民黨18全會定調為改革與團結,強調“改革才有未來,團結才有力量”,在全會後,他將帶領新任副主席召開新聞發佈會,宣告黨內團結的用意。

據台灣傳媒報導,馬英九在就職演說中,會說明他為甚麼要重新接任黨主席,以及未來領導黨的具體作法。在正式出任主席後,馬英九就會展開縣市長輔選行程,陸續出席縣市長候選人競選總部成立造勢大會。

針對外界質疑馬英九時代,黨將遭弱化。國民黨高層否認並強調,如果要弱化黨,馬英九何必來接任黨主席?

藍營發“軍令狀”
違紀輔選撤黨籍

針對年底縣市長三合一選舉,國民黨中央繼早前發出動員令後,緊接著發出“軍令狀”,嚴禁違紀輔選,視情節輕重,最重將撤銷黨籍處分。

黨主席吳伯雄週三下午主持任內最後一次中常會,會中除一口氣將違記登記參選年底縣市長選舉的7名立委,全數開除黨籍外,並將核定通過考紀會提出的年底縣市長三合一選舉黨員行為規範草案,嚴禁違紀輔選,依情節輕重,分別處以撤銷黨籍或停權2年以下等不同黨紀處分。

這份“軍令狀”,明確要求黨員不得為非黨提名參選人輔選,亦不得具名擔任該候選人競選組織任何職務,及參加各種站台造勢助選活動。

“軍令狀”同時責成各級黨部若發現有黨員違紀行為,應立即蒐集事證,依黨紀處理程序議定處分,陳報中央核定。黨務高層指出逢公職選舉,黨內都會有相關的“行為規範”,約束黨員行為,若對國民黨選情造成嚴重影響,撤銷黨籍處分。

吳:幸見兩岸和平發展

吳伯雄週三最後一次主持國民黨中常會,特別強調任內很幸運能見證兩岸關係走到互助雙贏、和平發展的道路上來。

吳伯雄說,擔任黨主席900多天,雖然只是黨史的一小段,但是他何等幸運,可以和大家並肩作戰,讓國民黨重新贏得大選,讓兩岸關係從衝突邊緣往和平發展方向走。他用“天寒飲冰水,點滴在心頭”形容其間感受,並稱“酸甜苦辣,都需要忍耐”。

英國‧未來10年或現無冰狀態‧北極冰帽30年內消失

(英國‧倫敦)在全球氣侯暖化的影響下,北極圈的冰帽將在20至30年內的夏季完全消失。據極地研究團隊的報告指出,北極在未來10年內,可能會於某些氣候較暖和的月份呈現無冰狀態。

英國探險家哈道連同另外2名英國人哈特利、丹尼爾斯組成一支考察隊,從北半球春季開始在北極冰帽展開為期73天考察行程,期間對北極圈冰層進行超過6000次測量及觀察。


英國極地研究小組的探險家之一丹尼爾斯指著北極圈的冰帽,警告再過20至30年,它們將會完全消失。(圖:法新社)


他們仔細分析今年3至5月所獲得的原始數據後,對北極冰帽的未來的變化作出預測。

劍橋大學北冰洋物理團隊組長沃德姆斯教授則表示,北極夏季冰帽的面積將大幅萎縮,並在來臨的20至30年內完全消失。

他說:“在未來的10年,北極圈將在夏季時成為一片汪洋。”

世界自然基金會(WWF)國際北極專案的資深顧問薩莫柯恩表示,考察報告顯示北極冰層溶化的現象比人類的預期還快。

台灣‧分治60年來首度‧兩岸互設觀光辦事處

(台灣‧台北)台灣《聯合報》今日(週四,10月15日)報導,台灣和中國大陸最遲將於今年底在兩岸互相設立觀光辦事處,令兩岸關係躍進一大步。

據報導,台灣海峽兩岸觀光旅遊協會和中國海峽兩岸旅遊交流協會的代表,將於近期在香港舉行的會談上,就互設辦事處作出定案。

報導也稱,中國海峽兩岸旅遊交流協會副秘書長范貴山,將成為首位派駐台灣的代表;而台灣迄今尚未決定代表人選。

《聯合報》報導,台灣交通部將在近日公佈“大陸地區觀光事務非營利法人設立辦事處許可辦法”,此為兩岸分治60年來,首度為大陸駐台辦事處提供法律依據。

大陸國台辦官員暫未就此事發表意見。

自去年7月起,台灣政府就已將每日到訪的中國遊客人數上限提高至3000人,至今已吸引超過36萬名中國遊客的到訪。

未來加強陸資招商

此外,台灣陸委會主委賴幸媛表示,未來半年,將加強對陸資企業的倡導及招商工作。她並指出,陸委會將建構台灣、大陸與國際重要智庫及官方定期對話交流機制。

賴幸媛指出,陸委會建構台灣、大陸與國際重要智庫及官方定期對話交流機制,將就相關重要議題進行研討或共同研究與互訪。

中國‧包括一漢人‧新疆騷亂再6被告死刑

(中國‧北京)中國新疆烏魯木齊法院今日(週四,10月15日)再判處涉及“7.5”騷亂事件的3名被告死刑,另3人死緩,令因涉及騷亂而被判死刑的人數增加至12人。

烏魯木齊中級人民法院週三(10月14日)審理第二批共14名涉及騷亂的被告,他們分別涉及3宗打砸搶燒的嚴重暴力案件,並分別被控故意殺人、縱火、搶劫、故意毀壞財物等罪名。

3人獲緩刑2年

其中3名“罪行極其嚴重”的被告遭判處死刑,包括一名漢人,有3人判死刑但獲緩刑2年;另外有3人被判無期徒刑,其餘5人被判監禁。

被判死刑的漢人是一名男子,他因聽信傳言,結夥向維族人展開報復行動,是致人死亡的直接兇手,故以故意殺人罪判處死刑。

法院週一首次公開審訊涉及“7.5”騷亂事件,首批7名被告都是維族人,其中6人被判死刑,另1人被判無期徒刑。

中國當局表示,還有數起涉及“7.5”騷亂的刑事案件,將陸續起訴至人民法院。

逮捕700涉亂嫌犯

早前有報導指出,除了本週受審的21人,公安也逮捕了700名涉亂嫌犯。

7月的新疆騷亂是新中國建國以來最嚴重的種族暴力騷亂,官方聲稱有近200人死亡,約1600人受傷,傷亡者大多是漢人。

儘管“7.5”騷亂事件已結束3個月,但據英國廣播公司(BBC)報導,當地社會氣氛風聲鶴唳,到處都是巡邏士兵,顯示新疆仍處於高度防暴狀態,當地維人對漢人仍抱有強烈敵意,種族衝突一觸即發。

新加坡‧為首個賭場鋪路‧2度假勝地申請賭牌

(新加坡)新加坡興建中的兩個綜合度假勝地(IR)已正式向賭場管制局申請賭場經營執照,為新加坡有史以來設立的首個賭場鋪路。

根據種種跡象顯示,已建得七七八八的聖淘沙名勝世界最快有望趕在今年底前建第一階段設施,如今它能否提前開業,就要它是否能及時領取所需的賭場執照。

賭場管制局週三(10月14日)證實,當局已分別在10月8日和9日收到濱海灣金沙和名勝世界的賭場執照申請。

目前名勝世界和濱海灣金沙都分秒必爭日夜趕工,爭取成為第一家開業且附有賭場的綜合度假勝地。

新加坡‧暴力衝收視‧輸者罰刺青‧主持人當街鬥挨耳光

(新加坡)兩位網絡電視主持人,為沖高收視率,竟挑戰彼此,誰能在半小時內,被更多路人刮巴掌,輸家得接受刺青懲罰!

更糟的是,節目聲稱,輸家在刺青之前根本不知道自己的刺青圖案是甚麼,因為贏家可以任意設計刺青,來作弄他。兩名主持人是麥克(21歲,木匠)和國強(25歲,91.3電台主持人)。

節目第一集“刮巴掌”

他們是為新加坡網絡電視台Clicknetwork的新節目,首次搭檔主持。這個新節目要求他們互相挑戰,每次挑戰結束後,輸家就得接受懲罰,而“刮巴掌”是節目的第一集。

首先上場的是麥克,他拿“免費挨巴掌”的牌子,在烏節路上四處哀求路人刮他巴掌。

當路人打得太輕時,那個巴掌就不算數,因此,主持人不斷哀求路人打“大力一點”。

最終,麥克只“收集”到11個巴掌,國強則得到12個巴掌。

麥克遭刺初戀情人全名

挑戰結束後,2人就到烏節路的一間刺青店,讓麥克當場接受國強設計的刺青。國強早已設計出寫著麥克的初戀情人全名的刺青,刺在他的下腹。

電視台董事長陳翠玲說,在進行任何挑戰前都會與主持人溝通,如果主持人不願意,製作組不會勉強。

不少路人認為,挑戰太暴力,紛紛拒絕參與!

激怒求饒法巴掌

記者發現,麥克在“狗急跳牆”的情況下,竟然開始使用激怒路人的方式來“賺”巴掌。

他向一名拒絕打他的斯文男子說“我昨天與你母親上床,她還欠我2角5分”,果然埃打。他也批評路人的衣服很醜。

國強則跪下來求路人。他也欺騙路人說,刮他巴掌是做慈善。

Gold Heading to $3000 Unless America Hits the "Reset" Button, Tice Says

Among the cavalcade of gold bulls to recently grace Tech Ticker's stage, David Tice is something of a centrist.

Gold will hit at least $3000 per ounce before the current rally ends says Tice, Federated's chief portfolio strategist for bear markets. The forecast falls roughly in between Peter Schiff's $5000 per ounce call and Jimmy Rogers' forecast of $2000.

With gold hitting yet another new high of $1064 Tuesday and bullish sentiment for the metal soaring, Tice is wary about the potential for a short-term reversal in the dollar down-gold up trend.

"We certainly could have a pullback," he says. "However, we believe this rally in gold is going to on for a long time."

As with Schiff, Rogers and pretty much everyone else these days, Tice is concerned about the "debasing" of the U.S. dollar and our reliance on foreigners to fund the deficit.

Unlike others of the Austrian School of economics, however, he does believe the government was right to spend money last year because "we were going through a meltdown."

But Tice is frustrated that policymakers appear to be trying to prop up a "dysfunctional system" rather than using the crisis as an opportunity to "reset" the U.S. economy.

"We need to get away from a consumption-based economy," Tice says. "Yes, it's going to be tough [and] accompanied by very bad economic statistics and a lot of unemployment. Yes it's going to be painful [but] we cannot simply continue to have foreigners or the Fed buy our Treasuries, agencies and mortgage-backed securities, etc. We have no real choice."

But with policymakers and politicians seemingly unwilling to make the hard choices, Tice is sticking with dollar alternatives like gold, gold miners (he declined to specify) and foreign currencies, including the euro, Swiss franc, Norwegian krona and Canadian dollar.

Ron Paul Warns of Violence from Pending Dollar Crisis; Says Israel Strike on Iran the Trigger

Ron Paul Warns of Violence from Pending Dollar Crisis; Says Israel Strike on Iran the Trigger

http://ronpaul1.blogspot.com/2009/10/ron-paul-warns-of-violence-from-pending.html

Dollar hits 14-month low against euro

http://www.presstv.com/detail.aspx?id=108647&sectionid=3510213

Dollar loses reserve status to yen & euro

http://www.nypost.com/p/news/business/dollar_loses_reserve_status_to_yen_hFyfwvpBW1YYLykSJwTTEL

Jim Rogers News Blog: Gold Will Hit $2000 Dollar Will Lose Reserve Status Jim Rogers

http://jimrogers1.blogspot.com/2009/10/gold-will-hit-2000-dollar-will-lose.html

—————————————————————————————

Israel and U.S. prepare for largest-ever joint air force drill
Pentagon Expedites Bunker-Buster Bomb Plan: Pentagon Boosts Development of Iran-Focused Bombs

One Response to “Ron Paul Warns of Violence from Pending Dollar Crisis; Says Israel Strike on Iran the Trigger”

Clinton challenges Russia on human rights

‘People must be free to take unpopular positions,’ she says

Image: Hillary Clinton
U.S. Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton reacts as Moscow State University's Viktor Sadovnichy presents her with flowers after she addressed students in Moscow, on Wednesday.



MOSCOW - U.S. Secretary of State Hillary Clinton wrapped up a European tour Wednesday by calling on Russia to uphold human rights and prevent attacks on activists who challenge the Kremlin.

Clinton devoted the second day of her Russia visit to events with ordinary citizens, following a round of diplomacy with Moscow officials which produced warm words from both sides about cooperation but no specific results.

"People must be free to take unpopular positions, disagree with conventional wisdom, know they are safe to peacefully challenge accepted practice and authority," she said in a speech at Moscow State University.

"That's why attacks on journalists and human rights defenders here in Russia is such a great concern because it is a threat to progress," Clinton said.

As Clinton spoke, Russian opposition lawmakers walked out of parliament in protest against regional elections Sunday in which Prime Minister Vladimir Putin's ruling United Russia party won victories across the country.

Some opposition leaders said they would boycott parliament until President Dmitry Medvedev agreed to meet them to discuss claims of vote-rigging. U.S. officials traveling with Clinton said they did not want to comment on "internal" Russian issues.

Clinton later flew east to meet one of United Russia's leaders, Tatarstan Governor Mintimer Shaimiyev, in the ancient city of Kazan. Dressed in a yellow headscarf, she toured a mosque and a Russian Orthodox cathedral in the mainly Muslim region.

"I appreciate the outreach you are doing to the Islamic world and to Europe and other places to serve as a model and a bridge between the worlds of Islam and Christianity," Clinton told Shaimiyev.

'Reset' of relations
U.S. President Barack Obama has called for a "reset" in ties with Russia and its people after the rows which dominated the relationship under his predecessor, George W. Bush.

But some rights activists fear Washington could tone down public criticism of the Kremlin in return for Moscow's cooperation on Afghanistan or Iran.

Clinton's criticisms of Russia on rights and democracy were made at two meetings with citizens which were not carried by state-run television while at her joint news conference with Lavrov she avoided harsh words.

At talks with Medvedev Tuesday, Clinton failed to secure support for tougher sanctions on Iran despite Obama's decision to scrap Bush-era plans for a missile shield in central Europe -- a concession to Russian concerns which Washington had hoped might spur Moscow to back its position on Iran.

"I believe if sanctions become necessary we will have support from Russia," Clinton told ABC television in an interview. "I'm very pleased about how supportive the Russians have been in what has become a united international effort."

On the issue of missile defense — which had been the most contentious issue between Moscow and Washington in the Bush era — there were few specifics during Clinton's visit.

Lavrov said he was still waiting hear more details about Obama's revised proposals, which envisage a mobile system using ships, and a Russian deputy minister said Moscow and Washington needed to agree first on where the missile threats were before they could think about cooperating.

Clinton said she had wished to meet Russia's key decision maker, Prime Minister Vladimir Putin, but he was on an official visit to China during her time in Moscow.

Clinton, taking questions from the Moscow students, said some officials in both countries were still mired in the Cold War and viewed each other as enemies.

"We have people in our government and you have people in your government who are still living in the past," Clinton said.

"They do not believe that the United States and Russia can cooperate to this extent. They do not trust each other. And we have to prove them wrong."

Copyright 2009 Reuters. Click for restrictions.


Marc Faber Dollar decline and inflation – Bloomberg Oct 14, 2009

No Gravatar


An open letter to Justice Edward Lehner on denying 9/11 justice

Justice Lehner of the New York State Supreme Court: When did the call come to decide against this ballot initiative, or was it simply your own thought to rubberstamp Referee Louis Crespo’s recommendation that the decision to establish a local commission to investigate the events of September 11, 2001, not be put before the voters? This is despite the fact that 80,000 New Yorkers have already signed and submitted a petition to do so via NYC CAN. Obviously, now it can’t, at least not for a while.

After showing what, in retrospect, seems to have been perhaps a feigned interest in weighing both sides’ arguments in the hearing, your somewhat short decision gives no indication that you seriously considered the petitioners’ memorandum of law or the “will of the people” it represented. You did not acknowledge the need for a new investigation, knowing full well New York City has never had, in any way, shape or form, its own independent investigation of the events of that awful day, that catastrophic day, on which the greatest crime on American soil was committed, right here in New York City, in fact not far from your courtroom.

Moreover, your rejection of the ballot initiative in effect agrees with and supports the City of New York’s callous dismissal of this investigation request as “irrelevant.” Irrelevant to what: the interests of the victims’ families and their quest for answers and justice; the citizenry as a whole’s interest in who and how a massive US intelligence organization, the military’s NORAD system, the multiple warnings from nations around the world to the Oval Office of a precipitous event like 9/11 were about to occur? All were ignored, dismissed, and somehow everyone was found asleep at the wheel in New York City and Washington, D.C., when and where the principal damage occurred.

Is this truly “irrelevant” to you or is it “undesirable” to certain voices that may have asked you to dismiss, not to embrace this chance to set a new level of justice, to reach a new level of thoroughness of information and/or of impartiality above and beyond the original 9/11 Commission, often referred to as the Commission of Omission? This, seeing how all of its members were tied to the Bush administration in one way or the other, and were neither impartial, fully informed of the events, and by their own admission, “doomed to failure.”

Were you, too, “doomed to failure” by any visible or invisible “arm twisting,” the phone call, the voice in the night whispering “no,” the threat of a curtailed career? Could that possibly be? Or do you from the bottom of your heart agree that the 3,000 souls that perished at the World Trade Center did not merit another investigation, that their lives were expendable, the fatalities of an unpleasant inciting incident for a War on Terror very much like Pearl Harbor, which all of America had to suck up in 1941, in order to facilitate a late entry into a World War against the Axis?

Of course, there was nothing but a military investigation then which made scapegoats of the Pearl Harbor’s Naval Commanders’ Kimmel and Short, who, according to military law were not present at their trial, the same which helped to dismiss them for dereliction of duty, an albatross which hung about their necks until they died. The fact that critical information about the attack was never passed to them from FDR was not mentioned. Is this the kind of justice we are talking about for 9/11/2001’s perpetrators, handpicking 19 photos from an FBI file in a matter of days, without further investigation, and presenting those images to the world, fait accomplis, as the culprits? Is that the kind of kangaroo court and justice we hand to the Republic of America, not to mention the people of New York City?

Can you live with that, Justice Lehner, knowing that literally volumes of new information have been discovered by scientists, engineers, pilots, architects, journalists around the world concerning the veracity of the 9/11 cataclysm? Are you willing to go to sleep at night thinking that you missed the greatest opportunity of a lifetime to pursue an inquiry that could affect a war-torn world, the primary outcome of an improperly examined crime, including the destruction of its scene by an overly ambitious Mayor Giuliani, who had the “cleanup” performed in eight months when in fact he had a year and a half to do the job?

The second effect of the careless destruction of the crime scene left a second round of slaughter for first responders, 10,000 of them, who were pushed to work night and day at Ground Zero, and mostly without even paper face masks. These are the same men and women now suffering life-threatening respiratory diseases, cancers of all kinds, severe psychological disorders, personal bankruptcies due to overwhelming medical bills, even the breakup of families that could not weather the emotional strain. And now these very people, those left standing, are petitioning for redress. Imagine what a new investigation would mean to them as well, and how it would impact on compensation for their ailing, waning lives.

This is a crisis of conscience that you are facing, Your Honor, whether you realize it or not. History is determined by men like you in important positions, who are called upon at some time to make extraordinary decisions -- in this case, whether or not to dismiss the notion of “irrelevancy” of this ballot initiative, and admit the possibility of a new investigation as totally relevant. This is no more “irrelevant” than justice itself. And yes, you can help take the blinders off of Justice and put some real weight on those scales she carries, those scales by which our lives, our times, and history are weighed by the future as they will be today. Do not pass on this opportunity history has handed you. It is in fact a gift.

Consider your own soul and inner being, your own well-being, and your family’s. How they, too, need for justice not to be delayed or denied, but to be granted by the one man who now stands as their head, and has the courage, the wisdom, the heart to expedite this new investigation, in spite of all the cynical voices surrounding him that wish to compromise the very meaning of justice.

Your ruling that modifying the petition to make it “legally permissible” would result in it being “inconsistent with the law sought by the signatories of the petition. This was despite the fact that all 80,000 signatories agreed by signing the petition that “If any provision of this law is held to be unconstitutional or invalid for any reason, the remaining provisions shall be in manner affected thereby but shall remain in full force and effect.”

Therefore, I urge you, Your Honor, to reconsider, to make this not another dark day for democracy as the shining, blue-skied day of 9/11 was. Make this a brighter day for justice and yourself as a justice. And thus make it a brighter day for New York, America, and the peace of the world.

Jerry Mazza is a freelance writer living in New York City. Reach him at gvmaz@verizon.net. His new book, State Of Shock: Poems from 9/11 on” is available at www.jerrymazza.com, Amazon or Barnesandnoble.com.

Copyright © 1998-2007 Online Journal
Email Online Journal Editor

Don't trust Dow 10,000

The stock market is supposed to be a leading indicator, predicting what happens next. But the rally doesn't mean the nation's economic woes are over.


NEW YORK (CNNMoney.com) -- As the Dow closed above 10,000 for the first time in more than a year Wednesday, economists cautioned that the blue-chip average shouldn't be seen as giving a green light to the economy.

The stock market is what is known as a leading economic indicator, as investors place bets on how strong they believe company results and the broader economy will be in the near future.

Lately, there has been a growing consensus among both investors and economists that the battered U.S. economy hit bottom and turned around earlier this year, and is now in a recovery.

The Federal Reserve said economic activity has "picked up" in its statement after its Sept. 23 meeting, and about 80% of leading economists surveyed by the National Association for Business Economics agreed in a survey earlier this month that the recovery has begun.

But even economists who agree the economy is in recovery say that growth will be slow and difficult, with continued job losses, tight credit and further declines in home prices. And even some who believe that the current Dow 10,000 level is justified say there's still a significant risk that the economy will take a step backward.

"One of the great challenges is whether consumers and small businesses come along with this recovery," said John Silvia, chief economist with Wells Fargo. "If they don't, you either sit at 10,000 or slip back to 9,500. To sustain another double-digit (percentage) gain to Dow 11,000 is asking too much from this economy and the risks we still see out there."

0:00 /3:36Earnings don't point to recovery

There are also economists who question whether the economy is truly in recovery, given that it continues to lose about a quarter-million jobs a month. They say the more than 50% rally in the Dow since it closed at a low of 6,594.44 on March 5 is only a reflection that the fear of the economy toppling into a full-fledged depression has abated.

"We're not at Armageddon anymore, so of course you should have some kind of rally," said Rich Yamarone, director of economic research at Argus Research. "But I think there's a bubble-like atmosphere going on here in the rush back to 10,000. Caution should rule the day. We're not out of the woods yet."

Several experts point out than many of the relatively strong earnings reports helping to lift the markets in recent days are being driven by cost cuts, rather than strong revenue growth that would be a better indicator of consumers and businesses being willing to spend again. If businesses keep cutting costs to make the numbers that Wall Street wants to see, that can only put more downward pressure on jobs and wages, and result in weaker economic growth or another downturn.

"The companies are cutting fat, and in many cases cutting bone and muscle. There's no organic economic growth there," said Yamarone.

Barry Ritholtz, CEO and director of equity research at Fusion IQ, said that despite their reputation as a leading indicator, the stock markets do a terrible job forecasting the economy.

"Beware of economists pointing to the stock market," he said. "The rallies tend to be false starts because it's a reaction to what came before. The sell-offs tend to be overdone because, as they gain momentum, they lead to panics."

Ritholtz said comparisons of current earnings to those of a year ago or stock levels to the lows of earlier this year greatly exaggerate the strength even the market sees in the economic outlook.

"It's like saying the Detroit Lions have better year-over-year comparisons because they're no longer winless," he said about the football team that went 0-16 in 2008, but has won one of five games so far this year. "But they're still in last place and they're not winning the Super Bowl."

Another reason that comparisons to Dow levels of a year ago are risky is that two of the more troubled components -- General Motors and Citigroup (C, Fortune 500) -- were dropped and replaced by stronger companies such as Cisco Systems (CSCO, Fortune 500) and Travelers Cos. (TRV, Fortune 500) in June.

Without those changes the Dow would be almost 100 points lower now than it is with the stronger companies, although precise comparisons are difficult since GM shares are no longer traded on the New York Stock Exchange.

"You take out the worst, put in the best, and by definition you'll get better numbers," said Yamarone

Reviving the Local Economy with Publicly Owned Banks

State and local leaders are considering creating publicly owned banks that can funnel credit to where it is needed most: directly into the local economy.

The credit crunch is getting worse on Main Street, despite a Wall Street bailout now in the trillions of dollars. The Federal Reserve’s charts show that “base money” is rapidly expanding—meaning coins, paper money, and commercial banks’ reserves with the central bank. But the money isn’t getting where it needs to go to stimulate economic growth: into the bank accounts of American businesses and consumers. The Fed has been pumping out money to the banks, and their reserves have been growing at unprecedented rates, but the money supply in the real economy has been declining.

According to Ambrose Evans-Pritchard, writing last month in the UK Telegraph, U.S. bank credit and M3 (the broadest measure of the money supply) contracted over the summer at rates comparable to the onset of the Great Depression. In the summer quarter, U.S. bank loans fell at an annual pace of almost 14 percent. “There has been nothing like this in the USA since the 1930s,” said Professor Tim Congdon of International Monetary Research. “The rapid destruction of money balances is madness.”

Chartered banks are allowed to create credit on their books equal to many times their deposit base, but lately they haven’t been doing it. In more normal times, one dollar in base money has been fanned by the banks into $8.50 in loans. Today, one dollar in base money produces only one dollar in loans. Although the Fed has been frantically pushing cash into the banks, it can’t make them lend to consumers.

This is not because the banks are trying to be difficult. If they had prudent loans on which to turn a profit and the capital base to do it, they no doubt would. But their books have been choked with toxic assets, destroying their capital positions; and the “shadow lenders” who once took subprime loans off their books have gotten wise to the scam and gone away. Bankers who know the endangered state of their own books don’t trust each other, so money is tight all around. And the Fed has already dropped interest rates as low as they can go, so it has no more leverage with which to entice borrowers.

reviving_the_economy.jpg

Residents of Grand Rapids, Michigan answer the question, "How has the recession affected you?" The installation is part of ArtPrize 2009.

Photo by Rachael Voorhees.

Local Government to the Rescue?

The Fed may have played all its cards, but state and local governments still hold a few aces. Some local politicians are looking into the feasibility of opening their own publicly-owned banks, providing them with their own credit machines. A new publicly owned bank would have a clean set of books, untainted by the Wall Street addiction to gambling in complex derivatives; and its profits would go back to the local government and community, rather than being siphoned off in exorbitant salaries, bonuses, and dividends. A publicly-owned bank could funnel credit where it is needed most, directly into the local economy.

One legislator who is considering a publicly-owned bank is Bruno Barreiro, County Commissioner for Miami-Dade County in Florida. In a September 23 article titled “Capital Sources: Recession Steers Banks Away from Business as Usual”, The Daily Business Review reported that Miami-Dade is planning to conduct a feasibility study proposing alternatives for becoming its own depository. Said the journal:

“Barreiro notes that throughout the year, a portion of the county’s $7.5 billion operating budget is deposited with outside financial institutions in return for an interest rate. However, he feels that given the instability of many banks, the county might be better off going into such a business on its own.”

Brian Bandell, writing in The South Florida Business Journal on September 11, reported that Barreiro is concerned that bank accounts are insured by the FDIC for only up to $250,000. The county often has over $50 million in a single account. If the county were to open its own depository institution, it could safeguard against these losses.

However, said Bandell, Barreiro is not proposing to allow the institution to make loans. Rather, the state’s money would be invested conservatively in Treasury bonds. The problem with that approach, said Miami banking analyst Kenneth Thomas, is that it would be a challenge to get good interest rates for the county’s deposits without making loans. “There’s a reason most other municipalities aren’t doing it,” he said.

In stopping short of making loans, the county could be missing a major business opportunity. The average interest rate on U.S. government bonds is currently 3.35 percent. If the funds in Miami-Dade’s operating budget were deposited in the county’s own bank, the money could serve as a reserve fund to support at least nine times that sum in loans. Assuming an average interest rate of 5 percent on these loans, the county could increase its revenues by over 1,000 percent (earning 45 percent interest instead of 3.35 percent). [A fuller explanation and references are available here.]

Maximizing the Potential of a Publicly-owned Bank

Economist Farid Khavari, a Democratic candidate for governor of Florida in 2010, is proposing a Bank of the State of Florida (BSF) that would take full advantage of the potential of a bank charter. It would not only act as a depository for the state’s funds but would actually make loans to Floridians at much lower interest rates than they are getting now. Among other benefits, the BSF could open up frozen credit markets, save homeowners many thousands of dollars in payments, produce major revenues for the state, and allow the state’s own debts to be refinanced at much lower rates. All those benefits are possible, says Khavari, because of the “fractional reserve” banking system used by all banks when they make loans. As he explained in a July 29 article in Reuters:

“Using the fractional reserve regulations that govern all banks, we can earn billions per year for Florida’s treasury, while saving thousands of dollars per year for Florida homeowners…For $100 in deposits, a bank can create $900 in new money by making loans. So, the BSF can pay 6% for CDs, and make mortgage loans at 2 percent. For $6 per year in interest paid out, the BSF can earn $18 by lending $900 at 2 percent for mortgages.
“The BSF can be started at no cost to taxpayers, and will be a permanent engine driving Florida’s economy. We can refinance state and local projects at 3 percent, saving taxpayers billions and balancing state and local budgets without higher taxes.”

The state would earn $15,000 per $100,000 of mortgage, at a cost of about $1,700; the homeowner would save $88,000 in interest and pay for the home 15 years sooner. “Our bank will save people about seven years of their pay over the course of 30 years, just on interest costs,” Khavari said. “We should work to support ourselves and our families, not the banks…What we have now…makes everyone work for a few greedy fat cats.”

Earlier Models

This sort of healthy public competition for the private banking monopoly has earlier precedents, going back to the colony of Pennsylvania in Benjamin Franklin’s day. Before Pennsylvania founded its own bank, the province was having difficulty attracting settlers, because there was a shortage of money with which to conduct trade. The settlers could get credit only by borrowing from British bankers at a hefty 8% interest, and even those loans were hard to come by. The provincial government then got the bright idea of printing its own paper money and lending it to the farmers at 5% interest. When credit became cheaper and more freely available, the local economy flourished.

The only state that owns its own bank today is North Dakota. North Dakota is also one of only two states (along with Montana) on track to meet their budgets by 2010. It currently has the lowest unemployment rate in the country and the largest budget surplus it has ever had, tallying in at $1.3 billion. Why this cold and isolated farming state should be doing so well when other states are teetering on bankruptcy has been the subject of several TV commentaries, including a spoof by Conan O’Brien on NBC’s Tonight Show, which attributed it to theft from tourists by local farmers. But North Dakota’s real secret seems to be that it has escaped the Wall Street credit debacle. The state has generated its own credit through its own publicly-owned bank for nearly a century.

The Bank of North Dakota (BND) was founded in 1919, when a political party called the Non Partisan League succeeded in uniting farmers suffering from an earlier credit crisis. The BND’s website states that the bank was originally formed to create additional competition in the credit industry, while providing a local source of capital for state investment and development. The BND avoids opposition from other banks by partnering with them in loan projects. According to the bank’s website:

“The primary deposit base of the BND is the State of North Dakota. All state funds and funds of state institutions are deposited with the bank as required by law…Use of the banks’ earnings are at the discretion of the state legislature. As an agent of the state it can make subsidized loans to spur development…[It] underwrites municipal bonds for all of the political units in the state, and has been one of the leading banks in the nation in the number of student loans issued. The bank also serves as the state’s ‘Mini Fed’…As a result of the banks’ services, it enjoys widespread support among the public and the independent banking community.”

Bringing the Model Current

The private banking system is in systemic failure, and the public is waking up to the fact. We have been fleeced by Wall Street; banks are not providing loans; and our savings are no longer secure. The publicly owned Bank of North Dakota has provided an alternative model that has worked remarkably well for nearly a century.

The BND has been around for so long, however, that skeptics can write off the state’s remarkable success to other factors. A modern-day public bank that quickly turned its flagging local economy around could set a precedent that was irrefutable. If Florida were to establish a successful public banking model, it could blaze a trail out of the economic wilderness for local governments everywhere.

by Ellen Brown wrote this article for YES! Magazine, a national nonprofit media organization that fuses powerful ideas with practical actions. Ellen developed her research skills as an attorney practicing civil litigation in Los Angeles. In Web of Debt, her latest book, she turns those skills to an analysis of the Federal Reserve and “the money trust.” She shows how this private cartel has usurped the power to create money from the people themselves, and how we the people can get it back. Her eleven books include Forbidden Medicine, Nature’s Pharmacy (co-authored with Dr. Lynne Walker), and The Key to Ultimate Health: Non-toxic Dentistry (co-authored with Dr. Richard Hansen). Her websites are www.webofdebt.com and www.ellenbrown.com.

Interested? In The New Economy, YES! Magazine introduces you to the activists, visionaries, and upstarts who are creating an economy that puts people first and works within the carrying capacity of Mother Earth.

Tommy Chong_on the Alex Jones Show:9/11 was an inside job p1

Check this link ....... http://bit.ly/IAA5D

Money and Mandarin lessons fuel China's African invasion

From Liberia to Ethiopia, Beijing is constructing a 21st century empire thousands of miles from home

This afternoon more than a dozen Liberians are expected at the Samuel Doe sports stadium in the capital, Monrovia. In a makeshift classroom with some plastic chairs and a whiteboard their teacher, Li Peng, is waiting to finish the group's second week of instruction in Mandarin Chinese. Early attendances at the free daily lessons provided by the Chinese embassy have been poor, but officials are blaming heavy rain rather than light interest. The class is still struggling with the basics and few Chinese listeners apart from their teacher would recognise the strange "hellos" and "goodbyes" being called out.

"Learning Chinese may prove difficult," Mr Li admitted. "But if they work hard they will make it."

The West African country set up to settle freed American slaves in 1843 is English-speaking and the going is hard.


John Cooper, a 57-year-old who has been attending the two-hour classes and works at a nearby youth centre, is determined to master Mandarin.

"Traditionally, we Liberians are closer to the Americans than we are to the Chinese," he says. "But the irony is that the Chinese are more open to us than the Americans are."

Liberia's government has no Mandarin speakers, and China's ambassador, Zhou Yuxiao, admits that he's uncomfortable that multibillion-dollar accords between the two countries are signed with one side unable to read the documents.

"We feel a little bit guilty at not being able to help Liberians to speak our language," he told the Associated Press.

On the same day last week that the Mandarin lessons were getting under way at the stadium in Monrovia, a much larger crowd was gathering about 300 miles to the northwest at another sports stadium, this time in Conakry, the capital of Guinea. The people had gathered to protest against the military junta and a young army officer, Moussa Dadis Camara, who with wearying predictability has been considering going back on earlier promises to hold free elections.

While Liberian students were grappling with Mandarin vowels more than 150 Guineans were being murdered. Scores of women were then raped. The massacre prompted international outrage, and the African Union meets next week to discuss possible sanctions. But it was revealed this week that China was preparing to throw the regime a lifeline in the form of nearly £4.3bn in oil and minerals deals.

It has left many wondering which is the real face of China in Africa: is it the quest for understanding being led by Mr Li in Monrovia? Or the naked pursuit of raw materials whose sale props up abusive governments like the one in Conakry?

China's engagement in Africa was supposed to have changed, experts say. Beijing's doctrine of "non-interference" in the domestic affairs of other countries was put to one side last year as it helped to nudge Sudan, one of its major oil suppliers, into allowing a beefed-up UN peacekeeping operation in Darfur. Then on a visit earlier this year China's president, Hu Jintao, signalled Beijing's intent to double aid to Africa.

According to Ian Taylor, a senior lecturer in international affairs at the University of St Andrews, the apparent contradiction is the product of a "clueless" approach to Beijing – "a tendency to treat China as if it's 'China Inc'."

Speaking from Beijing, he said: "There is no one Chinese policy towards Africa – it is a mixture of often-competing actors and influences that may or may not gel with official policy."

Chinese trade with Africa has grown from less than £6.3bn at the beginning of the decade to pass £60bn at the end of last year – only the European Union and the US do more business.

There are now some 800 Chinese companies operating in Africa and the investors in talks in Conakry are not from Beijing but from the Hong Kong-based China Investment Fund. Yet only two months ago officials in Beijing said that China would not be investing in Guinea.

"It's not clear if the CIF has the support of Beijing," said Dr Chris Alden, author of China in Africa. "Just like ordinary Western actors in Africa, China has independent actors who take decisions without reference to central government."

And some analysts suggest China's no-strings-attached approach in pariah states like Sudan and Zimbabwe is not the whole story.

Some 25 years after Band-Aid seared Ethiopia into the Western consciousness and conscience, China's engagement with Addis Ababa may say more about the Sino-African relationship. Whatever the achievements or shortcomings of famine-inspired aid in the Horn of Africa nation, they are being dwarfed by the Chinese-backed transformation of the country.

Ethiopia boasts none of the reservoirs of raw materials China is normally associated with, but Beijing has been doling out the credit to build roads and hydroelectric dams and is now financing a £940m expansion of the state-owned mobile telephone network.

In a recent paper for The South African Institute of International Affairs, Dr Monika Thakur found China's role in Ethiopia contradicted the spectre of the hungry dragon invoked by some in the West.

"China's activities in Ethiopia, and in Africa in general, are part of its continuing emergence as a global power, and as such are no different from what major powers traditionally have done," she wrote.

"Overarching judgements as to whether China's engagement is a blessing or a curse for Ethiopia are still unclear. What is certain is that the country can derive much from China's economic engagement."

The government in Addis Ababa has enjoyed the increased influence over Western donors that Chinese help has afforded.

"I think it would be wrong for people in the West to assume that they can buy good governance in Africa; good governance can only come from inside," Ethiopia's prime minister, Meles Zenawi, told the Financial Times recently. "What the Chinese have done is explode that illusion."

Mr Zenawi's government does not attract headlines in the way that Sudan's Omar al-Bashir does, but his administration has overseen the violent suppression of opposition in the wake of disputed elections. And he has since jailed popular opponents, such as opposition leader Birtukan Mideksa.

Dr Thakur warns that Addis Ababa could use Chinese assistance to avoid change – which could lead to "authoritarian stagnation".

However, China's own emergence as a great power, and the legitimacy of the one-party rule in Beijing, has been based on economic growth. Those looking for a champion of human or political rights are likely to be disappointed.

"The jury is still out on the significance of China's actions on Darfur," argues Dr Alden. "It's up to Africans to decide if China is having a positive or negative impact on rights in Africa. On the whole China is having a fairly neutral impact – it's really more about economic development."

By Daniel Howden

DOW 10,000!!!! Oh Wait, Make That 7,537

Another great representation of the amazing loss of purchasing power by the US public are today's oblivious statements about the Dow at 10,000. While in absolute terms the Dow may cross whatever the Fed thinks is a necessary and sufficient mark before QE begins to taper off (Dow crosses 10k just as Treasury purchases expire), the truth is that over the past 10 years (the first time the DJIA was at 10,000) the dollar has lost 25% of its value. Therefore, we present the Dow over the last decade indexed for the DXY, which has dropped from 100 to about 75. On a real basis (not nominal) the Dow at 10,000 ten years ago is equivalent to 7,537 today! In other words, not only have we had a lost decade for all those who focus on the absolute flatness of the DJIA, but it is also a decade where the US Consumer has lost 25% of purchasing power from the perspective of stocks! You won't hear this fact on the MSM.

And if you want to be really scared, here is the comparable representation for the DJIA in ounces of gold. It cost about 30 ounces to buy the 10,000 Dow last time. Now it costs less than 10.

5
Your rating: None Average: 5 (7 votes)