There used to be a thing we called “philanthropy.” Even though the concept of corporate-funded charity has raised thorny ethical questions since its Gilded Age birth (asking, for example, why companies give money away while workers struggle), the idea historically at least had some coherence. Industrial titans like J.D. Rockefeller and Andrew Carnegie took profits from their firms, however troubled their origins, and generally channeled them toward the disadvantaged and afflicted, funding public libraries, museums and disease research among other socially useful projects. The rich, in other words, idiosyncratically and undemocratically, gave to the poor.
In our new Gilded Age, however, even this arrangement seems like a golden vision from a picture-book past.
Stephen Schwarzman, the private equity tycoon who cofounded
the Blackstone Group, is the face of a new kind of philanthropy. To
borrow the language of Silicon Valley and Wall Street, he has “innovated”
novel ways in which the rich can give back to themselves, cementing and
heightening their power while claiming they’re doing the rest of us a
favor. Ostensibly charitable ventures need no longer benefit the
disadvantaged at all; they just need to be marketed that way.
In the late ’90s, even before he amassed much of his $6.5 billion
fortune, Schwarzman conducted an early trial of this idea at his alma
mater Yale, proposing a $17 million donation in exchange for renaming
the freshman dining hall for him. The offer was ultimately turned down
after Yale discovered it was actually “a contribution to one of
Blackstone’s investment partnerships on Yale’s behalf.” The university
wouldn’t receive money until the fund was liquidated, essentially
exposing it to a bet on the donation’s ultimate size. Years later,
Schwarzman found more success with a $100 million gift to the New York
Public Library, but only after a dispute over how many times his name would be engraved into its façade, another brand-building gambit that soured in the end.
Still, these million-dollar overtures seem trivial in
comparison to Schwarzman’s latest and largest philanthropic project, a
postgraduate China scholarship aptly titled the “Schwarzman Scholars”
program. Based at Beijing’s Tsinghua University, the initiative will
offer 10,000 students over the next 50 years the opportunity to enroll
in an all-expenses-paid master’s program designed to
“rival the Rhodes scholarship in prestige and influence.” At $300
million—including $100 million of Schwarzman’s own money—the program’s
endowment is already slated to far outstrip the $203 million Rhodes
fund.
To be clear: the ties and relationships they’re discussing here are business ones. Many of the Schwarzman scholarship’s top donors have lucrative interests in China, where government regulators still retain extensive control over foreign companies’ access to markets. As the New York Times notes, Schwarzman’s personal role will “raise his political profile in China,” giving him and Blackstone “increased access to Chinese leaders.” The second-biggest donor for the program is BP, among China’s largest foreign investors, with nearly $5 billion tied up in fossil fuel extraction and chemical processing plants. Other top donors include Boeing (China is the second-largest aircraft market), Caterpillar (China is the world’s top construction market), and an array of big banks seeking expanded access to China’s state-owned financial sector.
Republished from: AlterNet
No comments:
Post a Comment