The protest movement for higher wages for fast food workers has been simmering for several months now, in the form of employee walkouts and street rallies in several major US cities. Now, advocates have zeroed in on another group they say is suffering financially from fast food chains’ corporate stinginess: the American taxpayer.
The charge is that McDonald’s and other fast food
giants who pay their workers less than what many consider a "living
wage" are letting taxpayers pick up the slack in the form of public
assistance. A video released Wednesday by the labor advocacy group Low Pay is Not Ok drives the point home. In it, Nancy Salgado, a 10-year McDonald’s employee in Chicago
and a mother of two, calls a worker helpline called McResources,
purportedly set up to help employees with financial issues. During the
call, which the group recorded and edited, the operator suggests that
Ms. Salgado apply for food stamps and Medicaid, giving her numbers in the Chicago area to call.
“McDonald’s doesn’t want to pay its workers more. It wants you to pay its workers more,” text at the end of the video read.
McDonald’s refuted the video’s
contents in a statement Wednesday, calling it “not an accurate
portrayal of the resource line,” and “very obviously” edited. But the
full 14-minute call was made available to reporters, and while the
operator did tell Salgado that her franchise hadn’t signed up for full
McResource services, she did give her the information that the edited
video claims.
What’s more, the unedited call
does nothing to refute the concept of fast food chains underpaying
their workers as a hefty public burden, a notion that is gathering steam
with a small but growing number of advocacy groups, economists, and
policymakers.
RECOMMENDED: Monitor Frontier Markets Free Trial. Intelligent analysis on events in frontier/emerging countries.
The video’s release comes a week after economists at the University of California Berkeley and the University of Illinois released a study finding that fast food workers in the US
draw nearly $7 billion annually in taxpayer-funded federal aid, in the
form of food stamps ($1 billion), Medicaid ($3.9 billion), and earned income tax
credits ($1.9 billion). More than half of the 1.8 million “core” fast
food workers who work at least 11 hours per week and 28 percent of those
who work full time rely on some form of public assistance, according to
the study.
“Low wages
paid by employers in the fast-food industry create especially acute
problems for the families of workers in this industry,” the study’s
introduction reads. “Median pay for core front-line fast-food jobs is
$8.69 an hour, with many jobs paying at or near the minimum wage.
Benefits are also scarce … and many of the families of fast-food
workers must rely on taxpayer-funded safety net programs to make ends
meet.”
The
fight to improve the lot of low-wage workers in both the food service
and retail sector has been chugging along since at least last year, when
a group of Wal-Mart workers threatened to strike on Black Friday,
the biggest shopping day of the year. Some workers at McDonald’s,
Wendy’s, and other major fast food chains went on strike in late August,
demanding health benefits and a living wage.
Democratic Senator Elizabeth Warren from Massachusetts has even taken up the issue of fair worker, arguing in a March Senate hearing that it would only cost McDonalds four cents more per meal to provide a $10.10 minimum wage to all of its workers.
But
the focus on the tax aspect of the inequity is new, and it’s a shift
with the potential to give this particular protest movement staying
power, argues David S. Meyer, a professor of sociology and political science at the University of California in Irvine
who studies large protest movements. Still, he doubts that it would be
enough to affect a policy change on its own. “Are the people who are not
making enough money at McDonald’s enough to support a political
campaign? Probably not. That’s certainly not there,” he says.
Another issue: McDonald's
didn’t become the biggest restaurant chain in the world without a
successful business model. “It exists to sell food cheap,” Meyer points
out. “And if you pay people $15 an hour, it won’t be as cheap. And they
would be crazy to pay people much more than their competitors.”
For the movement to affect
change, he argues it would have to strike a chord with a powerful enough
group of people, or capitalize on the right news story. “The
antinuclear movement hung around for years, and then Three Mile Island
happened and made the whole thing bigger,” he says. “It just takes the
right opportunity.”
No comments:
Post a Comment