Gary Cameron/Reuters
When the Fed’s policy-making committee meets on Tuesday and Wednesday,
its members are likely to spend a lot of time talking about the
potential costs of the current stimulus campaign. Then the Fed’s
chairman, Ben S. Bernanke, will probably seek to reassure investors that the Fed plans to press on.
The central bank is buying $85 billion a month in Treasury and
mortgage-backed securities because it wants unemployment to fall more
quickly. While recent economic data suggests that growth is quickening,
Mr. Bernanke has said that the situation remains unacceptable and that
the pace of progress is uncertain.
Mr. Bernanke and the Fed’s vice chairwoman, Janet L. Yellen, “have been
abundantly clear in recent commentary that the improvement in the labor
market to date falls far short of what they will need to see before
reducing monetary policy accommodation,” Joseph LaVorgna, chief United
States economist at Deutsche Bank, wrote last week in a note to clients.
Also, the federal government has just embarked on another round of
spending cuts, known as sequestration, and the extent of the resulting
drag on the economy may not be evident for several months.
“The Fed will not take overt steps to scale back its asset purchases any
time soon,” Lou Crandall, chief economist at Wrightson ICAP, a New
York-based financial research firm, wrote last week. “The Fed is not
going to take any chances until it is sure that we have avoided another
spring/summer swoon.”
The central bank has said that it plans to hold short-term interest
rates near zero at least as long as the unemployment rate remains above
6.5 percent. It was 7.7 percent in February.
The asset purchases are intended to hasten the arrival of that moment
by further reducing long-term borrowing costs for businesses and
consumers.
Mr. Bernanke built a broad consensus among Fed officials last year in
favor of taking both steps, and analysts say that supporters of the
policy remain firmly in the majority of the Fed’s 12-member Federal Open
Market Committee. Only one official dissented at the most recent meeting in January.
But Fed officials who disagree with the policy, including some who do
not hold votes on the committee this year, have become increasingly
vocal in their criticisms. And among officials who support the
purchases, there is disagreement about how much longer the Fed should
keep its foot on the gas.
The focus of those concerns has shifted from the remote threat of inflation to the possibility that low interest rates could destabilize financial markets, in part by encouraging investors to take outsize risks.
Such concerns can dilute the impact of the Fed’s efforts by causing
investors to doubt how much longer rates will remain low. In response,
Mr. Bernanke and other supporters of the current policies have tried in
recent weeks to persuade markets that the purchases will continue
because the benefits far outweigh the potential costs. Indeed, Mr.
Bernanke argued recently that pulling back could pose even larger risks
to stability by weakening the economy.
“In light of the moderate pace of the recovery and the continued high
level of economic slack, dialing back accommodation with the goal of
deterring excessive risk-taking in some areas poses its own risks to
growth, price stability and, ultimately, financial stability,” he said
this month. “Indeed, as I noted, a premature removal of accommodation
could, by slowing the economy, perversely serve to extend the period of
low long-term rates.”
In seeking to persuade markets that it plans to press forward, the Fed
must also contend with evidence that the economy is gaining strength.
Fed officials projected in December that the economy would expand 2.8
percent to 3.2 percent this year, the fastest growth since the
recession. Analysts expect an updated forecast on Wednesday to be
modestly more optimistic.
The Fed has said that it will continue to stimulate the economy for an
unusually extended period, even as the recovery gains strength. Since
the benefits of that policy depend on its credibility, it is searching
for ways to communicate more clearly with investors so that expectations
of its eventual retreat do not become a premature drag on growth.
“At this stage in the business cycle, central bankers obsess that market
participants will expect policy tightening to come sooner and more
sharply than is consistent with sustained economic expansion,” said
Vincent R. Reinhart, chief United States economist at Morgan Stanley.
No comments:
Post a Comment