Source: UKT
There are two ways to look at the hugely controversial bailout
agreed for Cyprus in the early hours of Saturday morning, in which the
small island nation – accounting for only 0.2 per cent of eurozone GDP
but whose troubles will have an impact far beyond its size (including on
some 25,000 Brits in Cyprus) – received a €10bn rescue package in
return for a series of unusually harsh conditions. In a shock to
everyone, including admittedly Open Europe,
the deal included a “tax” on depositors: 6.75 per cent for anyone with
less than €100,000 in a Cypriot bank account, 9.9 per cent for anyone
with more than that.
The first way to look at the deal: lessons have been learned. Unlike
in the case of Greece, Cypriot debt will come down to around 100 per
cent of its GDP, following this deal. While not great, it’s not the type
of maddening cocktail of
continued austerity and increasing debt that Greece has been forced to
swallow (the country’s debt is at 160 per cent of GDP this year). At
least the combination of the deposit tax and privatisations in Cyprus
will give the country some breathing space. And the alternative, letting
Cyprus sink and leaving the euro, showing the world that the single
currency is no longer “irreversible”, would have been far worse.
The second way: All bailouts are unfair – the people who screwed up
almost never pay – but this is in a league of its own. Seventeen
Eurozone finance ministers locked themselves in a room and decided that
every Cypriot depositor – whether super-wealthy or dirt-poor – will, out
of the blue, see part of their hard-earned money seized. Remember,
Cypriot President Nicos Anastasiades explicitly promised in his election
campaign, only a few weeks ago, that depositors were safe. The Cypriot
electorate now faces losses on deposits as well as years of austerity
(under the bailout loan). What’s worse, deposits under €100,000 are
supposed to be protected by EU law, not raided by EU leaders. And
Cypriot banks have frozen close to €5.8bn, i.e. imposed capital controls
which is meant to be illegal under EU single market rules. This is
political dynamite.
Regardless of one’s interpretation, in the entrenched eurozone North-South stand-off,
this clearly represents a victory for the German government and German
taxpayers over their southern counterparts, as it was Berlin that drew a
line in the sand. In many ways, Cypriot depositors fell victim to the
forthcoming German elections in September.
What happens next? Well, the Cypriot parliament will vote on the deal tomorrow
(conveniently, a bank holiday in Cyprus). This will be a nail-biter.
The parties which supported Cypriot president Nicos Anastasiades only
hold 28 out of 56 MP, so not a majority. Yesterday, Anastasiades issued a stark warning:
accept the bailout deal or face “a complete collapse with a possible
exit from the euro”. Given the huge stakes, I reckon that MPs will
approve the deal, but it could be close – current voting arithmetic
suggests 30 in favour and 26 against, but this is incredibly fluid. Even
if the parliament does reject the package, there could still be room
for further negotiation.
The bailout format is therefore a gamble on several levels. Most
importantly, massive questions still linger over the precedent this
sets. If Cypriot depositors are forced to pay today, why not Spanish ones
tomorrow? People queuing up in massive numbers outside ATM machines is
always an incredibly scary sight wherever you are and given the anger in
Cyprus, we just don’t know how people will react when banks open again
(unclear when, the Cypriot government may declare both Tuesday and
Wednesday bank holidays as well). But fears of deposit-led contagion to
other parts of the eurozone should definitely not be be overstated. EU
leaders have gone out of their way to say that the depositor tax won’t
be repeated in other countries. And viewed with a depositor’s eyes from
Barcelona or Bilbao, Spain may have very little in common with Cyprus.
The eurozone also now has a contagion-fighting instrument in the
ECB’s bond-buying programme (the OMT), which can be used should panic
spread to Spain and Italy. There’s a problem here of course. If the
Cyprus deal represents a more assertive German approach, it will be far more difficult to
actually trigger the OMT as that, in turn, depends on whether the
debtor country will agree to be put on a bailout programme, with tough
conditions (a prerequisite for it to tap the OMT). Cyprus is small
enough to boss around, but Italy or Spain?
No comments:
Post a Comment