Last year, economist Emmanuel Saez estimated that the richest 1 percent
of the U.S. captured a whopping 93 percent of the income gains in 2010,
as the U.S. was emerging from the Great Recession. Saez is now back with
updated numbers from 2011, and they make the picture look even grimmer:
From 2009 to 2011, average real income per family grew modestly by 1.7% (Table 1) but the gains were very uneven. Top 1% incomes grew by 11.2% while bottom 99% incomes shrunk by 0.4%. Hence, the top 1% captured 121% of the income gains in the first two years of the recovery. From 2009 to 2010, top 1% grew fast and then stagnated from 2010 to 2011. Bottom 99% stagnated both from 2009 to 2010 and from 2010 to 2011.
How is it possible for the 1 percent to capture more than all
of the nation’s income gains? The number is due to the fact that those
at the bottom saw their incomes drop. As Timothy Noah explained in the
New Republic, “the one percent didn’t just gobble up all of the recovery
during 2010 and 2011; it put the 99 percent back into recession.”
Saez added that “In 2012, top 1% income will likely surge, due to
booming stock-prices, as well as re-timing of income to avoid the higher
2013 top tax rates…This suggests that the Great Recession has only
depressed top income shares temporarily and will not undo any of the
dramatic increase in top income shares that has taken place since the
1970s.”
No comments:
Post a Comment