Sunday, December 20, 2009

Credit Card Debt up to 15 Percent of Annual Household Income. Average Credit Card Debt in 1980 was $670 and Today it is up to $7,800. The Slimy World

Credit card companies have made it their passion to ensure that every eligible American has access to a credit card. They have also created a financial labyrinth with traps in every corner from tricky financial statements to interest rates that would make loan sharks blush. The credit card has become some form of financial rite of passage. Even colleges are plastered with credit card pushers trying to get their new batch of Americans hooked on the world of debt financing. In a way, this is an early initiation into the world of spending what you don’t have so when the U.S. Treasury and Federal Reserve create money out of thin air many Americans don’t find this concept foreign.

Credit card companies have expanded the scope of how many Americans actually hold the mighty plastic:

credit-card-stats

In 1965 only 5 million cards were in circulation and by 1996 some 1.4 billion cards were out floating in the market. How can this be? You have some people that have ten or more cards. As of today over 70 percent of eligible households have a credit card. This isn’t stunning since the average American needs to establish credit through this racket because of building up a FICO score. In many cases this score determines your interest rate or even whether you get a rental. How did people do it in the 1950s or before? They actually spent time vetting the person instead of deferring the hard work to some magical three digit number.

I’ve been trying to wrap my mind around the massive growth in credit card debt. This week Bank of America sent me a letter discussing the new changes to my credit card because of the new legislation kicking in 2010. A few key points include not being able to hike up your rates on all cards if you miss payment on one card. This is known as universal default. And another key was not being able to hike up your rate without advance notice. The letter was sent as if it were fantastic news. This is nonsense. This is like someone sending you a letter saying, “after 20 years of robbing your bank account, we have decided that we will no longer steal your money with both hands but only with one.” Is this really the kind of reform the corporate oligarchs have in mind for us?

And while this reform is coming, credit card companies are screwing as many customers as they can before the new legislation comes into effect. I made the inopportune mistake of acting in frustration and anger. One day as I arrived home after a tough day, I opened up a letter from Chase showing that my fixed rate of 4.9% was now going up to 18.99%. The letter in point 6-print stated that if I did not want this, I should pick up the phone and call some person half way around the globe to discuss a very local problem. I dialed away and told them that I wanted to completely opt out. Who in the world would say yes to this? Well as it turns out the rate shot up anyway and the card was closed because somewhere in the clause, not opting in was reason to move on the change. Furious I had my attorney draft up a letter and we sent it to Chase. They managed to get the rate back down. No late payments. Years of on time loyalty mean nothing here. Even a solid FICO score. My attorney just shook his head and said he is seeing this over and over.

Part of this comes from the massive growth in credit card debt over the years:

credit-card-debt-growth

In 1980 the average U.S. household held $670 in credit card debt. That number today is up to $7,800. Nearly $900 billion in credit card debt is outstanding. This is money that is created out of thin air. Think about a credit card transaction. You don’t have the money technically and neither does the credit card issuer. Once you buy say a flat screen or food, you’ve just created “X” amount of money on your purchase. Yet that money wasn’t there before your purchase even though you may think your credit line is actual money. As many people are now realizing many credit card issuers are now pulling back lines to shore up their beleaguered balance sheets. Many made the critical mistake of thinking of their credit line as some form of savings account.

As you can see with the green above in the chart, for nearly 30 years each year saw more and more credit card debt. That is until this massive crisis. We have reached an apex of debt. You might say that incomes have grown during this time. That is true but more is eaten up as a percentage by credit card debt:

credit-card-debt-and-annual-income

Back in 1980 credit card debt on average was slightly below 4% of U.S. household annual median income. Today that number is over 15 percent. This seems to be the breaking point. Let us not even couple in the massive amount of mortgage debt brought on by the gigantic housing bubble. Americans were spending more and more with debt that really didn’t connect to their actual economic status. Now, many are facing the grim prospect of paying inordinate amounts of money to credit card companies that are looking to suck every last penny out of debt holders. The same people credit card companies wooed with 0 percent 12 month offers are now getting rates jacked up and having traps setup in every imaginable path on the road. And the only legislation we can get is that they won’t scam Americans as much as they once did? Come on now.

It would be one thing if credit card companies that are connected to the too big to fail banks didn’t take any taxpayer money. Instead, the American taxpayer is backstopping the banking and corporate oligarchs to the tune of $14 trillion. And what are banks doing? They are hoarding the money:

excess-reserves

Banks are holding onto some $1.1 trillion in excess reserves. As we saw in our earlier chart they are doing the opposite of lending by pulling money out. It isn’t that banks don’t want to lend but they rather gamble in the stock market casino and make egregious amounts of money on the backs of struggling Americans. And what do we get? A nice letter in the mail telling us they will tone down their screwing of us via outrageous credit card practices.

I did an article a few months ago talking about an insane 79.9 percent credit card offer. Some doubted this but it is no joke:

“NEW YORK (AP) — It’s no mistake. This credit card’s interest rate is 79.9 percent.

The bloated APR is how First Premier Bank, a subprime credit card issuer, is skirting new regulations intended to curb abusive practices in the industry. It’s a strategy other subprime card issuers could start adopting to get around the new rules.

Typically, the First Premier card comes with a minimum of $256 in fees in the first year for a credit line of $250. Starting in February, however, a new law will cap such fees at 25 percent of a card’s credit line.

In a recent mailing for a preapproved card, First Premier lowers fees to just that limit — $75 in the first year for a credit line of $300. But the new law doesn’t set a cap on interest rates. Hence the 79.9 APR, up from the previous 9.9 percent.”

And before you think that poor people are going out of their way to seek this kind of financial destruction, think again:

“The bank typically mails offers to subprime households, meaning those with credit scores below 700. In the third quarter, however, 84 percent of its offers were sent to subprime households, down from 91 percent the same period last year, according to Synovate.

First Premier could be cleaning up its credit card portfolio since the new regulations will limit its ability to raise interest rates. That could mean First Premier won’t issue cards as liberally to those with bad credit.”

It is enough to make your head turn. How is this beneficial to anyone? How is this even legal after we just went through an economic collapse that came close to rivaling that of the Great Depression? Credit card companies and their banking parents have absolutely no shame. Time to bust these trusts up.

A Visual Comparison of United States

Russia vs United States: A Visual Comparison






China vs United States: A Visual Comparison




Study: 'Stimulus' package helps Democrats, not the economy

A new study has confirmed that Obama's "stimulus" spending is disproportionately targeting Democratic districts and being used for partisan constituent payoffs.

The study, conducted by the Mercatus Center at George Mason University in Virginia, found that the porkulus funds have gone to Democrat districts almost twice as often as Republican districts.

Now, as I have noted before, the worst economic disaster areas almost always are run exclusively by Democrats and have been for decades. However, as Mercatus Center scholar Veronique de Rugy explains:

If the stimulus money [were] actually spent to create jobs, there would be more stimulus money spent in high unemployment states...we don't find any correlation.

Click here to find out more!

911-War Promises



Source: NuoViso -Purchase DVD

Millions of people believe that evidence proves that Western intelligence services organized the hideous attacks on New York and Washington on 11 September 2001. Even the mainstream media have stopped defending the official version and now prefer to ignore the issue altogether.

Distrust in Western governments grows as the wars of aggression waged by the USA and NATO continue to be justified with these “false flag” operations. Ever harsher domestic laws are being passed to crush all outrage and resistance in Western populations; at the end of the day they aim to unleash the German military on German civilians, instead of allowing morality and ethics to flow into day-by-day policy-making.

That morality and ethics long ago stopped playing a part in political decision-making is shown by the use of internationally outlawed weapons in all the wars NATO has started. At best, one has heard of “depleted uranium” after seeing the film “Deadly Dust” by award-winning Frieder Wagner. But even that film is systemically blocked out and banished, although, or perhaps because, it shows the horrific consequences of the use of these uranium weapons.

Among those aghast at the actions of NATO and the complicity of Germany in such internationally illegal wars of aggression is Christoph Hörstel, for many years foreign correspondent and editorial head of the German public broadcasting network ARD. Of like mind is Giullietto Chiesa, a Member of the European Parliament, who slams the ignorance and disinterest of most of his fellow Members.

What they don’t know is explained in the film “War promises” by insiders and whistleblowers. Annie Machon was a spy with the British MI5 and reports on false flag operations, as do Andreas von Bülow and Jürgen Elsässer, who possess enormous insider knowledge from their membership of the parliamentary committee supervising the secret services, and want to bring it to the public.

Eight years after 9/11 millions of people have linked up through the Internet to jointly rebel against this criminal system. What was still dismissed as a wild conspiracy theory until just a few month ago is now regarded as proven, raising the question how we, the people, handle this situation, in which those who govern us have on their minds anything but our well-being.

Fair or Fail: Will Bernanke keep on driving Fed Express train?

Click this link ...... http://eclipptv.com/viewVideo.php?video_id=9032

中國‧“華人公共知識份子”發佈會被禁‧組織者遭帶走問話

(中國‧北京)中國民間機構評出2009年度“百名華人公共知識份子”,原在本週四(12月17日)於北京舉行發佈會,不料遭國安查禁,組織者被帶走問話。

有入榜者指,當局的反應過敏。

更有學者指,高壓只會激發民間思想熱,因為思想是禁不住的。

艾未未、蔣彥永、龍應台入選

評選活動由號稱是中國最大民間教育機構廣州信孚集團與民間智庫“政右經左工作室”主辦,入選者 大部份是近年活躍於中國的異見學者、律師和社會活動人士等,包括調查四川大地震死難學生人數的藝術家艾未未、揭露中國沙斯疫情的軍醫蔣彥永、維權律師劉曉 原等。另外,還有台灣作家龍應台、學者卜大中等。

活動原定在北京清華園賓館舉行發佈會,多名入榜學者均接到邀請。不料週三(12月16日)晚上,組織者被北京市國家安全局人員帶走,活動被迫流產。

中國‧4勝1負‧全場歡騰‧中國散打大勝泰拳

(中國‧佛山)即使少林寺拒戰、峨眉派不見人影,中國功夫還是稍勝一籌!

面對聲稱要“秒殺”中國功夫的泰拳5大拳王,低調內斂的5名中國散打高手以“真功夫”說話,以4勝1負的戰績痛宰對手,贏得上週六(12月19日)晚間在廣東佛山舉行的第6屆“中國功夫vs.職業泰拳爭霸賽”。


2009中國功夫對職業泰拳爭霸賽於週六(12月19日)在黃飛鴻故鄉廣東佛山開賽。此前,泰拳挑戰少林、少林拒不應戰、峨眉主動請纓等新聞被熱炒,使得 這項比賽受到空前的關注。本次比賽,泰方派出歷屆最強陣容,個個都是現役的頂尖高手,而中國隊是以廣東散打隊為班底組成的。之前傳聞指泰拳選手口出狂言, 向少林下戰帖。不過,最後,少林、峨眉都沒有人來。(圖:中新社)


19歲徐吉福先拔頭籌

首場60公斤級賽事,綽號“福星日月閃”的19歲徐吉福,憑著精湛的抱摔法,迅速擊敗對手23歲的“酷客寒刀”斐泰克,為中國隊先拔頭籌。

次場65公斤級賽事,19歲的“神劍筆上飛”董文飛,則受制於綽號“鬼見膝”舍受蓬的膝蓋威懾,以5分之差敗陣。

第3場70公斤級賽事,綽號“降魔手”的22歲劉層層是中國選手中實力較弱的,但他在首局賽事便以步伐靈活重創對手“魔術錐”納如蓬,其後4局穩打穩紮,避免與佔據身高優勢的納如蓬硬拚,確保點數優勢,為中國隊再下一城。

少林俗家弟子反敗為勝

第4場75公斤級賽事尤其精彩,22歲的少林俗家弟子“威風少俠”張開印,迎戰呼聲甚高的“白蓮斬”藍桑坤,藍桑坤不但在泰拳圈內極具名氣,更是泰國皇家衛隊的總教頭。

首兩局,藍桑坤利用兇狠的肘部攻擊張開印,張明顯處於下風,但第3局張突然加快進攻節奏打出 “組合進攻”,一記重拳擊中藍桑坤的面部,再一腳踢中他的胸部,最後重拳出擊,直接KO對手,完結了一場本來被認為是實力相差最大的比賽,藍桑坤被擊暈, 全場觀眾熱血沸騰,幾乎陷入瘋狂。

雖然中國提前鎖定勝局,但第5場80公斤級賽事仍繼續展開,是本屆賽事的壓軸大戲,堪稱巔峰對決。

“鐵腿王”對戰“屠龍肘”

“中國散打王”27歲的邊茂,出戰泰國最著名的拳王26歲的考萊克,“鐵腿王”對戰“屠龍肘”,5局賽事雙方都處於拉鋸戰,勢均力敵,最後裁判宣佈邊茂富勝出。

中國以4比1擊敗泰國,向世界證明中國功夫名不虛傳,全場7000多名觀眾掌聲雷動,網上亦一片叫好聲。

拳擊組織炒作
備受關注

中泰爭霸賽一向是主客場賽制,輪流在廣東與曼谷比賽,上屆是2006年比賽。

中國武術格鬥著重“遠踢、近打、貼身摔”,而泰拳的強項則是“頭頂、肘撞、膝擊”,風格和技法各有千秋。

從11月初傳出泰國拳王說中國功夫是“小菜一碟”“可秒殺所有對手”等具爭議言論,要跟少林方丈釋永信一比高下,引發少林拒絕應戰、峨嵋主動請纓一連串後續新聞,掀起軒然大波。

知情人士透漏,這其實是拳擊組織的炒作,但隨著中國各大媒體報導,激起不少人的國情操,網友在論壇大肆討論,令今年的比賽受到空前未有的高度關注。

花絮

票價一早售罄

此次比賽門票售價由150元至1680元人民幣(75.5至846令吉)不等,但所有票均已售罄;不少黃牛黨也早早趕到,求購剩餘門票,並向人群兜售。同時,全國20多家電視台、大型網站直播,不少網民更持續評論。

吸引不少女觀眾

此次賽事全場7000多個座位爆滿,觀眾不僅限於佛山,深圳、廣州甚至等地也來了大批功夫迷,比較特別的是,今次比賽吸引不少女性觀眾,落力為中國選手打氣,估計都是受愛國情緒激發,特地到場為打氣,“中國加油”的聲音此起彼落,聲勢磅礡。

選手違規引噓聲

第5場一開戰,邊茂富和對手考克萊相互試探,邊茂富先被推倒在地,隨即一記轉身掃腿得分。裁判叫停時,邊茂富立即停手,考克萊則繼續“佔便宜”,引起觀眾抗議,噓聲連連。

泰選手不服氣

比賽期間出現一段小插曲,張開印擊敗藍桑坤後,泰方隊員和教練不服氣,與中方裁判、工作人員在拳台進行理論,比賽因而中斷了5分鐘,最後泰方經過協商接受了裁決。