Saturday, March 16, 2013

CHART OF THE DAY: Fed's Balance Sheet Hits NEW RECORD $3 Trillion


Up, up and away in my beautiful balloon.
---
UPDATEBubble, Balance Sheet Losses Played Down By Bernanke
---
Details from the WSJ:
Fed’s Balance Sheet Tops $3 Trillion For First Time Ever
The U.S. Federal Reserve‘s balance sheet topped $3 trillion for the first time as the central bank continued with its easy-money policy.
The Fed’s asset holdings in the week ended Jan. 23 increased to $3.013 trillion from $2.965 trillion a week earlier, the central bank said in a weekly report released Thursday.  The Fed’s holdings of U.S. Treasury securities rose to $1.697 trillion Wednesday from $1.689 trillion a week earlier.  The central bank’s holdings of mortgage-backed securities rose to $983.17 billion, from $947.61 billion a week ago.
---
A detailed interactive chart of the Fed's balance sheet, courtesy of the Cleveland Fed.



---
Here's more on Bernanke's insanity from Zero Hedge.
Wake us up when the Fed's balance sheet is $4 trillion, in precisely 11 months.  The Fed will monetize roughly half of the US budget deficit in 2013.  This is what the Fed's balance sheet will look like in 1 year:

Another way of visualizing this is how many assets as a percentage of US GDP the Fed will hold on its books.  Currently, this number is 18%.  By the end of 2013, the Fed's historical flow operations will be accountable for 24% of US GDP.

Why is this important?  Simple: when the time comes for the Fed to unwind its balance sheet, if ever, the reverse Flow process will be responsible for deducting at least 24% of US GDP at the time when said tightening happens.
***
And finally from Global Macro Monitor.
How Much QE Is Leaking Into The Economy?
We have posted several pieces (see here and here) on how the expansion of the Fed’s balance sheet is financed by reserve creation, which are held by depository institutions in the form of excess reserves and not circulating in the economy.   In the chart below we try and get a sense of how much of the quantitative easing has leaked out of the banking system into the economy.
The monthly data in the chart below is the year on year change ($ billions) of total Federal Reserve assets less excess reserves of depository institutions.   Because the last observation of excess reserve data is from December the chart doesn’t capture the latest effects of quantitative easing.

---
Bernake's bubble theme song (Nancy Sinatra):

Would you like to ride in my beautiful balloon.

When Truth Is Suppressed Countries Die


Institute for Political Economy – by Paul Craig Roberts
Over a decade during which the US economy was decimated by jobs offshoring, economists and other PR shills for offshoring corporations said that the US did not need the millions of lost manufacturing jobs and should be glad that the “dirty fingernail” jobs were gone.
America, we were told, was moving upscale. Our new role in the world economy was to innovate and develop the new products that the dirty fingernail economies would produce. The money was in the innovation, they said, not in the simple task of production.  
As I consistently warned, the “high-wage service economy based on imagination and ingenuity” that Harvard professor and offshoring advocate Michael Porter promised us as our reward for giving up dirty fingernail jobs was a figment of Porter’s imagination.
Over the decade I repeated myself many times: “Innovation takes place where things are made. Innovation will move abroad with the manufacturing.”
This is not what corporations or their shills such as Porter wanted to hear. Corporations were boosting their profits by getting rid of their American employees and replacing them with lowly paid foreigners. Porter’s job was to reassure the sheeple so that no outcry would materialize against the greed that was hollowing out the US economy.
Now comes a study conducted by 20 MIT professors and their graduate students that concludes on the basis of the facts that “the loss of companies that can make things will end up in the loss of research than can invent them.” http://www.manufacturingnews.com/news/mit0305131.html
I am pleased to be vindicated by MIT. Of course, the professors are too late. The loss has already occurred. Nevertheless, it will be interesting to see if the MIT professors can be heard through the orchestrated disinformation.
Two years ago in 2011 a Nobel prize-winning economist, Michael Spence, confirmed my decade-old conclusion that the US economy no longer had the capability to create any jobs except low-wage domestic service jobs that do not produce tradable goods and services that can be exported to reduce the massive US trade deficit. Spence validated my argument that the “new economy” was the offshored economy. Spence concluded that the outlook for the US economy and US employment is dire. The US faces “a long-term structural challenge with respect to the quantity and quality of employment opportunities in the United States. A related set of challenges concerns the income distribution; almost all incremental employment has occurred in the non-tradable sector, which has experienced much slower growth in value added per employee. Because that number is highly correlated with income, it goes a long way to explain the stagnation of wages across large segments of the workforce.” http://www.cfr.org/industrial-policy/evolving-structure-american-economy-employment-challenge/p24366
There has been no more public policy response to Spence’s conclusion than to my identical conclusion.
We have heard all our lives that ideas are the most powerful force and prevail over material interests. Perhaps this was once true, but that would have been in previous times when material interests did not control the media, the universities, and the publishing companies along with the government. Voices such as mine, that of a high US Treasury official, and that of Spence, a Nobel prize winner, cannot compete with the voices paid by Big Money. Today the bulk of the population knows nothing except the propaganda fed to them by the oligarchic interests. They sit in front of Fox News or CNN and ingest it all. Those who fancy themselves more sophisticated get the same dose of lies from the New York Times.
If those who speak truth cannot be bought off or shut up, they are ignored or demonized. Almost everything Americans need to know is off limits in public discussion. Anyone who broaches the truth becomes an “anti-American,” a “terrorist sympathizer,” a “commie-socialist,” a “conspiracy theorist,” an “anti-semite,” a “kook,” or some other name designed to scare Americans away from the message of truth.
The corrupt corporations, the corrupt media, and the corrupt US government have insulated the country from truth. The result will be a massive crash. A country built on lies is like a house built on sand:
“Therefore everyone who hears these words of mine and puts them into practice is like a wise man who built his house on the rock. The rain came down, the streams rose, and the winds blew and beat against that house; yet it did not fall, because it had its foundation on the rock [truth]. But everyone who hears these words of mine and does not put them into practice is like a foolish man who built his house on sand [lies].The rain came down, the streams rose, and the winds blew and beat against that house, and it fell with a great crash.” Matthew 7:24-27 (NIV)
http://www.paulcraigroberts.org/2013/03/14/when-truth-is-suppressed-countries-die-paul-craig-roberts/

WATCH LIVE - JPM Senate Hearings On The London Whale


Bloomberg is providing televised coverage of the hearings.
We are live blogging the event inside.

JPM - Complete Fraud List (Background reading)
---
The first question to any witness should be foundational: given JP Morgan's extensive track record of lying to regulators and the public about the London whale trade, why should we not presume that all of your testimony today is perjured?
In a nutshell, JP Morgan's London whale trade involved (1) gambling with money covered by FDIC insurance, (2) watching its bet blow up and then doubling down on the bet, (3) chaging its risk model internally so it could understate the risks to the public, and (4) a regulator (OCC) who was privy to all the action and who did nothing.
Carl Levin just swore in the witnesses.  Query why no one in the Senate (or the House) made Jamie Dimon take an oath before testifying last summer?  Oh, that's right.  The JP Morgan witnesses are now free to perjure themselves blue in the face with Eric Holder's formal blessing.
10:05 am - Sen. McCain finishes reading from a prepared script.
10:10 am - Ina Drew is explaining how awesomely she has lived her life.  Seriously, how did this woman get control of the London office.
Levin: Per JPM representations to regulators, OCC reported that book is decreasing in size when in fact SCP [synthetic credit porfolio] was inceasing in size, correct?
Drew: Yes.
 Levin: Do you think it's a coincidence that the [undisclosed internal] CRM analyst projection of a $6 billion loss turned out ot be correct?
Weiland: Not completely.
McCain has asked good questions, which is eliciting interesting evasions and partial truths.  However, Johnny Boy is simply reading the questions and lacks the presence of mind to ask ANY follow-up answers.  Pathetic.
It's telling that in the first 90 minutes of live testimony, no one on the Senate subcommittee, despite having established JPM's knowledge of its massive lies to regulators, has asked a single question about JP Morgan's knowing and intentional violations of Sarbannes Oxley--an indisputable crime.  Why not?
Finally some action.  Braustein confirms that it was Jamie Dimon who ordered data provided to regulators be cut off.  He supposedly can't recall if Dimon was angry at him for restoring the data flow.  Braustein says (to McCain) that Dimon concealed the data reports due to concerns over confidentiality. That's so fucking ridiculous that it seems to have penetrated even McCain's punch-drunk skull, if his grasping and pathetic efforts to phrase a follow-up question is any indication.
[Note: Chris Whalen has been saying for close to a year that Dimon knew everything.]
Levin: losses are piling up, so you change your accounting practice from reporting mid-points to reporting outer limits.
 Cavanagh: We did that due to the market!
Levin: Was it coincidental that the change made losses took better?
Cavanagh: It's what happened.
Levin: Answer the question: was it a coincidence?
Cavanagh: Yes.
Levin: when did the reporting shift begin to occur?
Cavanagh: January 2012.
Levin: And it's your testimony that the shift was coincidental. You're under oath.
Cavanagh: The purpose of the change was to reduce the loss.
Levin: So you've changed your testimony.
Cavagnagh: Yes. I was misunderstood.  My first answer was made from the perspective of someone else!!!!

---
Hearing Background
Carefully orchestrated indignation is scheduled for yet another display in the Senate this morning at 9:30 a.m, in a sub-committee on Homeland Security, which is fitting given Jamie Dimon's role as a domestic global terrorist.
Let the Senate charades begin...
JPMorgan Whale Trades: A Case History of Derivatives Risks and Abuses - (Senate link)

Again, we are not calling JPM a terrorist bank, the government is.



Witnesses

PANEL 1

  • INA DREW
    Former Chief Investment Officer
    JPMorgan Chase Bank NA
    New York, NY
  • ASHLEY BACON
    Acting Chief Risk Officer
    JPMorgan Chase Bank NA
    New York, NY
  • PETER WEILAND
    Former Head of Market Risk - Chief Investment Office
    JPMorgan Chase Bank NA
    New York, NY

PANEL 2

  • MICHAEL J. CAVANAGH
    Co-Chief Executive Officer - Corporate & Investment Bank
    JPMorgan Chase Bank NA
    New York, NY
  • DOUGLAS L. BRAUNSTEIN
    Current Vice Chairman
    JPMorgan Chase Bank NA
    New York, NY

PANEL 3

  • THE HONORABLE THOMAS J. CURRY
    Comptroller of the Currency
    U. S. Department of the Treasury
    Washington, DC
  • SCOTT WATERHOUSE
    Examiner-in-Charge - OCC National Bank Examiners - JPMorgan Chase
    Office of Comptroller of the Currency
    Washington, DC
  • MICHAEL SULLIVAN
    Deputy Comptroller for Risk Analysis - Risk Analysis Department
    Office of the Comptroller of the Currency
    Washington, DC
---
Taken together, all previous displays of outrage by bought-and-paid-for government representatives have produced nothing of any substance whatsoever.  In fact, the impotence of these carnivals has become so predictable, indeed so yawn-inducing, that it appears dis-information merchants in congress are working overtime trying to distract people from the barren wasteland of justice with wild promises of a brighter future.
Sadly, this wholly unbelievable puffery manages to turn up credulous writers and bloggers round after round after round after round after round--where was I? doing Jaeger bombs!!!--as reliably as Charlie Brown's appearance before Lucy's teed up football.  In the current episode of "The Dupe" we see none other Dave Dayen in the starring role:
"People I’ve talked to expect the hearing to be explosive. As an excellent preview for the Friday fireworks..."  Yeah, yeah, yeah.....zzzzzzzzzz THUDDdddd.
Let's consider the actors involved in the imminent charade. First is Carl Levin, whose Senate subcommittee has investigated financial crimes before only to come up empty-handed. If memory serves, Levin produced a criminal referral that went straight into Eric Holder's waste basket without so much as furrowing the senator's brow.
Next is John McCain, who co-authored the report at the heart of tomorrow's hearing. McCain has never seen a financial fraud that he couldn't either profit from (as the worst of the Keating 5 scum in the S&L crisis) or cover up with bailout monies taken from the taxpaying fraud victims against their will (as the man who fatally derailed his own presidential campaign to champion TARP).
There are also the JP Morgan hearing witnesses such as Ina Drew. They will function as the punching bags tomorrow. One or two of them might even appear to lose their jobs. I say appear because that will happen only if they have already been compensated for a couple lifetimes' worth of "work" in exchange for any Kabuki hara kiri you might think you've seen. Rest assured it is fake, which is why you won't hear anything about the Senate's subpoena power in re witness compensation memos and agreements.
Unseen players include the aforementioned Washington disinformation merchants. Since last night, for example, another blogosphere luminary, Matt Taibbi, has weighed in on the supposed severity of the hearing using exactly the same term as Dayen: "explosive"
http://twitter.com/mtaibbi/status/312340511220432896
In other words, Disinfo Merchants 2, Public nil. Stay tuned for scoring updates.
Finally there is the Attorney General of the United States. He recently issued the formal coroner's report pronouncing the Rule of Law dead. That only underscores, does it not, the fact that the entire Senate proceeding tomorrow is fundamentally a sham? JP Morgan enjoys its status above the law as a matter of law now. How in the hell can the Senate at this point even purport to be relevant? I'll tell you how: by conducting the impeachment trial of Eric Holder. Place your bets on when that will happen. In the mean time, enjoy the latest iteration of the fraudulent conspiracy between Washington and Wall Street on display in a few hours.
Let's be clear about the so-called "explosion" that is apparently on tap: the goalposts of the financial crisis moved wtih Holder's declaration that systemic banks will not be prosecuted. With that, the U.S. jettisoned all pretense to the ideal formerly known as the Rule of Law and indeed democratic governance. Beware fake field goals on this Ides of March. Anything short of impending impeachment proceedings is a clear miss now.

TAG - The unknown banking subsidy - Chris Whalen
In the case of JPM, the hundreds of billions of dollars in new deposits helped to fuel the speculative mischief we now know as the “London Whale” trade. Faced with vast amounts of cash that the bank could not deploy in the loan market, JPM instead gave the TAG funds to the JPM office of the chief investment officer.  The London-based trader Bruno Iksil and his colleagues gambled the excess funds generated by TAG in the derivatives market, causing a significant financial and reputational loss for the bank.
More here:

Chris Whalen: Ina Drew Is A Scapegoat, Jamie Dimon Instructed London Office To Dump Hedging





BIGGUS DICKUS - BEWARE THE IDES
Eric and Jamie are friends
We know how this love affair ends
Jamie's a whale
Who's Too Big Too Jail
So Eric subserviently bends


Check this out (scroll down the page):

JPMorgan - Comlete Fraud List


WATCH: Eric Holder Questioned On Too Big To Jail

Senate investigation finds JP Morgan hid mistakes as trade losses grew

Bank executives to testify Friday after report claims company misled public during $6.2bn London Whale trading debacle


Jamie Dimon JP Morgan
The report also concludes that Jamie Dimon knew about the sustained trading losses when he dismissed the incident as a “tempest in a teapot”. Photograph: Bloomberg/Bloomberg via Getty Images
JP Morgan's $6.2bn London Whale trading debacle was born out of secretive trades and creative bookkeeping as the bank attempted to limit losses using a practice that one regulator called "make believe voodoo magic", a Senate investigation has concluded.
The report by the Senate subcommittee on investigations, published on Thursday, detailed a series of failures in which accounts were hidden and trades were valued incorrectly to minimize losses. It also alleged that regulators were kept in the dark, a head trader's concerns went unheeded and a $51bn trading portfolio ballooned to $157bn in three months.
The inquiry follows JP Morgan's own internal investigation in January and provides the first look into the emails and internal discussions at the bank around the infamous Whale trade. It centers on the secretive JP Morgan chief investment office, which accounted for as much as one-sixth of the bank's assets last year.
The 300-page report alleges that JP Morgan hid losses, did not share information with its regulators, and misled the public. The report also blames the bank's regulator, the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency, and recommends reforming the way regulators oversee derivatives, the complicated financial instruments that played a role in the Whale trades and the financial crisis.
The report also concludes that JP Morgan CEO Jamie Dimon, whose bonus was cut in half to $11.5m last year, knew about the sustained trading losses when he dismissed the incident as a "tempest in a teapot" in April 2012.
The report precedes a Senate hearing on Friday in which key players will testify, including former JP Morgan chief investment officer Ina Drew. Dimon will not take the stand.
Surprisingly, the report presents Bruno Iksil, the head trader of JP Morgan's chief investment office, in a sympathetic light. According to Iksil, a head trader who earned the title of the "London Whale" in media reports because he was thought to be in charge of large trades, he loudly objected to the directives of his bosses, including Achilles Macris and Javier Martin-Vartajo.
He called their instructions "idiotic", predicted more losses as early as January 2012, and commiserated with a junior trader about how they were forced to put the wrong value on some of their trades. At one point, those wrong values caused JP Morgan's trading partners to loudly object and call for $690m in collateral from the bank.
Iksil said he also encouraged the bank to unwind the trades, but he believed his bosses were still hoping the trades would be profitable and were unwilling to accept how much money that would cost.
As early as January 30, 2012, Iksil noted the failing trades and told his supervisor: "[W]e have to report a loss in the widening today," and said "we have to let the book simply die," implying that the portfolio of trades would fail. It would be three more months – in April – before press reports would unearth the growing losses, and at least June before JP Morgan put a stop to them according to the Senate.
"Mr Iksil sent Mr Martin-Artajo an email advising that they should just 'take the pain fast' and 'let it go'," the report said. "But according to Mr Iksil, his supervisor Mr Martin-Artajo disagreed and explicitly instructed him to stop losing money."
JP Morgan promised regulators it would reduce the size of its bets, according to the Senate committee, which maintained that the bank instead created a portfolio of trades that metastasized from $4bn to $51bn in only three years, followed by a three-month "trading spree" that took it to $157bn.
The Senate's inquiry focuses on something called the Synthetic Credit Portfolio, a shadowy group of trades that metastasized to $157bn. While the SCP, as it is called, was designed to protect the bank from the vicissitudes of the market, the report alleges that it encouraged gambling with the bank's money, some of which consisted of federally insured deposits.
Many of the findings in the Senate report cover the same ground as JP Morgan's own internal investigation released in January. That investigation summed up the bank's own findings of its "flawed trading strategies, lapses in oversight, deficiencies in risk management, and other shortcomings."
The Senate report is more heavily footnoted and researched, however, as well as twice the length.
"While we have repeatedly acknowledged mistakes, our senior management acted in good faith and never had any intent to mislead anyone," a spokeswoman for JP Morgan said. "We cooperated fully with the Subcommittee's staff and welcome the opportunity to respond to the Senate's questions. We know we have made many mistakes related to the CIO matter, and we have already identified many of the issues cited in the report. We have taken significant steps to remediate these issues and to learn from them."
Last year, according to a Vanity Fair profile, Dimon told employees, "The London Whale drama has been harpooned, beached, eviscerated, cremated, and killed. So help me God! It's fish food."
The investigators did not speak to some of the key players, including head trader Bruno Iksil or his supervisors, Achilles Macris and Javier Martin-Vartajo. But they subpoenaed their emails and taped phone conversations to piece together the narrative.
The investigation paints a picture of a growing debacle that started with the bank's attempt to reduce the risk of its trades so that it would have a stronger capital cushion and look powerful to regulators. It started with the overconfidence of traders after a lucky bet made about $400m on the bankruptcy of American Airlines. Drew applauded the traders.
They suffered from that overconfidence when they bet incorrectly on the bankruptcy of Eastman Kodak in January 2012. That kicked off nine straight days of trading losses that cost the bank at least around $50 million. One trader in the CIO told the Senate committee that "they were told not to let an Eastman Kodak-type loss happen again." As the traders scrambled to keep the trades – which were designed to benefit if there was a financial crisis – they found that the improving bond market worked against them. Between January and March 2012, it didn't have one profitable day in its CIO portfolio, according to the report.
The Senate report uses JP Morgan to make an argument for financial reform, including requirements for more disclosure and Washington oversight of derivatives, the complex financial instruments that played a key role in increasing losses during the crisis.
The report also argues for the speedy adoption of the Volcker Rule, a key feature of the Dodd-Frank financial reform bill that is meant to prevent banks from taking gambles of their own. The Volcker Rule has been held up by lobbying efforts. Carl Levin, an author of the Senate report, was also the co-author of the Volcker Rule. He has signalled he will not run for re-election.

Gold And Silver Manipulation At London AM Fix Or New York COMEX?




Today’s AM fix was USD 1,593.25, EUR 1,219.39 and GBP 1,051.23 per ounce.
Yesterday’s AM fix was USD 1585.00, EUR 1225.83 and GBP 1061.05 per ounce.

Gold was marginally higher yesterday and silver marginally lower. Gold rose just 20 cents and closed at $1,588.50/oz. Silver fell 15 cents to close at $28.75/oz.
Silver is trading at $28.80/oz, €22.40/oz and £19.20/oz. Platinum rose to $1,587.25/oz, palladium to $771.00/oz and rhodium stayed at $1,250/oz.
Gold continues to trade just below resistance at the $1,600/oz level but appears to be consolidating at these levels after the recent price falls. Investment sentiment towards gold is the worst we have seen it since the start of the secular bull market in the early 2000’s.
This is bullish from a contrarian perspective as the "froth" and less informed, speculative buyers have been washed out of the market as happens in the course of all bull markets as they climb a “wall of worry”.
Conversely, sentiment in stock markets is increasingly “irrationally exuberant” after the Dow Jones industrial average reached new record highs and extended its winning streak to 10 days on Thursday, a string of gains last seen in late 1996.
Retail investors are piling into the stock market again in the false belief that the worst of the economic crisis is over. Alas, those who are not properly diversified may again be in for a rude awakening.

Holdings of SPDR Gold Trust (March 2007 to Today) - Bloomberg
Holdings of SPDR Gold Trust, the world's largest gold-backed exchange-traded fund, had fallen 3.432 tonnes so far this week, on course for an eleventh week of decline, although holdings were unchanged at 1,236.307 tonnes from a day earlier on March 14.
The CFTC’s very unusual announcement through “people familiar with the matter” that it is examining various aspects of gold and silver price fixings in London, including whether they are sufficiently transparent, continues to be digested.
The London gold fixing is conducted twice a day by five banks: Barclays Plc, Bank of Nova Scotia (BNS), Deutsche Bank AG, HSBC Holdings Plc and Societe Generale SA. The pricing started in 1919 and was conducted in a meeting held at N.M. Rothschild & Sons Ltd.’s offices. It began taking place by telephone in 2004.
Deutsche Bank, Scotiabank and HSBC conduct the silver fixing by phone once a day at midday. The first settlement was in 1897.
The price fixing story has been picked up by the non specialist financial media internationally including by many publications and media groups who very rarely cover the gold market and nearly never cover the silver market.
It is now in the public domain and the story could result in the gold and silver markets receiving more scrutiny and coverage.
Overnight, CFTC commissioner Scott O'Malia said that the CFTC has engaged in "a couple" of conversations about whether the daily setting of gold and silver prices in London is open to manipulation akin to Libor.
Separately, CFTC commission member Bart Chilton said interest-rate rigging means other benchmark-pricing mechanisms such as gold and silver may need reviews. “Given what we have seen in Libor, we’d be foolish to assume that other benchmarks aren’t venues that deserve review,” Chilton said.
He continued "given the clubby manipulation efforts we saw in Libor benchmarks, I assume other benchmarks - many other benchmarks - are legit areas of inquiry."
Concerns have previously been expressed by investors due to the admission that leverage in gold trading in the London bullion market - the ratio between metal traded and metal actually existing - was as much as 100 to 1. This means that the so-called physical market may not be so physical at all.
The enforcement division of the CFTC began pursuing allegations of manipulation of the New York metals exchange, the COMEX silver market in September 2008 (the COMEX is a division of the New York Mercantile Exchange or NYMEX). Chilton said in August that there had been “devious efforts” to move prices of the precious metal through the concentrated short positions of a few banks.
Many of these same banks continue to have massive concentrated short positions on the COMEX and investors have alleged that banks have manipulated prices lower in order to profit.

Gold in USD – (5 Day) - Bloomberg 
Thus, it is surprising that such allegations are being made without a formal investigation being planned and without the CFTC completing their investigations of manipulation on the COMEX.
The charge of manipulation at the London AM Fix may be unfounded but it is certainly a distraction from the real risk of manipulation on the COMEX by banks through the use of futures contracts.
Regulators might better serve investors and the wider public by concluding their investigations of manipulation on the COMEX and coming to definitive conclusions.
Some have suggested that this may be a an attempt by Wall Street banks to discredit the London gold and silver fixing and rivalry between Wall Street and the City of London over control of the precious metals market may be at play. London has long had a monopoly regarding the benchmark gold and silver prices and the physical settlement of gold and silver at the London AM Fix.
The UK’s GMT time zone gives it an advantage when it comes to the global pricing of bullion due to it being between time zones in Asia and the Americas resulting in it capturing end of day trade in Asia and start of day trade in the U.S. Those fixings are used to determine spot prices for the billions of dollars of the two precious metals traded each day – by both industry and investors.
Today, many governments and central banks and certain banks are openly intervening in many markets – especially bond and foreign exchange markets – therefore it would be naive to completely gold and silver manipulation.
For the sake of investors and the proper functioning of markets it is important regulators investigate allegations to the full and banks are not seen as too big to investigate and “too big to jail” as was recently admitted by none other than the U.S. Attorney General .
Regulation and enforcement is important as is a proper rational debate. Increasingly governments, banks and central banks are distorting financial markets and the free market through constant interventions.
In the western world, we have seen interest rates cut close to zero, capital injections and bailouts, lending guarantees, saving and deposit guarantees, favouring certain banks and institutions over others, banning short selling and the banning of certain sovereign credit ratings.
At the same time competitive currency devaluations are taking place globally with central banks debasing currencies and many outright interventions in currency markets in order to lower the value of national and supranational currencies in competitive currency devaluations.
Japan is the recent glaring example of this and Switzerland’s ‘pegging’ of the Swiss franc to the beleaguered euro is in the same vein.
With governments surreptitiously and openly manipulating their currencies, they and the banks they have bailed out and work closely with, have an interest in not seeing their currencies fall sharply versus gold and silver.
This would be a vote of no confidence in fiat paper currencies and government and central banks stewardship of these currencies. They are also a vote of no confidence in bankers, banks and the financial system.
Ultimately, manipulation or no manipulation, gold and silver prices will be determined by supply and demand and the free market purchases and sales by people and companies all over the world.
Investors should fade out the noise and continue to own both gold and silver bullion as foundation safe haven assets.
NEWS
Japan’s Pension Funds Will Increase Gold Investments, MUFJ Says
(Bloomberg) -- Mitsubishi UFJ Trust and Banking Corp.’s Kazuhiko Inaba tells conference in Singapore that the funds will increase investments in gold through ETFs.
● Gold is important to Japanese pension funds for portfolio insurance, says Inaba, senior chief manager of frontier strategy planning and support division
● Japanese govt debt will continue to rise, so hedging against JGBs important for pension funds, Inaba says
Gold Price Now Is Not Excessive, Deutsche Bank’s Lewis Says
(Bloomberg) -- We don’t view the current level of the gold price as excessive, Michael Lewis, Deutsche Bank’s global head of commodity research, says at conference in Singapore.
“It’s expensive but not substantially misaligned with other commodities,” Lewis says
When measured in real terms and versus physical and financial assets, gold price needs to move in excess of $2,100 an ounce to move into territory that can be considered extreme, Lewis says
Silver Institute Sees Record Industrial Demand in Coming Year
(Bloomberg) -- Says industry widening use of the metal is expected to avg more than 483 m oz from 2012 to 2014, accord. to report on its website.
IShares Silver Trust Holdings Unchanged at 10,704 Metric Tons
(Bloomberg) -- Silver holdings in the IShares Silver Trust, the biggest exchange-traded fund backed by silver, were unchanged at 10,703.60 metric tons as of Mar. 14, according to figures on the company’s website.

================================================================================
                Mar. 14    Mar. 13    Mar. 12    Mar. 11     Mar. 8     Mar. 7
                   2013       2013       2013       2013       2013       2013
================================================================================
Million Ounces  344.129    344.129    344.129    342.292    342.292    342.292
 Daily change         0          0  1,836,369          0          0          0
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Metric tons   10,703.60  10,703.60  10,703.60  10,646.48  10,646.48  10,646.48
 Daily change      0.00       0.00      57.12       0.00       0.00       0.00
================================================================================
NOTE: Ounces are troy ounces.
SOURCE: iShares Silver Trust

Once Upon a Time, Corporations Paid Taxes

In America today, the New York Times reports, we’re living in “a golden age” — for corporate profits. These earnings have been leaping at a 20 percent annual clip. In fact, to find a year when corporations were grabbing as great a share of America’s income as they’re grabbing now, you have to go back to 1950.
But corporate execs in 1950 had cause to mute their celebrating. Unlike execs today, they paid heavy taxes on both their corporate and individual earnings.
In 1950, by statute, major corporations faced a 42 percent tax rate on their profits, a rate that would jump the next year to just over 50 percent. The share of profits corporations actually paid in taxes, after exploiting loopholes, averaged about 40 percent throughout the 1950s.
The tax hit on top executive individual incomes would be even heftier. In 1950, General Motors chief Charley Wilson took home more pay than any other U.S. chief executive. Wilson reported $586,100 in income that year, about $5.6 million in today’s dollars. He paid $430,350 of that income — 73 percent — in taxes.
Top corporate executives today operate in a totally different universe. The corporations they run, for starters, face a much smaller tax bill. The top corporate tax rate has dropped to 35 percent, and loopholes have proliferated.
In 2011, major U.S. corporations actually paid on average only 12.1 percent of their earnings in taxes. That same year, adds the Institute for Policy Studies, 25 major U.S. corporations paid their CEOs more than they paid in corporate income taxes.
Corporate execs as individuals enjoy an even better deal these days than the corporations they run, both before and after taxes.
General Motors ranked as America’s mightiest corporation in 1950. Yet the executive pay that Charley Wilson took in for running GM amounts to less than half the $12.1 million average pay, after adjusting for inflation, that went to the CEOs at America’s 500 top publicly traded corporations in 2012.
Two years ago, the CEO of contemporary America’s mightiest corporation, Apple computers, pocketed a pay deal worth $378 million, or over 67 times what GM, after inflation, paid Charley Wilson in 1950.
We don’t know how much Apple CEO Tim Cook is paying in federal income taxes today. We do know, from IRS stats, that Americans who made over $10 million in 2010 paid on average just under 24 percent of their incomes in federal income tax, less than a third what Charley Wilson paid in 1950.
How much should we read into these huge contrasts between corporate profits, pay, and taxes back over a half century ago and today? What difference does any of this make for the rest of us?
A huge difference. The outrageously rich rewards that top executives can pocket in 21st century America — and the absence of any meaningful tax bite on these rewards — give our top executives a powerful incentive to behave outrageously, to relentlessly pump up profits by whatever means necessary.
Our modern top execs, as one analyst notes, have more of an incentive “to loot” their companies than invest in their futures. The more they “loot” — by downsizing and outsourcing, by squeezing consumers, by stiffing Uncle Sam at tax time — the fatter the quarterly bottom lines, the greater their personal pay.
The end result of this looting: an America where corporate profits are setting records while typical workers, as former U.S. labor secretary Robert Reich points out, are making less today, in real dollars, than they earned a dozen years ago.
Corporate executives in Europe have been watching this U.S. corporate greed grab with intense personal interest. Over recent years, they’ve done their best to mimic U.S. corporate standard operating procedure, sky-high executive pay included. But Europeans are pushing back against this “Americanization.”
In Switzerland, 68 percent of voters in a landmark March 3 referendum opted to ban the most lucrative categories of executive pay bonuses. This overwhelming voter support for executive pay limits, a leading Zurich newspaper opined last week, reflects a deep-seated public sense “that company managers have been ransacking the coffers at the expenses of society.”
The Swiss vote, Bloomberg reports, is “raising pressure” on German chancellor Angela Merkel “to adopt her own tougher rules on executive pay,” and European Union ministers have already agreed to limit banker bonuses to no more than the equivalent of one year’s salary, down from the typical five to ten times.
In France, meanwhile, the government elected last year will be limiting total CEO pay at firms where French taxpayers have a controlling interest to no more than 20 times the pay of the lowest-paid worker.
All this activity has Corporate America starting to get a little nervous. U.S. corporate consulting firms are sending out alerts on the new Euro developments. The “reverberations from the Swiss vote,” notes Harvard analyst Stephen Davis, “could put fresh momentum into shareholder rebellions in the U.S.”
But Americans eager to counter corporate greed really don’t have to look to Europe for inspiration. They need just remember America’s not-so-misty past.
This piece was reprinted by Truthout with permission or license. It may not be reproduced in any form without permission or license from the source.

Corporate-Approved State Bills Kick Low-Wage Workers While They're Down

Prevailing wage laws, which protect local construction sector workers from private sector undercutting, are the kind of legislation that ALEC-affiliated state legislation would dismantle. Prevailing wage laws, which protect local construction sector workers from private sector undercutting, are the kind of legislation that ALEC-affiliated state legislation would dismantle. (Photo: Rubber Dragon)President Obama called for a modest raise in the federal minimum wage to $9 in his State of the Union Address, and several Democratic legislators have upped his bid with a proposed increase to $10.10.
But an insidious effort to lower the wage floor is already underway much closer to the groundin the state legislatures where right-wing lobbyists have been greasing the skids for years for an onslaught of anti-worker policies.
An extensive analysis recently published by labor advocacy organization the National Employment Law Project tracks more than 100 bills introduced in 31 states since January 2011 that “aim to repeal or weaken core wage standards at the state or local level." Each bears the fingerprint of notorious super-lobbying organization the American Legislative Exchange Council (ALEC), which acts as a forum for “private sector leaders” to advise public officials. Most of the anti-worker bills were proposed by lawmakers directly linked to ALEC and include language that echoes that of "model legislation" developed by ALEC. Among the proposals are measures to undercut minimum wages for teenage workers, restrict overtime pay and repeal or ban local laws to improve working conditions.
ALEC has been called out by activists for pushing legislation that advances a classic right-wing agenda, from school privatization to rolling back healthcare reform. But the “wage suppression” tactics are a particularly callous attempt by ALEC-affiliated legislators to feed corporate profits by starving workers.
The wage-suppression laws are the latest strike in a war of attrition waged by ALEC and “private sector leaders” (as the organization calls them) against labor and workplace rights, aimed at forcing low-wage workers into even deeper economic insecurity.
While efforts to pass pro-worker policies in Washington have met with resistance, ALEC-sponsored bills seek to outlaw protections for workers at the state and local level, such as living wage ordinances and paid leave mandates. In several states, including Arizona, Connecticut, Maryland and Michigan, lawmakers have introduced ALEC-associated legislation to preempt prevailing wage laws, which ensure workers receive relatively fair wages in government-contracted work, including the public infrastructure projects that fuel local construction sectors.
NELP points out that only a minority of these bills have actually been enacted, but the sheer volume of anti-worker legislative proposals is nonetheless alarming at a time when the labor movement, which has traditionally struggled to beat back pro-corporate legislation, is weaker than ever. 
The ALEC-inspired bills to weaken state minimum wage laws strike directly at state’s efforts to lift workers above the absurdly low federal minimum of $7.25 an hour. Some states have set base wages significantly higher than the federal minimumlike Vermont's minimum hourly wage of $8.60, adjusted automatically to keep pace with the cost of living.
 
Losing the state minimum wage could leave some workers completely unprotected, because they are excluded from the federal Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA). Home health aides, for example, have long been exempted from federal minimum-wage rules, despite strong grassroots campaigns to include them, but are covered by minimum wage law in some states, including New York and Massachussetts. Their incredibly low wagestypically less than $10 an hour across the industrycould be bumped down further if state wage floors are ripped from under them.
Overtime pay is another labor issue on which states have filled gaps in federal law. While the FLSA guarantees time-and-a-half overtime pay for many sectors, some low-wage workers, including certain federally-exempted domestic service jobs, are entitled to that wage boost only under state law. Legislators in some statesincluding the “right to work” battlegrounds of Ohio and Michigan, where unions are under siegehave tried to allow certain employers to get around overtime by instead paying workers “comp time,” or time off equal to one regular hour of work, even if they work more than 40 hours a week. One ALEC-affiliated bill proposed in 2011 in Nevada explicitly sought to exclude home care workers from overtime laws.
Noting that conservatives will hold majority control of most state houses this year, NELP analyst Jack Temple says, “Since legislation to raise the federal minimum wage usually depends on momentum from the states, bills like these that weaken or repeal wage standards at the state level serve to undercut the momentum needed to pass national legislation in Congress.”
The measures to prevent local officials from raising the bar for workers betrays ALEC’s underlying agenda. Though the organization purports to champion the “rights” of local authorities to act independently of “big government,” NELP reports, it’s really more about emancipating big business from regulation:
Despite ALEC’s putative support for limited government and local sovereignty, living wage preemption proposals would establish state-wide mandates that severely restrict the freedom that city governments have to set standards for businesses that receive public support.
According to Temple, with so many wage-suppression bills clogging state legislatures, even if many do not pass:
The significance of these bills for advocates at the state level concerns the sheer amount of energy and time that must be spent fighting back bills like these, which drains the time and resources that could otherwise be dedicated to improving wage standards rather than just protecting the laws already on the books.
A bill creeping through the Florida legislature seems poised to undercut emerging efforts to improve workers’ lives. HB 655 would ban towns and cities from taking local initiatives to raise wages and give workers paid leave time, thus blocking key policies that could improve the lives of workers surviving on the state’s threadbare minimum wage of $7.79 (about a third of what a single parent of two would need to earn a decent living). On the heels of a recent campaign, led by local labor groups, to establish paid sick days in Miami-Dade County, the bill would effectively block local officials from granting workers the basic protection of not having to lose wages for calling in sick.
Florida is just one battleground in a nationwide movement to improve protections and wage standards for the working poor, as labor advocates push for raises in state and federal minimum wages in tandem with the White House's proposal. But NELP's report reveals how groups like ALEC have already gotten a head start in our state legislatures. 
Without strong unions or even an adequate social safety net, minimum wage laws are the last line of defense between low-wage workers and abject poverty. So it makes sense that ALEC is now driving to pull the floor from under them; they might as well kick them when they’re down.
Originally published at InTheseTimes.com