We have all been shafted by
overdraft fees from our bank at some time or another. It’s an annoyance
and frustration, especially to those of us who already don’t have much
money as well as a constant puzzle: If one doesn’t have $5, how are they
going to pay an extra $35? Yet banks continue to do this and rake in
money, as can be seen by them having made $35 billion[1] in overdraft
fees in 2014. In order to get a better handle on the problem of
overdrafts, we need to understand the history of such fees as well as
reframe how we look at the situation, changing our perspective to see
overdraft fees as a sort of loan rather than a fee.
After World War 2, society as a whole
began to change, included how people borrowed money. Credit itself began
to change with things such as pawning and open-book credit (in which
goods are shipped with the recipient promising to make payments)
declined in usage and were replaced with other forms of loans such as
payday loans, credit cards, and overdraft protection. However, it wasn’t
as if everyone had access to overdraft protection, it was generally
reserved for those high-income customers who were having short-term
problems. Yet, as time wore on more and more people gained access to
overdraft protections, with “banks and credit unions [offering]
‘courtesy pay’ or overdraft features” starting in the mid-1990s “so that
consumers could overdraw their checking or debit accounts, for a
fee.”[2] What was important, though, was that people were accruing these
fees on their own, however this would change in the new millennium.
In 2003, it was reported that around
1,000 banks were “encouraging customers with low balances to overdraw
their checking accounts, allowing the banks to skirt credit laws and
collect billions of dollars in new fees.”[3] Banks were now actively
encouraging people with little money to spend beyond their limit as to
have to pay massive amounts in fees. From the banks’ perspective, this
made since as USA Today noted in 2005 that overdraft fees “provide a
more stable source of income to banks than products tied to fluctuating
interest rates.”[4]
According to an FDIC 2006 survey, it was
reported that “overdraft fees on average represent 6% of total net
operating revenues of FDIC-insured banks.”[5] It seems that only a small
group of banks are making money off of overdraft fees. Data from the
company SNL Financial showed that during the first quarter of 2015, the
three largest banks (JP Morgan Chase, Bank of America, and Wells Fargo)
“collectively generated $1.14 billion from overdraft fees and related
service charges”[6] and that those very same banks were also the ones
that collected the highest ATM fees of the first quarter. So, not only
have banks been actively encouraging people to get overdraft fees, but
they were making a killing from it.
There are a number of other problems
with overdraft fees, such as their similarity to payday loans and how
they act like credit cards, but are worse. A 2005 report from the
Consumer Federation of America found that overdraft fees were similar to
payday loans in that those without enough money to make ends meet until
the next payday were effectively given a cash advance by being able to
overdraw their account, however, overdrawing one’s account was similar
credit card usage.[7] Yet, with credit cards, banks aren’t allowed to
take funds directly from a person’s bank account to pay off a credit
card debt, but those who overdraw their account with a debit card “lack
this protection. A bank can use the right of setoff when a customer
creates an overdraft with a debit card to repay itself immediately when
the customer deposits funds into the account.”[8] Of course, this
doesn’t just cover the general costs, but also the overdraft fees that
are applied to the account.
The report also found that in many
cases, banks allow people to overdraw on purpose when they pay checks
that result in overdrawn accounts, “knowingly permit consumers to
electronically withdraw funds at the ATM or to make purchases at point
of sale,” or “pay pre-authorized debits despite the lack of funds in the
consumer’s account.”[9]
In addition to this, banks don’t tell consumers of better alternatives, from that same report:
For example, Citizens Bank’s overdraft protection language on its website sells its line of credit or savings account transfer overdraft protection product as offering ‘convenience and peace of mind.’ On the other hand, Citizens Bank sent an addendum to its deposit disclosure in late 2004 describing the account’s ‘courtesy’ overdraft provisions and informing consumers that overdrawing a check, ATM or debit card transaction would incur a fee of between $25 and $33 each, depending on the number of days the account remains overdrawn. This disclosure did not inform consumers that they could purchase optional savings account overdraft transfer coverage for $3 per month or apply for an overdraft protection line of credit which costs $20 annually, both of which could be more affordable for consumers.[10] (emphasis added)
It seemed that things would change for
the better in 2010 as the rules regarding overdraft fees changed.
Starting in July, banks were now “required to allow debit card customers
to opt-in to overdraft fees rather than automatically enrolling card
users in programs that charge $20 to $30 whenever there are insufficient
funds to cover purchases,”[11] meaning that if one didn’t have the
necessary funds to complete a transaction, their debit cards would be
declined at the register. Unfortunately, banks found a way around this
by engaging in bank fee manipulation. Information came out in August
2010 when a federal judge ordered Wells Fargo “to pay California
customers $203 million in restitution for claims that it had manipulated
transactions to maximize the overdraft fees it charged.”[12]
What occurred was that, rather than
dealing with each transaction in the order it was received, Wells Fargo
put through the largest to smallest transactions, resulting in people
paying increased overdraft fees. The very next year, Bank of America
paid out $410 million for the same reasons.[13] But the bank fee
manipulation continued, with Forbes reporting on the findings of a 2012
Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) report which showed that it
was still ongoing.[14]
The situation can get much, much worse
though. The Center for Responsible Lending complied a report in July
2013 which found that while the average banks charges an overdraft fee
of $35, some banks “also add a ‘sustained overdraft fee’ once the
account has remained overdrawn for several days. At some banks, this is a
one-time additional fee in the $35 range; at others, it is a fee in the
$6-$8 range charged daily until the account balance is returned to
positive” and that while a few banks have put limits on such sustained
fees, it “still [allows] for daily fees in the hundreds of dollars.”[15]
So not only are people’s bank fees being manipulated so that they pay
more money in overdraft fees, but unless they can come up with the money
quickly, the problems worsen.
For all this talk that’s been going on, though, we still have yet to discuss exactly who suffers from overdraft fees.
In 2008, the FDIC found that “9 percent
of checking account customers bear about 84 percent of overdraft fees”
and that evidence pointed to overdraft fees disproportionately impacting
low-income and young customers.[16] A CFPB 2014 report reinforced this
information as one of the key findings was that “eight percent of
customers incur nearly 75 percent of all overdraft fees” and that “10.7
percent of the 18-25 age group [have] more than 10 overdrafts per
year.”[17]
What effectively occurs with overdraft fees is that the poor subsidize the rich. In an article for The Economist, it was reported that “according to the FDIC low income (people who earn less than $30,000) earners are nearly twice as likely to have paid an overdraft fee”[18] and that it wasn’t uncommon for many of these low-income people to rack up fees to the point where they can’t pay them all.
What effectively occurs with overdraft fees is that the poor subsidize the rich. In an article for The Economist, it was reported that “according to the FDIC low income (people who earn less than $30,000) earners are nearly twice as likely to have paid an overdraft fee”[18] and that it wasn’t uncommon for many of these low-income people to rack up fees to the point where they can’t pay them all.
When this occurs, banks close the
indebted accounts and it is extremely difficult for people to open
accounts at other banks. They are effectively shut off from formal
banking, thus forcing them to turn to services such as pre-paid cards
which “charge for all kinds of things checking account customers are
used to getting for free: loading funds on to the card, point-of-sale
purchases, talking to a customer service representative, cutting a
check”[19] or check cashing which “can incur an average of 3-5% of the
check amount in fees, regardless of the nature of the check.”[20] The
costs of both of these can easily add up to more than what it would cost
to have a regular checking account.
Alternatives to overdraft fees are
asking one’s bank about a linked line of credit[21] or an affordable
small-dollar loan.[22] However, the best solution would be to get rid of
overdraft fees entirely. By combating overdraft fees, we will be able
to free millions of people from the worry of debt and its potential
long-term effects.
Notes1: Statistic Brain Research Institute, Overdraft Fee Statistics, http://www.statisticbrain.com/total-overdraft-fees/
2: Andrea Ryan, Gunnar Trumbull, Peter Tufano, A Brief Postwar History of US Consumer Finance, Harvard Business School, http://www.hbs.edu/faculty/Publication%20Files/11-058.pdf (2010)
3: Alex Berenson, Banks Are Reaping Billions From Stealth Overdraft Charges, Citizen Review Online, http://www.citizenreviewonline.org/jan_2003/banks.htm (January 23, 2003)
4: Kathy Chu, “Rising Bank Fees Hit Consumers,” USA Today, October 4, 2005 (http://usatoday30.usatoday.com/money/industries/banking/2005-10-04-bank-fees-usat_x.htm)
5: Todd J. Zywicki, “The Economics and Regulation of Bank Overdraft Protection,” Washington and Lee Law Review 69:2 (2012), pg 1153
6: Jon C. Ogg, Banks Making The Most From Overdraft and ATM Fees, 24/7 Wall Street, http://247wallst.com/banking-finance/2015/06/17/banks-making-the-most-from-overdraft-and-atm-fees/ (June 17, 2015)
7: Jean Ann Fox, Patrick Woodall, Overdrawn: Consumers Face Hidden Overdraft Charges From Nation’s Largest Banks, http://www.consumerfed.org/pdfs/CFAOverdraftStudyJune2005.pdf (June 9, 2005)
8: Ibid, pg 5
9: Ibid, pg 7
10: Ibid, pgs 7-8
11: Connie Prater, Fed: Consumers Must Opt In To Debit Card Overdraft Fees, http://www.creditcards.com/credit-card-news/opt-in-fed-debit-card-overdraft-fee-rules-1271.php (September 13, 2010)
12: Ron Lieber, Andrew Martin, “Wells Fargo Loses Ruling on Overdraft Fees,” New York Times, http://www.nytimes.com/2010/08/11/business/11wells.html (August 10, 2010)
13: Ben Popken, Bank of America Paying Out $410 Million For Reordering Your Transactions To Maximize Overdraft Fees, The Consumerist, http://consumerist.com/2011/07/14/bank-of-america-paying-out-410-million-for-reordering-your-transactions-to-maximize-overdraft-fees/ (July 14, 2011)
14: Halah Touryalai, “Yes, Banks Are Reordering Your Transactions And Charging Overdraft Fees, “ Forbes, June 11, 2013 (http://www.forbes.com/sites/halahtouryalai/2013/06/11/yes-banks-are-reordering-your-transactions-and-charging-overdraft-fees/)
15: Rebecca Borne, Peter Smith, The State of Lending in America and its Impact On U.S. Households, Center for Responsible Lending, http://www.responsiblelending.org/state-of-lending/reports/8-Overdrafts.pdf (July 2013), pg 3
16: Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, CFPB Launches Inquiry Into Overdraft Practices, http://www.consumerfinance.gov/newsroom/consumer-financial-protection-bureau-launches-inquiry-into-overdraft-practices/ (February 22, 2012)
17: Trevor Bakker, Nicole Kelly, Jesse Leary, Éva Nagypál, Data Point: Checking Account Overdraft, Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, http://files.consumerfinance.gov/f/201407_cfpb_report_data-point_overdrafts.pdf (July 2014). pg 5
18: A.S., “How The Poor Subsidize The Rich,” The Economist, http://www.economist.com/blogs/freeexchange/2010/08/money_and_banking (August 2, 2010)
19: Claes Bell, Check Cashing: Still Not A Good Deal, Bankrate, http://www.bankrate.com/financing/banking/check-cashing-still-not-a-good-deal/ (November 18, 2011
20: Account Now, Check Cashing Centers: Pros and Cons, http://www.accountnow.com/content/check-cashing/check-cashing-centers-pros-and-cons/
21: Jax Federal Credit Union, Overdraft Protection: Overdraft Line of Credit & Courtesy Pay, https://jaxfcu.org/checking/overdraft-protection.html
22: Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, FIL-50-2007, https://www.fdic.gov/news/news/financial/2007/fil07050a.html
The original source of this article is Occupy
Copyright © Devon Douglas-Bowers, Occupy, 2016
No comments:
Post a Comment