(Ron Haskins)
Of all the failures of recent Congresses and Presidents, none is more
important than their failure to deal with the nation’s long-term debt.
Although Congress tied itself in knots trying to address the problem,
the growth of debt remains, in the words of the Congressional Budget
Office, “unsustainable.”
Debt figures tell part of the story. When the Great Recession hit,
the federal debt was equal to about 40 percent of GDP. But to fight the
recession, Congress enacted an $800 billion dollar stimulus bill.
Stimulus spending, combined with already enacted spending and tax
policy, resulted in four years of trillion dollar deficits. As a result,
the debt ballooned to 78 percent of GDP in 2013, almost twice the
pre-recession level. The annual deficit is now declining at a stately
pace, but by 2016 it will begin increasing again, and by 2020 under
CBO’s alternative fiscal scenario, we will once again return to annual
deficits above a trillion dollars, thereby once again greatly increasing
the national debt.
The accumulation of debt should prevent federal policymakers from
feeling any sense of accomplishment. In fact, CBO estimates that the
debt will be well over 100 percent of GDP by 2039 under conservative
assumptions about spending and revenue. When CBO incorporates its
estimates of the impact of the continuing large federal deficits on the
nation’s economy, it estimates that the accumulated debt held by the
public will reach an astounding 180 percent of GDP by 2039. One wonders
if members of Congress or the President read these CBO reports.
What’s the word for our fiscal situation? Stunning? Shocking?
Desperate? In recent testimony before the Senate Budget Committee,
Boston University Economics Professor Laurence Kotlikoff, in effect,
told the Committee that all of these terms are pathetically inadequate
to describe our true fiscal situation. In compelling testimony,
Kotlikoff argues that the federal fiscal situation is much worse than
the CBO estimates let on. The reason is that CBO’s debt estimates do not
take into account the full financial obligations the government is
committed to honor, especially for future payments of Social Security,
Medicare, and interest on the debt. He asserts that the federal
government should help the public understand the nation’s true fiscal
situation by using what economists call “the infinite-horizon fiscal
gap,” defined as the value of all projected future expenditures minus
the value of all projected future receipts using a reasonable discount
rate.
What difference does the fiscal gap approach make in our
understanding of the true federal debt? CBO tells us that the national
debt was a little less than $13 trillion in 2014. But the fiscal gap in
that year as calculated by Kotlikoff was $210 trillion, more than 16
times larger than the debt estimated by CBO and already judged, by CBO
and many others, to be unsustainable. If a $13 billion gap is
unsustainable, what term should we apply to a $210 trillion gap?
Kotlikoff also calculates that the fiscal gap is equal to about 58
percent of the combined value of all future revenue. Thus, we would need
to reduce spending or increase taxes by enough to fill that 58 percent
gap if we wanted to put the federal budget on a path to solvency that
balances the interests of those now receiving benefits and those who
hope to receive benefits in the future.
Kotlikoff goes on to illustrate that the fiscal gap is increasing at
an alarming rate and that delay makes our problem much worse. In 2003,
just a little more than a decade ago, the fiscal gap was $60 trillion.
But by last year it had catapulted to $210 trillion. The fiscal gap may
not continue increasing as rapidly as it has over the past decade, but
with each passing year – as Congress and the President do their best to
avoid action – our hole grows deeper by substantial amounts.
Under the CBO estimates used by Congress, we have a huge debt hole.
Under the more comprehensive fiscal gap measurement, we have a chasm.
But little if any Congressional action is planned to deal with the
notorious level of debt. We’re headed toward a fiscal black hole.
No comments:
Post a Comment