There comes a time when the following occurs: a large number of banks’ customers lose confidence in either the banks, the government or the larger financial system, and all want to withdraw their deposits – at the same time simultaneously.
The result is panic, followed by chaos.
It’s happened before, and will happen again…
Geoffrey Pike explains…
“The head of the National Bank of Ukraine (NBU) is facing an investigation for abusing power and misusing her office. Governor Valeriya Gontareva has been the head of the Ukrainian central bank since June of this year. She is accused of manipulating the local currency, having executed major transactions on the foreign exchange market by buying and selling dollars using the Ukrainian currency. A Kiev-based court has directed prosecutors to file charges against Gontareva.”
“From an American
point of view, perhaps it is refreshing to see a person in high power
being held responsible for possible corruption. But it is hard to know
the circumstances here, and we can’t rule out the fact that she is being
brought down for political purposes.
Central banks exist for two main reasons: to act as a backstop for the big banks and to buy government debt.If Gontareva is guilty of crimes in Ukraine, then we certainly have to believe Bernanke was even guiltier in 2008 and 2009 when he bailed out major financial institutions and car companies.
And if central bankers are going to get into trouble for currency manipulation, then what about the Fed increasing the monetary base by a multiple of five over the last six years?
What about manipulating interest rates and paying interest on bank reserves?”
Traditionally, central bankers have been crooks and thieves, robbing and looting on a grand scale. Central bankers tell you that they’ve thought of everything, but what Janet Yellen and Associates cannot tell you is: what good will gold do me in that situation, and what would you really do if there is a run on the banks?
Global Research
Do you remember seeing old pictures of the Great Depression which depicted “lines”? There were two types, bread lines and also lines to the front doors of banks. While we don’t see any bread lines today, trust me, there are bread lines in every single state, and long ones at that. Nearly 50 million people in the U.S. survive on SNAP, EBT cards or whatever they are called in your state. Can you imagine the “confidence” it would instill if each day on your way to work you saw massive lines of people waiting for breakfast? Or, when you came home from work you turn on your television only to see long lines again, this time for supper?
I can see it now, some reporter out on the street giving us the “good” unemployment, inflation or GDP news with a line of people in the background waiting for food. My point? False economic news would be harder to “sell” and even harder to “stomach” (pun intended).
Back during the Great Depression
there were also the other type of lines, these formed in front of
banks. Many banks either “ran out of money” or had poor investments
which led to their demise. We also had this type of activity in the
U.S. in 2008-09… but again, we just didn’t see them. There were
“electronic runs” of all sorts which we either didn’t hear about or
never saw… but they did happen. This is why so many banks, brokers and
mortgage companies were rolled up together and merged. The failures had
to be hidden as best they could from the public’s eye because fear
would have bred more fear. This cannot be allowed in a system built and
standing alone on “confidence”.
I
mention the above because another situation is now arising, another
“line” is beginning to form. The current line formation is
unfortunately the scariest imaginable, we are facing the Mother of all Bank Runs!
This past week Willem Middlekoop uncovered another central bank asking for their gold back, Belgium. We already know Germany had publicly requested their gold back beginning in early 2013 and gotten very little so far. Just a couple of weeks back, The Netherlands announced the repatriation of 122.5 tons of gold …after the fact. When the announcement came, it said the transfer and transaction had already been done. Several days afterwards, a leading candidate for France’s next election also brought up the possibility of French gold being repatriated… and now it’s Belgium!!!
This past week Willem Middlekoop uncovered another central bank asking for their gold back, Belgium. We already know Germany had publicly requested their gold back beginning in early 2013 and gotten very little so far. Just a couple of weeks back, The Netherlands announced the repatriation of 122.5 tons of gold …after the fact. When the announcement came, it said the transfer and transaction had already been done. Several days afterwards, a leading candidate for France’s next election also brought up the possibility of French gold being repatriated… and now it’s Belgium!!!
Notice
I used three exclamation points, I did so because of all the central
banks to request their gold back Belgium in my opinion would be the very
last to do so with one “caveat”. The caveat being “unless something
REALLY big has changed”, let me explain. First, Belgium is the “seat” of
the European Union, this is where all European decisions are made and
announced (with Germany’s approval of course). The decision to
repatriate gold from the “safe haven” of New York and to do it publicly
raises eyebrows on its own, but this is Belgium, not “just some country”
in Europe. Brussels is where the EU itself is headquartered. We are
talking about a dealing between the #1 and #2 Western central banks in
the world. Did the EU or ECB in Frankfurt give the OK to ask for
repatriation? Yes I understand, Belgium’s central bank is not the ECB
but would they or any other central bank request repatriation without
ECB approval? The same could be asked of both Germany and The
Netherlands, they must have had prior approval before asking for their
gold back?
Looking
at this a little further, I remind you of earlier in the year when it
was discovered “Belgium” was holding some $400 billion worth of Treasury
securities. This was termed the “Belgian bulge” and not really
explainable because Belgium as a country did not have the wherewithal to
have purchased this amount. Either this was done via proxies or with
ECB help or some other manner, it has never been explained to my
knowledge. I mention this because of the important “tie” apparently
between the U.S. and Belgium. If “Belgium” trusted us so much to have
purchased $400 billion worth of Treasuries, then why repatriate their
gold? Belgium has 227 tons of gold, we found out in 2011 that 86 tons
of this amount were on lease, leaving approximately141 tons at the
FRBNY. This is only worth in current dollars somewhere close to $5
billion. The “ratio” if you will is better than 80 to one, Treasuries
to actual gold “held” but not leased (hopefully?).
Why
does it even matter what the ratio is? Let’s walk this through,
because we are talking about the issue of “trust”. The only reason one
would repatriate gold is because they want it in hand. If you believed
your gold was safe and sound, protected and “actually there”, no one
would ask for their gold back. Belgium has displayed their confidence
by holding $400 billion worth of U.S. Treasuries… but apparently not
with the U.S. holding less than $5 billion worth of gold? Why the
dichotomy of trust? Actually, I will use a better word, “bifurcation”
of trust, and yes there is a pun within this one too.
Another piece of news out of the ECB (Belgium) this week was the classification of member’s gold reserves.
Koos
Jansen brought this to our attention which on its own is very big news
but has now been overshadowed by the repatriation news though most
definitely connected. The member states it seems are being told to
differentiate between allocated and unallocated gold, and to also break
down swap positions and receivables. Theoretically this should make gold
holdings less opaque and more clear to view, but why? Why change the
reporting and why now during the repatriations …?
I
of course do not have the answer but we can speculate something has and
is definitely changing, and this “something” is HUGE! I say huge
because these events are a change to policy which has stood the test of
70 years time. For the last 70 years, the world has stored their gold
at the New York Fed and never asked for it back. Other than Germany
withdrawing 1,000 tons from the Bank of England in 2001, Venezuela is
the only country to ask for their gold back…until now. The only way to
describe what is beginning to happen is to call it a bank run, The Mother of all Bank Runs and an “old fashioned one” at that!
This
will be very interesting to watch exactly because of the “old
fashionedness” and the scramble for what we have been told and taught
for so long to be a worthless barbarous relic, gold. Current day bank
runs as you know have been papered over time and again, just look at
Fed, ECB, and BOJ balance sheets to understand this fact…
Bill Holter, Miles Franklin associate writer
Continue this article at Global Research
Bill Holter, Miles Franklin associate writer
Continue this article at Global Research
No comments:
Post a Comment