The Rome Opera House sacked its entire orchestra and chorus the other
day. Financed and managed by the state, and therefore crippled by debt,
the opera house — like so much else in Italy — had been a jobs-for-life
trade union fiefdom. Its honorary director, Riccardo Muti, became so
fed up after dealing with six years of work-to-rule surrealism that he
resigned. It’s hard to blame him. The musicians at the opera house — the
‘professori’ — work a 28-hour week (nearly half taken up with ‘study’)
and get paid 16 months’ salary a year, plus absurd perks such as double
pay for performing in the open air because it is humid and therefore a
health risk. Even so, in the summer, Muti was compelled to conduct a
performance of La Bohème with only a pianist because the rest of the
orchestra had gone on strike.
After Muti’s resignation, the opera house board did something
unprece-dented: they sacked about 200 members of the orchestra and
chorus, in a country where no one with a long-term contract can be
fired. It was a revolutionary — dare one say Thatcherite? — act. If only
somebody would have the guts to do something similar across the whole
of the Italian state sector. But nobody will. Italy seems doomed.
The latest panic on global stock markets has reminded the world of
the vulnerability of the euro, and this week pundits in the British
press have been busy speculating about France’s possible collapse.
Hardly anyone bothers to fret about Italy any more, even though last
week its exchanges took the second biggest hit after Greece. Italy’s
irreversible demise is a foregone conclusion. The country is just too
much of a basket case even to think about.
Italy’s experience of the European monetary union has been
particularly painful. The Italians sleepwalked into joining the euro
with scarcely any serious debate, and were so keen to sign up that they
accepted a throttlingly high exchange rate with the lira. The price of
life’s essentials, such as cigarettes, coffee and wine, doubled
overnight while wages remained static — though back then jobs were still
easy to find and money easy to borrow. But when the great crash
happened, Italy, as a prisoner of a monetary union without a political
union, was unable to do anything much about it, and could not even
resort to the traditional medicine of currency devaluation.
The only path to recovery permitted by Brussels and Berlin — that of
austerity — has been counterproductive because it has only been
skin-deep. If austerity is to stimulate growth, it must be done to the
hilt, which inevitably involves terrible suffering and the risk of mass
agitation. No Italian politician can stomach that.
Italy can’t blame all its problems on monetary union, however. The
euro did not cause the catastrophe, but it deprived Italy of a means to
combat it and exposed its fatal structural weaknesses.
Source and full piece: Nicholas Farrell, The Spectator, 25 October 2014
No comments:
Post a Comment