Published on Jun 19, 2014
The recent
Financial Times article about central bank “market” investments of $29
trillion has been widely misinterpreted in two major ways, and a key
question has been left unaddressed.
First, the huge “market”
intervention does NOT mean “stock market.” Rather, it refers to nearly
all markets generally–including gold.
Second, the interventionists
are not limited to central bankers. Instead, the $29 trillion investment
figure comes from not only central bankers, but also public pension
fund managers and sovereign wealth fund managers.
Missing from the discussion so
far is what happens when people start trying to get out of their
investments. Alas, the situation now is even worse than in 2007-08. Not
only have fundamentals deteriorated beyond where they were back then,
but the scope of the inevitable collapse–when nearly all overheated
markets regress to the mean–will be far broader.
It would appear that the
interventionists have surrounded themselves in a giant circle of lit
dynamite in hopes that the fuses all reach their cores simultaneously
and in rapturous harmony, and that the resulting explosions will cancel
each other out.
Unfortunately, since they’re
using public monies–in unprecedented quantities, mind you–we can’t
afford the luxury of sarcasm in wishing them the best of luck.
It should go without saying
that the media will be there to assure us that “no one saw it coming”
when the outcome of this insane experiment is anything less than 100%
success.
No comments:
Post a Comment