So
you haven’t read Thomas Piketty’s “Capital in the Twenty-First
Century?” The new bible on the history and future of global economic
growth? Well, you’re in good company. Neither did Alan Greenspan, former
Fed chairman, before his recent speech on the same subject, “worldwide
prospects for economic growth.”
Worse, Greenspan was delivering his speech before 170 members of the eliteCouncil on Foreign Relations,
whose 4,700 members include power players like Colin Powell, Madeleine
Albright, Robert Rubin, Tom Brokaw and David Rockefeller.
And it gets even more
bizarre: Not only haven’t most power players in politics and business,
liberal or conservative, read it, they probably never will read the No. 1
international bestseller that’s igniting a revolution in economic
thought.
So why aren’t America’s
leaders reading it? Because they don’t have to read it. They believe
they instinctively “know” its message. It’s that obvious. That Piketty
was simply putting a solid statistical research foundation under a New
American Dream for the Super Rich of the 21st century.
To fully understand,
here’s some background on Greenspan’s speech, which was delivered two
months after “Capital’s” early March pub date. He had lots of time to
read it. Why didn’t he?
Why won’t American
leaders read the most important economic book of the century? Why?
Because Piketty’s bottom line is obvious: “When the rate of return on
capital exceeds the rate of growth of output and income, as it did in
the nineteenth century and seems quite likely to do again in the
twenty-first, capitalism automatically generates arbitrary and
unsustainable inequalities that radically undermine the meritocratic
values on which democratic societies are based.” In short, the original
American Dream is dead, the new one is only for the Super Rich.
Yes, instinctively our
leaders understand Piketty’s bottom line. They already have their own
preconceived theories of economic growth and inequality in the 21st
century. They already have hard convictions on why, by 2100, the Super
Rich will be richer and the poor poorer. So why waste time reading a
boring 685-page book of facts? It won’t change their minds.
Nothing’s new from this
behavioral psychology principle: Remember Greenspan’s congressional
testimony a few years after the 2008 crash. After 18 years as Fed chair
he finally admitted that trickle-down free-market economics failed
America: “I made a mistake,” there was “a flaw in the model. Those of us
who have looked to the self-interest of lending institutions to protect
shareholders’ equity, myself included, are in a state of shocked
disbelief,” he told Congress. Unregulated markets were his mantra for
decades. But then “the whole intellectual edifice, however, collapsed.”
We’re still making the same mistake.
Why read Piketty? Your mind’s made up
Here’s how venture
capitalist Michael Pocalyk explained this psychological phenomenon later
in a newsletter for authors, the Algonquin Redux, under a simple
headline: “Nobody Actually Reads Piketty.” Listen to Pocalyk:
“I’m a life member of the
storied Council on Foreign Relations. … Greenspan was our luncheon
speaker … was discussing worldwide prospects for economic growth.” After
the host, Diane Farrell, global head of McKinsey’s Center for
Government, and Greenspan finished, “the audience of CFR members got to
ask questions.”
Sitting up front was
Mitzi Wertheim, head of special projects at the Naval Postgraduate
School. Her “hand shot up. She clearly wanted to ask the chairman
something pressing. Diana Farrell nodded to her.” Wertheim’s question
was about Piketty’s book, “which is of course the ‘it’ book of the
moment, especially among political and economic liberals.”
The question: “Had
Greenspan read it? What did he think?” Things suddenly got dicey. Diana
Farrell interrupted: “Wait a second, before you answer, let me ask all
of you . . . How many of you have read it? Show of hands, please.”
Ooops.
Pocalyk presses you to
“think about this for a moment. 170 Washington-based members of the
Council on Foreign Relations and a major complement of the U.S. and
international press corps — economic reporters — are in the room.
Listening to Alan Greenspan. Arguably the most august assembly of
economic policy elites that it is possible to assemble in America.”
Pocalyk “looked around
and counted four hands!” Just four out of 170. Wertheim’s “was one of
them. Mine was not. Neither was Alan Greenspan’s.”
Next,
Farrell’s interrogation dug deeper: “‘OK. How many of you have read
some review or commentary about it?’ You guessed right. Every hand in
the room went up.”
Now
here’s the lesson Pocalyk got out of this show-of-hands expose: “There
have always been books whose impact and significance — particularly in
high-literary and politico-cultural spheres of influence — are about
their act of publication rather than their content because nobody reads
them. We’ve all suspected that this is the case. Rarely do we get real
empirical proof, much as I disagree with him.”
So
America’s finally got the empirical proof. But so what? If we all
already know it. Conservative and liberal, Republican and Democrat,
everybody’s brain already knows instinctively how Piketty clearly
distilled the New American Dream from a 685-page book to several words:
By 2100, the Super Rich will be richer, the poor will be poorer.
Obvious, right? So why read a long, boring book of facts, figures,
charts and research about something you already know … or at least have
ironclad convictions about it.
Debate’s settled. No reading. Find more opportunities. Get Super Rich
Yes,
forget Piketty: Here are the real facts you need to know about a world
mass-producing billionaires. Forbes, Bloomberg and CNBC all report an
explosion of billionaires. From 322 in 2000 to 1,847 in 2014. China
alone now has 358 billionaires. Africa has 29, added nine just last
year. What’s more, the income of the world’s 85 richest billionaires is
greater than the 3.5 billion in the bottom half. Plus Credit Suisse Bank
predicts 11 trillionaire families in the world by 2100.
In
“China Minting Millionaires in Global Wealth Surge,” Bloomberg
BusinessWeek’s Dexter Roberts reports: “The number of millionaire
families around the world reached 16.3 million last year, up from 13.7
million the year before.” The magazine’s Max Abelson also adds that
individuals “worth $100 million or more has jumped 62% since 2003, to
37,104. Data confirming the Piketty trend, that the value of global
private wealth grew far faster than global economic output, up 14.6% to
$152 trillion, compared with an 8.6% increase in 2012,” and “much of the
new money originated in the Asia-Pacific region.”
Forget
politics. Irrelevant. The race to get super-richer is on, says
Huffington Post’s Mark Gongloff in “Big Bank Explains To Rich People How
To Profit Off Inequality.” He focuses on a Merrill-Lynch Hong Kong
report: “On Wall Street, the debate about wealth inequality is all but
over, except for finding ways to make tons of money from it. The rich
are going to keep getting richer all over the world,” just as Piketty
has been predicting.
Gongloff
next makes a fascinating cultural observation: “Reminiscent of the
‘debate’ over climate change: While partisans might still haggle over
its importance and/or existence, companies and governments with lives
and treasure at stake are already adjusting to its reality. So too with
rising wealth and income inequality,” especially in resource-rich
nations.
In fact, Merrill Lynch,
like Credit Suisse and other global banks, has been predicting
Piketty-style inequality for over a decade in “economies where economic
growth is powered by and largely consumed by the wealthy few …. While
this might sound like a nightmare world,” especially for the middle
class and poor, “it is also a chance to make a bunch of money, for those
(mostly rich people) with the means to invest in companies that most
profit from the wealthy elite. This includes luxury-goods makers, money
managers and private banks.”
Surrender America, the Super Rich are winning … jump on the bandwagon
Face
facts, this New American Dream is raging. Surrender to the
inevitability of the Piketty Principle, that the Super Rich will get
vastly richer, own more and more of the world. They won. They rule
America. Rule the world. Have redefined the American Dream as the New
Global Super Rich Dream. The old American Dream inspired all Americans,
everyone in the world. But no more. The new dream is about a rapidly
emerging world where more is never enough, ruled by the wealthiest one
percent.
But
at what cost? For in this dream world of our future … we are addicted
to wealth … we have lost our moral compass … our inner spirit, our
collective conscience … America has lost its soul.
Paul B. Farrell is a MarketWatch columnist based in San Luis Obispo, Calif. Follow him on Twitter @MKTWFarrell.
No comments:
Post a Comment