Swiss bank Credit Suisse pleaded guilty Monday to the charge that it
facilitated wealthy Americans who sought to commit tax evasion, becoming
the first major bank to admit criminal wrongdoing in over 20 years and
agreeing to pay $2.6 billion in fines.
The settlement announcement Monday included an acknowledgement from
bank officials that they knowingly and intentionally helped thousands of
US citizens put their money into offshore accounts, allowing them to
hide financial assets from the US Internal Revenue Service.
US Attorney General Eric Holder, who has been criticized for being
too slow to go after major banks, told reporters that the admission of
guilt was a major step forward for prosecutors investigating financial
institutions.
“This case shows that no financial institution, no matter its size or global reach, is above the law,” Holder said, as quoted by The New York Times. “Credit
Suisse conspired to help US citizens hide assets in offshore accounts
in order to evade paying taxes. When a bank engages in misconduct this
brazen, it should expect the Justice Department will pursue criminal
prosecution to the fullest extent possible, as has happened here.”
The penalty was handed down during a 45-minute hearing in New York
City on Monday, forcing the bank – which has an American chief executive
– to shell out the large sum and hire an independent monitor for two
years.
The bank agreed to shell out a federal fine of $1.13 billion, $670
million to the IRS, another $715 million to the New York State
Department of Financial Services, and $100 million to the Federal
Reserve.
The deal was struck just months after a US Senate panel determined
that Credit Suisse had specifically wooed more than 22,000 US customers
with a net worth between $10 billion and $12 billion, with little – if
any – of that money ever paid to the IRS.
Bankers traveled from Switzerland to recruit clients at US golf
tournaments, according to the panel, and at one point a banker handed
over financial documents hidden in a copy of ‘Sports Illustrated’
magazine.
“The bank went to elaborate lengths to shield itself, its
employees, and the tax cheats it served from accountability for their
criminal actions,” Holder went on. “They subverted disclosure
requirements, destroyed bank records, and concealed transactions
involving undeclared accounts by limiting withdrawal amounts and using
offshore credit and debit cards to repatriate funds. They failed to take
even the most basic steps to ensure compliance with tax laws.”
Before Credit Suisse agreed to plead guilty, six of the company’s
former bankers were indicted on charges that they helped wealthy
Americans hide $4 billion in assets, one of which pleaded guilty. Holder
said the settlement took months of planning, with the charges serious enough to close the bank down entirely.
“We deeply regret the past misconduct that led to this settlement,” Brady Dougan, the American CEO, said in a statement on Monday. “The
US cross-border matter represented the most significant and
longstanding regulatory litigation issue for Credit Suisse. Having this
matter fully resolved is an important step forward for us.”
The pressure has increased for top officials who remain at the bank,
as well, with well-known Swiss industry leaders calling for the Dougan’s
resignation.
“In my opinion, the CEO as well as the chairman of the board must go in order to save the bank,” Christoph Blocher, a billionaire industrialist and influential politician, told Swiss newspaper Schweiz am Sonntag.
Pressure has amplified on several European banks in recent years. In
2009, UBS – the largest bank in Switzerland – entered into a deferred
prosecution agreement with the US Justice Department. Under the terms of
the deal, the bank agreed to hand over $780 million in fines and
provide the names of the thousands of customers who were thought to be
evading the IRS.
The next major bank to plead guilty is expected to be BNP Paribas, a
massive French bank suspected of doing business with Sudan and Iran –
countries that are blacklisted by the United States. Estimates on the
size of the fine have ranged from $3 billion to north of $5 billion. The
stiff penalties are an indication that the US Department of Justice is
trying to shed its reputation of being soft on banking criminals,
according to Samuel Buell, a former federal prosecutor who now teaches
law at Duke University.
“The Justice Department is trying to play to two audiences at the
same time: the public, which wants something that looks like real
punishment, and the financial industry, which needs to be sent the sort
of message that will deter these behaviors,” he told Bloomberg.
No comments:
Post a Comment