The Dept. of Justice will let JP Morgan’s London Whale off the hook while prosecuting low-level traders.
TRANSCRIPT:
JESSICA DESVARIEUX, TRNN PRODUCER: Welcome to The
Real News Network. I’m Jessica Desvarieux in Baltimore. And welcome to
this edition of The Bill Black Report, where we’ll be discussing how the
U.S. government will announce the arrest of two Wall Street traders.
The traders are in trouble not for defrauding homeowners or state
governments, but rather because they lost their employer JPMorgan a lot
of money and harmed their reputation by covering up the size of the
multibillion-dollar losses.
Here to discuss all this is a Bill Black. Bill Black is an associate
professor of economics and law at the University of Missouri-Kansas
City. He’s a white-collar criminologist and former financial regulator.
And, of course, he’s a regular contributor to The Real News.
Thanks for joining us, Bill.
BILL BLACK, ASSOC. PROF. ECONOMICS AND LAW, UMKC: Thank you.
DESVARIEUX: So, Bill, will you please just summarize for us what is the story behind this “London Whale” scandal?
BLACK: Sure. This is actually a story of
Glass-Steagall, which was the legislation adopted after the Great
Depression to prevent conflicts of interest from owning the same
investment banking company and a commercial banking company. And we got
rid of Glass-Steagall, which had been a brilliant success, in the next
to last year of the Clinton administration. And then, of course, we had a
disaster, and we passed legislation that’s called the Volcker bill that
unfortunately doesn’t simply repeal the repeal of Glass-Steagall, but
it’s designed to prevent this kind of speculation in derivatives by
commercial banks.
Now, the game is that all the big commercial banks don’t admit that
they’re doing massive speculation. They call it hedging or something
else. But in reality, it was supposedly a huge source of revenue for
JPMorgan–until, of course, it all blew up and it turned out they weren’t
hedging at all, they were taking enormous risk. They lost the risk,
they doubled down, and they actually ended up tripling or even
quadrupling their losses, and then they decided to cover it up.
Now, these are not Wall Street traders, by the way. These are City of
London traders. And that’s happening for a reason, because the City of
London won the competition in laxity. And so, much of the sleaziest
activity in the largest commercial banks in the world moved to the City
of London, including the so-called “London Whale”, the huge trader for
JPMorgan. But that’s also where the LIBOR scandal has been, the HSBC
money laundering scandals, etc., etc., etc. So there’s something very
rotten in the heart of the financial industry in the City of London.
So the first thing, of course, is good news. The Justice Department
says it’s actually going to prosecute somebody who was at least maybe a
modestly large bank official. Bad news: not going to try the
corporation, not going to bring a criminal case against the top
leadership, not even going to bring a criminal case against the guy
whose trades, the so-called “London Whale”, actually caused the
disaster. So just going to, apparently, bring a prosecution against the
guys that covered it up [snip] this has anything to do with the
financial crisis. This occurred after the financial crisis. So the
Justice Department record of refusing to prosecute anybody elite who
actually caused the financial crisis is going to remain intact. But at
least they’ve remembered that it is possible to prosecute at least the
minnows in the large banks. And I guess we need to say hurrah at least
for that.
DESVARIEUX: Do you think that this is a signal that they might prosecute the banks, since they’re willing to prosecute the traders?
BLACK: No. In fact, it’s, I think, exactly the
opposite, that they’re unwilling to prosecute the bank. Indeed, they’ve
said pretty clearly that they won’t be prosecuting any large banks,
period, that they have effective immunity from the laws. We have a rule
of law with, you know, the asterisk some exceptions apply, and one of
the asterisks is any really large bank.
DESVARIEUX: Okay. And the Department of Justice sort
of patted themselves on the back last Friday. As you know, that’s
usually a dump day for the media, when they don’t want stories to be
exposed, and to get limited coverage. The DOJ announced that they vastly
overstated the number of prosecutions of bank officials. Originally,
Eric Holder had said that they had prosecuted about 530 people in the
financial industry, while actually the number was 107. So in your
opinion, Bill, what do you make of this?
BLACK: Well, first, of course, I guess their defense
is going to be lawyers are usually innumerate and can’t count. But this
is the second time on mortgage fraud prosecutions that they have
screwed up the numbers royally. And they did so in order to make a big
propaganda splash before elections and such. It’s utterly disgraceful.
There’s no way this could have happened once to let it happen twice. And
there is a really good reportage on this by Jonathan Weil, who pounded
and pounded Justice Department to get the right numbers. And they kept
promising and promising. And finally they refused to even answer his
emails. And then, as you say, without any real apology, they just dumped
this on a dead Friday afternoon hoping that they would get away.
So it’s bad enough to make a horrific mistake twice. It’s bad enough
to utterly fail in their duty to prosecute these folks. But to be such
cowards and liars about it–I mean, I was a Justice Department lawyer. It
makes me sick.
DESVARIEUX: Okay. Here at The Real News, too, we’re
always trying to advance the story a bit and think of solutions. What do
you think the government could do to rein in Wall Street? If you could,
just give us a couple of your thoughts.
BLACK: Well, the first thing is to take on the
systemically dangerous institutions and get rid of them. You should not
allow them to grow, and you should give them five years to shrink to the
point where they no longer pose a global risk to the world economy.
The second thing that you need to do is actually get an attorney
general. So you need to fire Holder. You need to replace the heads of
the regulatory agencies who are refusing to regulate. You need to
reinstall Glass-Steagall, and you need to repeal the Commodity Futures
Modernization Act, which created the regulatory black hole for
derivatives.
Those would be a good start.
DESVARIEUX: Okay. Thanks so much for joining us, bill.
BLACK: Thank you.
DESVARIEUX: And thank you for joining us on The Real News Network.
…read more
Republished from: Truth Out
No comments:
Post a Comment