The California housing market is providing us with two different pictures. First, home prices have surged and inventory is still very low
(although increasing from the spring low). However, the homeownership
rate continues to decline from the peak reached in 2006 of 60.2
percent. Today the California homeownership rate is 54.5 percent. How
big of a difference is this? Since 2007 California has added a net of
500,000 renter households while losing a net of 233,000 homeowners. Yet
the market continues to boom in the face of a declining homeownership
rate. As we look at the market today we start seeing a slowdown in the
speed in which flips are being accepted and inventory is rising. With higher interest rates and the fall season just before us, will the market thaw or continue to accelerate?
Taking account
It might be useful to take into account what has occurred in the last
few years in regards to the status of occupied-housing in California:
California has added a significant number of renters over this
period. Many of these people lost their homes via foreclosure and
simply shifted to renting their place of occupancy. What is interesting
is the number of renters being added has only increased. The above
data is from the Census ACS that came out in September of 2012 (the full
2012 data should be out in fall of 2013). The above figures were
calculated when California had a 55.3 homeownership rate (the latest
figure is 54.5 percent):
One of the big reasons for this shift has certainly come from investors purchasing homes for rent.
In more typical markets, a home is sold and then another one is usually
bought (two transactions are generated). In the recent market with
many foreclosures, you had someone losing their home and then someone
buying it from the bank (which was a one-and-done transaction if it then
became a rental). This was likely the case in many areas including the
Sacramento area and also the Inland Empire. I know of a few people
that bought in Los Angeles and Orange County for these purposes but
their rental yields were extremely low.
This trend to a lower homeownership rate is not only specific to California. It is a nationwide trend:
The homeownership rate today is back to where it was in the mid-1990s
or if you go further back, to what it was in the late 1970s. In
California home prices are in a manic like acceleration upwards. The
median home price in the state is up a record 28.5 percent over the
year:
Median price:
May 2012 $274,000
May 2013: $352,000
Home prices went up by $78,000 across the state while incomes look like this:
To put it another way, a California family would do better by simply
sitting in their home generating “equity” instead of working. This is
starting to sound very familiar since many of the ancillary businesses
are now starting to rev up and once again have become very real estate
dependent. For example, banks are living high on the hog with low rates
and a continual stream of refinances. Fees and leverage allowed for record profits once again. We are even seeing a few of our favorite loans cropping up once again as well.
Yet the change in California is symbolic of a bigger trend
nationwide. Fewer and fewer people will be able to live what they think
of as a middle class lifestyle in more expensive regions. And the
legions of poor are also growing. In 2008, California had 2,220,127
people of food assistance. Today it is closer to 4,000,000 (a jump of
80 percent in roughly four years). This is in the same state that saw
an overall median price jump of 28.5 percent.
The unsold inventory index is down to around 2.9 months which
indicates tight conditions for anyone looking to buy. While the talk is
heating up, the facts show that hundreds of thousands of Californians
have now become renters versus homeowners. A few open houses seemed a
bit calmer this month but only by a little.
What are you seeing in your local real estate market?
No comments:
Post a Comment