Obama Set to Kill U.S. Jobs Market with 30 Million Workers

Obama Immigration Bill will allow Illegal Workers to Displace 30 Million Legal American Jobs

WASHINGTON, DC – MAY 20: U.S. Sen. Charles Schumer (D-NY) (L) talks with one of his staff members during a markup session for the immigration reform legislation now before the Senate Judiciary Committee in the Hart Senate Office Building on Capitol Hill May 20, 2013 in Washington, DC. The Judiciary Committee is hoping to wrap up work on the landmark immigration reform bill this week after wading through the 300 amendments that were filed to the bipartisan bill. (Photo by Chip Somodevilla/Getty Images)

by Avalon
Intellihub.com
June 19, 2013
Contact your U.S. Representatives and U.S. Senators to take action and voice your opinion on this critical issue.
With the decline in employment, rather than implement ways to increase growth in the economy, the Obama administration is doing just the opposite. It is clear to so many people now that Obama was selected by the Elite to bring about the destruction of the United States. No decision he has made has had a single positive impact to our country – not one.
Now, the Obama administration is poised to roll in the Trojan Horse into the U.S. Economy and the timing couldn’t be better. With virtually 20% unemployment and 45 million people on Food Assistance, it’s time to bring another 30 million workers into the Jobs Market.
The current Immigration legislation would, in effect, legalize 30 million non–legal workers who will displace current workers in a failing economy. People are barely able to make ends meet in most cases and the additional burden of supporting these 30 million workers, some of which may find employment, with Financial Assistance of some kind will bankrupt most states. The individual states are failing and many are bankrupt, according to a ZeroHedge article 32 States Now Officially Bankrupt: $37.8 Billion Borrowed From Treasury To Fund Unemployment; CA, MI, NY Worst, the situation is an emergency. Quoting from the Zerohedge.com article:
Courtesy of Economic Policy Journal we now know that the majority of American states are currently insolvent, and that the US Treasury has been conducting a shadow bailout of at least 32 US states. Over 60% of Americans receiving state unemployment benefits are getting these directly from the US government, as 32 states have now borrowed $37.8 billion from Uncle Sam to fund unemployment insurance. The states in most dire condition, are, not unexpectedly, the unholy trifecta of California ($6.9 billion borrowed), Michigan ($3.9 billion), and New York ($3.2 billion).
Forget what the Mainstream Corporate Media is propagandizing – they are controlled by the Banking Sector who stands to gain from this influx of immigrants, cheap labor and indentured servants. The Zerohedge.com article was posted by Tyler Durden on 05/21/2010 and these facts are being totally ignored.
According to Governing.com data:

Many local governments across the U.S. face steep budget deficits as they struggle to pay off debts accumulated over a number of years. As a last resort, some have filed for bankruptcy.
Governing is tracking the issue, and will update this page as more municipalities seek bankruptcy protection.
Overall, bankrupt municipalities remain extremely rare. A Governing analysis estimated only one of every 1,668 eligible general-purpose local governments (0.06 percent) filed for bankruptcy protection over the past five years. Excluding filings later dismissed, only one of every 2,710 eligible localities filed since 2008.
Most recently, the Hardeman County Hospital District in Quanah, Texas, announced it was seeking bankruptcy protection in March. The majority of Chapter 9 bankruptcy filings have been submitted by utility authorities and other narrowly-defined special districts. In Omaha, Neb., nine Sanitary and Improvement Districts filed for bankruptcy in recent years.

It’s also important to note that only about half of states outline laws authorizing municipal bankruptcy. View our bankruptcy laws map for each state’s policies.
The article, Rand Paul Makes Immigration Move, by Alexander Bolton (06/18/13 05:00 AM ET) describes the political situation in detail, highlighting important practical measures that exert control over immigration and citizenship. Quoting from TheHill.com article:

Paul’s most ambitious proposal would eliminate the pathway to citizenship for 11 million illegal immigrants and lift the caps on guest workers. 
It would provide immigrant workers to employers who can demonstrate need, but immigrants would have to apply for legal permanent residency and citizenship through the existing lines of their native countries. 
Paul is expected to file that amendment this week.
Another measure, Paul’s “Trust but Verify” amendment, would give Congress — and not Homeland Security Secretary Janet Napolitano — ultimate authority on deciding when the southern border is secure. 
Under this plan, immigration reform would not proceed until Congress votes on whether several criteria have been met.
These objectives would include the completion of a comprehensive system to track visa entries and exits at all points of entry — not just air and sea ports as mandated by the broader bill — and law enforcement achieving a 95 percent apprehension rate of illegal entrants. 

Interestingly, The Heritage Foundation’s study 2013 Index of Economic Freedom, states that Mexico’s economy is expected to do better in coming years as explained and graphed at the site (pdf).

Mexico’s economic freedom score is 67.0, making its economy the 50th freest in the 2013 Index. Its score is 1.7 points better than last year, reflecting notable improvements in investment freedom, trade freedom, and monetary freedom. Mexico is ranked 3rd out of three countries in the North America region, but its score is well above the world average.
The Mexican economy has shown a moderate degree of resilience in the face of a challenging global economic environment. Reform efforts have continued in many areas related to economic freedom. Implementation of policies intended to support open markets and encourage a vibrant private sector has enhanced investment flows and the vitality of entrepreneurship, although growth remains sluggish. The 2012 labor reform bill, which aimed to increase labor market flexibility, was weakened by amendments to protect the country’s powerful unions. Source: 2013 Index of Economic Freedom: Mexico

Even OneIndia.in News of India, in an article titled, OECD: Mexico’s economy to grow at faster clip in 2014, reports that Mexico’s economy is on the rebound – despite the Drug Cartel & Banking Cartel Money Laundering and destruction of security and stability in the region.
Proving there’s been an Obama administration policy of pro illegal immigration is the resignation of Immigration and Customs Enforcement Director John Morton as reported in the USA TODAY article Obama’s immigration enforcement director to resign by Alan Gomez posted June 17, 2:42 p.m.  The interesting thing to note here is John Morton is going to work for Capitol One, known for credit financing – coincidence?

He will be moving to Capital One, the Fortune 500 financial services company, and be based in its McLean, Va., headquarters as head of the company’s compliance office, the company said in a statement.
[…]
Morton may best be remembered for a policy plan he authored in 2011 — known in immigration circles as the “Morton Memo” — which outlined a new strategy for determining whom the agency should deport.
In the memo, Morton explained that ICE has a limited amount of money and resources it can dedicate to deporting any of the 11 million unauthorized immigrants living in the country. So he ordered his agents to use “prosecutorial discretion” to focus deportation proceedings on certain groups of unauthorized immigrants, including those who pose a national security threat, who have extensive criminal backgrounds and recent border-crossers.
That strategy was dubbed “amnesty by any means” by the Center for Immigration Studies, a group that advocates for lower levels of immigration, and had already earned him a vote of “no confidence” from the National ICE Council, the biggest labor union for ICE employees.
“He was the architect of the administration’s non-enforcement policy,” said Ira Mehlman of the Federation for American Immigration Reform. “He was toeing the administration’s line rather than allowing them to do the jobs they were sworn to do.”

Attempting to inject sanity into the Immigration Debate is Senator Jeff Sessions, who posted this video on the SenatorSessions YouTube channel on June 18, 2013 titled Sessions On Immigration Bill: Doesn’t Congress Owe Its Allegiance To U.S. Workers?

Sessions On Immigration Bill: Doesn’t Congress Owe Its Allegiance To U.S. Workers?
http://www.youtube.com/user/SenatorSessions
Published on Jun 18, 2013
26 views on June 19, 2013 at 8:00 AM EST
Sessions, Jeff - (R–AL)
Reforming America’s Broken Immigration System
To HIGHLIGHT the corrupt politics at work, it’s interesting to read closely the New York Times article Immigration Law Changes Seen Cutting Billions From Deficit posted by Ashley Parker on June 18, 2013.

The report estimates that in the first decade after the immigration bill is carried out, the net effect of adding millions of additional taxpayers would decrease the federal budget deficit by $197 billion. Over the next decade, the report found, the deficit reduction would be even greater — an estimated $700 billion, from 2024 to 2033. The deficit reduction figures for the first decade do not take into account $22 billion in the discretionary spending required to implement the bill, however, making the savings slightly lower.
The report was immediately seized on by backers of the bill as a significant boost to its prospects. Senator Charles E. Schumer, Democrat of New York, one of the bill’s authors, said the report “debunks the idea that immigration reform is anything other than a boon to our economy.”
The budget office also found that in the next decade the legislation would lead to a net increase of about 10.4 million permanent legal residents and 1.6 million temporary workers and their dependents, as well as a decrease of about 1.6 million unauthorized residents.
Conservatives had expected that an analysis of the second decade — when immigrants would begin to qualify for federal benefits — would bolster their argument that the costs of an immigration overhaul were unwieldy, but that turned out not to be the case in the economic analysis.
Senator Jeff Sessions, Republican of Alabama, a leading opponent of the bill, said that its authors used “scoring gimmicks” in order to conceal the “true cost from taxpayers.” “As a result, the score effectively conceals some of the biggest long-term costs to taxpayers contained in this legislation, including providing illegal immigrants with Medicaid, food stamps and cash welfare,” Mr. Sessions said.

Disclaimer:
The views expressed in Intellihub.com articles are the sole responsibility of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect those of the Intellihub.com. Intellihub.com will not be held responsible or liable for any inaccurate or incorrect statements contained in Intellihub.com articles. Intellihub.com reserves the right to remove articles from the website. Posted 06–19–2013 at 10:10 AM EST
*****
Avalon is an Investigative Journalist and Strategist working for Intellihub.com