US retail sales fell unexpectedly in March, adding to fears that the
world's largest economy may have stalled at the end of the first
quarter.
Retail sales fell by 0.4pc last month, according to the US Commerce Department. Analysts had expected sales to be flat.
Consumer spending accounts for about 70pc of the world's largest
economy, and analysts said the fall suggested that a payroll tax hike in
January and jump in petrol prices had "forced households to pull back".
"Coming on the back of the weakening in the ISM surveys and
payrolls data in March, the economy appears to have lost some momentum,"
said Paul Dales, US economist at Capital Economics.
Omer Esiner, an analyst at Commonwealth Foreign Exchange, said that Friday's data would put more pressure on the dollar.
"It is the latest in a growing list of economic numbers that will
likely keep the dollar pressured and the Fed in no hurry to normalise
policy," he said.
Stripping out cars, petrol and building materials, sales fell 0.2pc in
March. This measure corresponds closely with the consumer spending
component of gross domestic product (GDP). The government revised lower
past core retail sales figures to show a 0.3pc gain in February and flat
sales in January.
Data last week showed that US jobs growth
slowed sharply last month, bringing to a halt the recent improvement in
the economy's labour market.
US President Barack Obama has set out spending cuts to replace the $85bn "sequester" cuts that kicked-in last month.
The White House said the measures would together bring the US budget
deficit down to 2.8pc of GDP by 2016, from 5.3pc this year, and would
cut the US deficit by $1.8 trillion in a decade.
However, it stands little chance of being enacted into law because of Republican opposition to tax increases.
Separate producer price data for March showed that wholesale prices in
the US fell 0.6pc on a monthly basis in March, as petrol costs fell back
from recent highs.
The drop was the biggest since May 2012, and followed a 0.7pc gain in February, according to the US Labor Department.
No comments:
Post a Comment