Gambling on high-risk synthetic credit derivatives is
not the only area of interest at JPMorgan’s Chief Investment Office
(CIO) – the division that has thus far admitted to losing $6.2 billion
in the London Whale debacle. According to Exhibit 81 released by the
U.S. Senate’s Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations, Ina Drew, the
head of the CIO, was also overseeing the investment of funds in the
firm’s Bank Owned Life Insurance (BOLI) and Corporate Owned Life
Insurance (COLI) plans – a scheme enshrined by the U.S. Congress in 2006
that allows too-big-to-fail banks as well as many other corporations to
reap huge tax benefits by taking out life insurance policies on workers
– even low wage workers – and naming the corporation the beneficiary of
the death benefit.
According to the exhibit, Drew was tasked with “Maximization of
tax-advantaged investments of life insurance premiums” for the BOLI/COLI
plans. According to a report in the Wall Street Journal in 2009,
JPMorgan had $12 billion in BOLI, noting that a JPMorgan spokesperson
had confirmed the figure. Other insurance industry experts put the total
for both BOLI and COLI at JPMorgan significantly higher.Most Americans are unaware that for at least 25 years big business and banks have been secretly taking out millions of life insurance policies on their workers and naming the corporation the beneficiary of the death benefit without the knowledge of the employee. The individual policies are frequently in the hundreds of thousands of dollars and sometimes millions. To keep track of employees who have left the company, deaths are routinely tracked through the Social Security Administration. The policies became known as “dead peasant” or “janitor” policies because corporations took out life insurance on millions of low-wage workers, including janitors, without their knowledge or consent.
The insurance can give a nice boost to bottom-line corporate profits because it provides multiple tax breaks, including: the cash buildup in the policy is reported as income but is tax-exempt because it resides in a tax-sheltered life insurance policy; the cash payment the company receives when the employee dies is also tax-free under existing tax law.
In 2003, the General Accountability Office (GAO) released a study which found that multiple companies held policies on the same individual and that 3,209 banks and thrifts had current cash values in these policies totaling $56.3 billion.
In 2006, Congress passed the Pension Protection Act. Instead of outlawing this dubious practice, Congress grandfathered all of the millions of previously issued policies while imposing a few tax and reporting rules.
A study by Susan Lorde Martin, Professor of Business Law at Hofstra University in Uniondale, New York found that Portland General, at the time a subsidiary of Enron, had created a COLI arrangement where the death of low-wage workers was funding lavish compensation plans for top executives. Martin writes: “About seventy-five percent of an estimated $80 million in benefits from the policies pays for a long-term compensation plan for managers, directors, and other top officers; the other twenty-five percent contributes to a supplemental executive retirement plan. Workers who have had their entire retirement funds of hundreds of thousands of dollars wiped out by Enron’s collapse were shocked to discover that their deaths will support benefit plans for top Enron executives.”
In a presentation made by JPMorgan Asset Management, apparently to sell its own investment services for managing monies in other firms’ COLI or BOLI plans, JPMorgan explains how companies can smooth earnings volatility with these plans:
Under a heading of “GAAP Accounting Treatment,” JPMorgan notes:
“Income Statement: ‘Other Income,’ ‘above
the line treatment due for income is recurring in nature.’ Please note
that BOLI is accounted for under FASB 85-4 which states that the asset
is booked at ‘net realizable value.’ Therefore, all realized and
unrealized gains and losses of the contract are booked through the
income statement which is similar to how a trading security is treated
under FASB 115. Because of this treatment, many financial institutions
have found it advantageous to ‘wrap’ their BOLI assets with Stable Value
Protection to achieve a book value accounting treatment whereby gains
and losses are amortized over a period of time to minimize period to
period volatility.”
Last week, on March 15, Senator Carl Levin convened a Senate hearing
to take further testimony on the CIO losses at JPMorgan. In his opening
remarks, the Senator confirmed that the speculative trades had been made
with insured deposits held at the bank – not the firm’s own capital –
and that JPMorgan had the lowest ratio of any bank in terms of lending
out those insured deposits rather than using them for risky derivative
gambles. Senator Levin stated:
“JPMorgan’s Chief Investment Office
rapidly amassed a huge portfolio of synthetic credit derivatives, in
part using federally insured depositor funds, in a series of risky,
short-term trades, disclosing the extent of the portfolio only after
intense media exposure…
“It was recently reported that the eight
biggest U.S. banks have hit a five-year low in the percentage of
deposits used to make loans. Their collective average loan-to-deposit
ratio has fallen to 84 percent in 2012, down from 87 percent a year
earlier, and 101 percent in 2007. JPMorgan has the lowest
loan-to-deposit ratio of the big banks, lending just 61 percent of its
deposits out in loans. Apparently, it was too busy betting on
derivatives to issue the loans needed to speed economic recovery.”
The primary reason banks exist is to make sound business loans that
will create jobs and new industries to help the U.S. remain competitive
and to enhance the standard of living for all Americans. What we see at
JPMorgan is something radically different.
No comments:
Post a Comment