Mention 9/11 and immediately you get the
yawn brigade babbling "oh not again??!". Well, honestly, I don't
intend trying to put you to sleep - personally, if you cannot see that
the official line is total bunk from statements made by Firemen and
first responders who stated that there were explosions, to the literal
myriad of documents and articles that show the official story was just
as cleaver as Lee Harvey Oswald was a lone gunman - then nothing I can
say will change your mind.
For those of you who actually want some
investigative work done and are prepared to consider [I didn't say,
accept] a view that is contrary to what the NWO wants you to believe,
then read on; hopefully I may make some sense.
Let's go back just a little way, pre
9/11. Investigative journalist Greg Palast, exposed in 2001, a technique
that the NWO [World Bank, IMF, global elite, illuminati and cohorts]
use to asset strip a nation. As mentioned in my previous articles - the
NWO is not that smart as they continue to repeat a process, so if you
can identify the mechanism used once - it will be used again if it was
initially successful. As a successful operation, it is often
euphemistically referred to by a name or acronym - like the CIA coloured
revolutions [rose, violet, orange et..a]. in this case, the act of
asset stripping was referred to as the IMF Riot.
The
two words in the identifying name give us the clue as to who is behind
it and how it works. The final act of asset stripping is to promote a
riot [total civil unrest/disobedience], bankrupting the country and
collapsing the government. Look at Ireland [PIIGS group]. Ireland was a
standout economy 10 or 12 years ago; it was hailed as a model economy
and I remember visits from Irish delegations to New Zealand to explain
what they were doing and how they had such success. Other EU countries
were held up against Ireland and measured against Ireland. Now Ireland
[as others, Greece] is being setup for asset stripping.
What the IMF criminals do is to promote
growth by fiscal policy and money supply; they want the country to gain
wealth - the more wealth, the more they make when the strip it. When
they consider the time right, they change policy, call in loans and
impose IMF conditions upon the governments; forcing the governments into
the IMF policies of austerity, privatisation and deregulation. Sound
familiar - it should do as it is happening all around the globe - even
here in New Zealand! This economic terrorism, forces the people to
riot; the rioting brings down the government and the IMF move to
instigate their own controlled government [puppet government]. This
puppet government, in order to dig itself and country out of the
financial hole it finds itself in, sells off the nation's jewels.
Nationally own assets, power generation etc [all paid for by taxpayers
and owned by the people] are all sold by privatisation to "overseas"
buyers". Industry is stripped, sold off and moved either off shore or
closed down to prevent opposition to IMF controlled business. What they
have done by sleight of hand is obtain all real assets for worthless
monopoly money that they printed and forwarded as "Loans".
How they do it is no real secret [how
people keep falling for it is a mystery though] so I'll take the liberty
here to simplify the process by outlining it.
A credit rating company [an IMF patsy]
goes to a country and says "we're going to do a credit rating of your
country". The country says great, we'll get a new rating. Later the
credit rating company goes back to the country and says, "well, you've
got good stable government, you've got democracy [that's important
because without it they can't work their scheme], you are paying off
debt, the country has good infrastructure and workforce and your GDP is
growing. All things considered, we like what we see and award you AAA+
rating." Fantastic says the government - happy that their governance
has been "rewarded".
Then along comes the IMF/World Bank -
"We see you have a very good credit rating - look, we can forward you 5
billion dollars at 3% PA on the strength of this credit rating - just
think what you can do with that? - Build more infrastructure, maybe a
new power station, water treatment plant etc - it will help you get
re-elected.".
The government quickly takes up this
fantastic offer and sees the chance of re-election that much easier.
But, reality sets in, the government finds that people actually have
short memories and their expenditure is forgotten coming up to election
year. No problem - the IMF/World Bank are there to help prop up their
model economy - the one touted as an example for other to follow. Soon
the county has substantial debt, but a government that has been elected
on the strength of their social reforms and economic achievements.
Nudge, nudge, from the IMF to the Credit
Rating agency - "time for a re-assessment". A new assessment is
conducted and the government is told "look, we don't like the ratio of
debt to GDP and this isn't looking too good for you - we'll have to drop
your rating to AA+."
No comments:
Post a Comment