By Paul B. Farrell, MarketWatch
Wharton School economist Jeremy Siegel, author of two classics,
“Stocks For the Long Run” and “The Future for Investors,” is one of
America’s most respected financial minds. He recently told cable channel
CNBC that Dow 15,000 was “definite,” with 50-50 odds of Dow 17,000 by
year-end 2013.
He even doubled down in Kiplinger’s: “My Dow 17,000 projection
may turn out to be too timid.” Now that’s real bull, a 20%-plus gain for
2013.
Dow 15,000? Dow 17,000? Irrational exuberance? DNA flaw?
Delusional? Or are these predictions just typical marketing hype
calculated to drive Main Street’s 95 million investors into Wall Street
casinos for another end-of-a-bull-market slaughter?
Whoa, stop, take a deep breath before we dissect Siegel’s
over-the-top Dow 17,000 prediction. First, a refresher course in basic
market psychology. Let’s remind ourselves: There’s a profound difference
between the DNA, brains and biases of bulls versus bears.
A bull brain has a massive blind spot. They can’t see the
light-at-the-end-of-a-tunnel. Only short-term profits. Wall Street makes
money on the action, on volatility. Whether up and down generates
opportunities and profits. Bulls blindly hang on till the profitable
last drop. Bears do see the light. But once lured into the game, they’re
blinded by the light. Trapped as both ride over the cliff.
One more time, Wall Street will push everyone to the edge … and over
Here’s a great summary looking inside a bull’s brain:
“While the end-of-the-world scenario will be rife with
unimaginable horrors,” predicts the CEO of a leading Wall Street bank,
“we believe that the pre-end period will be filled with unprecedented
opportunities for profit.”
Profits, profits, profits … get it? Bulls may see the end of a
rally, end of a bull cycle … but till the very last unpredictable
minute, they’ll squeeze every last ounce of profits out of the casino …
and into their pockets.
And they honestly believe they can get out well ahead of all
the little investors who are always left holding the bag … America’s 95
million average investors who naively believe predictions like Siegel’s
Dow 17,000 for 2013 … who get stuck with heavy losses in the next
recession … till Wall Street starts hyping a new
bull market.
Can you guess which bank CEO concluded, “We believe that the
pre-end period will be filled with unprecedented opportunities for
profit?” It was a CEO in the Cartoon Bank. Actually, that prediction was
made by the New Yorker magazine’s Robert Mankoff who brilliantly
captured the behavioral science problems with Wall Street’s brain.
28 words tell all you need to know about Wall Street’s addictive brain
Read it, commit it to memory … those 28 words are everything
you will ever need to know about behavioral economics … everything about
what a neuroscientist sees in the brain scans of high-frequency
derivative traders … about the all-consuming addiction driving Wall
Street bank CEOs … about the obsessions that drive financial lobbyists
to block all regulation reforms … even the fierce war against the
environment waged by corporate CEOs … everything you can ever imagine
about
the stock market’s
ever-increasing volatility, wild disastrous swings … everything you
need to know about why, inevitably, Wall Street’s profits addiction and
$100 million trading days will drive America over a new 1929-style cliff
and into a new Great Depression II.
Behavioral economics isn’t complicated. The DNA in Wall
Street’s brain is simple: Markets go up. Markets go down. Wall Street
knows how to get rich in up and down markets. Their casino makes money
skimming a third off the top. On the way up or down. And when the end
comes, Wall Street bulls are always several steps ahead of Main Street’s
95 million naive investors. So the house always wins at the Wall Street
casino.
No, we’re not predicting the end of the world. That’s not the
point of our behavioral economics lesson. Rather we want you to
visualize Wall Street’s brain in action, see what their brains are doing
every microsecond, every minute, of every day. Throughout 2013. For all
eternity.
Their brains are your worst enemy, plotting their next move in
the stock market, to take maximum advantage of your naivete, smiling as
they say: “While the end-of-the-world scenario will be rife with
unimaginable horrors, we believe that the pre-end period will be filled
with unprecedented opportunities for profit.” So you trust, invest in
their money-losing casinos.
11 reasons Dow 17,000 prediction creates a “sucker’s rally” in our minds
A long 10 months ago USA Today’s mutual fund guru John Waggoner
said in his column “the bull market was now in its fourth year.” That
reminded us of something Bill O’Neil, the publisher of Investors
Business Daily, said in the first edition of his classic, “How to Make
Money in Stocks”: “During the last 50 years, we have had 12 bull markets
and 11 bear markets … The bull markets averaged going up about 100% and
the bear markets, on the average, declined 25% to 30%,”And “the typical
bull market lasted 3.75 years and the classic bear market lingered only
nine months.”
Get it? This aging bull is now way past retirement age, ripe
for a lengthy bear. And yet bulls like Jeremy Siegel want us to believe
the rally in stocks (which rocketed over 100% since March 2009) can go
up another 20%, at least to 15,000.
More likely, that will lure you into a suckers rally, where the
bulls just keep hyping the good times so every naive investor left will
finally pile in, fearful they’re missing the race to 17,000 …
forgetting the dot-com disaster in 2000, forgetting the huge losses
after the subprime mortgage disaster of 2008.
The professor should follow his own advice, be more cautious in
making such over-the-top predictions. In his classic “Stocks for the
Long Run,” Siegel studied market turning points from 1801 to 2001. His
bottom line: In 75% of the time he found no rationale for big market
turns. None.
Siegel should also reread Nassim Taleb’s “The Black Swan,” as
well as Brandeis Professor William Sherden’s “The Fortune Sellers: The
Big Business of Buying and Selling Predictions.” Sherden tested the
accuracy of leading forecasters over many decades. His research
concluded: There’s “no way economic forecasting can improve since it is
trying to do the impossible.”
In short, whether you’re a bull or bear, optimist or pessimist,
conservative or progressive, Republican or Democrat, predicting the
future of the economy is impossible, delusional, bordering on hoax … in
fact, most of the time the game of predicting is an attempt by Wall
Street to manipulate investors’ minds. Sherden’s 11 findings are scary:
1. Economists’ predictions are no better than guesses
Forecasting skill of economists is no better than guessimates by Main Street investors.
2. Government economists often worse than guesses
Sherden discovered that predictions made by the elite
economists on the President’s Council of Economic Advisors, the Federal
Reserve Board, and even the non-partisan Congressional Budget Office
were actually worse than guessing.
3. Long-term accuracy is impossible
The accuracy of forecasting declines the longer the lead times.
4. Turning points cannot be predicted
Economists cannot predict the crucial turning points in the
economy, confirming Siegel’s research. Worse, the vast majority of all
long-term predictions fail.
5. No specific forecasters are better than the rest of pack
Sherden also learned that no particular forecasters were consistently more accurate.
6. No forecaster was more expert with specific statistics
No forecaster has consistently higher skills in predicting any one economic statistic.
7. No one ideological orientation was better
No ideology perspective consistently produced superior forecasts.
8. Consensus forecasts do not improve accuracy
But still, the press and their readers love those lists, averages and consensus forecasts.
9. Psychological bias distorts forecasters and their forecasts
Some economists are naturally optimistic and bullish. Others
are naturally pessimistic bears. Some are conservative, some
progressive. Why? Look inside their brains at their DNA, Every economist
has mental biases and political ideologies that distort their choice of
research topics and data selection, and therefore, skew their
predictions.
10. Increased sophistication does not improve accuracy
Sorry folks, but all the new scientific methods, technologies,
algorithms and computer models of the economy can make forecasts worse.
At least give skilled Wall Street insiders an even better edge over
naive retail investors.
11. No improvement over the years
Finally, Sherden says there’s no evidence that economic
forecasting has improved in recent decades, despite vast new
technologies.
In recent years the science of forecasting has been
deteriorating more as partisan politics intensifies, along with global
macro trends, high-frequency trading, Wall Street’s market
manipulations, and unpredictable black swan events. All increase
volatility, uncertainty and create countless new ways for forecasters to
invent new illusions of economic accuracy, while hardening the mental
biases of forecasters.
Fidelity’s Peter Lynch said it best many years ago: “If you
spend 15 minutes a year studying the economy, that’s 10 minutes too
much.”
No comments:
Post a Comment