From yesterday's TARP Congressional hearing with Neil Barofsky.
Video - Mar. 30, 2011 - Rep. Darrell Issa (R-CA), Chairman of the House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform
The hearing explored whether financial markets and market participants perceive our largest financial institutions as "too big to fail" despite passage of the Dodd-Frank Act and subsequent financial regulations and, if so, the implications of such a perception.
--
Criticism of TARP ‘Moral Hazard’ Unfair, Massad Says
“We recognize that moral hazard is a real and significant concern” in the Troubled Asset Relief Program, Timothy Massad, acting assistant secretary for financial stability, said in a hearing before a House Oversight Committee panel today. “But to suggest that it is TARP’s main legacy is to ignore the facts, and to confuse the response to a crisis with the need to address the causes of the crisis.”
Massad was responding to criticism from Neil Barofsky, special inspector general for TARP. Barofsky told the House panel’s TARP subcommittee today that the program’s “most significant legacy may be the exacerbation of the problems posed by ‘too big to fail,’ particularly given the manner in which Treasury executed the bailout.”
TARP largely spared “executives, shareholders, creditors and counter parties, reinforcing that not only would the government bail out the largest institutions, but would do so in a manner that would do little harm to the responsible stakeholders,” Barofsky said.
--
Background:
No comments:
Post a Comment