Monday, March 21, 2011

Pentagon overpaid billionaire oil tycoon by up to $200million

A Pentagon audit has revealed that the federal government overpaid a billionaire oilman up to $200million.

The audit found that Harry Sargeant III was overpaid on several military contracts worth nearly $2.7billion.

It also found that three contracts the Florida businessman won were awarded under conditions that effectively eliminated the other bidders.

Profits: Harry Sargeant III was overpaid up to $200million by the Pentagon over three oil contracts

Profits: Harry Sargeant III was overpaid up to $200million by the Pentagon over three oil contracts

House Energy and Commerce Committee Chairman Henry Waxman
US Defense Secretary Robert Gates

Critical: Henry Waxman, left, called on Defense Secretary Robert Gates, right, to probe Harry Sergeant III's oil contracts with the federal government

The audit, by the Defense Department’s inspector general, was posted on the Pentagon’s web site this week.

It estimated that the department paid the oilman '$160 [million] to $204 million more for fuel than could be supported by price or cost analysis'.

Sargeant, a once prominent Republican donor, first faced scrutiny over his defence work in October 2008, when he was accused in a congressional probe of using his close relationship with Jordan’s royal family to secure exclusive rights over supply routes to U.S. bases in western Iraq.

According to the Washington Post, Republican Henry A. Waxman who led the probe, asserted in a letter to Defense Secretary Robert Gates that Sargeant had won the three jet fuel contracts, despite having the highest bids, because he had an effective monopoly over the routes.

He accused Sargeant and his company of price gouging and 'engaging in the worst form of war profiteering'.

Mr Waxman called on Sargeant to repay the Pentagon, saying in a statement that the report 'confirmed what we found in 2008 - the International Oil Trading Company overcharged by hundreds of millions of dollars while the Bush administration looked the other way'.

In an interview with the Washington Post late last year, Sargeant's attorney Ron Uscher accused Mr Waxman of running a politically motivated investigation and that his client had done nothing wrong.

He said: 'A guy like Harry Sargeant has a lot of targets on his chest. He’s a rich guy, an oil guy, and he is bidding on war contracts.'

According to the Post, it was Mr Waxman’s concerns in 2008 that prompted the Defense Department’s inspector general to begin auditing Sargeant’s company in 2009.

Three days after the probe began, Sargeant secured another fuel contract from the department, valued at up to $1billion, making the oil tycoon's company $123million.

A Defense Department spokesman said fuel deliveries on that contract ceased in early 2010, coinciding with U.S. troop withdrawals from Iraq.

Although the audit is classified, the department’s inspector general’s office released a summary of its findings on Tuesday with results supporting some of Mr Waxman’s findings.

Mr Waxman had calculated that the department would have saved at least $180 million by choosing the lowest bidders on fuel contracts awarded to Sargeant.

The audit found that the prices paid to Sargeant were not reasonable because 'no one else could transport the fuel through Jordan'.

No comments:

Post a Comment