Corporate media mouthpieces would do well to heed Abraham Lincoln's words of wisdom should they expect to survive our crisis in America:
" You can fool some of the people all of the time, and all of the people some of the time, but you can not fool all of the people all of the time."
Media character assassinations of the messengers bringing 911 truth contradicting the fairytale that was force-fed to the public by their feckless "representatives" follow a usual pattern. But times are a'changin'.
The geometric growth in public awareness regarding the facts of 911 truth has brought with it newly invigorated and stronger demands for answers from government and misleading media who continue propagandistic pollution of our public airwaves. Who would expect that the profit mode would help enlighten our typically purblind corporate fountains of koolaid propaganda as they face a stark reality: that if they continue to pretend that overwhelming evidence of fraud and crime doesn't exist- they will continue to lose viewers - and lost viewers means lost advertising dollars. That's how America really works - and there is no escaping that fact!
RT Interviews Dr. David Ray Griffin-see first video below
The snickering interviewer begins with the usual professionalism of corporate-owned media puppets :
" I'm guessing, that you think ... and this is just an assumption on my part ..."
Dr. David Ray Griffin discusses that there is no other possibility that WTC7 collapsed due to any other means than explosives.* This has no effect on the interviewer - such as provoking follow-up questions - or, as far I can tell - thought.
The interviewer asks Dr. Griffin how much of the argument he is "buying" from Mr. Fujita. As is the norm - the interviewer seems numb to the fact that Usama bin Laden is NOT wanted by the FBI for 911 - yes you heard Dr. Griffin - because the FBI "has no hard evidence." Facts as this are brushed over as if never mentioned - again the norm for TV "news."
Interviews such as this are standard - where the public does all the investigating - then is confronted with a deaf and blind news media. A "news medium" that doesn't walk like a news medium, doesn't talk like a news medium, probably isn't a real news medium. This interview shows signs of slight progress by not following the usual pattern where, after the show is put on for the unsuspecting victim/viewers, and the guest is no longer around to keep them honest - the half-truths, omissions and smears can begin anew. This RT interview simply ended leaving the viewer with only the information Dr. Griffin was able to fit into the meager time slot with only some amateurish barbs thrown in. Yes - things are turning around.
Although this RT bit wasn't as bad as the usual hit-piece, they could have done a little more preparation - like maybe finding someone with the courage or maybe a college degree to debate Dr. Griffin.
Dr. Griffin's research on this topic is peerless - the anti-911-truth advocates will exercise the usual name-calling tactics - always avoiding the ocean of detailed information available that has been uncovered by his and others' research.
Perhaps the RT interviewer could have come to work more prepared by watching this excellent speech. If all you listen to is the first part of this speech where he carves Cass Sunstein up like the turkey he is.
Comment on Circumstances of Washington Post Editorial Dated Mar 8, 2010
Yukihisa Fujita
Member of the House of Councillors
Office Tel: 3508-8205
" ... However, once the one hour interview had ended and Hockstader had closed his laptop, he mentioned as an aside that he had noticed from my resume that I had raised the issue of the 9/11 terror attacks in a Diet committee, and asked whether I had some doubts about this issue. In response, I explained the circumstances that led me to become involved in the 9/11 issue and pointed out a number of points that still remained unexplained about the events of that day.
2. In other words, after answering questions on the agreed upon theme for around one hour, I naturally responded to this question as being separate from the interview itself."
-------
* Here is WTC7 collapse - controlled demo hypothesis best fits the evidence:
No comments:
Post a Comment