Tuesday, March 22, 2016

Market Volatility and Your Retirement Plan



There are three near-certainties in the investing world: Markets go up, markets go down, and over time, markets have gone up. Sounds simple, doesn’t it? The challenge comes with timing. Can you stomach the ups and downs? What happens if a lengthy down stretch hits at an inopportune time?
Most retirement portfolios are structured to withstand the ebbs and flows, and even deep dives, in the markets. Still, if you’re in retirement or near it, the volatility could put you in a constant state of panic or make you realize real quick that your risk tolerance is much less merciful than you once thought.
If that’s the case, stay calm. “It’s always important to invest with a rational perspective, not an emotional one,” says Matt Sadowsky, director of retirement and annuities for TD Ameritrade. “Responding to a market correction with an emotional reaction is a bad way to handle your portfolio. Don’t sell everything because of fear.”
Your “rational” approach might look like this:
Assess the Real Situation
Nobody likes to lose money on a position or take a realized loss, but know the difference, Sadowsky says. An unrealized loss—or the loss you see on your monthly statements—is not the real McCoy. An unrealized loss is the disparity between what you bought the stock for and what it’s trading at. A realized loss is the actual dollars-and-cents dent from subtracting the sale price from the purchase price. If you can sit tight, that gap could narrow.
Rebalance the Mix
“But if you’re still worked up by the gyrations of the stock market, then you should reassess if the portfolio is properly balanced relative to the amount of risk you want to take,” Sadowsky says.
That might mean taking a more conservative approach—examples might include an 80-20 or 70-30 mix of bonds and stocks—which may need to be rebalanced if market conditions change. Or it could involve moving toward more defensive sectors like health care and utilities. It might also entail a higher proportion of bonds with higher credit ratings that, because of their perceived lower risk of default, typically carry lower interest rates.
Keep in mind that rebalancing could generate capital gains or losses that might have tax implications that challenge your retirement-funding needs. Consult with your tax professional before you act.
Jump on Opportunity
With market muddle may come opportunity. Some investors look with fresh eyes to favorite stocks that are falling because the markets are responding to outside forces like the economic stress from China this summer or currency fluctuations abroad. Retirement professionals say not to change your risk tolerance by putting your retirement funds in jeopardy, but if you can afford to and want to take on more stock, you might do so judiciously.
You might also want to use a down period to convert traditional Individual Retirement Accounts (IRAs) to Roth IRAs. “When you have your assets in a traditional IRA that has been significantly reduced by the market downturn, that might be a time to consider converting into a Roth IRA , where you’re paying taxes on the lower amount that’s being converted,” Sadowsky says. “You have to consider if you want to pay those taxes now or later. I would rather pay taxes when I have a lower tax rate and a lower asset value. Keep in mind that converting a Traditional IRA to a Roth is not for everyone. Again, here’s a reminder to consult with your tax advisor before converting.”
Rethink Your Withdrawal Strategy
“The 4% rule is a rule of thumb, not a law,” Sadowsky says. If you’re following that general canon of withdrawing 4% annually from your portfolio, adjusted for inflation, remember the ratios will change with a pullback.
For example, 4% of a $1 million account is roughly $3,300 monthly. If that account falls 20% and you don’t change the amount of dollars drawn down, you’re now looking at a 5% take down on an $800,000 account.
“Consider the longevity of your portfolio by setting a safe withdrawal rate when market valuations are low,” he says. “In a boom market, you might be more conservative.”
Turn to Cash?
Yes, cash is king, particularly in times when you don’t want to sell stocks at a loss or in a downturn.
Many financial professionals suggest that investors have at least six months’ worth of expenses covered (but up to a year’s worth if you want to be conservative) with cash in an emergency fund.
Though trading in the stock market has often been likened to gambling, remember that it’s not. Gambling is a zero-sum game, taking money from losers to give to winners. There’s no gain. Buying stock is an investment in a company, a piece of the action with “winnings” that will rise and fall with the fundamentals and management of the company—not to mention the overall economy. Remember, too, that the markets rise and fall.
Click here for more information on Retirement Planning.

All investing involves risks, including loss of principal.
Commentary provided for educational purposes only.
Past performance is no guarantee of future results or investment success.Asset allocation and diversification do not guarantee against investment losses. TD Ameritrade, Inc., member FINRA/SIPC. TD Ameritrade is a trademark jointly owned by TD Ameritrade IP Company, Inc. and The Toronto-Dominion Bank.
Marketwatch Studio is a unit of the MarketWatch advertising department. The MarketWatch newsroom was not involved in the creation of this content.

April will decide the market's fate

 

Getty Images
When we turned bullish in mid February, many were looking for the market to crash. While many of the bears are now capitulating and turning bullish, the potential for the market to drop to the 1700s on the S&P has not completely dissipated, and the next several weeks will tell us if we are heading to 2500 from here, or if we have to drop down to the 1700s before we rally to the 2500 region.
While the market did not follow through early this past week in the most bullish expectation I had, at no time have we broken support, and we ended the week striking the 2050-2060 target I wanted to hit.
Without any break of support, I still see the potential to head up to the 2080SPX region as early as this week. As usual, the question is the path. As long as the market remains over 2035SPX, the path can be a more direct one, which can see us strike 2080 by the middle of the week. However, if we break 2035SPX early this coming week, then we will likely drop to retest the 1995-2005SPX support region, and as long as it holds, we will then likely rally up to the 2080SPX region to complete wave iii off the February lows.
Should we actually rally up toward the 2080SPX region, I would expect to see us drop back to at least the 2027SPX region in a wave iv, as outlined in the green count on the 60-minute chart linked below. As long as the market remains over 1995-2005 support on all pullbacks into April, that will set us up to challenge the prior all-time highs in the SPX. But I do not believe we will breach the 2015 market high by much, if at all, which will then lead to a wave (2) pullback in a few months from now, which if it holds support, sets us up to rally to 2500-2600 in the SPX going into 2017.
Alternatively, if the market breaks below the 1995-2005SPX support at any point in time over the next month, it will be a strong signal that the market has not moved back into a long-term bullish posture, and I would expect that we will be testing the 1700 region later this year, as we continue within primary wave 4.
I warned in January and February of this year that we have a potential setup for a global melt up in emerging markets, commodities and U.S. equities, and much has followed through as expected so far. While we still have much to do on the upside over the next two months to confirm this case, by the summer, we will know if the market is setting up for a major bullish move into the second half of the year, or if we will be mired in a primary wave 4 into the fall, with the 1700's still being seen before the global melt up begins.
See charts illustrating the wave counts on the S&P 500 and Russell 2000.

Opinion: Government debt could bring China’s credit party to a halt

Markets ignore coming glut of new bonds from local governments

Reuters
China's central bank Gov. Zhou Xiaochuan warns of growing corporate debt burdens, but the biggest (and mostly hidden) problems may be with government debt.


HONG KONG (MarketWatch) — China’s economy may have run out of growth before it ran out of credit, but no one told its companies.
One of the biggest China puzzles today is the seemingly never-ending ability of its corporates to access new supplies of credit, without running into trouble or someone saying no.
Some analysts warn that we are looking in the wrong place for distress; it could be building in the government bond market.
This year, China’s easy money policy has been most graphically on display through an unprecedented overseas buying spree by its companies. The latest Chinese company throwing its checkbook around is insurer Anbang with a $13.1 billion cash offer for Starwood Hotels and Resorts HOT, +4.49%   . Earlier ChemChina broke China’s record for outbound merger and acquisition activity with an offer to buy Syngenta SYNN, -0.23%  in cash for $44.1 billion.

China's Aviation Dreams Hit Turbulence
Beijing has long wanted to develop an advanced aerospace industry capable of rivaling Western giants such as Airbus and Boeing. Here is a look back at some of China's efforts so far.
In fact, in the first three months of this year, China outbound M&A activity has rocketed to $102.7 billion, almost equal to the record total of $107.5 billion for the whole of 2015, according to data from Dealogic.
Heavily geared balance sheets appear no hindrance to connected mainland companies being able to access funding.
On Monday, Shanghai shares SHCOMP, -0.60%  rallied after more, cheaper money was promised to China’s brokers for margin financing.
Yet it was possible to detect a hint of caution from the central bank governor at the weekend after the chorus of upbeat commentaries on the economy from China’s leaders in recent weeks.
Zhou Xiaochuan said that “lending as a share of [gross domestic product], especially corporate lending as a share of GDP, is too high” and also that a high leverage ratio is more prone to macroeconomic risk. Corporate gearing in China is now widely estimated at some 160% of GDP.
It is these kinds of concerns that have led Moody’s to downgrade the outlook on China’s sovereign rating at the beginning of March.
Other analysts are also turning their attention to central government debt — which has long been viewed as manageable — as these funding needs could emerge as a new fault line of distress.
Societe Generale said in a new report the government bond market faces an unprecedented supply glut due to combined local and central government bond issuance.
As the market has yet to factor in this exponential growth in government paper, it could lead to disruption, which could potentially spill over into the corporate bond market, they warn.
The upswing in issuance is due to an expanded local government debt swap program (where bad loans from special funding vehicles were swapped for debt) and central and local government fiscal deficits. In total, SG calculates this year could see a total net issuance of 7.58 trillion yuan, up by 2.66 trillion yuan from 2015.
And this paper will keep coming. The latest audit report put the amount of local government debt eligible for being swapped into bonds at a massive 15.4 trillion yuan.
SG says the market does not appear to be pricing in the supply risk in the mid- to long-term end of the market. This could lead to a steepening of the curve when the market pays more attention to the supply.
This potential fallout in the government bond market from the local authority debt cleanup shows that the central government backstop is unlikely to be painless.
Any follow-through, such as higher yields, is likely to have a negative impact on the corporate bond market.
China’s corporate bond market has already been attracting attention as a potential area of stress in recent weeks after an issuance spree amid expectations of increasing defaults.
The added strain with reliance on bond issuance is finding buyers. China’s corporate bond market has benefitted from a switch of retail money away from equities this year, yet it could still be vulnerable to further asset relocation.
Chinese regulators do appear to recognize they need more bond buyers.
Last month, the People’s Bank of China (PBoC) stated that it would allow medium- to long-term foreign institutional investors to access China’s interbank bond market without any quota restriction.
This initiative could get a push if international bond indices include Chinese bonds. Last week J.P. Morgan said it was considering adding China’s government bonds to the J.P. Morgan Government Bond Index-Emerging Markets Global Diversified index.
Still, finding foreign buyers to keep China’s debt party going might look a stretch. They will need more than index inclusion to overcome various concerns from the value of the yuan to transparency.
Within China’s opaque system of state capitalism, it is always difficult to connect the dots on who owns assets, and who is ultimately responsible for debt.
If ultimately that debt stress appears in the government bond market, once again look for the yuan USDCNH, +0.0786%   to come under pressure.

Unlike in housing bubble, home buyers now put off by rising prices

By


Would-be home buyers see high prices as a deterrent, not an incentive to get in the market


Shutterstock.com
No bubble here....
There’s a paradox in Monday’s existing-home sales data.
Sales slid 7.1% to the lowest pace since November, the National Association of Realtors said. NAR has warned for many months that low levels of supply, which are pushing prices ever higher, will eventually cripple the market.
February’s decline may be a sign that the Realtors’ fears are coming true, although it may still turn out to be a temporary blip caused by weather, new closing regulations, and the difficulties of adjusting data to account for all those anomalies.
Still, as NAR Chief Economist Lawrence Yun said in a statement, “the main issue continues to be a supply and affordability problem. Finding the right property at an affordable price is burdening many potential buyers.”
That may sound obvious: if you can’t afford the few limited options available on the market, you’d probably give up too. It also tracks with a survey NAR published last week, which found that the share of current renters who say now is a good time to buy fell in the most recent quarter.
But it’s worth remembering, as Yun pointed out in a press conference Monday morning, that it wasn’t too long ago that higher prices drew more buyers in, rather than shutting them out.
That phenomenon was documented by Robert Shiller, one of the creators of the S&P/Case-Shiller home price index and a Nobel Prize winner for his research on asset price psychology.
In a 2007 paper, Shiller described the bubble mentality as “a feedback mechanism operating through public observations of price increases and public expectations of future price increases. The feedback can also be described as a social epidemic, where certain public conceptions and ideas lead to emotional speculative interest in the markets and, therefore, to prices increase.”
A few paragraphs later, Shiller wrote, “That the recent speculative boom has generated high expectations for future home price increases is indisputable.”
That’s vastly different than the world we live in now. In the February Fannie Mae Home Purchase Sentiment Index, survey respondents said they expect home prices to rise 1.7%. One year ago, respondents forecast prices would rise 2.5%.
In the 12 months to February, the actual price gain was 4.4%, NAR said Monday, but in recent months the yearly increase has been as high as 8.2%.
Homeowners are also less confident about the value of the equity they have in their homes. That means they’re no longer cashing out to finance other spending, as they did in the bubble years.
But it also means they may not understand how much their homes could command on the market, making them less likely to list and worsening the supply problem.

This is the simple mathematical reason why Osborne’s strategy will lead to financial ruin



The reason why Osborne’s plans were always going to come unstuck is a function of simple arithmetic.
Assume my spending remains constant at 100. To fund that spending I must have receipts, every year, of 100. Over five years to fund spending of 500 I must have income of 500. That five years is important because it’s the time horizon over which we plan our nation’s spending.
If my income is not 100 a year but 85, I have a problem. You might think, and rightly so, that I am 15 short. This Government has been 15 short.
What it has done, to hide that truth, is accelerate a whole bunch of 15s from later years into earlier years to hide the shortfall. Which is fine in earlier years – your budget looks balanced – but it leaves you in those later years with a shortfall of 30: the 15 you had anyway and the further shortfall consequential on you taking 15 from those later years for use in earlier years. Instead of having 85 you’ll only have 70. It’s not that complicated: if you spend tomorrow’s money today, you won’t have it tomorrow.
For a number of years, this is what we’ve been doing. On an extraordinary scale. Did you see those italics? Good, because I’m going to come back to them. And we’re now looking at a whole bunch of 70s.
Read more

World Trade Coming To Virtual Stand Still! Some Truckers Stuck For A Week At A Time For Product To Haul. Economy Is In Shambles And Only Appears To Look Strong Because Of The Hot Money That Is Holding It Up

WORLD TRADE COMING TO VIRTUAL STAND STILL! SOME TRUCKERS STUCK FOR A WEEK AT A TIME FOR PRODUCT TO HAUL-WHEN THE TRUCKS STOP RUNNING, SO DO AMERICAN HOUSEHOLDS
I import from China and I just received a container of products. I personally know the delivery driver.
We had a considerable delay because he had to drive 65 miles to get a container chassis from Maersk Line. This is unheard of because they always have a lot of chassis at the Chicago rail head. I asked him what was up because it is not peak volume time for anyone.
The delivery driver is part of a company that also imports a lot of products. I asked if they were experiencing any shipping problems out of China (because we have had issues). He said they had a container waiting for 7 weeks because Maersk had cancelled 35 sailings. I know the world economy is bad but 35 sailings is a lot….
http://www.stevequayle.com/index.php?s=33&d=1724
Website tracking shipping from satellites:
http://www.marinetraffic.com/en/ais/home/centerx:-53/centery:54/zoom:3
Economy is in shambles and only appears to look strong because of the hot money that is holding it up
Central bankers have been on a massive Gold Buying Spree led by Russia and China. One must remember that not only is Putin ex-KGB, but he is also an economist and holds a black belt in judo. Judo teaches you to use your opponent’s momentum to defeat him or her, and that appears to be what Putin is doing.
Ability hits the mark where presumption overshoots and diffidence falls short. John Henry Newman Central bankers have been on a massive Gold Buying Spree led by Russia and China.
One must remember that not only Putin is ex-KGB officer, but he is also an economist and holds a black belt in judo. Judo teaches you to use your opponent’s momentum to defeat him or her, and that appears to be what Putin is doing. He has this administration running circles, by the time they figure out what he is up to, it is too late to do anything. Putin and China can see that the writing is on the wall that the days of US holding the top spot are numbered.
Our economy is in shambles and only appears to look strong because of the hot money that is holding it up. Regarding illusions, it is a perfect illusion and for now, the masses have bought it, but Russia and China have not.
http://sputniknews.com/blogs/20160311/1036155953/us-russia-china-gold.html#ixzz43M84C6rI
IMF’s Lagarde Says Negative Rates Have Helped Global Economy
http://finance.yahoo.com/news/imfs-lagarde-says-negative-rates-112936086.html
Negative Interest Rates is outright theft of Capital and wealth that is the latest plunder of the citizens by the Public Sector Syndicate. It does not help an economy just as the other Keynesian Economics of Stimulus and QEs does not help any economy as they just destroy the wealth and monetize the debt. The criminals of the Public Sector Syndicate including the Central Banks, IMF, etc. have created and enabled all depressions and recessions since their inception or establishment. The crime and corruption of the Public Sector Syndicate is the cancer that has bankrupted every nation in the World today.
Well That Didn’t Work
Japan yield curve March 16
This sudden failure of easy money to produce the usual result is potentially huge, because the only thing standing in the way of a debt-driven implosion of the global economy (global because this time around emerging countries are as over-indebted as rich ones) is a belief that what worked in the past will keep working. If it doesn’t — that is, if negative interest rates start strengthening rather than weakening currencies — then this game is over. And a new one, with rules no one understands, has begun.
http://dollarcollapse.com/monetary-policy-2/well-that-didnt-work/
Wolf

The Administration’s response to the popped real estate bubble was to blow the bubble back up, and now younger buyers are getting priced out of the market. Unexpectedly.

CHOCOLATE RATION INCREASED: Previously Owned U.S. Home Sales Decline More Than Forecast.
Closings on existing homes, which usually take place a month or two after a contract is signed, decreased 7.1 percent to a three-month low 5.08 million annual rate after a 5.47 million pace in January, the National Association of Realtors said Monday. Sales were weaker than the most pessimistic forecast in a Bloomberg survey of economists.
Faster growth in residential real estate is being hampered by a limited selection of available properties that has led to higher offering prices. While mortgage rates are attractive, affordability remains an issue for potential first-time and lower-income buyers whose participation would help broaden the market’s improvement.
“This number seems to suggest the trend may be a little weaker than we thought,” said David Sloan, senior economist at 4cast Inc. in New York. “Supply is fairly limited, so that is a restraint on sales.”
The Administration’s response to the popped real estate bubble was to blow the bubble back up, and now younger buyers are getting priced out of the market.
Unexpectedly.
Owning a home does not make you a success, it is a sign of success.
Subsidizing home ownership or otherwise making those with poor credit able to attain a home loan is going to do nothing except create another housing bubble.

SG