Saturday, September 21, 2013

Stock Market SELL OFF -186!!! – The Bernanke Rally Is Already Collapsing! (BIG BOYS GETTING OUT)

If you thought gold was bad, look at silver – down 5.7%
http://www.businessinsider.com/gold-is-getting-slammed-20-2013-9
Gold And Silver Battered By Bullard’s Bernanke Rebuttal

http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2013-09-20/gold-and-silver-battered-bullards-bernanke-rebuttal
Ben Bernanke Continues To Crush It As Most Hedge Funds Underperform: Complete Hedge Fund Performance Update
http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2013-09-20/ben-bernanke-continues-crush-it-most-hedge-funds-underperform-complete-hedge-fund-pe
The Bernanke rally is already collapsing
http://www.businessinsider.com/the-bernanke-rally-is-already-collapsing-2013-9
Stocks Fall: Here’s What You Need To Know
http://www.businessinsider.com/stocks-fall-heres-what-you-need-to-know-2013-9
First comment from there:
Given the rally on Bernanke’s comments on Wednesday and the sell off on Bullard’s toady, anyone who still claims that stocks are trading based upon fundamentals now looks like a complete idiot.
Dow Slumps Most In 3 Weeks; Erases All Fed Gains
http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2013-09-20/dow-slumps-most-3-weeks-erases-all-fed-gains
The days of easy money may be over
Commentary: New indicator says the time to sell is here
http://www.marketwatch.com/story/the-days-of-easy-money-may-be-over-2013-09-20?siteid=rss

BlackBerry says it will fire 4,500 employees, lost nearly $1 billion last quarter, stock collapses 20%!
http://www.businessinsider.com/blackberry-cutting-4500-jobs-2013-9
http://www.businessinsider.com/blackberry-shares-halted-2013-9

Luis

Hundred-Thousand Investors Told “Sorry, We Can’t Pay You” Just the Beginning?


By  for Profit Confidential
Major cities across the U.S. economy are struggling. Yes, we saw great cities like Detroit go bankrupt. But don’t for a second believe it’s all over. The reality is we will have more situations like Detroit.
Take the City of Los Angeles, for example. In his budget proposal to the city council, the mayor of the city, Antonio Villaraigosa, said Los Angeles will have a budget deficit of $216 million in the current fiscal year. (Source: City of Los Angeles, April 20, 2013.)
But Los Angeles isn’t the only problem city in California. When I look at San Francisco, it shows even more trouble for the municipal bonds market. The city’s controller says the budget deficit will increase from $283 million last year to $829 million by fiscal 2015/2016. (Source: City of San Francisco, Office of the Controller web site, last accessed September 16, 2013.)
Minneapolis, Minnesota was downgraded by Moody’s Investors Service recently. This puts the city’s $679 million worth of general obligation municipal bonds on the line. (Source: Moody’s Investors Service, July 29, 2013.) A couple of the reasons for the downgrade by Moody’s were that property values in the city have declined and it has a pension liability of 4.3 times the operating revenue it received in fiscal 2012!
Risks are growing in the municipal bonds market. Let’s not forget: in Detroit, over 100,000 municipal bond investors were told, “Sorry, we can’t pay you.”
What we are seeing with U.S. cities sinking in debt should alarm us, but just like other crisis situations, like auto loans and student debt, no one wants to talk about it.
Municipal bonds continue to be issued at a rapid pace; in the second quarter of 2013, 8.9% more municipal bonds were issued than in the previous quarter. California, where we have been seeing a significant number of municipalities posting budget deficits, raised $13.6 billion worth of bonds in the second quarter. (Source: “Municipal Bond Credit Report,” Securities Industry and Financial Markets Association web site, last accessed September 16, 2013.)
The more I look into the municipal bonds market and how cities across the U.S. are registering budget deficits, the more I really wonder if it’s a safe place to be. My conclusion is that the municipal bonds are becoming dangerous. There are too many troubles with the cities backing the municipal bonds, which can’t be easily solved. Caution is the best option for those who are involved in the municipal bonds market.
Michael’s Personal Notes:
Last week, I attended the Toronto Resource Investment Conference, which is organized by Cambridge House International. This annual conference features companies involved in the resources sector, mainly gold bullion and silver explorers and producers.
To say the very least, the sentiment at the conference was dismal, and the “hope factor” just wasn’t there. After attending this annual conference for a few years, you tend to get an idea about what you will see and what kinds of opinions you will hear. This time was different. Attendance was way down, as were the number of gold companies exhibiting.
Those who pitched gold explorers, and gave their tips, were saying, “But you have to be really careful.” The “feeling” was gold bullion producing companies, be they senior miners or junior miners, face an anemic future ahead. And for those companies that explore for the precious metal, the “feeling” was that they will have trouble raising money.
But one thing all the speakers did agree on was that demand for the precious metal is increasing. I heard China is buying gold bullion; demand for the precious metal in India is robust; production at mints around the world is in overdrive mode; and so on. This is what I have already been writing about in these pages.
It was unusual to see the regular gold bugs actually being cautious on where the gold prices are going next. They were very clear that the damage that took place in the most recent sell-off would take some time to recover. They were concerned the price of gold bullion is being manipulated.
To me, all of this is negative sentiment—something I haven’t seen in years—is a bullish signal for gold prices. Attending the conference reminds me of what the “buy when there’s blood on the street” saying actually means.
Yes, it’s a time of elevated pessimism for gold bullion. Can it get worse? After all, we are hearing once again how The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. (NYSE/GS) is calling for lower gold bullion prices ahead—even saying it could fall below $1,000 an ounce.
When I look at gold prices, I don’t look at daily fluctuations; I look at the big picture. When I do just that, I see the precious metal is still trending higher, as you can see in the chart below.
Gold-Spot Price-ChartChart courtesy of www.StockCharts.com
I remain bullish on gold bullion. I’m very interested to see if Goldman’s recent “sell recommendation” on gold pushes the metal’s price down again. And I like all the growing negativity surrounding gold bullion. Are we getting to the point we were at in 2001, when bearishness for gold bullion reigned? To me, these are all bullish signs.
What He Said:
“I see a deal when it’s a deal. And right now there’s a good ‘for sale’ sign flashing on gold bullion and gold producer shares. In fact, after peaking at the $690 an ounce level earlier this year, gold could be a bargain at its current price of around $650 per ounce. As a reader, you are undoubtedly aware of my negative stance on the general stock market and the U.S. economy. As the economic problems that continue to brew in the U.S., as these problems develop into others, and as they are finally exposed, what other investment but gold will worldwide investors turn to?” Michael Lombardi in Profit Confidential,March 14, 2007. Gold bullion was trading under $300.00 an ounce when Michael first started recommending gold-related investments. Many gold stocks recommended in Michael’s advisories gained in excess of 100%.

The U.S. Economy Is Close To Imploding

Having allowed a couple of days for the tidal wave of mainstream, post-“tapering” nonsense to subside; it’s now time to look at the facts, as once again The Boy Who Cried Exit Strategy got in front of microphones to say “just kidding.”
At the time that B.S. Bernanke originally began his musings now known as “tapering”; it had already been observed that the U.S. pseudo-recovery was “longer than average duration” – i.e. it was already past its expiry-date. After stalling for 4 ½ years, and failing to deliver on all his previous promises of an “exit strategy” – while the U.S. economy was relatively “strong”(?) and supposedly growing – no rational government (or central bank) would ever time the withdrawal of stimulus to coincide with the end of a growth-cycle.
“Tapering” was always a hoax.

Simply talking about tapering caused interest rates (i.e. borrowing costs) on U.S. ten-year Treasuries to nearly double; and naturally/inevitably those higher borrowing costs filtered through the entire U.S. economy. Thus in simply talking about tapering for seven months; the Banksters created so much economic “drag” on the U.S. economy that if Bernanke had actually, finally delivered on (yet another) “exit strategy” promise, it could have only been interpreted as deliberate economic suicide.
“Tapering” was always a hoax.
There is a delicious irony here. The “latest rounds of QE” – the current, $1 trillion per year of totally gratuitous U.S. money-printing – are not actually “new” money-printing at all. These infinite stacks of Bernanke-bills were being conjured into existence just as quickly before these “announcements”, it simply wasn’t being reported/declared.
It was counterfeit money, in every sense of the word. This was explained in a previous commentary. The original problem? No buyers (anywhere) for U.S. Treasuries – at “all-time record prices”. The solution? Counterfeit money.
Secretly print-up $trillions in counterfeit Bernanke-bills, and use that counterfeit money to “buy” U.S. Treasuries in auctions which (conveniently) had just been made totally opaque. Readers have seen or heard my description of the new-and-improved “Treasuries auction” previously.
A stack of Treasuries is placed on a table. The lights go out. (Sounds of paper-shuffling are heard.) The lights come back on. The stack of Treasuries is gone. “Auction” complete.
This cheap ‘magic trick’ was the Perfect Crime, and then Reality ruined everything. With the U.S. pseudo-recovery already beginning to obviously sag (in its old age); the call went out to the Fed for “more stimulus” – given the fact that the U.S. Treasury is totally empty (save for the IOU’s).
So B.S. Bernanke and Co. simply began reporting the “new money” they had already been counterfeiting previously, and presto! One $trillion per year in new, so-called “stimulus.” Now (suddenly) there was an actual “reason” for U.S. Treasuries to be improbably perched at all-time record prices – despite the fact the U.S. economy is obviously bankrupt: the Federal Reserve wasopenly monetizing all debt.
“The Truth shall set you free”? Not if you’re a central banker at the Federal Reserve. Then it’s a nasty ball-and-chain which (you discover to your horror) you can never remove.

Pages: Next

House Passes CR Defunding Obamacare Puts Senate In Position To Shut Government – Lou Dobbs


House Passes CR Defunding Obamacare Puts Senate In Position To Shut Government – Lou Dobbs

'All you can do is pray': What poverty in America really looks like

Damaris Alecia / Witnesses to Hunger
Boarded-up houses in North Camden, N.J., as photographed by Damaris Alecia, a single mother and participant in the "Witnesses to Hunger" project. "If they fixed this, people probably would be better and be less motivated to do bad stuff," says Alecia, who calls this photo "Negative Motivation."
By Barbara Raab, Senior Producer, NBC News
When the U.S. Census Bureau released its latest data on poverty in America earlier this week, many experts opined about the statistics and their significance. Less present in the conversation were the voices behind the numbers: the voices of the poor.
“Witnesses to Hunger,” a project of the Center for Hunger-Free Communities, a non-profit organization based at Drexel University School of Public Health in Philadelphia, seeks to change that. Launched in 2008, the advocacy and research project invites parents and caregivers of young children who have experienced poverty and hunger to document their lives through photographs and stories -- and to advocate for changes that could help break the cycle of poverty.
"Witnesses" started in Philadelphia and has since branched out to other cities, including nearby Camden, N.J. Once the proud home to companies like RCA Victor, and the biggest shipbuilding company in the world, Camden is now better known for poverty, violence and blight. According to the new Census data, the overall poverty rate in the city is 39.3 percent; more than half of Camden's children, 53.3 percent, live below the poverty line. 
This week, the photos of 10 “Witnesses to Hunger” participants in Camden, all women, are featured in a groundbreaking exhibit at an art gallery there. The participants were given point-and-shoot digital cameras and encouraged to capture images related to the health and well-being of their families and community, problems they want to change, and anything else they want the public or policymakers to be aware of regarding poverty and their lives. The images are on display at a Camden art gallery, Eleven One, through Saturday.
Damaris Alecia, a single mother, took several photos (like the one at top) documenting her frustration with the high number of abandoned, derelict buildings in Camden and the lack of decent housing options. "If [people] have affordable housing and they have heat," she says, "then maybe there would be less violence. There would be less people on the block selling drugs and stuff like that."
Kathy / Witnesses to Hunger
In this photo, called "The Search Continues," Kathy documents her frustrating search for affordable housing. "I'm on the list through Section 8," she said, "and they told me that I might not get called for three years, maybe five."
Another Witness to Hunger participant, Kathy (she declined to provide her last name), also a single mother, chose to depict what it was like to search for affordable, subsidized housing. After more than three months in a shelter with her two children, she says, she found an apartment for $850 a month, and moved in, but her social services caseworker told her she had to find housing at a lower price.
"I don't know where I'm going to find a two-bedroom for a lower price," Kathy says. "All the housing that's low-income is like a year waiting list or more." And her photo shows the response she got when she tried calling a long list of landlords: no answer. Kathy and her family now live with a relative.
Camden resident Anisa Davis was coming home from the store when she was struck by the image of three friends paying tribute to "Hollywood," a man who had been shot to death in the streets of Camden.
Anisa Davis / Witnesses to Hunger
Anisa Davis took this photo, entitled "Violence is Everywhere." Her teenage son has been caught in two shoot-outs, she says. "We had a shooting the other day and they locked the school down."
She says her 19-year-old son "has already been caught up in two shootouts. "All you can do is pray and try and keep them off these streets." She says "there are guns everywhere," and amid the "senseless murders going on in this city, I needed that picture. There was so much love on that step that day."
Tanya Smith / Witnesses to Hunger
Tanya Smith shot this image of one her family's staple foods. "Oodles of Noodles, essential," she says.
Tanya Smith photographed a box of Oodles of Noodles, "the favorite end of the month meal," she laughed, when her $200 monthly food stamps allowance is gone. "If there's nothing else, you've got the noodles."
Smith, who has been working as a secretary, says she hopes the photo exhibit will show that "people out here are really struggling. They should build more places to feed people and places to sleep."
Alecia, who photographed her two children, 5-year-old Yonell and 7-year-old Amaya, says the only way up may be out. She has applied for low-income housing in another town about 100 miles away from Camden, where she says her kids could get a better education than they're getting in Camden.
"I wish I could move," she says.
Damaris Alecia / Witnesses to Hunger
Alecia says she would like to leave Camden so her two children, Yonell and Amaya, pictured here, could get a better education.

Too Big To Fail Is Now Bigger Than Ever Before

By Michael Snyder
Lower Manhattan At Night - Photo by Hu Totya
The too big to fail banks are now much, much larger than they were the last time they caused so much trouble.  The six largest banks in the United States have gotten 37 percent larger over the past five years.  Meanwhile, 1,400 smaller banks have disappeared from the banking industry during that time.  What this means is that the health of JPMorgan Chase, Bank of America, Citigroup, Wells Fargo, Goldman Sachs and Morgan Stanley is more critical to the U.S. economy than ever before.  If they were “too big to fail” back in 2008, then now they must be “too colossal to collapse”.  Without these banks, we do not have an economy.  The six largest banks control 67 percent of all U.S. banking assets, and Bank of America accounted for about a third of all business loans by itself last year.  Our entire economy is based on credit, and these giant banks are at the very core of our system of credit.  If these banks were to collapse, a brutal economic depression would be guaranteed.  Unfortunately, as you will see later in this article, these banks did not learn anything from 2008 and are being exceedingly reckless.  They are counting on the rest of us bailing them out if something goes wrong, but that might not happen next time around.
Ever since the financial crisis of 2008, our politicians have been running around proclaiming that they will not rest until they have fixed “the too big to fail problem”, but instead of fixing it those banks have rapidly gotten even larger.  Just check out the following figures which come fromthe Los Angeles Times…
Just before the financial crisis hit, Wells Fargo & Co. had $609 billion in assets. Now it has $1.4 trillion.Bank of America Corp. had $1.7 trillion in assets. That’s up to $2.1 trillion.
And the assets of JPMorgan Chase & Co., the nation’s biggest bank, have ballooned to $2.4 trillion from $1.8 trillion.
We are witnessing a consolidation of the banking industry that is absolutely stunning.  Hundreds of smaller banks have been swallowed up by these behemoths, and millions of Americans are finding that they have to deal with these banking giants whether they like it or not.
Even though all they do is move money around, these banks have become the core of our economic system, and they are growing at an astounding pace.  The following numbers come from a recent CNN article…
-The assets of the six largest banks in the United States have grown by 37 percent over the past five years.
-The U.S. banking system has 14.4 trillion dollars in total assets.  The six largest banks now account for 67 percent of those assets and the other 6,934 banks account for only 33 percent of those assets.
-Approximately 1,400 smaller banks have disappeared over the past five years.
-JPMorgan Chase is roughly the size of the entire British economy.
-The four largest banks have more than a million employeescombined.
-The five largest banks account for 42 percent of all loans in the United States.
As I discussed above, without these giant banks there is no economy.  We should have never, ever allowed this to happen, but now that it has happened it is imperative that the American people understand this.  The power of these banks is absolutely overwhelming…
One third of all business loans this year were made by Bank of America. Wells Fargo funds nearly a quarter of all mortgage loans. And held in the vaults of JPMorgan Chase is $1.3 trillion, which is 12% of our collective cash, including the payrolls of many thousands of companies, or enough to buy 47,636,496,885 ofthese NFL branded toaster ovens. Thanks for your business!
A lot of people tend to focus on many of the other threats to our economy, but the number one potential threat that our economy is facing is the potential failure of the too big to fail banks.  As we saw in 2008, when they start to fail things can get really bad really fast.
And as I have written about so many times, the number one threat to the too big to fail banks is the possibility of a derivatives crisis.
Former Goldman Sachs banker and best selling author Nomi Prins recently told Greg Hunter of USAWatchdog.com that the global economy “could implode and have serious ramifications on the financial systems starting with derivatives and working on outward.” You can watch the full video of that interview right here.
And Nomi Prins is exactly right.  Just like we witnessed in 2008, a derivatives panic can spiral out of control very quickly.  Our big banks should have learned a lesson from 2008 and should have greatly scaled back their reckless betting.
Unfortunately, that has not happened.  In fact, according to the OCC’slatest quarterly report on bank trading and derivatives activities, the big banks have become even more reckless since the last time I reported on this.  The following figures reflect the new information contained in the latest OCC report…
JPMorgan Chase
Total Assets: $1,948,150,000,000 (just over 1.9 trillion dollars)
Total Exposure To Derivatives: $70,287,894,000,000 (more than 70 trillion dollars)
Citibank
Total Assets: $1,306,258,000,000 (a bit more than 1.3 trillion dollars)
Total Exposure To Derivatives: $58,471,038,000,000 (more than 58 trillion dollars)
Bank Of America
Total Assets: $1,458,091,000,000 (a bit more than 1.4 trillion dollars)
Total Exposure To Derivatives: $44,543,003,000,000 (more than 44 trillion dollars)
Goldman Sachs
Total Assets: $113,743,000,000 (a bit more than 113 billion dollars – yes, you read that correctly)
Total Exposure To Derivatives: $42,251,600,000,000 (more than 42 trillion dollars)
That means that the total exposure that Goldman Sachs has to derivatives contracts is more than 371 times greater than their total assets.
How in the world can anyone say that Goldman Sachs is not being incredibly reckless?
And remember, the overwhelming majority of these derivatives contractsare interest rate derivatives.
Wild swings in interest rates could set off this time bomb and send our entire financial system plunging into chaos.
After climbing rapidly for a couple of months, the yield on 10 year U.S. Treasury bonds has stabilized for the moment.
But if that changes and interest rates start going up dramatically again, that is going to be a huge problem for these too big to fail banks.
And I know that a lot of you don’t have much sympathy for the big banks, but remember, if they go down we go down too.
These banks have been unbelievably reckless, but when they fail, we will all pay the price.

Ron Paul ~ It’s The Monetary System We Need To Deal With Not The Particular Manager