Tuesday, August 13, 2013

'Hindenburg Omen' hovering over Wall Street again

ittery Wall Street traders are looking up in the sky and seeing Hindenburgs.
That can be a bad thing for markets, which have suffered in the past when the tripwires associated with the "Hindenburg Omen" get activated.
Market veteran Art Cashin said Monday that the market phenomenon is looming again.
"There have been multiple occurrences of the Hindenburg Omen in the last several weeks," Cashin, the director of floor operations at UBS, said in his morning note.
Cashin: 'Folklore on the floor' has investors waiting
CNBC's Bob Pisani and Art Cashin of UBS discuss why investors are reluctant to jump into the market at this point, as stocks toggle in and out of positive territory.
(Read more: The stock market's line in the sand—S&P 1,700)
To demonstrate, he cited research from SentimenTrader's Jason Goepfert, who has been warning about Hindenburg dangers all summer.
From his most recent findings:
Sometimes a topic in the market takes hold and it's hard to shake it off. One of those is the technical "market crash" signal called the Hindenburg Omen.
It has its boosters and its detractors, and we're not going to get caught up in debating its merits. We've discussed it for 12 years, always with the same arguments.
On June 10th, we outlined the market's historical performance after suffering at least 5 signals from the Hindenburg Omen within a two-week period. Stocks were consistently weak afterward, and proved to be so again, at least for a while.
With the latest market rally, the Omens are flaring up again.There have been 5 Omens triggered out of the past 8 trading sessions (your data may vary—we're using the same sources we've always used for historical data). That's actually the closest-grouped cluster since early November 2007.
It's extremely rare to see as many Omens occurring together as we've seen over the past 50 days. The last time was prior to the bear market in 2007.
The time before that was prior to the bear market in 2000.
The most commonly cited Hindenburg factor is when an unusually high number of stocks on the New York Stock Exchange hit 52-week highs and lows.
Others include when the NYSE index is higher than it was 50 days ago; when market breadth is negative, and when new highs are less than new lows. Traditional thinking is that all the indicators must occur on the same day, though interpretations vary.
(Read more: Why a 4 to 6 percent pullback may happen soon: Pros)
To be sure, the Hindenburg signals don't always work.
The most recent spate of Hindenburg chatter came May 31, and the S&P 500 is up nearly 4 percent since.
(Read more: The 'Hindenburg Omen': Bear signal scares market)
Yet the recurrence of signs still has trading floors buzzing.
"Two precedents don't make a pattern," Cashin said, "but that sure makes that 'check engine' light glow much, much brighter."

—By CNBC's Jeff Cox.

U.S., Japan Conclude First Round Of TPP Talks


The U.S. and Japan on Friday completed an initial round of talks over a proposed free trade zone in the Asia-Pacific region but were reportedly unable to reach an agreement on automobiles, insurance and non-tariff measures, which are the biggest obstacles in the negotiations.

Acting United States Trade Representative Wendy Cutler on Friday completed three days of bilateral negotiations with her Japanese counterparts. The talks centered around the proposed Trans-Pacific Partnership, a pact to reduce tariffs and other trade barriers between the U.S. and 11 other... 

Read More...

One of the root causes of today’s financial disaster is the deregulation of derivatives trading that Larry Summers campaigned for.

by Stephen Lendman


Be Very Quiet_ I'm Stealing. Larry Summers

When his Fed chairmanship term ends in January, Bernanke’s expected to step down. Wall Street wants Summers replacing him. It usually gets what it wants. More on that below.

Money power runs America. The Federal Reserve isn’t federal. It’s privately owned and controlled. Wall Street decides who runs it.
Bankers choose chairmen and governors. It’s always been this way. It’s more than ever so now. Presidents have no say. They announce pre-selected choices. They pretend otherwise.
auditfed_dees
America’s founders knew the dangers. Letting bankers control money assures trouble.
James Madison called them “Money Changers,” saying:
“History records that the Money Changers have used every form of abuse, intrigue, deceit and violent means possible to maintain their control over governments by controlling money and its issuance.”
Thomas Jefferson said:
“I sincerely believe that banking institutions are more dangerous to our liberties than standing armies.”
“Already they have raised up a money aristocracy that has set the government at defiance.”
“The issuing power should be taken from the banks and restored to the people to whom it properly belongs.”
According to Lincoln:
“The money powers prey upon the nation in times of peace and conspire against it in times of adversity.”
“It is more despotic than a monarch, more insolent than autocracy and more selfish than a bureaucracy.”
“It denounces, as public enemies, all who question its methods or throw light upon its crimes.”
“I have two great enemies, the Southern Army in front of me and the bankers in the rear. Of the two, the one at the rear is my greatest foe.”
Andrew Jackson called the Bank of the United States (the Fed’s equivalent then) a “hydra-headed monster.” He called bankers “a den of vipers and thieves.”
They were tame compared to now. Privatized money power is humanity’s greatest threat. Bankers control it for personal gain. They use it to accumulate more. Political complicity permits it.
Alan Greenspan wrecked the economy. William Greider called him “among the most duplicitous figures to serve in modern American government.”
He used “his exalted status as economic wizard (to) regularly corrupt the political dialogue by sowing outrageously false impressions among gullible members of Congress and adoring financial reporters.”
When he stepped down, he left a colossal mess. Bernanke accelerated a failed process. He’s run amuck. He’s responsible for the most reckless money printing madness in history.
It continues. He’s debasing the dollar irresponsibly. A slow-motion train wreck looms. Nothing’s being done to prevent it. Ordinary people will be harmed most.
Bail-ins will confiscate their savings. Bankers will benefit most. They control the Fed. Except for coins, they create money, credit and debt.
In 1927, Bank of England president Josiah Stamp said:
“The modern banking system manufactures money out of nothing. The process is perhaps the most astounding piece of sleight of hand that was ever invented.”
“Banking was conceived in inequity and born in sin.” (They) own the earth.”
“Take it away from them but leave them the power to create money, and, with a flick of a pen, they will create enough money to buy it back again.”
“Take this great power away from them and all great fortunes like mine will disappear, for then this would be a better and happier world to live in.”
“But, if you want to continue to be the slaves of bankers and pay the cost of your own slavery, then let bankers continue to create money and control credit.”
Privatized money facilitates financial war on humanity. It assures poverty, unemployment, inflation, out-of-control debt, human misery and economic slavery.
Today’s system far exceeds the worst of past eras. Among names floated for next Fed chairman, Summers is the worst possible choice. He’s ideologically over-the-top.
He’s a walking conflict of interest. He sold out America. He did so for personal gain. He’s in bed with Wall Street. His rap sheet exposes him.
As Clinton’s Treasury Secretary, he pushed banking deregulation to the extreme. He ignored industry fraud.
He supported industry consolidation. He promoted anything goes. He spearheaded Glass-Steagall repeal.
He successfully thwarted Clinton’s Commodity Futures Trading Commission head Brooksley Born’s efforts to regulate financial derivatives.
He campaigned for passing the Commodity Futures Modernization Act. It deregulated derivatives trading. It legitimized swap agreements and other hybrid instruments.
99 per centIt’s one of the root causes of today’s financial disaster. It ended derivatives and leveraging regulatory oversight. Doing so unleashed a tsunami of trouble. It rages out-of-control. It more than ever turned Wall Street into a casino.
It facilitates fraud. It does so on an unprecedented scale. It wrecked the economy. It scams millions of investors. It hangs ordinary people out to dry. It spreads human misery. It does so on a global scale.
As Obama’s National Economic Council director (2009 – 2010), Summers pushed destructive economic policies. He did so for personal gain.
He peddled influence. He earned millions of dollars doing so. He got millions more in Wall Street sponsored speaking fees. Bailed out banks rewarded him for services rendered.
William Greider said stop him “before he messes up again.” Mendacity is his most notable attribute.
He’s “noxious.” He’s a “clumsy public liar.” He collaborates with Wall Street insiders. He helped engineer financial collapse. Appointing him Fed chairman “will be a sick joke.”
Say it isn’t so. He represents same old, same old. He’s a disaster waiting to happen.
Greider urged “no more second chances for Larry Summers.” Once bitten is enough.
As World Bank chief economist (1991 – 1993), he supported structural adjustment harshness. He drafted an infamous secret memo. He called Africa under-polluted.
He proposed a “free market in toxics.” He said the World Bank should encourage “migration of dirty industries to the LDSs (less developed countries).”
“Health impairing pollution should be done in the country with the lowest cost, which will be the country with the lowest wages,” he added.
He stoked further controversy saying:
“There are no…limits to the carrying capacity of the earth that are likely to bind any time in the foreseeable future.”
“There isn’t a risk of an apocalypse due to global warming or anything else.”
“The idea that we should put limits on growth because of some natural limit, is a profound error and one that, were it ever to prove influential, would have staggering social costs.”
Critics demanded his resignation. Brazil’s environmental secretary, Jose Lutzenberger, wrote him. He called his ideas “totally insane.”
They reflect the “social ruthlessness and arrogant ignorance of many conventional economists concerning the nature of the world we live in.”
“If the World Bank keeps you as (chief economist), it will lose all credibility.”
As Harvard president, he pushed a right wing neocon agenda. He supported reestablishing ROTC.
Vietnam War era campus protests downgraded it to an extracurricular activity. Harvard let students participate at MIT.
Summer’s proposal failed. In March 2011, President Drew Faust returned Naval ROTC. She did so disgracefully.
Summers accused African-American Studies Professor Cornel West of spending too much time on political activism. West left for Princeton.
He called Black professors unfit scholars. He was fired for making derogatory remarks about women. Faculty and staff demanded he go.
He supports Israeli occupation harshness. In 2002, he campaigned against Harvard and other universities divesting from companies doing business with Israel. He called doing so “anti-Semitic.”
In September 2010, Nomi Prins headlined “Bye Larry Summers – Thanks for the Hangover,” saying:
“The departure of Larry Summers from President Obama’s Economic Advisory Free-market Squad, is similar to that of the high-school degenerate who left the keg party after the last barrel was emptied and the place was demolished.”
“Only it was the reckless financial deregulation he promoted through Glass Steagall repeal as Treasury Secretary in 1999 that brought about the Great Bailout Party of 2008 where Wall Street drank the federal subsidy barrel dry and left the general economy trashed.”
“It’s good he’s finally leaving, but it should have happened long ago.”
Imagine a second act. Imagine the unimaginable. Summers as Fed chairman assures the equivalent of financial nuclear winter for humanity.
On July 31, AP headlined ”Obama speaks up for Larry Summers as liberal Democrats question consideration for Fed post,” saying:
“Speaking up for a contentious former aide, President Barack Obama pushed back Wednesday against liberal Democrats who are urging the president not to pick Lawrence Summers to run the Federal Reserve.”
“In a closed-door session with House Democrats, Obama offered what participants in the meeting described as a keen defense of Summers.”
It “continued at the White House, where press secretary Jay Carney said Summers had ‘stood shoulder to shoulder’ with Obama during an economic crisis.”
“He made decisions and put forth the policies that helped reverse the tragic economic decline that this country faced in the beginning of 2009.”
False! He helped turn disaster into catastrophe. He did so for growing millions. Protracted Main Street Depression continues out-of-control.
Wrongheaded policies deepen it. Obama bears full responsibility. So does Summers. His tenure as White House point man was disastrous.
It bears repeating. He’s in bed with Wall Street. He operates for personal gain. He’s a walking conflict of interest. He assures greater disaster than already.
On August 2, Francis Boyle headlined “The Cowardice of Harvard’s Larry Summers,” saying:
He wanted to debate Summers publicly. At issue is calling Harvard alumni involved in urging Israeli divestment anti-Semitic.
He “did not have the courage, the integrity, or the principles to back up his scurrilous charges,” said Boyle.
Harvard fired him for “attempt(ing) to impose his Neo-Conservative agenda and in particular (claiming) women are dumber than men when it comes to math and science.”
He’s an unconscionable Fed chairman choice. Appointing him defends the indefensible. He assures deepening hard times for millions.
Robert Weissman’s an economic expert. He’s written extensively on financial and corporate accountability. He heads Public Citizen.
“Forget Larry,” he says. A petition calls him “the wrong person to lead the Federal Reserve.”
“Summers has continuously advocated for deregulation and other policies that favor Wall Street and corporate interests. He should not head the nation’s central bank.”
Summers Dead Wrong 310 X 233  Impact 18 white



“Sign our petition urging President Obama to nominate someone better suited than Larry Summers to be Federal Reserve Board Chair.”
“After you sign the petition, Public Citizen will keep you updated on other ways to stand up to giant corporations and their cronies like Larry Summers.”

Congress should be ashamed about jobs

US Representative Marlin Stutzman said, “Most people will agree that if you are an able bodied adult without any kids you should find your way off food stamps.” That depends on whether those ways can be found. If Stutzman and other members of Congress believe it’s that easy to find a job with a living wage, they’re either ignorant of middle-class life or victims of free-market delusion. In either case, Congress, with its shameful response to the people who elected them, has not only made the job search more difficult for average Americans, but has also impeded the process.
Senate Republicans killed a proposed $447 billion jobs bill in 2011 that would have added about two million jobs to the economy. They filibustered Nancy Pelosi’s “Prevention of Outsourcing Act,” and temporarily blocked the “Small Business Jobs Act.” Most recently, only one member of Congress bothered to show up for a hearing on unemployment.
Congress’ unwavering support of big business donors shows a callous disregard for the needs of the millions of Americans they’re supposed to be representing. Here are five of the paralyzing consequences:
1. They’ve stifled the growth of millions of young adults
In the US, more than half of college graduates were jobless or underemployed in 2011. Over the last 12 years, according to a New York Times report, the United States has gone from having the highest share of employed 25- to 34-year-olds among large, wealthy economies to having among the lowest. The Wall Street Journal recently noted that nearly 300,000 people with at least a bachelor’s degree were making the minimum wage in 2012, double the number in 2007. Not since the 1960s have so many young adults been living with their parents.
2. They’ve mocked the concept of a “living wage”
At the very least, one would think, workers should be able to sustain their lifestyles over the years, to keep from falling backwards in earnings. But they’ve lost 30% of their purchasing power since 1968. This happened during a time of steady American productivity. It has been estimated that a minimum wage tied to productivity should now be $16.54 per hour, but the current $7.25 is less than half of that, and below poverty-level. It’s been getting worse in the last five years. While 21 percent of post-recession job losses were considered low-wage positions, 58 percent of jobs added during the recovery were considered low-wage. Congress fiddles while more and more American families lose their earning power.
3. They’ve allowed nearly half of America to go into debt
Our young adults are not only underemployed, but the college graduates among them are dealing with an average of $26,600 in debt, which translates, according to Demos, into $100,000 of lifetime wealth loss. Total student debt has quadrupled in just ten years.
It goes beyond students to the population at large, many of whom survived the boom years by borrowing heavily on homes and credit cards. In 1983 the poorest 47% of America owned an average of $15,000 per family, 2.5 percent of the nation’s wealth. By 2009 the poorest 47% of America, as a group, owned ZERO PERCENT of the nation’s wealth. Their debt exceeds their assets. Yet Congress caters to “too big to fail” financial institutions while “too little to matter” American homeowners don’t earn enough to stay out of debt.
4. They’ve persisted with the trickle-down “job creator” myth
The “low tax = job creation” argument is absurd. Congress need only look at four of its pet projects: Bank of America, Citigroup, Pfizer, and Apple. Each one of the first three made much of their revenue in the US over the last two years, but claimed billions of dollars of US losses (big foreign gains, though). Yet with almost zero US taxes among them, all three companies are among the top ten job cutters.
Apple is a special case. Rand Paul fumed, “What we need to do is apologize to Apple and compliment them for the job creation they’re doing.” But Apple only has 50,000 US employees, and despite earning about $400,000 per employee, they were the biggest US tax avoider in 2012.
As America waits in vain for corporate job growth, Congress might look in its own back yard for the very worst job cutter, the federal government itself, which has begun to slice up a long-time model of public service, the Post Office.
5. They’ve aligned against the one area that would ensure jobs and a safer future
A study at the University of Massachusetts concluded that at least 1.7 million jobs could be generated by a commitment to clean energy, about three times as many as in the fossil fuel industry. Half of them would be labor-intensive jobs requiring at most a high school education. And all these new employees would help to reduce their own home heating costs. A recent report by a Kansas energy group, which analyzed data from 19 wind projects, concluded that wind energy generation “is equivalent to, or in some cases significantly cheaper than, new natural gas peaking generation.”
If Congress were really concerned about job creation, and about the cost and environmental impact of energy choices, and about the implications of falling behind China and Germany in clean technologies, they would see that a transition to wind and solar power is necessary. But oil, gas, and coal received over twice the level of subsidies provided for renewable fuels from 2002 to 2008.
Globally it’s six times more, with US post-tax fossil fuel subsidies of $502 billion leading the world. Even with their subsidy advantage, right-wing groups, funded by Koch Industries, are seeking to repeal renewable energy initiatives in individual states. Their deceitfully-named “Electricity Freedom Act” will keep the money flowing to dirty energy. But not the jobs.
Shame, Shame
How can the job-defeating behavior of Congressional Republicans be explained? It was suggested earlier that they’re either ignorant of middle-class life or victims of free-market delusion. Perhaps it’s more insidious. Thom Hartmann reports on a dinner meeting the night of January 20, 2009, when “Republican conspirators vowed to bring Congress to a standstill, regardless of how badly Congressional inaction would hurt the already hurting American economy and people.” In short, they don’t want Obama to look good. If that’s true, it goes beyond shame. To disgrace.
AHT/AGB
…read more
Republished from: Press TV

‘Greece to need more bailout loans’

A report has revealed a document showing Germany’s central bank predicts that the recession-hit Greece will need more rescue loans from its international creditors by the start of the next year.
According to the report published by prominent German magazine Der Spiegel earlier this week, the document from the Bundesbank indicated that the cash-strapped Mediterranean country will need more bailout loans from the so-called troika of international lenders — the European Union (EU), the European Central Bank (ECB), and the International Monetary Fund (IMF) by the start of 2014.
The German magazine dubbed the document a Bundesbank report prepared for the IMF and German finance ministry.
Greece has been dependent on bailout funds from international rescue loans approved by the troika of international creditors since May 2010.
The Greek economy is in its sixth year of recession due to fiscal mismanagement resulting in tax rises and spending cuts.
This is while Greece™s jobless rate reached 27.6 percent in May 2013, up from 27.0 percent in April, according to a report released on August 8 by Greece™s statistic service LSTAT.
The agency added that the youth aged between 15 and 24 were hit the hardest with a 64.9 unemployment rate in May.
The country™s unemployment rate stands at more than double the eurozone’s average reading of 12.1 percent, reflecting a deepening recession after years of austerity being imposed under the EU bailout plan.
Europe plunged into financial crisis in early 2008. The worsening debt crisis has forced the EU governments to adopt harsh austerity measures and tough economic reforms, which have triggered incidents of social unrest and massive protests in many European countries.
MAM/AS
…read more
Republished from: Press TV

They Are Systematically Destroying Our Independence And Making Us All Serfs Of The State

by Michael Snyder 
Shackled prisoner - Photo by Luftluzer
The percentage of Americans that are economically independent has dropped to a stunningly low level.  In order to be economically independent, you have got to be able to take care of yourself without any assistance from anyone else.  Unless you are independently wealthy, that means that you either have your own business or you have a full-time job.  Unfortunately, as you will see below, the percentage of Americans that are self-employed is at an all-time record low and the percentage of Americans with a full-time job has declined to a level not seen in about 30 years.  As a result, more Americans than ever find themselves forced to turn to the government for assistance.  When you add it all up, about half of all Americans get money from the government each month these days.  And yes, there will always be poor people that cannot take care of themselves that need help, but when you have more than half of the population dependent on the government that is a major problem.  You see, the truth is that our independence is systematically being taken away from us and we are steadily being made serfs of the state.  And once you become a serf of the state, it is very hard to resist anything the government is doing in a meaningful way.  After all, the money that you are getting from the government is enabling you to survive.  In essence, your allegiance has been at least partially purchased and you may not even realize it.
Of course this is not how the United States was supposed to operate.  We were never intended to be a collectivist nation.  Rather, we were intended to be a country where liberty and freedom thrived and where most people would be able to independently take care of themselves.
Unfortunately, it is becoming increasingly difficult to be economically independent in America today.  One reason for this is that the environment for small businesses in this country is the most toxic that it has ever been before.  The federal government, our state governments and even our local governments are constantly coming up with new ways to oppress small business.
And just this week we learned that the IRS is specifically targeting small business owners and sending them threatening letters.
Yes, you read that correctly.  Despite all of the trouble that the IRS is currently in, they are still choosing to specifically go after small businesses with both barrels.  As a recent Forbes article explained, the IRS plans to send threatening letters to 20,000 small businesses all over the country…
The tax agency is doing some targeting of its own, fingering at least 20,000 small businesses. And that number will grow. The scrutiny on this group and in this way is a little frightening. Small business people across America are receiving IRS notices. More will be coming. The IRS gathers data from many third parties—including credit card companies—to see if you picked up every nickel of income.
This is absolutely disgusting, but it is just another example of how small business is being eradicated in the United States.  As I mentioned in aprevious article, the percentage of Americans that are self-employed has dropped to a record low…
Self-Employed As A Share Of Non-Farm Employment
Well, at least we can achieve economic independence by getting a full-time job, right?
Sadly, that is becoming increasingly difficult to do as well.
The chart below was created by Chartist Friend from Pittsburgh, and it shows that the percentage of working age Americans with a full-time job dropped sharply to 47 percent during the last recession and it has stayed about that level ever since.  The yellow line is the line in the chart which demonstrates this…
FULLTIME-EMP-POP-RATIO
As you can see, we briefly touched that level in the 1970s and again briefly in the 1980s, but it is important to remember that the percentage of women that chose to seek employment was much lower back then.  When you take that into account, the current level of full-time employment in this country looks even worse.
The quality of jobs in this country has been steadily falling for quite some time, and we are rapidly transitioning to an economy where part-time employment will be much more prominent.
But you can’t support a family or be economically independent on a part-time income.  In fact, most of those that try to make it on a part-time income find that they must turn to the government for help.
And right now, a higher percentage of Americans are economically dependent on the government than ever before.  The following is from a recent article by Charles Hugh-Smith…
Why? Because half of us are getting a direct check, benefit or payment from the state. Over 61 million people get a check from Social Security, over 50 million draw Medicare benefits, another 50 million get Medicaid benefits, 47 million receive SNAP food stamp benefits, 22 million people work directly for the state on all levels, millions more work for government contractors that are effectively proxies of the state, millions more receive Federally funded extended unemployment, retirement checks, Section 8 housing benefits, and so on.
Orwell underestimated the power of complicity. Once a citizen receives a direct payment from the state, the state has purchased their complicity, for no matter how much that citizen may complain privately about the state, he or she will never risk the payment/benefit by resisting the state in a politically meaningful way.
Once you get a check from the state, you begin loving your servitude. The collusion of the state and its central bank is truly a thing of authoritarian beauty: the central bank (the Federal Reserve) creates money out of thin air and buys government bonds with the new money. The state can thus borrow unlimited sums at low rates of interest, and continue to send tens of millions of individual payments out to buy the passivity and complicity of its citizens.
So what is the solution?
Of course the solution would be for our economy to produce more small businesses and more full-time jobs so that more people could achieve economic independence.
Sadly, right now our system is steadily killing full-time jobs and small businesses, and there does not appear to be any hope for a major turnaround any time soon.
At this point, the number of Americans that are financially dependent on the government is absolutely staggering, and it gets worse with each passing year.  Just consider the following statistics which come from one of my previous articles entitled “21 Facts About Rising Government Dependence In America That Will Blow Your Mind“…


1. Back in 1960, the ratio of social welfare benefits to salaries and wages was approximately 10 percent.  In the year 2000, the ratio of social welfare benefits to salaries and wages was approximately 21 percent.  Today, the ratio of social welfare benefits to salaries and wages is approximately 35 percent.
2. According to the U.S. Census Bureau, 49 percent of all Americans live in a home that gets direct monetary benefits from the federal government.  Back in 1983, less than a third of all Americans lived in a home that received direct monetary benefits from the federal government.
3. Overall, more than 70 percent of all federal spending goes to “dependence-creating programs”.
4. According to the Survey of Income and Program Participation conducted by the U.S. Census, well over 100 million Americans are enrolled in at least one welfare program run by the federal government.  Sadly, that figure does not even include Social Security or Medicare.
5. Today, the federal government runs about 80 different “means-tested welfare programs”, and almost all of those programs have experienced substantial growth in recent years.
6. The number of Americans on Social Security disability now exceeds the entire population of the state of Virginia.
7. If the number of Americans on Social Security disability were gathered into a separate state, it would be the 8th largest state in the country.
8. In 1968, there were 51 full-time workers for every American on disability.  Today, there are just 13 full-time workers for every American on disability.
9. Right now, there are approximately 56 million Americans collecting Social Security benefits.  By 2035, that number is projected to soar to an astounding 91 million.
10. Overall, the Social Security system is facing a 134 trillion dollar shortfall over the next 75 years.
11. The number of Americans on food stamps has grown from 17 million in the year 2000 to more than 47 million today.
12. Back in the 1970s, about one out of every 50 Americans was on food stamps.  Today, about one out of every 6.5 Americans is on food stamps.
13. Today, the number of Americans on food stamps exceeds the entire population of the nation of Spain.
14. According to one calculation, the number of Americans on food stamps now exceeds the combined populations of “Alaska, Arkansas, Connecticut, Delaware, District of Columbia, Hawaii, Idaho, Iowa, Kansas, Maine, Mississippi, Montana, Nebraska, Nevada, New Hampshire, New Mexico, North Dakota, Oklahoma, Oregon, Rhode Island, South Dakota, Utah, Vermont, West Virginia, and Wyoming.”
15. According to a report from the Center for Immigration Studies, 43 percent of all immigrants that have been in the United States for at least 20 years are still on welfare.
16. Back in 1965, only one out of every 50 Americans was on Medicaid.  Today, one out of every 6 Americans is on Medicaid, and things are about to get a whole lot worse.  It is being projected that Obamacare will add 16 million more Americans to the Medicaid rolls.
17. As I wrote about recently, it is being projected that the number of Americans on Medicare will grow from 50.7 million in 2012 to 73.2 million in 2025.
18. At this point, Medicare is facing unfunded liabilities of more than 38 trillion dollars over the next 75 years.  That comes to approximately$328,404 for every single household in the United States.
19. Back in 1990, the federal government accounted for just 32 percentof all health care spending in America.  It is being projected that the federal government will account for more than 50 percent of all health care spending in the United States very soon.
20. The amount of money that the federal government gives directly to the American people has increased by 32 percent since Barack Obama entered the White House.
21. When you total it all up, American households are now receiving more money directly from the federal government than they are paying to the government in taxes.
Once again, there is certainly nothing wrong with helping the poor, and there will always be people that need a helping hand.
But what we have in America today is far beyond that.  What we have in America today is a situation where economic independence is being systematically eradicated and the government is increasingly being expected to provide our daily bread and to take care of all of us from the cradle to the grave.
And once you are dependent on the system, at least part of you is going to become resistant to anyone or anything that threatens to bring meaningful change to the system because your survival depends on the system.
Or could I be wrong about this?
What do you think?

Insurers Flee: Health rates to ‘soar’ in Ohio and Florida, Insurance ratings dropped from CA website, OR delays full access to exchange

Insurers Flee 
(CNSNews.com) – Major health insurance companies–Blue Cross, Aetna, United, Humana–have decided not to participate in various states in the Obamacare health-insurance exchanges that will be the only place Americans will be able to buy a health insurance plan using the federal subsidies authorized under the Obamacare law.
Under the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (AKA Obamacare), every American must buy a health insurance plan that meets minimum government specifications. If a person does not get health insurance through their employer, and is not on Medicaid, they can buy insurance through their home state’s insurance exchange (which, depending on the state, will be run by either the state or federal government).
- See more at: http://cnsnews.com/news/article/blue-cross-aetna-united-humana-flee-obamacare-exchanges#sthash.R0A5mYkZ.dpuf
http://cnsnews.com/news/article/blue-cross-aetna-united-humana-flee-obamacare-exchanges
Health rates to ‘soar’ in Ohio and Florida

 
At a White House press conference Friday afternoon, President Obama said that health insurance plans offered under Obamacare will be “significantly cheaper” than plans currently on the market, but a string of recent reports say that isn’t true.