Friday, March 9, 2012

President Andrew Jackson, Peter Cooper on monetary reform Continue reading on Examiner.com President Andrew Jackson, Peter Cooper on monetary reform - National Nonpartisan

This is my paper for The Center of Process Studies’ conference, Money-Creation in a Finite World (free and open to the public, April 10-12, 2012; Claremont Colleges, CA):
Money and credit as public services for full-employment, optimal infrastructure, ending debt slavery: Epic proponents, related history of US government and corporate media, partnership for Occupy victory
It’s divided into these 11 parts for articles (links added with each new section):
Monetary and credit reform: full-employment, end of debt slavery
Thomas Edison, Thomas Jefferson on monetary reform
President Andrew Jackson, Peter Cooper on monetary reform
NYC Mayor John Hylan, House Banking Committee Chairs on monetary reform

Benjamin Franklin, William Jennings Bryan on monetary reform
Charles Lindbergh Sr., 86% of Great Depression economists on monetary reform
What should the average citizen know about US War Crimes?
What should the average citizen know about US war history?
What is the leverage point for Occupy’s victory?
What does monetary and credit freedom look like?
My personal history of the 1% choosing to kill a million children each month
Summary:
Monetary and credit reform is a policy objective to end transfer of trillions of the “99%’s wealth to an oligarchic “1%.” The US banking collusion only and always co-exists within a larger oligarchy with government for legal protection, and media for public propaganda. This paper presents histories in monetary reform and US government crimes in war suppressed by today’s US corporate media’s history texts and news journalism. When the oligarchy’s voice is professionally exposed as obviously and egregiously lying in omission and commission in claims of central importance of the past and present, government and corporate media loses credibility in an “emperor has no clothes” transformation. Refutation of the oligarchy’s voice with objective and independently verifiable facts, especially in light of current War Crimes and Constitutional destruction, supports our policy goal for monetary and credit reform because the public will seek alternative voices to build a brighter future. To support our goal of upgraded economic policies, we should be open to synergy with ecological and resource-based economic models, and network with Occupy.
**********
Andrew Jackson (1767-1845) is the last US President to pay-off the national debt. He did so only after ending the Federal Reserve of his day, the privately-owned Second Bank of the United States. As did Thomas Jefferson, Jackson understood the subversive act and perpetual national debt with banks creating money to lend to the government. He did not understand the positive policy response of the government creating money directly for the payment of public goods and services. Jackson critics would respond that he was proficient in killing, and indeed less than capable with constructive policy. In 1836 President Jackson issued an Executive Order called the Specie Circular that required payment to the government for land to be only in gold or silver. This increased demand and emptied the banks of the day of the fractional gold and silver backing their bank notes, causing bank runs. Jackson and Congress could have issued money directly, and then accepted this fiat currency for all payments:
“The bank, Mr. Van Buren, is trying to kill me, but I will kill it.” (referring to the Second Bank of the US) . - Said to Martin Van Buren (July 8, 1832), quoted in The Autobiography of Martin Van Buren, published in Annual Report of the American Historical Association for the Year 1918, vol. II (1920), ed. John Clement Fitzpatrick, ch. XLIII (p. 625)
“I too have been a close observer of the doings of the Bank of the United States. I have had men watching you for a long time, and am convinced that you have used the funds of the bank to speculate in the breadstuffs of the country. When you won, you divided the profits amongst you, and when you lost, you charged it to the Bank. You tell me that if I take the deposits from the Bank and annul its charter I shall ruin ten thousand families. That may be true, gentlemen, but that is your sin! Should I let you go on, you will ruin fifty thousand families, and that would be my sin! You are a den of vipers and thieves. I have determined to rout you out and, by the Eternal, (bringing his fist down on the table) I will rout you out.”   - From the original minutes of the Philadelphia committee of citizens sent to meet with President Jackson, February 1834, according to Stan V. Henkels, Andrew Jackson and the Bank of the United States, 1928
The following two paragraphs are President Andrew Jackson in his veto message for the renewal of the privately-owned Bank of the United States, which would have continued their private monopoly of creating US money. July 10, 1832.
“It is maintained by some that the bank is a means of executing the constitutional power ‘to coin money and regulate the value thereof.’ Congress have established a mint to coin money and passed laws to regulate the value thereof. The money so coined, with its value so regulated, and such foreign coins as Congress may adopt are the only currency known to the Constitution. But if they have other power to regulate the currency, it was conferred to be exercised by themselves, and not to be transferred to a corporation. If the bank be established for that purpose, with a charter unalterable without its consent, Congress have parted with their power for a term of years, during which the Constitution is a dead letter. It is neither necessary nor proper to transfer its legislative power to such a bank, and therefore unconstitutional…
It is to be regretted that the rich and powerful too often bend the acts of government to their selfish purposes. Distinctions in society will always exist under every just government. Equality of talents, of education, or of wealth can not be produced by human institutions. In the full enjoyment of the gifts of Heaven and the fruits of superior industry, economy, and virtue, every man is equally entitled to protection by law; but when the laws undertake to add to these natural and just advantages artificial distinctions, to grant titles, gratuities, and exclusive privileges, to make the rich richer and the potent more powerful, the humble members of society — the farmers, mechanics, and laborers — who have neither the time nor the means of securing like favors to themselves, have a right to complain of the injustice of their government. There are no necessary evils in government. Its evils exist only in its abuses. If it would confine itself to equal protection, and, as Heaven does its rains, shower its favors alike on the high and the low, the rich and the poor, it would be an unqualified blessing.”
“I have no hesitation to say if they can re-charter the bank (2nd Bank of the US – a privately-owned central bank) with this hydra of corruption they will rule the nation and its charter will be perpetual and its corrupting influence destroy the liberty of our country. When I came into this administration…I had a majority of 75. Since then it is now believed it (the bank) has bought over by loans, discounts, etc until…there were 2/3 for re-chartering it.” – President Andrew Jackson, April 7, 1833 letter to R. H. M. Cryer referring to votes in Congress. Ralph Catterall, The 2nd Bank of the U.S., Univ. of Chicago Press, 1902.
"But you must remember, my fellow-citizens, that eternal vigilance by the people is the price of liberty, and that you must pay the price if you wish to secure the blessing." - Farewell Address, March 4, 1837.
After President Jackson vetoed Congress’ re-charter the 2nd Bank of the US and paid-off the national debt, President Van Buren (elected 1836) and Jackson’s Vice President, was confident the goal of defending the US from a privately-owned central bank was won:
“The practice of funding the public debt…has long been discontinued…A National Bank has become a completely ‘obsolete idea’ among us, as thoroughly condemned in public opinion as a national debt.” – Catterall, p. 431.
Peter Cooper (1791-1883) was one of America’s leading inventors and businessmen. He designed and built the first US locomotive in 1830, the “Tom Thumb.” Cooper was the first to introduce anthracite coal into iron production in 1845, resulting in the US’ first wrought iron beams for construction. In 1854, Cooper was a founder in the telegraph company that created the first trans-Atlantic cable. Peter Cooper was the Greenback Party candidate for President in 1876. Cooper learned about monetary policy from Albert Gallatin, US Secretary of the Treasury from 1801-1814:
The following 14 paragraphs are the summation of his life-long experience of the benefits of monetary reform that he witnessed from Andrew Jackson ending the privately-owned 2nd Bank of the United States and promptly paying-off the national debt, the US government directly issuing Greenbacks to pay for the Civil War rather than borrow the money, and then the economic depression when that policy was rescinded in favor of the federal government again borrowing money, as we do today. This was his address at the Convention of the National Greenback Party in Boston on June 4, 1879. This third-party received 3.3% of the popular vote in the 1880 US presidential election.
“I think, that the neglect of our several administrations to make laws, that shall properly regulate the currency, both in volume and value, has been a greater cause of demoralization, want and misery among the mass of the people, than all other causes combined.
The American people have a right to demand of their Government a substantial reason for having taken from them their money, used by them for years as the currency of the country without cost to the Government. Our present Secretary of the Treasury declared in the Senate that 'every citizen of the United States had conformed his business to the clause of the law regulating the currency of the country.'
I believe it will be impossible for our Government to show a good reason for having taken from the people their circulating notes, possessing (as the late Secretary McCulloch stated at the banquet, given by the New York Chamber of Commerce) 'all the legal attributes of money.'  The Secretary at the same time said, that, 'In the very year, in which the war was closed, the reduction of the debt was commenced, and the reduction has been steadily continued, to the amazement of foreign nations.'
This debt, so called, was also 'the credit of a great nation, cut up into small pieces and circulated as money;' as was well said by Secretary Chase.  What shall we think of the administration of a Government, expressly designed, 'by the people and for the people,' that should turn their circulating credit and their real money, into a debt which stops that circulation, vital as it is to the trade and prosperity of this people, and makes it a burden of bonds and taxes on their industry?
It will be equally impossible to show a good reason for having taken from the people their fractional currency, which was costing the Government nothing, and supplying its place with a more inconvenient currency, at the cost of thirty-two millions of dollars, added to the National debt.
The amount, already paid by the people as interest on the National debt, apart from any payments on account of the principal, is already one thousand, two hundred and twenty-four millions of dollars.
I have long been compelled to believe, that all that is now or ever has been required to secure permanently, is a safe deposit for all the unoccupied moneys of the country, and an ever strengthening bond of National union, as well as the best currency, that our country or the world ever saw, will be for the Government to do now, what should have been done at the close of the civil war,—and at the close of the war of Revolution against England—namely, to make the people’s money, found in circulation at the close of the war the sole money of the country, and the unflactuating measure of all values, receivable for all forms of taxes, duties and debts, and interconvertible with the interest-bearing bonds of the Government, which should bear an equitable but low rate of interest.
…How can we, as a Republican and a free people, control the Financial Institutions and the policy of this Government in the interest and prosperity of the whole people?
It is evident, that some fatal errors have been committed, some where, by which want, ruin and distress have been introduced, where before was prosperity, abundance and full employment for the enterprise and industry of this nation.
Individuals may suffer from extravagance, over-trading or over-production; but how can a whole nation have its joy and prosperity turned into mourning, but by the fatal errors of its ruling classes, which make the laws, and can thus mete out injustice and dry up the resources of a nation by rapacity and greed of gain, instead of diffusing happiness, education and freedom among the people.
Misgovernment and the faults of the ruling class have always proved in history the trouble and sorrow of nations. All the responsibility of a nation’s happiness, which may depend on a people’s laws and administration, must rest upon those, who are, for the time, the law making and administrative class.
Though the influences, that are now working against the rights of labor and the true interests of a Republican Government, are insidious and concealed under plausible reasons, yet the danger to our free institutions, now, is no less than in the inception of the rebellion, that shook our Republic to its centre. It is only another oligarchy, another enslaving power, that is asserting itself against the interest of the whole people. There is fast forming in this country an aristocracy of wealth—the worst form of aristocracy, that can curse the prosperity of any country.  For such an aristocracy has no country—“absenteeism,” living abroad, while they draw their income from the country, is one of its common characteristics. Such an aristocracy is without soul and without patriotism.
Let us save our country from this, its most potent, and, as I hope, its last enemy.  I beseech you, fellow-citizens, to consider well what the crisis of the country demands of you, not losing sight of the fact, that there are great wrongs which must be righted in the administration of the finances of this country for the last twelve years. Old issues of North and South are, in a great measure, passing away, but there is no section of our common country, that needs so much the reviving influence of an abundant and a sound currency, as the South. The Southern people have the finest natural resources, that our country affords; every facility for manufacture—the material, labor and water-power indefinite.  They need only money, wisely distributed among its working and enterprising population, for their work and their enterprise, which may draw out the money, and put it to the best use.  It was well said, lately, by one of the Southern statesmen, that the 'Government had impoverished, discomfited, and crushed the South more by its financial policy, since peace was declared, than by its arms during the whole war of Rebellion!'
If the people can look for no relief from the present Congress and Administration—if those, who now sway the financial interests of the country cannot see their great opportunity—then new men must be chosen by the people, whom they can trust to make laws, and execute measures, that 'shall secure the blessings of liberty to themselves and their posterity.'
I will close my remarks by a quotation from a speech of Daniel Webster.  He declared that 'The producing cause of all prosperity is labor, labor, labor.  The Government was made to protect this industry, and to give it both encouragement and security.  To this very end, with this precise object in view, power was given to Congress over the currency and over the money of the country.'”
*          *          *          *          *          *          *          *  
“The bankers will favor a course of special legislation to increase their power…They will never cease to ask for more, …so long as there is more that can be wrung from the toiling masses of the American People…The struggle with this money power has been going on from the beginning of the history of this country.”
– Peter Cooper, in his letter to President Hayes, June 1, 1877.

Related topics

Click here to find out more!

By

Nonpartisan Examiner Carl Herman is a National Board Certified Teacher in economics, government, and history. His hobby is research, education, and lobbying for...

THE NEXT PINK SLIP MIGHT BE YOURS….

*
THE OBJECT OF THE EVENT WAS TO DEMAND JOBS & ALERT PEOPLE THE NEXT PINK SLIP COULD BE FOR YOU.
*
Photos © by Bud Korotzer
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*

George Carlin - Death Penalty

Thursday, March 8, 2012

1.4billion ways to squander our cash: Whitehall finds £159m in savings... by blowing NINE times that sum on 'efficiency' project

  • Whitehall spends £1.4bn in seven years finding savings
  • Money spent on project could pay for 60,000 nurses


Civil servants tasked with reducing Whitehall bills have cost taxpayers nearly nine times more than the so-called efficiency savings they made.
Government departments have squandered £1.4billion over the past seven years on elaborate programmes to share 'back-office' functions.
But the National Audit Office has found that the initiative - launched by Labour - has so far saved taxpayers just £159million.
Down the drain: Piles of money have been wasted in a bid to save Government costs
Down the drain: Piles of money have been wasted in a bid to save Government costs. In total, a seven-year programme has saved just £159million at a cost of £1.4billion
That 'saving' is 8.8 times less than the amount they actually spent, which is enough to pay the salary of more than 60,000 nurses.
And auditors revealed that it is possible that civil servants may have saved even less than £159million outlined in a damning report..
This is because some ministries were no longer monitoring progress - and those that are doing so report a net cost to the taxpayer.
In a damning report, it concluded that a combination of over-expensive IT systems and poor co-ordination between departments and quangos had seen costs soar instead of being slashed.
Last night, Labour MP Margaret Hodge, chairman of the powerful Public Accounts Committee, said it was 'a shockingly familiar story of spiralling costs and poor value for money'.
The huge projects for government departments and their quangos to share back-office functions - including human resources, procurement, finance and payroll - was enthusiastically launched by Labour in 2004.
In its report, the NAO said that private-sector firms typically slash a fifth off their annual spend within five years using similar methods to share back office functions.
Labour MP Margaret Hodge said it was 'a shockingly familiar story of spiralling costs and poor value for money'
Labour MP Margaret Hodge said it was 'a shockingly familiar story of spiralling costs and poor value for money'
But despite trying a similar approach, central government had managed to undermine the whole point of the programme by increasing costs.
In just one shocking entry in the catalogue of waste, auditors discovered that the shared services system set up by the Department for Transport with four of its quangos had so far cost £129million more to set up and run than it had saved.
But with the net savings of joint working totalling only £1.3million last year, the watchdog said 'at this rate it would seem difficult to break even'.
In one example of the problems to beset the scheme, the report found that the Maritime and Coastguard Agency was blocked from joining the DfT scheme because it did not have security clearance for Whitehall IT systems.
Another shared services unit, set up by Research Councils UK, has recorded a net cost to the taxpayer so far of £126million.
Shockingly, financial oversight is so lax that two ministries - the Department for Work and Pensions and the Department for the Environment, Food and Rural Affairs - have no idea whether their schemes have saved any money at all, because no one has been tracking progress.
There was one success story. The Ministry of Justice was saving £33million a year and broke even ahead of schedule - at which point officials there also stopped monitoring performance.
The NAO acknowledged that ministers have recognised the problem and put in place plans to shake up the system and impose more central control over the process. But they warned that the reform was 'ambitious and contains significant risk'.
Mrs Hodge said: 'The Shared Service Initiative started out filled with good intentions to save money and reduce duplication of back-office functions across Whitehall. This has not been delivered.
'Departments lost sight of their overall objective to save money. Departments ordered tailor-made systems which have cost the taxpayer too much.
'The Cabinet Office is now committed to bring this initiative back under control but it may be too little, too late to achieve value for money.'
Sharing back-office functions - also including finance and payroll - was a key recommendation of the 2004 Gershon Review into slashing Government running costs.
In total, eight projects have been set up in various departments - with the five examined by the NAO costing £500million more than budgeted: £1.4billion rather than the expected £900million.
The NAO said one of the main problems was that the bodies that were supposed to be pooling their operations stuck rigidly to individual systems - frustrating the aims of co-operation.
It questioned why officials ordered expensive IT systems without even considering far cheaper versions which would have been more than adequate.
The National Audit Office acknowledged that ministers have recognised the problem and put in place plans to shake up the system and impose more central control over the process
The National Audit Office acknowledged that ministers have recognised the problem and put in place plans to shake up the system and impose more central control over the process
It also blamed a 'collaborative' culture of letting individual departments have freedom from central control for the failure to produce any of the hoped-for cross-Whitehall sharing.
Other factors the NAO highlighted were the need for organisations such as town halls to go through a full European Union tendering process in order to join shared procurement schemes.
A system of sanctions against poor performance - and the power for the Cabinet Office to require bodies to sign up to collaboration - would also help, the NAO said.
Its head, Amyas Morse, said: 'The initiative for government departments to share back-office functions has suffered from an approach which made participation voluntary and tailored services to meet the differing needs of individual departments.
'The result was over-complexity, reduced flexibility and a failure to cut costs. The new Cabinet Office strategy on shared services acknowledges these issues but, if it is to achieve value for money, it must learn the lessons from past implementation.
'Only in this way can the sharing of back-office functions have a realistic prospect of contributing towards the government's drive to cut public spending in the long-term.'
Robert Oxley, campaign manager of the TaxPayers' Alliance said: 'Whitehall bureaucrats appear utterly incapable of taking steps to work more efficiently and save taxpayers' money. It defies belief that civil servants have wasted such incredible sums on an exercise that has failed so spectacularly to save any cash.
'This gross failure suggests an institutionally lax attitude with taxpayers' money that cannot be allowed to continue unchallenged. Hard pressed taxpayers can't afford to keep handing Whitehall a blank cheque only to see it frittered away with nothing to show for it.'
Last night a spokesman for the Cabinet Office said: 'We have been clear that the Government will leave no stone unturned in the hunt for savings.
The Government has already announced a new approach to shared services that will cut through the complexity in the current system and save money for taxpayers.
'The Government is committed to the correct management of major government projects which previously have not always delivered what they set out to achieve.
'A Major Projects Authority - set up under a mandate from the Prime Minister - was created in 2010 and introduced tough new controls for major projects to manage risk.'

TODAY STARTS THE REPUBLIC BROADCASTING PLEDGE DRIVE.

Today it is quite easy to realize that people across the globe are at a point of desperation, struggling to meet the bills, to feed our children and attend to our own well being.
Obviously this global depression has been brought about through many forces within the inner workings of our government and financial sectors. It is becoming more and more common to see our able youth coming out of college with their degrees and finding zero outlets for their education; meanwhile some of us are left feeling abandoned by our world, left to work a terrible job, to go home to the depressing reality – there’s little more that can be done within this system to improve our lives both singularly and collectively.
RBN is not without these financial woes and concerns… Simply put, our success is not guaranteed without continued support from our listeners. Past fund drives have helped us mitigate the costs of our necessities, bills have been paid and a station within our home state of Texas has been established with the hope to find more listeners and keen minds. But we’re still in need of help. Humbly, we again are asking for the support of our listeners to further extend our collective voice to all markets.
It is our goal to put together at least $100,000 dollars in six months to accommodate the following improvements and expansions.
  • Upgraded Computer Equipment for Staff, Producers and Engineers
  • Equipment to ensure professional quality broadcast production
  • Continue broadcasting on KHFX 1140 AM in Dallas
  • Expansion into more markets
  • Hire new staff as well as solidify the stability of our current employees
  • Office Supplies for newly hired staff
  • Finally, to help us expand our office space in order to properly accommodate newly hired staff.
There are many reasons to show your support in addition to your donations!
You can supplement your support by:
  1. Choosing from literal thousands of individual broadcasts that can be acquired on hard copy for both CD players and MP3 format. These broadcasts can be copied and distributed at your leisure.
  2. Subscribing to our content for unlimited access in the archives.
  3. Buying and distributing our business cards and bumper stickers.
RBN has maintained extraordinary goals for many years now: to open minds and free those who are trapped in both political and sociopolitical paradigms; to educate everyone in the realities of our world and the system in which we are confined; and to grow at an exponential rate until we can finally take our country back.
With your help and support these are not just hopeful dreams they are simply inevitable!

Daniel Hannan - Politicians can't create jobs

Huge Spike in Repeat Foreclosures

The pig in the python is suddenly moving.
Foreclosure
Fuse | Getty Images

Thousands of foreclosures that were stuck in process due to delays over the so-called "Robo-signing" paperwork scandal are working their way through a revamped banking system and heading toward final bank repossession.
Foreclosure starts surged 28 percent in January from December, according to a new report from Lender Processing Services. More than 230,000 loans began the foreclosure process in January.
Even more indicative of this new surge in processing is that repeat foreclosures hit an all-time high in January, representing 47 percent of all starts, according to LPS. Repeat foreclosures are either failed loan modifications, or loans that banks were attempting to modify but couldn't.
"This large amount of foreclosures that have been sitting out there, with borrowers not making payments for an extended period of time, this may be coming to an end," says LPS' Herb Blecher. "This is what the market is looking for."
That's because while painful to housing in the short term, moving the huge pipeline of delinquent loans to their inevitable end will help the overall market in the long term. There are nearly 4 million loans now in some stage of delinquency which have not even entered the foreclosure process. Banks are modifying loans more aggressively now, but many of these mortgages simply cannot be saved, and the sooner they are processed and new buyers are found for the properties, the sooner overall home prices can recover.
"It's the resolution of the crisis. It started with a flood of new troubled loans, bottlenecks presented themselves as delinquent loans piled up. "The necessary resolution before we can get back to a healthy market is that that inventory goes away," says Blecher.
Mortgages

30 yr fixed3.88%3.84%
30 yr fixed jumbo4.71%4.69%
15 yr fixed3.16%3.28%
15 yr fixed jumbo4.06%4.10%
5/1 ARM2.75%2.99%
5/1 jumbo ARM3.28%3.22%
Find personalized rates:


The new surge in foreclosure starts consequently created an equal surge in foreclosure sales, that is bank repossessions or short sales (when the bank allows the property to be sold for less than the value of the mortgage. Foreclosure sales rose 29 percent month to month in January, indicating that there will be a new surge of distressed properties coming to the housing market in the next few months, as banks try to sell these homes.
While the pipeline is moving, there is still a stark contrast between states that require a judge in the foreclosure process and states that do not. Foreclosure sales in non-judicial states outnumbered those in judicial states by three to one, according to LPS. But signs are that even judicial states are ramping up, with foreclosure starts increasing twice as much as they did in non-judicial states in January.
While new mortgage delinquencies are falling, the backlog of distress is large. More than 40 percent of loans in foreclosure are more than two years past due, and judicial states have 63 months of foreclosure inventory to work through. Of course that's better than last February, when foreclosure inventories hit an all-time high of 147 months.