Wednesday, December 15, 2010

J.P. Morgan and the Great Silver Caper

There’s
a lot of rumor, buzz, innuendo, chitchat and scuttlebutt about the
precious metals markets these days. Most of the chitchat is about
J.P. Morgan and silver. Rumor has it that J.P. Morgan has amassed
a whopping short position in silver.

The scuttlebutt,
according to Scott
Rubin of Benzinga.com, is that “J.P. Morgan holds a giant
short position in silver. Furthermore, some observers are accusing
the bank of acting as an agent for the Federal Reserve in the market…I.e.,
a lower silver price helps maintain the relative appeal of the US
dollar…

“By selling
massive amounts of paper silver in the futures market,” Rubin
continues, “J.P. Morgan has been able to suppress the price
of the precious metal. It is believed that these short positions
are naked (i.e. they are not backed by any physical silver).”

If the silver
price were falling, Morgan’s (alleged) short position would
be lauded as a stroke of genius. But since the silver price is soaring,
Morgan’s (alleged) short position looks much less laudable.

“In recent
days,” Rubin notes, “rumors have been swirling on the
Internet that J.P. Morgan’s massive short position is about
to blow up in its face in the form of an almighty short squeeze
and potential COMEX default, as large traders demand physical delivery
of silver that COMEX does not have in its vaults.”

Based on some
of the latest conjecture, Morgan’s short position totals a
whopping 3.3 billion ounces. If, therefore, the buzz about J.P.
Morgan and silver is even half true, the prestigious investment
bank could be cruisin’ for bruisin’.

For perspective,
3.3 billion ounces is roughly equal to:

1) One third
of all the world’s known silver deposits;

2) Two times
the world’s approximate stockpiles of silver bullion;

3) Four times
the annual mined supply of silver;

4) 30 times
the inventory of silver at the COMEX.

To repeat,
short positions – even titanic ones – are no big deal,
as long as the price of the underlying asset is falling. But if,
inconveniently, it is rising, the spaghetti can hit the fan in spectacular
and gruesome fashion.

The silver
price is rising…a lot. From less than $10 an ounce two years
ago, the silver price has more than tripled. Therefore, if J.P.
Morgan does, in fact, hold a 3.3 billion ounce short position, every
one-dollar increase in the silver price would produce a loss of
$3.3 billion…at least on paper.

Unfortunately,
Morgan cannot simply unwind this trade with a couple of mouse-clicks
in an E*trade account. The position is too large, both in relation
to the world’s physical supplies of silver and in relation
to the paper “supplies.” (Morgan holds almost half of
all short positions on the COMEX, which is essentially a “paper
market” – participants rarely take delivery of physical
silver).

To make matters
even more dicey for Morgan, the supplies of physical silver are
disappearing rapidly from the marketplace. Increasingly, the kinds
of folks who invest in precious metals are also the kinds of folks
who distrust intermediaries. These precious metals investors want
to know that the shiny stuff is in their personal possession.

Meanwhile,
the ETFs that hold precious metals are soaking up massive quantities
of physical metal. Over the last 12 months, the silver ETFs around
the globe have increased their holdings by nearly 100 million ounces
– or almost as much silver as the entire inventory of the COMEX.
The trend in gold is identical.





Therefore,
as a result of soaring demand from both individual investors and
ETFs, the physical stockpiles of gold and silver are atrophying
in relation to the paper claims on both metals. This is not a pleasant
picture for a short seller of silver.

Furthermore,
the kinds of folks who tend to buy gold and silver are also the
kinds of folks who have contempt for Wall Street…and for Wall
Street banks like J.P. Morgan. So it should come as no surprise
that a grassroots campaign has formed – the sole purpose of
which is to punish J.P. Morgan for its attempted manipulation of
the silver market.

“A viral
campaign (Crash JP Morgue Video [below]) to buy a physical silver
and ‘crash’ the bank is now spreading like wildfire on
the Internet,” Rubin reports. “Just Google, ‘Crash
JP Morgan Buy Silver’ [to learn more about it]… Those
who wish to participate in squeezing the living daylights out of
J.P. Morgan, may want to consider buying physical silver, silver
futures and SLV.”

Maybe this
story about J.P Morgan’s short position in silver is mere innuendo.
Maybe not. But two facts are irrefutable:

  1. J.P. Morgan
    is already under investigation by the CFTC for manipulating the
    silver market. “The investigation into the bank can be traced
    back to November 2009,” Rubin reports, “when London
    metals trader and whistleblower Andrew Maguire contacted the CFTC
    to report market manipulation prior to it actually occurring.”
  2. Precious
    metals investors are increasingly keen to get their hands on physical
    gold and silver, rather than mere paper facsimiles.

December
11, 2009

Eric J. Fry has been
a specialist in international equities since the early 1980s. He
was a professional portfolio manager for more than 10 years, specializing
in international investment strategies and short-selling. Mr. Fry
launched the sometimes abrasive, mostly entertaining and always
insightful Rude
Awakening
. His views and investment insights have appeared in
numerous publications including
Time, Barron’s, Wall Street
Journal, International Herald Tribune, Business Week, USA Today,
Los Angeles Times, San Francisco Chronicle and Money.
He appears regularly on business news stations like CNBC and Fox.

Copyright
© 2009 Daily Reckoning

Vatican Bank 'allowed clergy to act as front for Mafia'


The Vatican Bank is under new scrutiny in a case involving money-laundering allegations that led police to seize €23m (£19.25m) in September.

The Vatican calls the seizure of assets a "misunderstanding" and expresses optimism it will be quickly cleared up. But fresh court documents show that prosecutors say the Vatican Bank deliberately flouted anti-laundering laws "with the aim of hiding the ownership, destination and origin of the capital". The documents also reveal investigators' suspicions that clergy may have acted as fronts for corrupt businessmen and Mafia.

The documents pinpoint two transactions that have not been reported: one in 2009 involving the use of a false name, and another in 2010 in which the Vatican Bank withdrew €650,000 from an Italian bank account but ignored bank requests to disclose where the money was headed.

The new allegations of financial impropriety could not come at a worse time for the Vatican, already hit by revelations that it sheltered paedophile priests. The corruption probe has given new hope to Holocaust survivors who tried unsuccessfully to sue in the United States, alleging that Nazi loot was stored in the Vatican Bank.

Yet the scandal is hardly the first for the bank, already distinguished from other banks by the fact that its cash machines are in Latin and priests use a private entrance.

In 1986, a Vatican financial adviser died after drinking cyanide-laced coffee in prison. Another, Roberto Calvi, was found dangling from a rope under London's Blackfriars Bridge in 1982, his pockets stuffed with money and stones. The incidents blackened the bank's reputation, raised suspicions of ties with the Mafia, and cost the Vatican hundreds of millions of dollars in legal clashes with Italian authorities.

On 21 September, financial police seized assets from a Vatican Bank account. Investigators said the Vatican had failed to furnish information on the origin or destination of the funds as required by Italian law.

The bulk of the money, €20 million, was destined for the American JP Morgan bank branch in Frankfurt, Germany, with the remainder going to Banca del Fucino, an Italian bank.

Prosecutors alleged the Vatican ignored regulations that foreign banks must communicate to Italian financial authorities where their money has come from. All banks have declined to comment.

10 Signs That Confidence In U.S. Treasuries Is Dying And That Financial Armageddon May Be Approaching

Selling government debt is a gigantic confidence game. For decades, investors all over the globe have gobbled up massive amounts of U.S. debt at incredibly low interest rates because they believed that it was a certainly that they would be paid back and be able to make a little bit of profit on top of it. Unfortunately, things have changed. Confidence is U.S. Treasuries is dying, and if confidence in U.S. government debt completely collapses at some point we could literally be looking at financial Armageddon. Why is that so? Well, when the world totally loses faith in U.S. Treasuries, interest rates on U.S. Treasuries will have to keep going up until enough investors are found to buy them. But much higher interest rates will mean much higher interest on the national debt and thus much higher federal budget deficits. That will erode confidence in U.S. Treasuries even further. In the end, a vicious cycle of eroding confidence and higher interest rates could ultimately lead to hyperinflation as the U.S. government and the Federal Reserve flood the system with endless amounts of paper money to try to keep the system solvent.

Faith in U.S. Treasury bonds is absolutely critical if the world financial system is going to continue to operate in a stable manner. In the post-World War 2 era, U.S. Treasuries have been largely viewed as the absolutely safest investment out there. So if there comes a point when the market for U.S. Treasuries completely collapses, it is going to cause unprecedented financial chaos. The worldwide derivatives market, which is already highly unstable, would almost certainly implode. Credit markets all over the globe would seize up. Global trade would quickly grind to a standstill.

This isn't going to happen overnight (hopefully). Rather, the loss of confidence in U.S. Treasuries is something that is likely to take months or even years to play out. But once that confidence is gone, it is not something that will be able to be rebuilt easily.

Think of it this way - once you drive a car off a cliff, is it easy to reconstruct it?

Of course not.

Well, that is where we are headed with U.S. Treasuries.

The Federal Reserve is flooding the system with new dollars, Barack Obama and the U.S. Congress seem poised to pass a new tax deal which does not include corresponding spending cuts which will cause U.S. government budget deficits to become even more bloated, and there is a tremendous lack of faith both in U.S. political leaders and in the Federal Reserve at this point.

The rest of the world is losing faith that the U.S. government is going to be able to handle all of the debt that it has accumulated. We may be approaching a "tipping point" soon.

The following are 10 signs that confidence in U.S. Treasuries is dying....

#1 The financial community is extremely concerned that the tax deal that Barack Obama is pushing is going to dramatically increase U.S. government budget deficits over the next two years. On Monday, Moody's warned that if Barack Obama's tax deal with the Republicans becomes law, it will increase the likelihood that Moody's could soon be forced to slash the rating of U.S. government debt.

#2 Already there are signs that some bond investors are looking for the exits. Last week, U.S. Treasuries suffered their largest two day sell-off since the collapse of Lehman Brothers back in September 2008.

#3 The yield on 10-year Treasury bonds set a six-month high on Monday before pulling back a bit. Most analysts believe that Treasury yields are going to push significantly higher in coming weeks.

#4 This trend of rising yields has been going on for a while. In fact, yields on 10-year Treasury bonds have been steadily rising since October 7th.

#5 Even before the recent tax deal was announced there were already troubling signs regarding the growth of U.S. government debt. The U.S. government budget deficit rose to $150.4 billion in November, which was the largest November budget deficit ever recorded.

#6 It is not just the new tax deal that has investors around the globe spooked. The truth is that the rest of the globe reacted very negatively to the new round of quantitative easing that the Federal Reserve announced back in November. The Federal Reserve is flooding the system with liquidity and the rest of the world is not amused.

#7 The American people have less faith in the Federal Reserve and in the financial system than at any other point in recent memory. For example, a new Bloomberg National Poll has found that a majority of Americans now want the Federal Reserve to either be held more accountable or to be abolished entirely.

#8 Investors all over the globe are starting to wake up and realize that America's debt problem is unsolvable. David Bloom, the currency chief at HSBC, raised eyebrows when he recently stated that "if yields are rising because people think America's fiscal situation is unsustainable, then its Armaggedon."

#9 There is also a growing feeling among investors that the Federal Reserve simply does not care about the danger of inflation, and this is making bondholders very nervous. Stephen Lewis of Monument Securities recently put it this way....

"There is a feeling that the Fed doesn't care about inflation – in fact, wants more of it – and that is certainly not in the interest of bondholders."

#10 Over the next 12 months, the U.S. government is going to be rolling over trillions of dollars in debt along with all of the new borrowing that it is going to be doing. In fact, the U.S. government is somehow going to have to find a way to finance debt that is equivalent to 27.8 percent of GDP in 2011.

For years our politicians have told us that "deficits don't matter", but the truth is that they do matter. The national debt of the United States is now the biggest debt in the history of the world by far, and yet most Americans do not seem to grasp the absolute financial horror that we are facing as a nation.

In the end, debt is always painful. It can be a lot of fun to run out and buy a beautiful new house, a couple of brand new cars and to run your credit cards up to the max, but eventually it catches up with you. Well, the same thing is now happening to us on a national level.

We are getting to the point where eventually we are not even going to be able to service the debt that we have already piled up. Once that happens we can either declare national bankruptcy or we can try to hyperinflate our way out of trouble.

Meanwhile, the once great U.S. economic machine is dying as well. The only reason we have been able to survive with all of this debt as long as we have is because of how powerful our economy has been.

But over the past couple of decades, the big global corporations that now dominate our economy have shipped thousands of factories and millions of jobs overseas.

The mighty economic machine which is supposed to provide funds to pay off all of this debt is being dismantled right in front of our eyes.

There was no way in the world that U.S. government debt was going to be sustainable even if our economy remained vibrant and healthy. The sad truth is that U.S. government debt is approximately 13 times larger than it was just 30 years ago.

But now that the "real economy" is dying a savage death there is simply no hope that this thing is ever going to turn around. The only thing left to do is to take bets on when the implosion is going to happen.

All of this "great tax cut debate" nonsense going on in Washington D.C. right now is just a bunch of incompetent politicians running around rearranging the deck chairs on the Titanic. Perhaps these tax cuts will provide enough of a short-term economic boost to get many of them re-elected in 2012. Meanwhile, our long-term economic problems continue to get a lot worse.

It has become quite obvious that Barack Obama is completely clueless about the economy, and what is even sadder is that the "highly educated" Chairman of the Federal Reserve, Ben Bernanke, seems almost equally as clueless.

Unfortunately, Americans have become so dumbed-down that they don't even realize that their leaders are incompetent. In fact, as sad as it is to say, most Americans you will meet on the street probably cannot even tell you what U.S. Treasuries are.

Let us hope and pray that investors around the globe continue to have at least some confidence in U.S. Treasuries for at least a little while longer. When "financial Armageddon" finally does happen, it isn't going to be pleasant for any of us.

So enjoy these happy economic times while you still have them, because at some point things are going to get a whole lot worse.

Tuesday, December 14, 2010

Water, Meet Blood - JP Morgan Admits To, Reduces Massive Silver Short Position, Proves Millions Of Conspiracy Theorists Correct

In the latest example that virtually every conspiracy theory is almost always inevitably proven to be fact, the Financial Times reports that JP Morgan, the firm targeted by thousands of "tin foil hat" wearing, conspiratorially-oriented "gold bugs", has cut back on its US silver futures. "JPMorgan has quietly reduced a large position in the US silver futures market which had been at the centre of a controversy about its impact on global prices for the precious metal." And in what can only be considered an unprecedented victory for all those who have over the past year agitated to putting JP Morgan out of business, most recently spearheded by the likes of Mike Krieger and Max Keiser, by forcing a massive short squeeze on its commodities trading desk, we learn that "the decision by JPMorgan was an attempt to deflect public criticism of the bank’s dealings in silver, a person familiar with the matter said. The person added that the bank’s position in silver would from now on be “materially smaller” than in the past." Of course, the latter is pure and total bullshit: as Bart Chilton indicated over the weekend, it is JP Morgan who at one point or another (and possibly very recently) controlled as much as 40% of the silver market, via a massive short. Attempting to make others believe that this short could be covered without pushing the price of the silver metal to over $100/ounce is an indication of either how stupid JPM believes the general population to be, or just how desperate the firm is to end the ongoing short squeeze onslaught. Either way, we are confident that this first unprecedented confirmation that a) JPM is indeed massively short silver and b) that it is hurting bad, will merely redouble efforts to put the world's biggest financial company out of business. Lastly, this means that silver is about to really blast off as the push to really hurt JPM takes off in earnest.

From FT:

The US regulator, the Commodity Futures Trading Commission, announced in September 2008 that it was investigating complaints of misconduct in the silver market, although it did not name specific entities.

However, JPMorgan said in a statement: “It is absolutely incorrect to say or imply that the Nymex, CFTC or any other exchange or regulator has instructed or asked us to reduce our position.” The bank declined to comment on whether it had reduced its position in the silver market.

The price of silver has risen more than 70 per cent since mid-August to hit a 30-year high of $30.68 a troy ounce last week on the back of a surge in investor buying and a rebound in industrial silver consumption.

In two previous reviews of the silver market, the CFTC has dismissed claims of manipulation. Most analysts say there is little reason to believe the price of silver is being systematically manipulated.

But Bart Chilton, a CFTC commissioner, said in October that he believed there had been “fraudulent efforts” to “deviously control” the silver price. He did not name any party.

Publicly available data on individual traders’ positions are sketchy. In a speech last Wednesday, Mr Chilton said that “earlier this year, one trader held more than 40 per cent of the silver market”. He declined to identify the trader.

The CFTC’s Bank Participation Report shows that one or more US banks held a gross short silver futures position equal to 19.1 per cent of the total number of outstanding contracts in early December. In January the share was 30.2 per cent.

The CFTC only reports data for the US silver futures market, a small corner of the global derivatives market for the precious metal, which is centred in London and largely traded via private over-the-counter deals. The data also do not cover transactions in the physical market.

Analysts and traders said that JPMorgan’s large short positions on New York’s Comex exchange, a division of Nymex, were hedges for the bank’s long positions in physical silver and London’s over-the-counter market.

JPMorgan has invested nearly $3bn over the past two years in its commodities business led by Blythe Masters.

And while we revel in the knowledge that the short squeeze is causing massive pain for JPM, we are far more overjoyed that the days of Blythe Masters as head of JPM's commodities desk is coming to an end: any comparable massive admission of weakness by a trader is always and inevitably followed by some very high profile terminations.

9 TRILLION Dollars Missing from Federal Reserve,Fed Inspector General Ca...

Moody's May Cut US Rating on Tax Package

Reuters

Moody's warned Monday that it could move a step closer to cutting the U.S. Aaa rating if President Obama's tax and unemployment benefit package becomes law.

The plan agreed to by President Obama and Republican leaders last week could push up debt levels, increasing the likelihood of a negative outlook on the United States rating in the coming two years, the ratings agency said.

A negative outlook, if adopted, would make a rating cut more likely over the following 12-to-18 months.

For the United States, a loss of the top Aaa rating, reduce the appeal of U.S. Treasuries, which currently rank as among the world's safest investments.

"From a credit perspective, the negative effects on government finance are likely to outweigh the positive effects of higher economic growth," Moody's analyst Steven Hess said in a report sent late on Sunday.

After Obama announced his plan, Treasury prices fell sharply in volatile trade last week and yields have hit a six-month high, in part due to concerns over the effect the package will have on government debt levels.

If the bill becomes law, it will "adversely affect the federal government budget deficit and debt level," Moody's said.

On Monday, the Democratic-led U.S. Congress moved toward grudging approval of President Obama's deal with Republicans to extend expiring tax cuts, even for the wealthiest Americans, Last week, Moody's and Fitch Ratings both expressed concerns about the U.S.'s rating longer term, with Moody's fearing the impact if the tax cuts become permanent.

Read Full Article

"Washington’s Role Is To Serve The Banks" Says Spencer Bachus Incoming House Banking Committee Chairman »

Scroll down for VIDEO...

---

A reporter is doing an interview and is obviously recording. Do these guys even think before they begin speaking.

Bachus supported TARP, though begrudgingly, and only after he was removed by Republicans from his role as lead TARP negotiator with Democrats. He also showed some intelligence last week when, against certain Wall Street Congressional interests, he appointed Ron Paul as Chairman of the House Monetary Policy sub-committee with oversight over the Fed.

But he's still a hypocritical TARP scallywag

---

Bachus Gets His Chairmanship

Source - Birmingham Times

Rep. Spencer Bachus (R-AL) will become chairman of the House Financial Services Committee in the 112th Congress. Bachus, in an interview Wednesday night, said he brings a "main street" perspective to the committee, as opposed to Wall Street.

  • "In Washington, the view is that the banks are to be regulated, and my view is that Washington and the regulators are there to serve the banks."
  • He later clarified his comment to say that regulators should set the parameters in which banks operate but not micromanage them.

In the 2009-10 election cycle, the finance/ insurance/real estate sector gave Bachus' campaign account $752,200, most of it from political action committees, according to an analysis by the Center for Responsive Politics. Democrats Wednesday were critical of that connection.

"Republicans putting Spencer Bachus in charge of financial regulation is voting for the fox to guard the henhouse," said Ryan Rudominer of the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee.

  • But Bachus is not alone in accepting huge donations from the industries that the committee oversees. Outgoing chairman Frank accepted $986,000 from the sector over the last two years, according to the center.

In his quiet campaign for the chairmanship, Bachus promoted an agenda to end taxpayer subsidies for mortgage giants Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, repeal those parts of the Wall Street reforms that he thinks still leave the door open for taxpayer bailouts of financial institutions or their creditors, and increase oversight of President Barack Obama's administration.

"Now is the time to get government out of the way so businesses can create jobs and grow the economy," Bachus said.

Bachus has spent the last four years as the ranking Republican on the banking committee, the counterpart to chairman Rep. Barney Frank, D-Mass., and it wasn't without controversy. He irritated some of his GOP colleagues during the crisis negotiations over the $700 billion economic rescue package back in 2008, and they replaced him as their lead bargainer in the talks. He eventually supported the Troubled Assets Relief Program, but quickly became a critic of how President George W. Bush's administration was implementing it. Soon after, he survived a challenge to his ranking position, a sign that he has loyal friends inside the Republican caucus, many of whom he has showered with campaign contributions over the years.

Continue reading...

---

Now watch Bachus and try not to hurl...

Video - Bachus is upset about TARP but he voted for it

---