Sunday, September 19, 2010
When you're Cool the Sun is Always Shining.
Illegal Alien Child Molester Awarded $4.5 Million in California!
Mexico celebrates the 200th anniversary of its independence in Mexico City
Mexico has celebrated the 200th anniversary of its independence with a huge parade in Mexico City
Across the capital hundreds of thousands of people flooded the streets to join the parade of floats, dancers and musicians
"The Colossus" is transported in front of the Fine Arts Palace
Women wear masks representing "La Catrina"
The city spent $40 million on the fiesta which was two years in the making and drew people from across the country to the main Reforma Avenue and Zocalo Square
Women wear dresses in the colours of the flag and dance on stilts
An actress performs during the opening ceremony
A festival goer floats by the Angel of Independence
Locals dressed up for the event
Dressed as indigenous men on horseback
Actors perform
The festivities were a welcome change for a country that most recently has seen car bombs, the assassination of a gubernatorial candidate, and the massacre of 72 migrants who refused to smuggle drugs for a brutal gang
President Felipe Caldero, pictured with his family, capped the evening by ringing the original independence bell from a balcony in the Zocalo square and delivering "El Grito," patterned on founding father Miguel Hidalgo's 1810 call to arms against Spain: "Long live independence. Long live the bicentennial ... Long live Mexico!"
In cities where drug violence is heaviest, festivities were more subdued. The grito was cancelled in Ciudad Juarez for the first time in its history. People still showed their patriotism in the border city — Mexico's most violent — by hanging Mexican flags from their roofs and hosting family dinners.
Dancers parade down the street dressed as devils
A dancer dressed as a bouquet of flowers
Dummies representing Mexican revolutionaries
The Zocalo plaza and Metropolitan cathedral were illuminated for the evening's events
Fireworks explode in the city
An illuminated mannequin of "La Catrina"
Acrobats form the word Mexico during celebrations
One in seven Americans live in poverty
The ranks of the working-age poor in the United States have climbed to the highest level since the 1960s after the recession forced millions of people out of work and left one in seven Americans living in poverty.
The report covers 2009 President Barack Obama's first year in office
The overall poverty rate climbed to 14.3 per cent, or 43.6 million people, the Census Bureau said in its annual report on the economic well-being of US households. The report covers 2009, President Barack Obama's first year in office.
The poverty rate climbed from 13.2 per cent, or 39.8 million people, in 2008.
The share of Americans without health coverage rose from 15.4 per cent to 16.7 per cent - or 50.7 million people - mostly because of the loss of employer-provided health insurance during the recession. Congress passed a health overhaul law this year to address rising numbers of the uninsured, but the main provisions will not take effect until 2014.
The new figures come at a politically sensitive time, just weeks before the Nov. 2 congressional elections, when voters restive about high unemployment and the slow pace of economic improvement will decide whether to keep Democrats in power or turn to Republicans.
The 14.3 per cent poverty rate, which covers all ages, was the highest since 1994. Still, it was lower than estimates of many demographers who were bracing for a record gain based on last year's skyrocketing unemployment. Many had predicted a range of 14.7 per cent to 15 per cent.
Analysts credited in part increases in government pension plan payments in 2009 as well as federal expansions of unemployment insurance, which rose substantially in 2009 under the economic stimulus program. With the additional unemployment benefits, workers were eligible for extensions that gave them up to 99 weeks of payments after a layoff.
"Given all the unemployment we saw, it's the government safety net that's keeping people above the poverty line," said Douglas Besharov, a University of Maryland public policy professor and former scholar at the conservative American Enterprise Institute.
Record low temp tied
The old record was set in 1949.
Record low temperatures for the day were tied at other coastal locations in Los Angeles, Orange and San Diego counties.
The temperature hit a low of 66 in Newport Beach, which tied a record set in 1934. At Oceanside Harbor, the temperature was also 66, tying a record set in 1953, according to the weather service.
Temperatures across the Los Angeles region will continue to remain below normal for much of the week as an onshore flow pushes coastal low clouds and fog inland, the weather service reported.
Acid attack victim who gained world's sympathy after horrific attack admits her injuries were 'self-inflicted'
- Motive behind Bethany Storro's bizarre plan is still a mystery
- How - and where - she inflicted injuries remain unclear
- Police: 'She's very remorseful... This got bigger than she expected'
- Still not clear if she will be criminally charged
The woman who gained sympathy around the world after a stranger threw acid in her face has made a shocking confession: she made the whole thing up.
Bethany Storro, 28, confessed to police yesterday, saying the severe burns she suffered in the horrific 'attack' were actually 'self-inflicted'.
Police said they did not know the motive behind her bizarre plan.
Her confession - which is set to cause outrage around the world - came after police, suspicious at the holes in her story, turned up the pressure by searching her house.
Scroll down for video report
Severely burned: Bethany Storro is flanked by her parents Nancy and Joe Neuwelt during a news conference earlier this month at Legacy Emanuel Hospital in Portland, Oregon. Her story has been exposed as a lie
Before surgery: Bethany suffered second-degree burns to her face, but doctors say the operation went well
It is not clear if she will be criminally charged. ‘It’s obvious to everybody here that she’s got a fragile mental state,’ said Commander Marla Schuman, who led the investigation to find the bogus attacker.
‘She is extremely upset and remorseful. This got much bigger than she expected.
He added that the investigation had wasted hundreds of hours of police time.
Storro had claimed a black woman in her late twenties came up to her as she walked into a Starbucks coffee shop and hurled the acid in her face after saying: ‘Hey pretty girl, do you want to drink this?’
She suffered severe burns, her eyesight saved only by a pair of sunglasses she had allegedly bought earlier that day.
But after she held a press conference about her horrific experience, doubts began to emerge about her story.
A reporter for the Vancouver Voice visited a park where Storro claims she was attacked and talked to a number of homeless people who had witness the incident.
They claimed she was 'clearly alone when she dropped to the ground screaming.'
There were also questions about how Storro - who has been almost deaf since having spinal meningitis as a child - could have heard what her assailant said.
The internet was soon rife with rumours that the attack was a hoax.
Then Storro pulled out of an appearance on the Oprah Winfrey show, claiming the interview 'was going to possibly turn into another direction, so my family and I decided not to go on.'
Police began to find holes in Miss Storro’s story soon after she posed with bandages covering her head.
There was no question that she had been badly burned by strong caustic acid, possibly hydrochloric or sulphuric acid.
But doctors suggested the splash pattern of the acid wounds looked like liquid had been poured or rubbed on the skin, rather than thrown.
And hard as they tried, police could not find any witnesses to back up Miss Storro’s version of events.
Vancouver police chief Clifford Cook said Storro was still being interviewed by detectives.
'Hey pretty girl': The chilling words that Bethany claimed the stranger spoke to her before throwing an acid-like liquid in her face. It is still not clear why she carried out her bizarre plan
The police chief said that 'during the course of the investigation, several discrepancies began to emerge regarding the alleged attack.'
That led police to search her home earlier Thursday and question her again
'During the interview, Ms Storro admitted the injuries were self-inflicted,' Cook said.
Funds were set up for Storro at Umpquah and Riverview Community banks. The banks have not yet commented on the latest revelations.
Vancouver police Commander Marla Schuman said detectives were working on a way to return any money donated to Storro.
Schuman said the alleged attack and the probe stretched the resources of Vancouver's small police department.
Discrepancies: Vancouver Police Chief Clifford Cook said Storro was still being interviewed
'It's been hundreds of hours,' Schuman said about the time invested in the investigation.
'It really took a toll on the department and the resources that we have.'
Cook said any decision to charge Storro with a crime would be left to the Clark County Prosecuting Attorney's Office.
'She is extremely upset,' Schuman said. 'In many ways, this got bigger than she expected.'
Schuman was asked whether Storro will face a charge of filing a false police report, to which she responded: 'At this point, yes, that would certainly fit.'
Storro's parents, Joseph and Nancy Neuwelt, have not yet commented on the latest revelation about their daughter.
The couple has called the alleged attack 'an act of evil,' but said the family would persevere.
A burn surgeon who operated on Storro said the substance thrown on her face was an acid as strong as hydrochloric or sulfuric acid.
Storro held a press conference as she recovered in the burns unit at a hospital in Portland, Oregon, earlier this month.
She was hailed as 'brave' as, heavily bandaged after her operation, and flanked by her mother and father, she said: 'It was the most painful thing ever.
'My heart stopped. It ripped through my clothing the instant it touched my shirt; I could feel it burning through my second layer of skin.'
Her mother said had Storro not been wearing the sunglasses - which her daughter claimed she had bought just an hour earlier, despite never wearing sunglasses - may have saved her eyesight.
She referred to it as 'the hand of God protecting her eyes - she would have been blind'.
At the press conference, Storro insisted that she would not let the attack wreck her life, and even joked about the possibility of losing her sight.
She revealed that she had spinal meningitis twice as a child, which robbed her of most of her hearing, and said, 'Oh my gosh, to be hard of hearing and blind? That would drive them nuts', referring to her parents.
She added: 'They have to be in the same room for me to hear them. I'm just so glad it's a miracle.'
Starbucks: The scene of the 'attack' in Vancouver, Washington. No witness was found to corroborate Storro's story
And, in quotes now revealed to be fabrication, she said of her 'attacker': 'I have never, ever seen this girl in my entire life. When I first saw her, she had this weirdness about her - like jealousy, rage.
'Was it a dare, or did the woman wake up Monday morning and tell herself that today, she was going to "carry some acid in a cup and throw it on the first person I see?".'
Vancouver police spokeswoman Kim Kapp said that doctors and authorities are trying to determine what kind of substance caused Storro's facial burns.
Dr Nick Eshraghi said Storro suffered second-degree burns and perhaps deeper burns. He added that his goal during the surgery was to remove as much damaged skin as possible.
At the time of the press conference, Mr Neuwelt said the family hoped the attacker was quickly found.
'You can imagine how I feel,' he said. 'This is my little girl. We're going to get through this we're not going to allow this to stop our lives. We're going to get through it.
Miss Storro had only recently moved back to her home town after splitting up with her husband.
Just days before she admitted lying, her former mother-in-law, Pamela Storro, called claims that she made up the story ‘insane.’
‘There is no way she would ever do anything like this,’ she said, adding that the idea that she fabricated the incident was ‘as hideous as the crime itself.’
Visit msnbc.com for breaking news, world news, and news about the economy
Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/worldnews/article-1312802/Bethany-Storro-hoax-Acid-attack-victim-confesses-injuries-self-inflicted.html#ixzz0zuH4Ouh4
Saturday, September 18, 2010
We Are Living Through an Exceptional Moment in Human History.
September 15, 2010 "Information Clearing House" -- "Cuba Debate" -- Sep 10, 2010 -- The deadlines established by the United Nations Security Council for Iran to yield to the demands imposed by the United States regarding nuclear research and uranium enrichment for medical purposes and to generate electricity will be expiring in these days.
This is the only nuclear use that has been documented in Iran.
The fear that Iran is looking forward to producing nuclear weapons is only based on an assumption.
With regard to this delicate issue, the United States and its western allies, among them two of the five nuclear powers with veto power -France and the United Kingdom- supported by the richest and most developed capitalist powers of the world, have promoted an increasing number of sanctions against Iran, a rich, oil-producing Muslim country. Today, the measures adopted include the inspection of Iran’s merchant vessels and severe economic sanctions aimed at suffocating its economy.
I have been following very closely the grave dangers that may result from that situation, because if a war breaks out in that region, it could very quickly go nuclear, and this will have lethal consequences for the rest of the planet.
In referring to such danger I was not looking for publicity or sensationalism. I just wanted to warn the world public opinion hoping that, being advised of such grave danger it could contribute to avoid it.
At least we have managed to draw attention to a problem that was hardly mentioned by the big world media.
This has made me use part of the time scheduled for the launching of this book, on which we worked diligently. I did not want this to coincide with the dates of September 7 and 9. September 7 marks the end of the 90 days term established by the Security Council to know whether Iran complied or not with the requirement of authorizing the inspection of its merchant vessels. September 9 marks the expiration of the three months term fixed by the Resolution adopted on June 9. Quite possibly the establishment of this last term was what the Security Council intended to do originally.
So far we have only had the weird statement made by the Director General of the IAEA (International Atomic Energy Agency), the Japanese Yukiya Amano, a man who serves the interests of the Yankees. He added all the fuel to the flames and then, like Pontius Pilate, he washed his hands of the issue.
A spokesperson from the Foreign Ministry of Iran commented his statements with a well earned contempt. According to a news report published by EFE, Amano’s assertion that “‘our friends should not worry, because we don’t believe our region is in the position to engage in new military adventures’ and that ‘Iran was fully prepared to respond to any military invasion’ was an obvious reference to the Cuban leader Fidel Castro, ‘who warned about a possible Israeli nuclear attack against Iran with the support of the United States’”.
News on this topic are pouring and get mixed with others of remarkable repercussion.
The journalist Jeffrey Goldberg of The Atlantic magazine, already known by our people, has been publishing some excerpts of the long interview he made me. He has been discussing some interesting aspects of it before he finally writes a future and long article.
“There were many odd things about my recent Havana stopover, [...]“, he wrote, but one of the most unusual was Fidel Castro’s level of self-reflection [...] but it seemed truly striking that Castro was willing to admit that he misplayed his hand at a crucial moment in the Cuban Missile Crisis [...] that he regrets asking Khrushchev to nuke the U.S.” It is true that he addressed the topic and he asked me that question. Literally, as he wrote in the first part of his report, his words were the following: “I asked him: At a certain point it seemed logical for you to recommend that the Soviets bomb the U.S. Does what you recommended still seem logical now?” He answered: “After I’ve seen what I’ve seen, and knowing what I know now, it wasn’t worth it all.”
I had thoroughly explained to him -and there is written evidence of that- the content of that message: “…if the United States invades Cuba, a country with Russian nuclear weapons, under such circumstances Russia should not allow to be dealt the first strike, as the one dealt against the USSR on June 22, 1941, when the German army and all European forces attacked the USSR.”
As can be observed from that brief reference to the issue, from the second part of his report to the audience on that news, readers could not realize that “if the United States invaded Cuba, a country with Russian nuclear weapons”, under such circumstances, my recommendation was to prevent the enemy from launching the first strike; nor the profound irony embedded in my response - “…and knowing what I know now…”, which was an obvious reference to the betrayal by one Russian President who saturated himself with some ethylic substance and revealed to the United States the most important military secrets of that country.
Further on Goldberg wrote about another moment of our conversation: “I asked him if he believed the Cuban model was still something worth exporting.” Obviously, that question implicitly suggested the theory that Cuba exported the Revolution. So I responded: “The Cuban model doesn’t even work for us anymore”. I said this to him without any bitterness or concern. And now I laugh at the way he literally interpreted what I said and how, according to him, he consulted it with Julia Sweig, a CFR analyst who accompanied him and worked out the theory he described. But the truth is that the meaning of my response was exactly the opposite of the interpretation made by both American journalists of the Cuban model.
My idea, as everybody knows, is that the capitalist system does not work anymore either for the United States or the world, which jumps from one crisis into the next, and these are ever more serious, global and frequent and there is no way the world could escape from them. How could such a system work for a socialist country like Cuba?
Many Arab friends worried when they knew I had met with Goldberg, and sent some messages describing him as “the staunchest advocate of Zionism.”
From all of these we can infer the big confusion that exists in the world. Therefore I hope that what I am telling you about my thoughts could be useful.
The ideas I expressed are contained in 333 Reflections -see what a coincidence. The last 26 refer exclusively to the problems affecting the environment and the imminent danger of a nuclear war.
And now I should very briefly add something.
I have always condemned the Holocaust. I my Reflections entitled “Obama’s Speech in Cairo”, “A Swipe Waiting to Happen”, and “The Opinion of an Expert” I expressed this very clearly.
I have never been an enemy of the Jewish people, which I admire for having resisted dispersion and persecution during two thousand years. Many of the most brilliant talents, such as Karl Marx and Albert Einstein, were Jews, because that was a nation where the most intelligent managed to survive by virtue of a natural law. In our country and in the whole world they were persecuted and slandered. But this is just pat of the ideas I defend.
They were not the only one who were persecuted and slandered for their beliefs. Muslims were attacked and persecuted for their beliefs by the European Christians for much more than 12 centuries, just as the first Christians were in ancient Rome before Christianity became an official religion of that empire. History should be accepted and remembered just the way it happened, with all its tragic realities and its fierce wars. I have spoken about that and that is why I have all the more reason to explain the dangers jeopardizing humankind today, when wars have become the biggest suicide risk for our fragile species.
If we add to this a war against Iran, even if it were of a conventional nature, the United States would rather turn off the light and say goodbye. How could the US put up with a war against 1.5 million Muslims?
For any true revolutionary, defending peace does not mean to renounce to the principles of justice, without which human life and society would be meaningless.
I still believe that Goldberg is an excellent journalist who is able to set out, in an enjoyable way and masterly way, his views, which promotes debate. He does not invent phrases; he transfers them and interprets them.
I will not refer to the content of many others aspects of our conversation. I will respect the secrecy of the issues we discussed and I eagerly await his future long article.
The current news that have started to pour from all sources make me to complement his presentation with these words whose essence is contained in the book “La contraofensiva estratégica” (The Strategic Counteroffensive), which I have just presented.
I believe that all peoples have the right to peace and enjoy all the goods and natural resources of the planet. What is currently going on with peoples in many countries of Africa, where there are millions of emaciated children, women and men out of lack of food, water and medicines is a shame. We feel astonished by the images we see from the Middle East, where Palestinians are deprived from their lands, their homes are demolished by gigantic equipment, and men, women and children are bombed with white phosphorus and other extermination means; the Dantesque scenes of families exterminated by the bombs dropped over Afghan and Pakistani towns by drones; the Iraqis who are dying after years of war; and the more than one million lives lost in that conflict imposed by a US President.
The last we could expect to see were the news about the expulsion of the French gypsies, who are victims of a new sort of racial Holocaust. The strong protest by the French is only logical. At the same time, the millionaires restrict French citizens’ rights to retirement while reducing the possibilities to get a job.
From the US we have heard the news of a pastor in Florida that intends to burn the Holy Book of the Quran in its own church. Even the Yankee and military chiefs engaged in punitive war missions were disturbed by the news which they believed would put their soldiers in jeopardy.
Walter Martínez, the prestigious journalist who conducts the Venezuelan TV program Dossier, was amazed at such madness.
Yesterday, Thursday 9th in the evening, some news asserted that the pastor had relinquished his idea. It might be necessary to know what the FBI agents who visited him told him to “persuade him”. That was a colossal media show, a chaos. Those are things proper of an empire that is sinking.
I thank all of you for your attention.