Wednesday, July 22, 2009

中國‧21世紀最長日全食‧全球數十億人同“追日”

(印度‧瓦拉納西/中國‧武漢)全球數十億人今日(週三,7月22日)共同“追日”,創下人類史上最大規模的觀測潮紀錄!

來自世界各地的天文迷當天齊聚中國長江流域,抬頭仰望21世紀歷時最長的日全奇景;而亞洲包括日本、韓國及印尼數以百萬計民眾,也興奮迎接這次被喻為“等了500年”的日全食盛會,一同見證白天轉為黑夜的天文奇景。

吸引史上最多人仰頭觀測

美國太空總署(NASA)表示,這次全程歷時最長6分39秒的日全食現象行經半個地球,通過全世界人口最多的印度與中國,約有250公里寬的地區能觀測得到日全食,因此這次“追日”盛會,也創下人類史上最大規模的觀測潮紀錄。

這一次全日食最早於印度時間6時20分(大馬時間8時20分)開始,一路東移,掠過孟加拉、尼泊爾、中國、日本及印尼等國,在亞洲各國都掀起“追日潮”,唯獨印度將之視為厄運、不祥徵兆,在進入全日食時刻,當地民眾不斷唱印度教聖歌“驅魔”。

透過視頻轉播過程

在中國長三角地區,雖然受陰天氣候影響,卻燒不熄“追日族”的熱情。不過兩岸三地當天已透過互聯網視頻轉播日全食過程,讓沒法親自到戶外一睹天文奇景的網民解癮。

在武漢,民眾聚在高堤防,高聲歡呼並揮手向太陽消失前的銀光說再見,整座城市隨即陷入黑暗。

不過,相較之下,中國中部的日食見證者顯然比上海附近沿海城市的天文迷來得幸運,因為當地天氣蔭沉,部份地區甚至下起雨來,完全阻擋了太陽。

日本興奮的程度也不亞於中國,日本觀測日全食時間最長的地方是鹿兒島等地,當地政府已設置攝影機,讓民眾能觀測天文奇景,相關部門亦派出了考察船,在太平洋上觀測這次日食。

此外,印度也專門派出了737專機供科學家觀測日食。而美國和加拿大的航空航天部門都不甘寂寞,派出了大量科學家前往亞洲地區觀測這次難得的日全食奇觀。

各地沒重大意外或社會事件

此前有報導稱,日食奇景將干擾電離層,擾亂全球通訊,不過,可能是各地政府都有備而來,做好事先功夫,全力防止因為日全食造成社會秩序不安,亞洲日全食帶在長達數分的黑暗中,並沒有傳出重大意外事故,僅上海傳出車禍大事故超過500起,不過並不清楚到底是陰雨天,還是日全食惹的禍。

日食趣聞

情侶特殊方式見證

在湖北宜昌三峽大壩附近的罈子嶺風景觀測區,日全食過後,在太陽重新出現時,觀測台下一名外國男子,給女友送上了求婚戒指,用這種特殊的方式,見證愛情。

小販觀測鏡價飆漲

在重慶市的幾大商圈,不少小販聚集售賣專門的日全食觀測鏡。即便觀測鏡的單價從3元(人民幣,下徟)陡漲到20元,小販們的生意依然異常火爆。

偏食露臉僅幾秒

500年一遇的日偏食在貴州省貴陽市露臉短短幾秒,旋即被烏雲遮住,市民感嘆:“貴陽的太陽就是貴,露了一下臉就藏起來了。”

The Federal Reserve Caused the Economic Crash and Bailout

Check this link ......... http://tinyurl.com/l7urr9

More corruption: The ballot counts are in!

How can the ballots be counted, you ask, since the vote never took place?

¡No importa!
as we say in Spanish.

Agents of the DNIC (criminal investigation) discovered ballots, computers, and certified vote counts in an office rented by Enrique Flores Lanza, member of Zelaya's mediating team who you may remember made a L. 40 million cash withdrawal from the central bank two days before the election was to occur. The count sheets neatly tallied the yes and no votes, the blank or disqualified votes, and the totals for various mesas (polling places).


You won't be surprised to learn that Zelaya's proposal won heartily with approximately 80% affirmative votes.


In fact, Zelaya's people should have probably used a little more discretion to make it believable. In one tally sheet that was reported, 'yes' votes totaled 450 while 'no' votes totaled only 30. Since a Gallup poll conducted from June 30 to July 4 reported that 63% of the respondents were against the fourth ballot box for a Constitutional Assembly, the fraudulent results should have been a bit more modest in favor of the cuarta urna.

Though this find was widely reported in the Honduran media, complete with reporters on the site of the investigation in process, here we are three days later and I'm willing to bet that you haven't heard about it yet from the media in your country.

Thanks to a reader, I found that
Alberto de la Cruz of Babalú has already done my investigation work for me. He found only one one-sentence report in USA Today. You can read his report and a translation of the only detailed Spanish article that he was able to find. Since then, Lucianne and American Thinker have picked up the story.

Rick Moran at American Thinker wrote this:
It appears certain that the Honduran people narrowly avoided the prospect of a Chavez clone setting up shop as a dictator for life in their country. Only the courageous actions of their political, military, and judicial leaders avoided catastrophe.

I am ashamed of our president and government that they continue to support Zelaya at the expense of Honduran freedom. And I am ashamed of our media who obviously backed the wrong horse and are too arrogant to admit it.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Big surprise: Today at the 30th anniversary of the Sandista revolution celebration, Daniel Ortega, President of Nicaragua, put forth the idea of a Nicaraguan referendum "to have a better constitution".

~~~~~~~~~~~~~

How can Honduras get a fair shot if none of the major media outlets are reporting the facts. It is NOT acceptable to dismiss news by saying, "Oh, it's coming out of the Honduran media therefore it must be false."

Reporters, come down and find out for yourself, please! Our newspapers have political leanings just like all of yours. That doesn't mean that everything they report is false.


Even better would be if some countries would send their own investigators to follow along with Honduras' investigators and report on their findings. I have no doubt that Honduras' government would welcome that outside cooperation with open arms.


Alan Grayson grills Ben Bernanke on Foreign Lending 07/21/2009

No Gravatar


Ron Paul questions Ben Bernanke on definition of inflation 07/21/2009

No Gravatar


Yannone's Blog-Interesting Reading

Check this link ........ http://yannone.blogspot.com/

Industry Cash Flowed To Drafters of Reform

As liberal protesters marched outside, Sen. Max Baucus sat down inside a San Francisco mansion for a dinner of chicken cordon bleu and a discussion of landmark health-care legislation under consideration by his Senate Finance Committee.

At the table on May 26 were about 20 donors willing to fork over $10,000 or more to the Democratic Senatorial Campaign Committee, including executives of major insurance companies, hospitals and other health-care firms.

"Most people there had an agenda; they wanted the ear of a senator, and they got it," said Aaron Roland, a San Francisco health-care activist who paid half price to attend the gathering. "Money gets you in the door. The only thing the other side can do is march around and protest outside."

As his committee has taken center stage in the battle over health-care reform, Chairman Baucus (D-Mont.) has emerged as a leading recipient of Senate campaign contributions from the hospitals, insurers and other medical interest groups hoping to shape the legislation to their advantage. Health-related companies and their employees gave Baucus's political committees nearly $1.5 million in 2007 and 2008, when he began holding hearings and making preparations for this year's reform debate.

Top health executives and lobbyists have continued to flock to the senator's often extravagant fundraising events in recent months. During a Senate break in late June, for example, Baucus held his 10th annual fly-fishing and golfing weekend in Big Sky, Mont., for a minimum donation of $2,500. Later this month comes "Camp Baucus," a "trip for the whole family" that adds horseback riding and hiking to the list of activities.

To avoid any appearance of favoritism, his aides say, Baucus quietly began refusing contributions from health-care political action committees after June 1. But the policy does not apply to lobbyists or corporate executives, who continued to make donations, disclosure records show.

Baucus declined requests to comment for this article. Spokesman Tyler Matsdorf said the senator "is only driven by one thing: what is right for Montana and the country. And he will continue his open process of working together with the president, his colleagues in Congress, and groups and individuals from across the nation to get this legislation passed."


Baucus's fundraising prowess underscores the enduring political strength of the health-care lobby, which led all other sectors in donations to federal candidates during the last election cycle and has shifted its giving to Democrats as the party has tightened its control of Congress.

The sector gave nearly $170 million to federal lawmakers in 2007 and 2008, with 54 percent going to Democrats, according to data compiled by the Center for Responsive Politics, which tracks money in politics. The shift in parties was even more pronounced during the first three months of this year, when Democrats collected 60 percent of the $5.4 million donated by health-care companies and their employees, the data show.

Many of these contributions have been focused on Baucus, Charles E. Grassley (R-Iowa) and other senators in the moderate camps of their respective parties, whose votes could prove crucial in a final health-care reform deal, as well as the leaders of five key committees leading the debate. Grassley, the Finance Committee's ranking Republican, received more than $2 million from the health and insurance sectors since 2003. House Ways and Means Chairman Charles B. Rangel (D-N.Y.) took in $1.6 million from the health sector and its employees over the past two years; ranking Republican Dave Camp (Mich.) received nearly $1 million.

But Baucus, a senator from a sparsely populated and conservative Western state who is serving his sixth term, stands out for the rising tide of health-care contributions to his campaign committee, Friends of Max Baucus, and his political-action committee, Glacier PAC. Baucus collected $3 million from the health and insurance sectors from 2003 to 2008, about 20 percent of the total, data show. Less than 10 percent of the money came from Montana.

Top out-of-state corporate contributors included Schering-Plough, New York Life Insurance, Amgen, and Blue Cross and Blue Shield; individual executives such as Richard T. Clark, chief executive and president of drugmaker Merck, have also made regular donations. Most of these companies, particularly major insurers, strongly oppose a public insurance option, which is favored by President Obama and top House Democrats but has not received support from Baucus's committee.

Baucus is a longtime centrist in the Democratic caucus, and his committee chairmanship has made him a key broker in the health-reform debate. Many former Baucus staff members, including two chiefs of staff, lobby on behalf of the pharmaceutical industry and other health-care players and have been closely involved in negotiations on the legislation.

John Jonas, a Patton Boggs health-care lobbyist who has attended a Baucus fly-fishing event and other fundraisers, said the Montana senator is "key to getting anything done" when it comes to health-care legislation.

"This is not an overwhelmingly liberal Congress, and it's certainly not a liberal Senate," said Jonas, whose clients include Bristol-Myers Squibb, Pfizer and Northwestern Mutual. "I think Max is uniquely situated to try to accomplish that, because he's more of a centrist and moderate Democrat than others are."

But Jerry Flanagan, a health-care analyst with Consumer Watchdog, a California-based advocacy group, said the tide of campaign contributions amounts to "a huge down payment" by companies that expect favorable policies in return. "That is the cold reality of big-money politics," he said.

Baucus won easy reelection in the fall, but he has continued to hold fundraisers since then. In addition to the fly-fishing event, he held his "Eighth Annual Ski and Snowmobile Weekend" in Big Sky in February and celebrated the start of his sixth term with a $10,000-a-table dinner at the Washington Court Hotel later that month. Aides say another fundraiser scheduled for July 7 at Bistro Bis in Capitol Hill was scrapped.

Baucus's office declined to provide attendance and donation details about his fundraising events, and federal records laws do not require such disclosures. Starting in June, aides say, Baucus adopted an internal office policy to refuse contributions from health-care PACs and to continue doing so until after Congress passes reform legislation.

But new Federal Election Commission documents filed last week show that individual lobbyists and others with health-care connections continued to make contributions to Baucus committees throughout June. Examples from Baucus's Glacier PAC include $5,000 from the Independent Insurance Agents and Brokers of America and $2,500 from lobbyists with U.S. Strategies, which represents numerous health-care firms. Overall, half of the $110,000 in donations to the PAC from April to June came from health-care firms and lobbyists, including Schering-Plough, Medtronic and New York Life.


Craig Holman, government affairs lobbyist for the Public Citizen advocacy group, said the continued fundraising by Baucus during the health-care debate is "very troubling."

"He's doing all this fundraising right in the middle of this effort to mark up a bill," Holman said. "When you put these events close to matters concerning these lobbyists, clearly it's a signal. You are expected to show up with a check."

Baucus and his aides strongly dispute any assertion that campaign contributions have an impact on the senator's policy views and proposals. Aides say he has frequently backed policies opposed by health-care companies, including support for greater availability of generic drugs, allowing drug imports from Canada and cutting payments to the Medicare Advantage plan.

During an interview earlier this year with the Missoulian newspaper, Baucus said that "no one gets special treatment." He added: "Your word is your bond back there."

Research editor Alice Crites contributed to this report.

By Dan Eggen